Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
145
145 employees · 0 contractors · 49 on an average day Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Lawrence, KS
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Lawrence, KS
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
Nursing time at Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community runs 4 hours and 14 minutes per resident daily. That number belongs to the nursing home and skilled nursing offerings in Lawrence, Kansas, where licensed nursing works at all hours. Seventy-six beds sit under the license.
Independent living is offered, and it’s at the far end of the range: private living with community services and no daily care. Assisted living adds that daily care in terms of bathing, dressing, and medication for those who need it when those tasks become unmanageable, but before anything clinical is strictly needed. A family visiting drives to the same address no matter which level their loved one is in. That’s a selling point for a building with several levels of care: needs grow without needing to transfer facilities or towns.
Respite care is offered and covers short stays, because sometimes the regular caregiver is the one who needs taking care of. Pets are allowed, so anyone who moves in can keep theirs with them.
The Rapid Recovery program and rehabilitation services handle recovery work. Someone living alone has nobody to notice a problem at home for some hours of the day, and that isn’t a problem here. A Walk Score of 87 makes the area very walkable, which counts most for the residents who no longer drive but still can and want to go out on their own.
Deja Rhodeman is the administrator. Medicare and private pay are both accepted; Medicare covers short skilled weeks of care needed after a hospital stay rather than residence.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 71st out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 14m
This nursing home is ranked 71st out of 136 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 14mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +362% above Kansas average
1 of 6 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
50m
↑ 15% · KS 43mThis facility: 50m per resident per day, 15% above the Kansas average of 43m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 9 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
9 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.8-hour shifts
46m
↑ 15% · KS 40mThis facility: 46m per resident per day, 15% above the Kansas average of 40m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
2h 38m
↓ 2% · KS 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 38m per resident per day, 2% below the Kansas average of 2h 41m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 64 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
64 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 26 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
26 staff · 6.4-hour shifts
9m
↑ 362% · KS 2mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 362% above the Kansas average of 2m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 26 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
26 staff · 6.4-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 44m
↑ 4% · KS 3h 35mThis facility: 3h 44m per resident per day, 4% above the Kansas average of 3h 35m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
31m
↑ 2% · KS 30mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 2% above the Kansas average of 30m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
145
145 employees · 0 contractors · 49 on an average day
145 total staff / 61 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.38 : 1
↑ 7% · KS 2.22This facility: 2.38 staff per resident, 7% above the Kansas average of 2.22 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
145 staff ÷ 61 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 4% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 4% below the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
33,228 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
76
Rank #53 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
76
Rank #53 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #3 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #3 / 162Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 162 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
87
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #84 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #84 / 143Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 84th out of 143 nursing homes we track in Kansas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Kansas average, with its Statewide rank out of 143. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
78.2%
This home usually has availability
Based on 59.4 residents and 76 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Similar to the Kansas average: 80.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
129
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing Facility | Assisted Living Facility
StatusActive
CountyDouglas
License Number175445
CMS Certification Number175445
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community is administered by Deja Rhodeman.
