Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
300
53 employees · 247 contractors · 69 on an average day San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · San Francisco, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 73 / 100, a C — 11 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 73 / 100, a C — 11 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · San Francisco, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
C
ALM's inspection grade is 73 / 100, a C — 11 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 73 / 100, a C — 11 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of San Francisco Health Care and Rehab
San Francisco Health Care is a renowned nursing home in San Francisco, CA, that offers nursing services, therapy, mental health services, and other medical services. With 24-hour care options, older adults receive the utmost attention for their comfort and safety. X-ray, housekeeping, and pharmacy services are just some of the community’s unique offerings, dedicated to improving older adults’ quality of life. The community also strives to promote diversity and inclusivity with a multilingual team and a welcoming setting, ensuring older adults feel a sense of belonging during their stay.
Parties, light exercises, and community events are conducted to encourage residents to make new friends and have fun. A restaurant-style dining is also provided, so residents have a hassle-free dining experience that caters to their dietary needs and preferences. Occupational, speech, and physical therapy are also provided to help residents go back to their routines. As one of San Francisco’s trusted nursing homes, this senior living community makes a good option for those seeking a wide range of care for their healthcare needs.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 154th out of 290 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 15m
This nursing home is ranked 154th out of 290 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 15mStandout metric: RN, weekends is +58% above California average
2 of 6 metrics below California average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 29 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
49m
↑ 25% · CA 39mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 25% above the California average of 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 29 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 18 agency contractors.
29 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 70 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 64 agency contractors.
70 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
31m
↓ 58% · CA 1h 13mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 58% below the California average of 1h 13m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 70 total: 6 of the facility's own employees and 64 agency contractors.
70 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 180 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 150 agency contractors.
180 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
2h 55m
↑ 10% · CA 2h 39mThis facility: 2h 55m per resident per day, 10% above the California average of 2h 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 180 total: 30 of the facility's own employees and 150 agency contractors.
180 staff · 8.9-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 41% · CA 5mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 41% above the California average of 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 56m
↓ 3% · CA 4h 5mThis facility: 3h 56m per resident per day, 3% below the California average of 4h 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
47m
↑ 58% · CA 30mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 58% above the California average of 30m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
300
53 employees · 247 contractors · 69 on an average day
300 total staff / 109 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.75 : 1
↑ 54% · CA 1.79This facility: 2.75 staff per resident, 54% above the California average of 1.79 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
300 staff ÷ 109 residents
See full California ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.7 h
↑ 13% · CA 7.7 hThis facility: 8.7 h, 13% above the California average of 7.7 h (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
55,301 staff hours this quarter
See full California ranking →40.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
California average: 95.3% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (150), Licensed Practical Nurse (64), Registered Nurse (18), Qualified Activities Professional (7), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Nurse Practitioner (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
168
Rank #92 / 341Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 341 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
168
Rank #92 / 341Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 92nd out of 341 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #6 / 344Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #6 / 344Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
96
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #111 / 299Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 299 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 299. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #111 / 299Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 299 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 299. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
85%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 168 beds.
Similar to the California average: 82.2%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
143
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
154
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
CMS Certification Number056272
U.S. News & World Report Best Senior LivingU.S. News rates communities from independent surveys of residents and their families (the 2025 edition analyzed ~450,000 responses across 3,800+ communities) covering safety, caregiving, activities, dining, management and value. Only communities meeting its data thresholds earn a Best designation for that year.
Resident Council
Cantonese
Mandarin
Russian
Spanish
Tagalog
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Laboratory Services
Social Work & Case Management
Housekeeping
Pets not allowed
Private Dining Room
Activities
Social Activities for Seniors
Parties and Special Activities
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc..
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc..- Private dining room for family events.
