Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
86
70 employees · 16 contractors · 30 on an average day Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Lebanon, MO
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Lebanon, MO
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
N & R Of Lebanon South operates Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab, with Teresa Knight as administrator. The home carries 184 beds, which is large enough that a resident’s day is shaped by their own wing rather than by the building as a whole. Licensed nursing carries through the night shift, which is where a nursing home earns the second word in its name.
Hospice care runs inside the same walls, for a resident with a terminal illness. The people providing the care do not change; the aim does.
Rehabilitation services deliver therapy as part of a stay. Resident Transportation is a named program, so a trip out is arranged through the home rather than through whichever relative is free. Nursing time reaches 3 hours and 40 minutes per resident each day.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Families often pay privately for a stretch while a Medicaid application moves through the state, since the paperwork rarely keeps pace with the move-in date.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 40m
This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 40mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +61% above Missouri average
2 of 6 metrics below Missouri average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
45m
↑ 61% · MO 28mThis facility: 45m per resident per day, 61% above the Missouri average of 28m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8-hour shifts
19m
↓ 54% · MO 41mThis facility: 19m per resident per day, 54% below the Missouri average of 41m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
2h 36m
↑ 12% · MO 2h 19mThis facility: 2h 36m per resident per day, 12% above the Missouri average of 2h 19m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 53% · MO 2mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 53% below the Missouri average of 2m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 13m
↑ 6% · MO 3h 3mThis facility: 3h 13m per resident per day, 6% above the Missouri average of 3h 3m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
27m
↑ 36% · MO 20mThis facility: 27m per resident per day, 36% above the Missouri average of 20m (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
86
70 employees · 16 contractors · 30 on an average day
86 total staff / 64 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.34 : 1
↓ 19% · MO 1.66This facility: 1.34 staff per resident, 19% below the Missouri average of 1.66 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
86 staff ÷ 64 residents
See full Missouri ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↓ 1% · MO 8.1 hThis facility: 8 h, 1% below the Missouri average of 8.1 h (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
22,095 staff hours this quarter
See full Missouri ranking →95% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Missouri average: 92.5% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
184
Rank #20 / 288Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
184
Rank #20 / 288Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 288 nursing homes we track in Missouri for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Missouri facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #47 / 167Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Missouri for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Missouri facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #47 / 167Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 47th out of 167 nursing homes we track in Missouri for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Missouri facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
2
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #65 / 296Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 296 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #65 / 296Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 296 nursing homes we track in Missouri for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Missouri facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
67
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
70
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
89
days
About This Community
Facility TypeSkilled Nursing Facility, Residential Care Facility
IssuanceJuly 15, 2024
CountyLaclede
License Number051998, 051997
CMS Certification Number265428
Certification TypeMedicare / Medicaid
Alzheimer's / behavioral care programA branded memory-care program developed by this community's operator - a structured approach to dementia care, rather than an independent external certification.
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab is legally operated by N & R Of Lebanon South, LLC, and administered by Teresa Knight.
Corporate EntityN & R OF LEBANON SOUTH, LLC
Owner NameN & R Of Lebanon South, LLC
Skilled Nursing Facility
116 units
Residential Care Facility
68 units
Total beds
184 units
CNA Training Program
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Doctor on Staff
Pharmaceutical Services
Dietitian
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Handicapped accessible vans
Pets not allowed
Room Types
Private Room
Semi-Private / Shared Room
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Missouri, the Department of Health and Senior Services, Division of Regulation and Licensure performs the inspections and unannounced surveys required for all long-term care providers.
Since 2018 · 8 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 51 deficiencies 20 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 51 deficiencies 20 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Missouri state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2018 vs. Missouri state average
Overall vs. MO average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Missouri average:
• Total deficiencies (11% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Missouri average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (35% below)
• Total deficiencies (11% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Missouri average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (35% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | MO Average | vs. MO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 51 | 46.0 | This facility has 11% more total deficiencies than a typical Missouri nursing home (51 vs. MO avg 46).↑ 11% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 2.6 | 4.0 | This facility has 35% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Missouri nursing home (2.6 vs. MO avg 4).↓ 35% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | MO Average | vs. MO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 20 | 11.0 | This facility has had 82% more total inspections than the Missouri average (20 vs. MO avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 82% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↓ 9% · MO 6.6This facility: 6, 9% below the Missouri average of 6.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
33
Rank #154 / 274Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 154th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Missouri State average, with a ranking across all 274 MO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 9% · MO 36.1This facility: 33, 9% below the Missouri average of 36.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.5
Rank #160 / 274Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 160th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Missouri for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Missouri mean across 274 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 2% · MO 5.6This facility: 5.5, 2% below the Missouri average of 5.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
33 of 33 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MO 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 0.6 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↓ 9% · MO 1.1This facility: 1, 9% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
32
↓ 4% · MO 33.3This facility: 32, 4% below the Missouri average of 33.3 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MO 1.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Missouri average of 1.1 (among Missouri facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 16, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 7 of 33 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 16, 2026
