Inspection Reports for
Sunrise of Orange
1301 E Lincoln Ave, Orange, CA 92865, United States, CA, 92865
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 3 years)
Deficiencies (over 3 years)
0.3 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
93% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
4
3
2
1
0
Occupancy
Latest occupancy rate
71% occupied
Based on a October 2025 inspection.
This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.
Occupancy rate over time
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 99
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Oct 13, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted following an allegation that staff dispensed an unprescribed supplement, Melatonin, to memory care residents without their knowledge.
Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff dispensed an unprescribed supplement to residents without their knowledge. The investigation found the allegation to be unfounded based on record reviews and interviews.
Findings
After reviewing resident records, interviewing staff, witnesses, and residents, the allegation was found to be unfounded as there was no evidence to support that unprescribed Melatonin was given without residents' knowledge.
Report Facts
Staff interviewed: 12
Witnesses interviewed: 3
Residents interviewed: 7
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Benito Del Toro | Executive Director | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during investigation and participated in exit interview |
| RoseMarie Ruppert | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the complaint investigation visit |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Census: 99
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Sep 5, 2025
Visit Reason
An unannounced case management health and safety visit was conducted to follow up on a self-reported incident report received on September 4, 2025, regarding Resident #1.
Findings
The facility was observed to be in good repair, clean, and free of obstructions. No health and safety issues were observed during the visit. Resident #1 was not present and could not be interviewed. The incident requires further investigation.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Benito Del Toro | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and interviewed regarding incident. |
| Crystal Vital | Resident Care Director | Interviewed via telephone regarding incident. |
| Shay Porter | Reminiscence Coordinator | Interviewed via telephone regarding incident. |
| Jenifer Tirre | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced case management health and safety visit. |
Inspection Report
Follow-Up
Census: 99
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Sep 5, 2025
Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced case management health and safety follow-up inspection triggered by a self-reported incident involving Resident #1 received on September 4, 2025.
Findings
The facility was observed to be in good repair, clean, and free of obstructions with no health and safety issues noted. Resident #1 was not present for interview, and the incident requires further investigation with updates to be provided by the facility.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Benito Del Toro | Administrator | Met with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and interviewed regarding the incident. |
| Jenifer Tirre | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the unannounced case management health and safety visit. |
| Crystal Vital | Resident Care Director | Interviewed via telephone during inspection. |
| Shay Porter | Reminiscence Coordinator | Interviewed via telephone during inspection. |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 90
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: May 2, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced required annual visit conducted using the CARE Inspection Tool to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements.
Findings
The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies noted. Observations included operational rooms, proper infection control practices, adequate food supplies, and safety equipment in working order.
Report Facts
Hospice residents present: 5
Fire extinguishers observed: 8
Residents reviewed: 8
Staff reviewed: 5
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Luis Rodriguez | Executive Director | Assisted with the facility inspection and was present during the exit interview |
| Jenifer Tirre | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection visit |
Inspection Report
Annual Inspection
Census: 50
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 1
Date: May 13, 2024
Visit Reason
An unannounced visit was conducted for the purpose of performing an annual required evaluation of the facility.
Findings
The facility was found to be generally compliant with regulatory requirements including cleanliness, safety, and operational standards. However, a deficiency was cited regarding staff response to call light pendants, where a resident reported a 40-minute delay in response.
Deficiencies (1)
Facility personnel were not sufficient or competent to meet resident needs as evidenced by failure to respond to a resident's call light for 40 minutes.
Report Facts
Residents receiving hospice care: 2
Resident files reviewed: 10
Personnel files reviewed: 10
Call light response delay: 40
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Bryan Reamer-Yu | Executive Director | Present during inspection and cited in deficiency related to call light response. |
| Crystal Vital | Resident Care Director | Met with Licensing Program Analysts during inspection. |
| Alisa Ortiz | Licensing Program Manager | Supervisor of the inspection and cited in report. |
| Rosie Quiroz | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and authored the report. |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Apr 13, 2023
Visit Reason
This announced inspection was conducted for the purpose of a pre-licensing inspection of a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly. The application was submitted on 2023-01-20 and this is an initial application with no residents in care.
Findings
The facility was toured and inspected, including structure, resident bedrooms, bathrooms, food service, safety equipment, and storage areas. All observed areas and equipment were found to be operational and compliant. The facility was deemed ready for licensure, with final approval pending.
Report Facts
Rooms: 92
Water temperature: 109.4
Water temperature: 112.2
Food supply: 2
Food supply: 7
Floors: 3
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Tina Bagheri | Applicant | Met with Licensing Program Analysts during inspection and discussed the purpose of the inspection |
| Sean Haddad | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection and signed the report |
| Dwayne Mason Jr. | Licensing Program Analyst | Conducted the inspection |
| Armando J Lucero | Licensing Program Manager | Named in the report as Licensing Program Manager |
Inspection Report
Original Licensing
Capacity: 139
Deficiencies: 0
Date: Mar 22, 2023
Visit Reason
The visit was an initial licensing evaluation of the Residential Care Facility for the Elderly to verify the applicant/administrator's understanding of California Code Title 22 regulations and readiness for licensing.
Findings
The applicant and administrator participated in a telephone interview (COMP II) confirming their understanding of facility operation, admission policies, staffing, health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints, and pre-licensing readiness. Identification was verified and required documentation was obtained.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kelly Jacobs | Administrator | Named as facility administrator in relation to licensing evaluation |
| Tina Tayebeh Bagheri | Participant in COMP II interview | |
| Jude De La Concepcion | Licensing Program Manager | Named in report header |
| Bethany Hunter | Licensing Program Analyst | Named in report header and analyst conducting evaluation |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...