Building Type2-story
Room Types
Private
Shared Rooms
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
73 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
11 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
126 severity-weighted points (34 citations) · 32% higher than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 95)
Enforcement
Concern
$152,404 in fines · 2 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
34 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 25)
Total health inspections
5
↓ 59% · CA 12.2This facility: 5, 59% below the California average of 12.2 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
34
Rank #114 / 293Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 114th out of 293 nursing homes we track in California for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the California State average, with a ranking across all 293 CA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 32% · CA 49.9This facility: 34, 32% below the California average of 49.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.8
Rank #262 / 293Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 262nd out of 293 nursing homes we track in California for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the California mean across 293 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 43% · CA 4.75This facility: 6.8, 43% above the California average of 4.75 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
34 of 34 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 233% · CA 0.3This facility: 1, 233% above the California average of 0.3 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 122% · CA 0.9This facility: 2, 122% above the California average of 0.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
31
↓ 34% · CA 47.2This facility: 31, 34% below the California average of 47.2 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 1.5 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 28, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 34 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 28, 2026
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 28, 2025
12 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 01, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 22, 2024
12 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 18, 2021
6 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 34 citations
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (21%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
6 deficiencies (18%)
Pharmacy Services
6 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (9%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
29 of 34 citations resulted from standard inspections; 4 of 34 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 34 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 28, 2025 · $28,529 civil money penalty
Feb 28, 2025 · $28,529 civil money penalty
Jan 22, 2024 · $123,875 civil money penalty
Total fines
$152,404
↑ 164% · CA $58KThis facility: $152,404, 164% above the California average of $57,703. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #291 / 295Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 291st out of 295 nursing homes we track in California for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the California average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 295 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 3% · CA 2.06This facility: 2, 3% below the California average of 2.06. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CA avg 0.57California average: 0.57. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Feb 28, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$28,529
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$28,529
Jan 22, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$123,875
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$123,875Fine amount comparison
This facility
$152,404
California average
$57,703
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. California and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the California average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↓ 5% · CA 4.2This facility: 4.0, 5% below the CA average of 4.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 15% · CA 3.5This facility: 3.0, 15% below the CA average of 3.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 11% · CA 5.9This facility: 5.2, 11% below the CA average of 5.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 36% · CA 10.0This facility: 6.4, 36% below the CA average of 10.0 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 3 worse, 4 near CA average
8 short-stay measures: 2 better, 2 worse, 1 near CA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.4%
↓ 28% · CA 10.2This facility: 7.4, 28% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.4%
↓ 28% · CA 10.2This facility: 7.4, 28% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
↓ 17% · CA 9.8This facility: 8.1, 17% below the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.1%
↓ 17% · CA 9.8This facility: 8.1, 17% below the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.7%
↓ 64% · CA 10.2This facility: 3.7, 64% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.7%
↓ 64% · CA 10.2This facility: 3.7, 64% below the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↑ 113% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.6, 113% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.6%
↑ 113% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.6, 113% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
↓ 15% · CA 1.6This facility: 1.4, 15% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
↓ 15% · CA 1.6This facility: 1.4, 15% below the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 19% · CA 4.3This facility: 5.1, 19% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.1%
↑ 19% · CA 4.3This facility: 5.1, 19% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↑ 2% · CA 4.0This facility: 4.1, 2% above the CA average of 4.0 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
↑ 2% · CA 4.0This facility: 4.1, 2% above the CA average of 4.0 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5%
↓ 93% · CA 7.3This facility: 0.5, 93% below the CA average of 7.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.5%
↓ 93% · CA 7.3This facility: 0.5, 93% below the CA average of 7.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.3%
↓ 48% · CA 12.0This facility: 6.3, 48% below the CA average of 12.0 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.3%
↓ 48% · CA 12.0This facility: 6.3, 48% below the CA average of 12.0 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.4%
≈ 0% · CA 98.6This facility: 98.4, level with the CA average of 98.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.4%
≈ 0% · CA 98.6This facility: 98.4, level with the CA average of 98.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.2This facility: 99.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.2This facility: 99.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.29
↑ 2% · CA 2.25This facility: 2.29, 2% above the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.29
↑ 2% · CA 2.25This facility: 2.29, 2% above the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.35
↑ 48% · CA 1.59This facility: 2.35, 48% above the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.35
↑ 48% · CA 1.59This facility: 2.35, 48% above the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.7%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.7, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
66.7%
↑ 24% · US 53.7This facility: 66.7, 24% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.6%
≈ 0% · US 50.6This facility: 50.6, level with the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
50.6%
≈ 0% · US 50.6This facility: 50.6, level with the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
↓ 3% · CA 94.4This facility: 91.2, 3% below the CA average of 94.4 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
↓ 3% · CA 94.4This facility: 91.2, 3% below the CA average of 94.4 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.4%
↓ 31% · CA 93.2This facility: 64.4, 31% below the CA average of 93.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.4%
↓ 31% · CA 93.2This facility: 64.4, 31% below the CA average of 93.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.1%
↓ 26% · CA 23.2This facility: 17.1, 26% below the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.1%
↓ 26% · CA 23.2This facility: 17.1, 26% below the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.0%
