Inspection Reports for
Ranch View Senior Assisted Living

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and documentation were present and in order.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and documentation were in place and functioning properly.

The complaint included multiple allegations: failure to administer medication resulting in seizure, neglect in incontinence care, neglect/lack of supervision leading to sexual activity between residents, failure to respond promptly to resident's representative, and inadequate staff training. All allegations were investigated and found unsubstantiated based on staff interviews, records review, and independent outside source investigations.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate any of the allegations. Medication was administered correctly, incontinence care was timely and adequate, no sexual activity between residents was confirmed, communications with the resident's representative were prompt, and staff had proper medication training.

The complaint included allegations that staff did not administer medication resulting in a seizure, left a resident in a soiled diaper for an extended time, neglect led to sexual activity between residents, licensee did not respond promptly to communications, and staff lacked proper medication training. The investigation, including interviews, records review, and outside source investigations, found these allegations unsubstantiated.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegations. Medication was administered correctly, residents were assisted timely with incontinence care, no sexual activity occurred between residents, communications with the resident's representative were timely, and staff had proper medication training.

The complaint alleged that staff refused to provide an assistive device (CPAP machine) to a resident. The allegation was investigated through interviews with staff and outside sources, records review, and direct observation. No evidence was found to support the claim, and the complaint was unsubstantiated.

The investigation included staff interviews, records review, and direct observation, which found no evidence to corroborate the allegation. The resident's CPAP machine was consistently cleaned and administered by staff, and the allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged staff refused to provide an assistive device to a resident. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on staff interviews, records review, observations, and outside agency input.

The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation. Staff interviews, records review, and observations confirmed that the resident's CPAP machine was consistently used, cleaned, and staff assisted or attempted to assist the resident. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that a resident arrived at an outside care agency with soiled clothing, indicating unmet incontinence needs. Investigation included interviews with staff, the resident, outside sources, and records review. Staff and management stated the resident was clean and dry prior to transport. The resident frequently refused prescribed medication necessary to prevent incontinence. Outside sources did not corroborate the allegation and admitted assumptions were made without confirming facility care.

Based on interviews, direct observations, and records review, the allegation that the licensee failed to meet the resident's incontinence needs was unsubstantiated. The resident was observed to be clean and well cared for, and records showed the resident frequently refused medication that would have prevented incontinence episodes.

The complaint alleged that the licensee did not meet a resident's incontinence needs. The investigation included interviews with staff and the resident, review of medication administration records showing frequent medication refusals by the resident, and observations. Outside sources had concerns but did not verify with the facility. The allegation was found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the allegation was unsubstantiated. Staff interviews, record reviews, and direct observation confirmed that the resident's incontinence needs were met and the resident was clean and groomed. The resident frequently refused medication that would have prevented incontinence episodes, which contributed to the issue.

A wellness check was conducted at the facility with no health or safety issues identified and no deficiencies cited or observed during the visit.

A wellness check was conducted at the facility with no health or safety issues identified. No deficiencies were cited or observed during this visit.

The complaint alleged staff did not treat a resident with dignity and handled the resident roughly. The investigation included unannounced visits, interviews, and records review. Staff and residents did not corroborate the allegations, and no evidence of injury was found. The complaint was unsubstantiated.

The investigation found no corroboration of the allegations after interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. The resident showed no signs of injury and staff behavior was consistent with maintaining dignity. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that staff did not treat Resident 1 with dignity. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation including interviews, observations, and records review. The resident exhibited manipulative and aggressive behaviors and was not medically indicated for a hospital bed as claimed.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review showed no corroboration of staff treating the resident without dignity. The staff member named in the complaint had not worked at the facility since October 2023, prior to the resident's admission.

The complaint involved allegations of neglect causing bodily injury, failure to seek medical attention, and failure to report a resident's change in condition. The investigation included interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that staff properly followed procedures during the incident, preventing greater injury to the resident. Notifications to the hospice agency and family were timely, and x-rays confirmed no fractures. The allegations were unsubstantiated as evidence did not prove neglect or failure to report.

The complaint was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff not treating a resident with dignity and handling the resident roughly. Investigations included interviews, observations, and records review, all of which did not support the allegations.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff, residents, outside sources, and records review did not corroborate the claims. The resident was observed to have no injuries, and the facility conducted an internal investigation with no findings of abuse.

The complaint alleged that staff did not treat Resident 1 with dignity. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation, including interviews and observations. The resident exhibited manipulative and aggressive behaviors, and the staff member named had not worked at the facility since October 2023, prior to the resident's admission.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Interviews with staff, residents, outside sources, and records review showed no indication of staff treating the resident without dignity. The staff member named in the complaint had not worked at the facility since before the resident was admitted.

The complaint involved allegations of neglect causing bodily injury, failure to seek medical attention, and failure to notify the responsible party. The investigation included interviews, records review, and outside source verification. The allegations were found unsubstantiated based on consistent staff accounts, timely reporting, and appropriate follow-up care and communication with family and hospice.

The investigation found that staff properly followed procedures during the incident involving Resident 1 (R1), who suffered bruising due to a fall prevented by staff intervention. Notifications were timely made to the Department, Hospice, and R1’s Responsible Party. The allegations were unsubstantiated as evidence showed no neglect or failure in care or reporting.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and records were in order and properly maintained.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and records were in place and properly maintained.

