Inspection Reports for
Vineyard Place

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated for all allegations, meaning there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate any of the allegations, including resident developing sepsis while in care, staff serving cold food, inadequate food portions, unsanitary conditions, and restriction of phone calls. Interviews and observations supported that the facility was clean and residents were not restricted from phone calls.

The complaint included allegations that staff were not following resident's advanced directives about decision-making, not meeting toileting needs, and not maintaining the facility free from odor. The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate these allegations.

The investigation involved interviews with staff, residents, and review of records. All allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove violations occurred.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included denial of visitation due to COVID-19 cases and insufficient staffing to meet resident needs. Interviews and record reviews did not support these claims.

The investigation found no corroborating evidence to support the allegations. Interviews with residents, staff, and the administrator, as well as record reviews, confirmed that visitation was not denied and staffing levels were sufficient to meet residents' needs. Therefore, the allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated.

The complaint alleged staff neglect causing a resident to have maggots on a pressure injury. The allegation was investigated and found to be Unfounded based on lack of evidence and denial by hospice and wound care staff.

The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation. Hospice and wound care nurses denied the presence of maggots, and progress notes on the date of the allegation showed no unusual skin changes. The allegation was deemed Unfounded.

The complaint alleged staff neglect causing a resident to sustain a pressure injury with maggots present. The allegation was investigated and found to be Unfounded, meaning it was false, could not have happened, or lacked reasonable basis.

The investigation found no evidence to support the allegation. Hospice and wound care nurses denied the presence of maggots, and progress notes on the date of the allegation showed no unusual skin changes. The allegation was deemed Unfounded.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies issued. Resident and staff records were reviewed and found complete, medication administration records showed no discrepancies, and the facility environment met all required standards.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The facility paid the outstanding annual fees of $2,601.00 during the visit, and documentation was reviewed. Interviews and documentation related to the alleged incident were conducted and reviewed.

The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews, reviewed documentation related to the alleged incident, and confirmed that the facility paid the outstanding annual fees of $2,601.00 during the visit. No deficiencies were cited during this inspection.

The inspection found the facility to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The facility environment, client and employee records, medication storage, and safety measures were all reviewed and found satisfactory.

The inspection found the facility to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The facility environment, client and employee records, medication storage, and safety measures were all reviewed and found satisfactory.

The complaint alleged that a resident's medical needs were not being met, including lack of physician visits and medical attention. The investigation found the resident was receiving Hospice care and medical attention as needed, leading to the complaint being classified as unfounded.

The investigation, which included staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and observations, found that the resident receives Hospice services and medical attention two to three times a week. The evidence did not support the allegation, and the complaint was deemed unfounded.

The complaint alleged that a resident's medical needs were not being met, including lack of physician visits and medical attention. The allegation was investigated and found to be unfounded based on interviews, observations, and record reviews.

The investigation found that the resident receives Hospice services and is seen by a Hospice Nurse several times a week, with the attending physician responsible for medical care. Staff interviews and record reviews did not corroborate the allegation, and the complaint was deemed unfounded.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated as there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations regarding staff training, facility disrepair, unsanitary conditions, and malodor.

Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated. Staff training was verified, the facility was functional despite minor issues, and the malodor was attributed to resident incontinence with cleaning efforts in place.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included improper staff training on resident transfers, facility disrepair, unsanitary conditions, and malodorous environment. Evidence did not support these allegations.

Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated. Staff training was documented, facility disrepair was minimal and functional, sticky floors were due to cleaning chemicals not urine, and the urine odor was attributed to the resident population with incontinence issues and managed with cleaning efforts.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and compliant with infection control, safety, and staffing requirements. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and compliant with infection control, safety, staffing, medication management, and emergency preparedness requirements. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The facility was found to have sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. There were no cases of COVID-19 at the time of inspection, and the facility has a designated infection control lead responsible for tracking COVID-19 cases and maintaining PPE and cleaning supplies.

The Licensing Program Analyst observed sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead responsible for tracking COVID-19 cases and maintaining PPE and cleaning supplies.

The facility was found to have sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The facility has a designated infection control lead responsible for tracking COVID-19 cases, maintaining PPE supplies, and ensuring staff training in infection control.

The facility was found to have sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning and disinfecting provisions, and proper use of face coverings. The designated infection control lead person effectively manages COVID-19 tracking, PPE supplies, and staff training on infection control.

The complaint alleged lack of supervision resulting in a resident being hit by another resident. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove the violation.

The investigation found that the incidents occurred in the main activity room with staff present and no injuries were sustained. Both residents involved have dementia which can cause impulsive behavior. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of lack of supervision.

The complaint was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur.

The investigation found that the incidents occurred in the presence of staff and no injuries were sustained. Both residents involved have dementia which can cause impulsive behavior. There was insufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation of lack of supervision.