Inspection Reports for
The Pointe at Summit Hills

CA, 93306

Back to Facility Profile

Deficiencies (last 2 years)

Deficiencies (over 2 years) 2.5 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.

38% better than California average
California average: 4 deficiencies/year

Deficiencies per year

8 6 4 2 0
2025
2026

Occupancy

Latest occupancy rate 90% occupied

Based on a March 2026 inspection.

This facility has shown a steady increase in demand based on occupancy rates.

Occupancy rate over time

20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Jul 2025 Jul 2025 Oct 2025 Mar 2026

Inspection Report

Annual Inspection
Census: 76 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 5 Date: Mar 17, 2026

Visit Reason
The inspection was an unannounced annual visit conducted by Licensing Program Analyst M. Garza to evaluate compliance with licensing requirements at the facility.

Findings
The inspection found several deficiencies in resident records, including missing admission agreements, pre-placement appraisals, TB tests, personal property/valuables documentation, and functional capabilities assessments. These deficiencies pose potential risks to the health, safety, or personal rights of residents.

Deficiencies (5)
1 of 5 files did not have an admission agreement.
5 of 5 resident files reviewed did not have a pre-placement appraisal.
1 of 5 resident files reviewed did not have a TB test completed.
5 of 5 resident files reviewed did not have personal property/valuables completed.
5 of 5 resident files did not have a functional capabilities completed.
Report Facts
Deficiencies cited: 5 Capacity: 170 Census: 76

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Perla PenaExecutive DirectorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during inspection and developed plan of correction.
Mary GarzaLicensing Program AnalystConducted the inspection and signed the report.

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 77 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Mar 17, 2026

Visit Reason
An unannounced complaint investigation was conducted following complaints that facility staff did not ensure residents' showering needs were met and did not respond to residents' call bells in a timely manner.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to meet residents' showering needs and untimely response to call bells. Evidence did not support the allegations.
Findings
The investigation found that residents were provided showers and refusals were documented with responsible parties notified. Facility response times to call bells were under ten minutes based on interviews and record reviews. The allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 170 Census: 77

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Perla PenaAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analyst during complaint investigation
Vadim GorbanLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation
Alexandria WaltonSupervisorSupervisor overseeing the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 79 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Oct 16, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to a complaint alleging that staff did not ensure the facility was free of pests.

Complaint Details
The complaint alleged that staff did not ensure the facility was free of pests. The investigation was unsubstantiated as there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.
Findings
The investigation found that while the facility sometimes has flies due to doors opening and closing, the facility has taken measures such as ordering a screen and using a fan to reduce flies, and maintains a monthly pest control service. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 170 Census: 79

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Perla PenaAdministratorMet with during the investigation and received findings
Shawna DoucetteLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation

Inspection Report

Complaint Investigation
Census: 79 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Oct 16, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an unannounced complaint investigation conducted in response to allegations that staff did not ensure the facility was free of pests.

Complaint Details
The complaint was unsubstantiated after investigation. Although the allegations may have happened or be valid, there was not enough evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.
Findings
The investigation found that while the facility sometimes has flies due to doors opening and closing, the facility has taken measures such as ordering a screen and using a fan to reduce flies. The facility also has a monthly pest control service. The allegations were unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Report Facts
Capacity: 170 Census: 79

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Shawna DoucetteLicensing Program AnalystConducted the complaint investigation and delivered findings
Perla PenaAdministratorFacility administrator who was met with and received findings

Inspection Report

Original Licensing
Census: 76 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 28, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was a pre-licensing inspection conducted to evaluate the facility's compliance with licensing requirements prior to issuing a license.

Findings
The facility met all pre-licensing requirements with no deficiencies noted. The inspection included a tour of the facility, verification of furnishings, safety equipment, food and medication storage, and review of resident and staff records.

Report Facts
Hot water temperature range: 105.2 Hot water temperature range: 113.4 Facility capacity: 170 Facility census: 76

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Perla PenaAdministratorMet with Licensing Program Analysts during pre-licensing visit
Shawna DoucetteLicensing Program AnalystConducted pre-licensing visit and inspection
Jimmy DuarteLicensing Program AnalystConducted pre-licensing visit and inspection
Alexandria WaltonLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on report

Inspection Report

Census: 85 Capacity: 170 Deficiencies: 0 Date: Jul 3, 2025

Visit Reason
The visit was an office type announced inspection conducted on 07/03/2025 to evaluate the applicant/administrator's understanding and readiness for community care facility licensing laws and regulations as part of a change of ownership (CHOW) application process.

Findings
The applicant/administrator participated in COMP II, confirming understanding of licensing laws, facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. No specific deficiencies were cited in the report.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Perla PenaAdministrator/DirectorFacility administrator involved in the licensing evaluation and interview.
Aron ShlomoMet with during the inspection visit.
Victoria MoralesLicensing Program ManagerNamed as Licensing Program Manager on the report.
Nicole RouseLicensing Program AnalystNamed as Licensing Program Analyst on the report.

Viewing

Loading inspection reports...