The complaint alleged that staff inappropriately touched resident 1 (R1). The allegation was found to be unfounded after investigation, meaning it was false, could not have happened, and/or was without a reasonable basis.

The investigation found the allegation to be unfounded based on staff interviews, outside source interviews, resident interview, and records review which indicated the resident had agitation and hallucinations and recanted the accusation.

The complaint alleged staff inappropriately touched resident 1 (R1). The allegation was investigated through interviews, records review, and observations. The resident recanted the accusation and stated it was a dream. The allegation was determined to be unfounded.

The investigation found the allegation to be unfounded based on staff interviews, outside source interviews, resident interview, and records review which showed no evidence of mistreatment. The resident was found to have agitation and hallucinations, and the allegation was dismissed.

The complaint involved allegations of neglect including severe malnourishment, dehydration, multiple pressure injuries, serious injury, and failure to observe changes in condition for Resident 1. The investigation concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated based on interviews, records, and observations.

The investigation found that the allegations of neglect resulting in severe malnourishment, dehydration, multiple pressure injuries, serious injury, and failure to observe change in condition were unsubstantiated. Staff and outside source interviews, records review, and observations indicated appropriate care and interventions were provided, and no evidence supported the allegations.

The complaint involved allegations of neglect including severe malnourishment, dehydration, multiple pressure injuries, serious injury, and failure of staff to observe changes in condition for Resident 1. The investigation concluded the allegations were unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the allegations of neglect resulting in severe malnourishment, dehydration, multiple pressure injuries, serious injury, and failure to observe change in condition were unsubstantiated based on staff interviews, records review, outside source interviews, and direct observations.

The complaint alleged staff were using a belt to restrain a resident in a chair. The investigation included observations of residents, review of medical records, and interviews with staff and outside sources. The complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the observed safety belts were positioning cushions with doctor's orders, not restraints. Interviews and record reviews showed no evidence of staff using belts to restrain residents. The allegations were unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged staff were using a belt to restrain a resident in a chair. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on observations, record reviews, and interviews.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Observations and medical record reviews confirmed that positioning cushions and safety belts were used appropriately with doctor's orders, and interviews with staff and outside sources confirmed no use of belts for restraint.

The complaint alleged lack of supervision resulting in injury to resident R1. The allegation was unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and record reviews.

The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and direct observations, which found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Staff presence was adequate, and no physical altercations were observed or reported during the timeframe in question. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that lack of supervision resulted in an injury to a resident when pushed by another resident. The allegation was unsubstantiated after investigation.

The investigation found no evidence to substantiate the allegation. Interviews, observations, and record reviews indicated adequate staff presence and supervision during the timeframe in question, and the incident was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint involved five allegations: staff chemically restrained a resident, uncleared staff working at the facility, unlawful eviction of a resident, licensee not following reporting requirements, and staff forged documents. The investigation found no evidence to substantiate these allegations.

The investigation included interviews, facility tours, and record reviews, which did not corroborate any of the allegations. No evidence was found to support claims of chemical restraint, uncleared staff working, unlawful eviction, failure to report incidents, or document forgery. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included chemical restraint of a resident, uncleared staff working, unlawful eviction, failure to follow reporting requirements, and forged documents. Evidence did not support any of these claims.

The investigation included interviews, facility tours, and records review, and found no evidence to substantiate any of the five allegations. Staff and outside sources denied the claims, and records confirmed proper medication administration, cleared staff, lawful resident placement, proper reporting, and truthful documentation.

The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. The allegations included facility disrepair and failure to address pest issues, both of which were found to be unproven based on evidence.

The investigation found that the facility was undergoing repairs for an HVAC malfunction and cosmetic remodeling, and pest control services were being regularly performed with no evidence of roach infestation. Both allegations were unsubstantiated based on observations, interviews, and records review.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included facility disrepair and failure to address pest issues. The HVAC leak was repaired promptly, and pest control records showed no activity of roaches. The facility was undergoing minor renovations and maintained monthly pest control services.

The investigation found that the facility was undergoing repairs for an HVAC malfunction and cosmetic upgrades, and pest control services were active with no evidence of roach infestation. Both allegations were unsubstantiated based on observations, interviews, and records review.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations that staff do not assist residents with bathing and that the facility does not provide activities. The allegations were found to be unsubstantiated after review of records, interviews with residents, staff, and representatives, and observations of activities.

The investigation found that all residents are assisted with showering as scheduled and as needed, with staff making multiple attempts to encourage residents. Activities are provided daily, with residents generally enjoying participation. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and record reviews.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and observations conducted during the investigation.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. Staff assist residents with showering twice weekly and as needed, and activities are provided daily with resident participation encouraged. Residents and representatives reported no concerns.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and in good condition with no deficiencies noted. All safety features and resident amenities were observed to be appropriate and operational.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and in good condition with no deficiencies noted. Safety features such as smoke and carbon monoxide alarms were present and operational.

The Component II completion was successful, confirming the applicant/administrator's understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness.

The Component II completion was successful. The applicant and administrator demonstrated understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness.