Inspection Reports for
Sunrise of Cupertino

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated based on interviews, observations, and document reviews. Allegations included facility disrepair, malodorous rooms, poor food quality, delayed call button responses, mail distribution failures, lack of transportation, and untimely council meeting notices. The department found no sufficient evidence to prove violations.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Resident rooms were odor-free and in good condition, food quality was supported by menu review and staff interviews, call button response times averaged 5-10 minutes, mail distribution was confirmed to be handled appropriately, transportation was provided or alternatives arranged, and resident council meetings were posted timely on activity calendars.

The facility was found to be generally compliant with regulations, with clean and well-maintained physical plant and resident rooms, proper medication storage, and operational safety equipment. No citations were issued during this inspection.

The complaint involved allegations that staff did not properly assist resident R1 with hygiene needs and did not allow R1 to wear their own clothing of choice. After investigation including staff and resident interviews, observations, and record review, the allegations were determined to be unfounded.

Based on interviews, observations, and record review, the allegations were found to be unfounded. Staff provided assistance and options for clothing to the resident, and measures were taken to prevent the resident from reusing dirty clothes. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint alleged that staff did not properly assist resident R1 with hygiene needs and did not allow R1 to wear their own clothing of choice. The investigation included interviews with 6 staff members, observation of the resident's clothing and environment, and review of records. The allegations were determined to be unfounded.

The investigation found the allegations to be unfounded based on interviews, observations, and record reviews. Staff provided appropriate assistance and options for clothing, and the resident's clothing was observed to be clean. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint alleged that a resident with wandering behavior left the facility unassisted. The investigation revealed the resident was not on the facility's roster and the facility had no record of the resident living there. The allegation was found to be false and unfounded.

The investigation found that the resident named in the allegation was not living at the facility and the allegation was determined to be unfounded. No deficiencies were cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22.

The complaint alleged that a resident with wandering behavior left the facility unassisted. The investigation revealed the resident was not on the facility's roster and had never lived there. The allegation was found to be false and unfounded.

The investigation found that the resident named in the allegation was not living at the facility and the allegation was determined to be unfounded. No deficiencies were cited under the California Code of Regulations, Title 22.

No deficiencies were cited during this unannounced case management visit. The immediate exclusion letter was delivered and the staff member was terminated following the incident.

No deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. The excluded staff member was immediately terminated after the incident.

The visit was triggered by a complaint involving alleged sexual abuse. The case management is ongoing and pending further investigation.

During the unannounced case management incident visit, two staff members were interviewed and various documents related to the incident were obtained. The case management is pending additional investigation.

The visit was triggered by a complaint alleging sexual abuse involving resident R1. The case management is ongoing and pending further investigation.

During the unannounced case management incident visit, two staff members were interviewed and various documents related to the incident were obtained. The case management is pending additional investigation.

The facility was toured inside and outside, including resident bedrooms and memory care units, with observations of food supply, safety equipment, and maintenance. No deficiencies or violations were explicitly noted in this portion of the report. The LPAs will return to complete the annual inspection.

The inspection included tours of the facility's interior and exterior, verification of food supplies, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, memory care unit safety features, and fire safety equipment. No deficiencies or violations were explicitly noted in the report.

No deficiencies were cited. The resident was allowed to have the scissors based on medical records, and after the incident, the facility conducted a re-assessment, in-service training, and provided a private 24/7 companion for the resident.

No deficiencies were cited. The resident was found to have brought scissors into the apartment during admission, which was allowed based on medical records. After the incident, the resident was provided a private 24/7 companion and the facility conducted a re-assessment and in-service training with staff.

No issues were noted during the pre-licensing inspection. The facility was observed to be ready for licensing, with proper safety measures, equipment, and supplies in place. The report will be submitted for final review and approval by the Central Application Bureau.

No issues were noted during this pre-licensing inspection. The facility was observed to be ready for licensing, with proper safety measures, equipment, and supplies in place. However, final approval is subject to review by the Central Application Bureau.

The applicant/administrator demonstrated understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. Signed documentation and photo ID were obtained.

The applicant/administrator demonstrated understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. No deficiencies or violations were noted in the report.