Inspection Reports for
The Commons at Woodland Hills

The complaint alleged that staff did not adequately supervise a resident who exposed themselves in the dining room. The investigation included interviews and record reviews, concluding there was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation.

The investigation found no reported incidents or evidence supporting the allegation. Interviews with staff and residents indicated adequate supervision and no inappropriate resident behavior. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure a resident's prescribed medication was filled. The allegation was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the resident's routine medications were being administered as prescribed, and although PRN pain medications were available, the resident preferred not to take them. Staff reported that prescriptions are sent directly from the physician to the pharmacy and then delivered to the facility. Seven residents interviewed reported no medication concerns. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The complaint alleged that a resident exposed themselves in the dining room and was not adequately supervised. The investigation included observations, interviews with the Executive Director, staff, and residents, and document review. The complaint was found unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation. Interviews with staff and residents, as well as record reviews, indicated no incidents of inappropriate resident behavior or inadequate supervision. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure a resident's prescribed medication was filled. The allegation was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that the resident's routine medications were being administered as prescribed, and although PRN pain medications were available, the resident preferred not to take them. Interviews with staff and residents revealed no concerns regarding medication administration. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence.

The complaint alleged that residents' rooms were infested with cockroaches and that management did not follow through with pest control services for weeks. The complaint was investigated through resident interviews, staff interviews, facility tours, and review of pest control records. The complaint was found unsubstantiated.

The investigation found that although one resident reported some bug activity, the facility provided assistance, pest control services, and room changes. Documentation and interviews confirmed the facility is making continuous efforts to keep the facility free from pests, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews with residents and staff, review of pest control service records, and observations during the investigation.

The investigation found that although one resident reported some bug activity and the facility provided assistance including pest control services, documentation and interviews confirmed the facility is making continuous efforts to keep the facility free from pests. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated at this time.

The facility was found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The physical plant, kitchen, common areas, resident bedrooms, medication storage, infection control policies, and emergency disaster plans were all inspected and found adequate and properly maintained.

The facility was found to be in compliance with Title 22 regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The physical plant, kitchen, common areas, resident bedrooms, medication storage, infection control policies, and emergency disaster plans were all inspected and found adequate and properly maintained.

The complaint was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to document changes to the resident's condition and failure to obtain consent prior to moving the resident to the memory care unit. The investigation concluded that the facility communicated with the resident and family, and the responsible person signed the admission agreement.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to support the allegations. Records and interviews confirmed that the resident's family and responsible person were aware of and consented to the move to the memory care unit due to safety concerns related to cognitive decline and behavior changes.

The facility was toured and found to have appropriate physical plant conditions including adequate kitchen supplies, properly furnished resident rooms with required safety features, common areas suitably equipped, and functional fire safety systems. Emergency pull cords and medication room security were verified. No deficiencies or violations were noted in the report.

The applicant and administrator successfully completed COMP II, demonstrating understanding of Title 22 regulations including facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints reporting, and pre-licensing readiness.