↑ 43% · CA 11.2This facility: 16.0, 43% above the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
16.0%
↑ 43% · CA 11.2This facility: 16.0, 43% above the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 288 California nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−4.2% operating margin
+7.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most California homes
43.0% payroll share of revenue
CA average 61.4%Rank #267 / 288Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 267th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $2.4M while revenue rose $0.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with California homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $15.3M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $15.3M | Rank in CA Rank #145 / 288Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 145th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 50% of homes | Above CA median Higher net patient revenue than 50% of CA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.9M | −$0.7M | Trend 20172024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.6M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −4.2% | +7.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | −$0.9M | Trend — | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most California homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.6M | −$2.4M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $8.8M | Rank in CA Rank #215 / 288Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 215th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Below CA median Higher payroll than 25% of CA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 43.0% | −17.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 53.8% | Rank in CA Rank #267 / 288Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 267th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 7% of homes | 18.4 pts under CA average The CA average is 61.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the California payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $19.3M | $20.7M | $14.6M | $18.1M | $16.5M | $16.1M | $15.0M | $15.3M |
| Operating expenses | $16.7M | $17.8M | $15.7M | $16.6M | $15.8M | $15.5M | $16.7M | $15.9M |
| Net patient income | $2.6M | $2.9M | −$1.1M | $1.5M | $0.7M | $0.6M | −$1.7M | −$0.6M |
| Operating margin | 13.6% | 13.9% | −7.7% | 8.5% | 4.1% | 3.6% | −11.3% | −4.2% |
| Net income | $2.7M | $2.9M | −$1.1M | $2.8M | $5.0M | $0.6M | $0.3M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $7.0M | $6.5M | $9.4M | $10.1M | $8.3M | $8.9M | $9.0M | $6.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 36.1% | 31.4% | 64.8% | 55.7% | 50.3% | 55.3% | 60.1% | 43.0% |
| Beds | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 | 168 |
| Gross revenue | $19.4M | $20.7M | $18.6M | $19.9M | $16.5M | $16.1M | $16.3M | $14.8M |
| Salaries | $5.6M | $5.1M | $7.8M | $8.6M | $6.8M | $7.5M | $7.7M | $5.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $1.1M |
| Contract labor | $3.1M | $3.0M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $0.8M | $1.3M | $1.6M | $2.1M |
| Other operating costs | $9.7M | $11.3M | $6.3M | $6.5M | $7.5M | $6.6M | $7.7M | $9.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $376 | $443 | $315 | $406 | $432 | $449 | $405 | $413 |
| Cost per day | $325 | $382 | $339 | $371 | $414 | $433 | $451 | $430 |
| Average length of stay | 130.8 days | 127.6 days | 146.5 days | 121.5 days | 147.6 days | 166.9 days | 133.7 days | 153.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
238 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
86 · 36%
Medicaid
6 · 3%
Private pay & other
146 · 61%
Resident snapshot
109 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
20 · 18%
Medicaid
65 · 60%
Private pay & other
24 · 22%
Leaving
241 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
79 · 33%
Medicaid
45 · 19%
Private pay & other
117 · 49%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.
1.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from San Francisco's city center to San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.'s address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around San Francisco
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the CA Dept. of Social Services (CDSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The California average is: 61.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Avenues Transitional Care Center | NH HOS MC RC SNF | San Francisco (Outer Sunset) | 140
Facility
140
CA AVG
161
Rank
#118 / 341 | B |
95.5%
Facility
95.5%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#34 / 299 | +16% | 4.18
Facility
4.18
CA AVG
4.33
Rank
#113 / 290 | +57% | -4% | $12.7k
Facility
$12.7k
CA AVG
$60.5k
Rank
#209 / 295 | 21
Facility
21
CA AVG
49.9
Rank
#41 / 293 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
CA AVG
4.7
Rank
#149 / 293 | 1 | 134 | A |
85
Facility
85
CA AVG
60
Rank
#54 / 344 | Craig Orgill | $25.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$25.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#52 / 288 | $13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#55 / 288 | 52%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
52%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.4%
Rank
#170 / 288 | 055963 | ||||
| The Sequoias San Francisco | NH AL CCRC HOS MC RC SNF | San Francisco (Japantown) | 400
Facility
400
CA AVG
161
Rank
#27 / 341 | ? |
88.0%
Facility
88.0%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#158 / 299 | +7% | 1.56
Facility
1.56
CA AVG
4.33
Rank
#15 / 290 | +121% | -64% | $0
Facility
$0
CA AVG
$60.5k
Rank
#1 / 295 | 15
Facility
15
CA AVG
49.9
Rank
#17 / 293 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
CA AVG
4.7
Rank
#193 / 293 | - | 352 | - |
99
Facility
99
CA AVG
60
Rank
#1 / 344 | Sequoia Living, Inc | $7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#273 / 288 | $12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$12.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#70 / 288 | 173.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
173.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.4%
Rank
#7 / 288 | 056071 | ||||
| San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. | NH SNF | San Francisco (North Of The Panhandle) | 168
Facility
168
CA AVG
161
Rank
#92 / 341 | C |
85.0%
Facility
85.0%
CA AVG
82.2%
Rank
#111 / 299 | +3% | 4.24
Facility
4.24
CA AVG
4.33
Rank
#154 / 290 | +9% | -2% | $152.4k
Facility
$152.4k
CA AVG
$60.5k
Rank
#291 / 295 | 34
Facility
34
CA AVG
49.9
Rank
#114 / 293 | 6.8
Facility
6.8
CA AVG
4.7
Rank
#262 / 293 | 3 | 143 | A |
96
Facility
96
CA AVG
60
Rank
#6 / 344 | Stan Stukov | $15.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$17.3M
Rank
#145 / 288 | $6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
$9.8M
Rank
#215 / 288 | 43%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
43%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
CA AVG
61.4%
Rank
#267 / 288 | 056272 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other CA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in California
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. is located in San Francisco, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Frequently Asked Questions about San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.
What neighborhood is San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. in?
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. is in the North of the Panhandle neighborhood of San Francisco.
What languages are spoken at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.?
The team at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. speaks Cantonese, Mandarin, Russian, Spanish, and Tagalog.
Is San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. in a walkable area?
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. has a walk score of 96. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
What is the occupancy rate at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.?
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.'s occupancy is 85%.
Are pets allowed at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.?
No, San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc.?
The team at San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. can be reached at info@sfhcr.com.
Does San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
San Francisco Health Care and Rehab Inc. is registered as a for-profit in CA.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