Owner NamePioneer Ridge LLC
Resident Council
Family Council
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Since 2013 · 13 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 66 deficiencies 21 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 66 deficiencies 21 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2013 vs. Kansas state average
Overall vs. KS average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
2 Better
Metrics better than Kansas average:
• Total deficiencies (35% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (11% below)
• Total deficiencies (35% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (11% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 66 | 101.0 | This facility has 35% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (66 vs. KS avg 101).↓ 35% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 3.1 | 3.5 | This facility has 11% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (3.1 vs. KS avg 3.5).↓ 11% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 21 | 24.0 | This facility has had 13% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (21 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 13% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↑ 40% · KS 4.3This facility: 6, 40% above the Kansas average of 4.3 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
52
Rank #125 / 138Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 125th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 138 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 89% · KS 27.5This facility: 52, 89% above the Kansas average of 27.5 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.67
Rank #114 / 138Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 138 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 138 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 36% · KS 6.37This facility: 8.67, 36% above the Kansas average of 6.37 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
52 of 52 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
2
↑ 150% · KS 0.8This facility: 2, 150% above the Kansas average of 0.8 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Kansas average of 0.8 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
48
↑ 90% · KS 25.2This facility: 48, 90% above the Kansas average of 25.2 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 186% · KS 0.7This facility: 2, 186% above the Kansas average of 0.7 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 01, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, critical), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 16 of 52 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 01, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 03, 2025
20 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 20, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 19, 2025
2 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 17, 2024
15 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 19, 2023
11 citations
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 52 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 52 citations
Quality of Life & Care
16 deficiencies (31%)
Resident Rights
9 deficiencies (17%)
Infection Control
7 deficiencies (13%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (8%)
Administration
4 deficiencies (8%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
33 of 52 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 52 resulted from complaint investigations; and 15 of 52 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jun 1, 2026 · $14,385 civil money penalty
Jun 1, 2026 · $14,385 civil money penalty
Mar 19, 2025 · $14,901 civil money penalty
Total fines
$29,286
↓ 27% · KS $40KThis facility: $29,286, 27% below the Kansas average of $40,388. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #103 / 139Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Kansas average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 139 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 7% · KS 2.16This facility: 2, 7% below the Kansas average of 2.16. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.25Kansas average: 0.25. Average among the 151 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jun 1, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,385
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,385
Mar 19, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,901
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,901Fine amount comparison
This facility
$29,286
Kansas average
$40,388
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Kansas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 35% · KS 3.0This facility: 4.0, 35% above the KS average of 3.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 16% · KS 2.6This facility: 3.0, 16% above the KS average of 2.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 5% · KS 9.5This facility: 9.1, 5% below the KS average of 9.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
19.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 1% · KS 18.9This facility: 19.1, 1% above the KS average of 18.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 7 worse
8 short-stay measures: 1 better, 3 worse, 1 near KS average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.2%
↓ 10% · KS 17.9This facility: 16.2, 10% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.2%
↓ 10% · KS 17.9This facility: 16.2, 10% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.3%
↓ 18% · KS 16.2This facility: 13.3, 18% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.3%
↓ 18% · KS 16.2This facility: 13.3, 18% below the KS average of 16.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.9%
↑ 24% · KS 22.6This facility: 27.9, 24% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.9%
↑ 24% · KS 22.6This facility: 27.9, 24% above the KS average of 22.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.7%
↓ 42% · KS 2.9This facility: 1.7, 42% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.7%
↓ 42% · KS 2.9This facility: 1.7, 42% below the KS average of 2.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7%
↑ 57% · KS 4.3This facility: 6.7, 57% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.7%
↑ 57% · KS 4.3This facility: 6.7, 57% above the KS average of 4.3 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6%
↑ 28% · KS 4.4This facility: 5.6, 28% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.6%
↑ 28% · KS 4.4This facility: 5.6, 28% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 28% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.5, 28% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 28% · KS 4.9This facility: 3.5, 28% below the KS average of 4.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↑ 33% · KS 6.5This facility: 8.6, 33% above the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.6%
↑ 33% · KS 6.5This facility: 8.6, 33% above the KS average of 6.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
↓ 59% · KS 18.1This facility: 7.4, 59% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.4%
↓ 59% · KS 18.1This facility: 7.4, 59% below the KS average of 18.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.6%
↓ 11% · KS 92.1This facility: 81.6, 11% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.6%
↓ 11% · KS 92.1This facility: 81.6, 11% below the KS average of 92.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.6%
↓ 21% · KS 95.5This facility: 75.6, 21% below the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
75.6%
↓ 21% · KS 95.5This facility: 75.6, 21% below the KS average of 95.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.08
↑ 67% · KS 1.84This facility: 3.08, 67% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.08
↑ 67% · KS 1.84This facility: 3.08, 67% above the KS average of 1.84 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.49
↓ 31% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.49, 31% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.49
↓ 31% · KS 2.16This facility: 1.49, 31% below the KS average of 2.16 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
49.2%
↓ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 49.2, 8% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
49.2%
↓ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 49.2, 8% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.8%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.8, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
63.8%
↑ 26% · US 50.6This facility: 63.8, 26% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 9% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.7%
↓ 9% · US 0.8This facility: 0.7, 9% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 44% · KS 1.9This facility: 1.0, 44% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
↓ 44% · KS 1.9This facility: 1.0, 44% below the KS average of 1.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.7%
↓ 48% · KS 76.1This facility: 39.7, 48% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
39.7%
↓ 48% · KS 76.1This facility: 39.7, 48% below the KS average of 76.1 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.5%
↓ 23% · KS 73.8This facility: 56.5, 23% below the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
56.5%
↓ 23% · KS 73.8This facility: 56.5, 23% below the KS average of 73.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.0%
↑ 35% · KS 23.0This facility: 31.0, 35% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.0%
↑ 35% · KS 23.0This facility: 31.0, 35% above the KS average of 23.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.6%
↓ 1% · KS 11.7This facility: 11.6, 1% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.6%
↓ 1% · KS 11.7This facility: 11.6, 1% below the KS average of 11.7 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 139 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.5% operating margin
+0.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.4M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Kansas homes
48.0% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.3%Rank #109 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.7M | Rank in KS Rank #75 / 139Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 75th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | Below KS median Higher net patient revenue than 46% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.8M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.4M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.5% | +0.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.4M | +$0.0M | Trend — | KS median — | Rank in KS Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.0M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.6M | Rank in KS Rank #83 / 139Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Below KS median Higher payroll than 41% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 48.0% | +0.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.4% | Rank in KS Rank #109 / 139Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | 9.3 pts under KS average The KS average is 57.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.2M | $6.6M | $6.6M | $5.1M | $5.5M | $5.4M | $6.0M | $6.2M |
| Operating expenses | $6.2M | $6.2M | $6.0M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.0M | $5.6M | $5.8M |
| Net patient income | −$0.0M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.0M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Operating margin | −0.2% | 7.1% | 8.8% | 0.2% | 8.0% | 7.2% | 5.9% | 6.5% |
| Net income | $0.0M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.7M | $2.4M | $2.3M | $2.3M | $2.8M | $3.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.1% | 42.2% | 41.8% | 46.6% | 42.3% | 43.5% | 47.2% | 48.0% |
| Beds | 76 | 76 | 76 | 70 | 76 | 76 | 76 | 76 |
| Gross revenue | $8.5M | $8.6M | $8.3M | $6.1M | $6.8M | $6.4M | $7.0M | $7.3M |
| Salaries | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.5M | $2.6M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.4M | $3.4M | $3.2M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.8M | $2.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $302 | $303 | $296 | $281 | $304 | $304 | $326 | $341 |
| Cost per day | $302 | $281 | $270 | $281 | $280 | $282 | $306 | $319 |
| Average length of stay | 66.5 days | 73.6 days | 91.4 days | 127.8 days | 121.0 days | 123.1 days | 159.4 days | 129.3 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
139 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
105 · 76%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
34 · 24%
Resident snapshot
61 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
20 · 33%
Medicaid
40 · 66%
Private pay & other
1 · 2%
Leaving
141 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
91 · 65%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
50 · 35%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lawrence's city center to Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Kansas
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community is located in LAWRENCE, Kansas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Kansas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community in?
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community is in the Lawrence Cultural District neighborhood of LAWRENCE.
02 Who is the owner of Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community?
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community is legally operated by Pioneer Ridge LLC, and administered by Deja Rhodeman.
03 Is Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community in a walkable area?
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community has a walk score of 87. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
04 What is the license number of Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community?
According to KS state health department records, Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community's license number is 175445.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community?
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community's occupancy is 78.2%.
06 Are pets allowed at Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community?
Yes, Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community allows residents to bring their pets.
07 Does Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community is registered as a for-profit in KS.
Updated on