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 06, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 23, 2025
10 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 25, 2025
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 06, 2023
11 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 05, 2021
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 33 citations
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (21%)
Quality of Life & Care
7 deficiencies (21%)
Nutrition & Dietary
5 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (15%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (12%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
27 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 6 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
MO avg $81KMissouri average: $81,235. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MO avg 1.93Missouri average: 1.93. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MO avg 0.7Missouri average: 0.7. Average among the 220 Missouri facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Missouri average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 27% · MO 2.7This facility: 2.0, 27% below the MO average of 2.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 5% · MO 2.1This facility: 2.0, 5% below the MO average of 2.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 21% · MO 9.8This facility: 11.9, 21% above the MO average of 9.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
22.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 24% · MO 17.8This facility: 22.0, 24% above the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse
4 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.7%
↑ 14% · MO 18.1This facility: 20.7, 14% above the MO average of 18.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
20.7%
↑ 14% · MO 18.1This facility: 20.7, 14% above the MO average of 18.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.1%
↑ 67% · MO 17.4This facility: 29.1, 67% above the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.1%
↑ 67% · MO 17.4This facility: 29.1, 67% above the MO average of 17.4 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.4%
↓ 8% · MO 17.8This facility: 16.4, 8% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.4%
↓ 8% · MO 17.8This facility: 16.4, 8% below the MO average of 17.8 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 48% · MO 2.3This facility: 1.2, 48% below the MO average of 2.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 48% · MO 2.3This facility: 1.2, 48% below the MO average of 2.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2%
↑ 28% · MO 4.1This facility: 5.2, 28% above the MO average of 4.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.2%
↑ 28% · MO 4.1This facility: 5.2, 28% above the MO average of 4.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
↓ 55% · MO 4.5This facility: 2.1, 55% below the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
↓ 55% · MO 4.5This facility: 2.1, 55% below the MO average of 4.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4%
↓ 55% · MO 5.3This facility: 2.4, 55% below the MO average of 5.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.4%
↓ 55% · MO 5.3This facility: 2.4, 55% below the MO average of 5.3 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
↓ 11% · MO 18.5This facility: 16.5, 11% below the MO average of 18.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
16.5%
↓ 11% · MO 18.5This facility: 16.5, 11% below the MO average of 18.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2%
↓ 27% · MO 23.5This facility: 17.2, 27% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.2%
↓ 27% · MO 23.5This facility: 17.2, 27% below the MO average of 23.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.0%
↑ 17% · MO 84.1This facility: 98.0, 17% above the MO average of 84.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.0%
↑ 17% · MO 84.1This facility: 98.0, 17% above the MO average of 84.1 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
↑ 9% · MO 90.9This facility: 98.6, 9% above the MO average of 90.9 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.6%
↑ 9% · MO 90.9This facility: 98.6, 9% above the MO average of 90.9 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.7%
↓ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 45.7, 10% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.7%
↓ 10% · US 50.6This facility: 45.7, 10% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↓ 13% · MO 2.2This facility: 1.9, 13% below the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.9%
↓ 13% · MO 2.2This facility: 1.9, 13% below the MO average of 2.2 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.5%
↑ 42% · MO 65.7This facility: 93.5, 42% above the MO average of 65.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.5%
↑ 42% · MO 65.7This facility: 93.5, 42% above the MO average of 65.7 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3%
↑ 28% · MO 63.5This facility: 81.3, 28% above the MO average of 63.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.3%
↑ 28% · MO 63.5This facility: 81.3, 28% above the MO average of 63.5 (among MO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 267 Missouri nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
0.4% operating margin
+19.7 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.2M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Missouri homes
47.4% payroll share of revenue
MO average 54.9%Rank #184 / 267Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 184th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $1.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Missouri homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MO median | Compared with MO homesRank in MO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.3M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | MO median $6.2M | Rank in MO Rank #132 / 267Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | Above MO median Higher net patient revenue than 51% of MO homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $6.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | MO median — | Rank in MO Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.0M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | MO median — | Rank in MO Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 0.4% | +19.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | MO median — | Rank in MO Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | MO median — | Rank in MO Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.2M | +$0.7M | Trend — | MO median — | Rank in MO Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Missouri homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MO median | Compared with MO homesRank in MO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.0M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | MO median $3.5M | Rank in MO Rank #158 / 267Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 158th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Below MO median Higher payroll than 41% of MO homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 47.4% | −4.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | MO median 52.9% | Rank in MO Rank #184 / 267Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 184th out of 267 nursing homes we track in Missouri for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Missouri average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Missouri that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 31% of homes | 7.5 pts under MO average The MO average is 54.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MO benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Missouri payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MO payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.4M | $7.0M | $6.4M | $5.7M | $4.1M | $4.2M | $5.1M | $6.3M |
| Operating expenses | $7.6M | $6.7M | $6.6M | $6.8M | $5.3M | $5.5M | $6.1M | $6.3M |
| Net patient income | −$1.2M | $0.2M | −$0.2M | −$1.1M | −$1.2M | −$1.3M | −$1.0M | $0.0M |
| Operating margin | −18.9% | 3.5% | −3.8% | −19.8% | −28.9% | −29.8% | −19.3% | 0.4% |
| Net income | −$1.2M | $0.3M | −$0.2M | $0.0M | −$0.7M | −$0.9M | −$0.6M | $0.2M |
| Payroll costs | $2.9M | $2.6M | $2.5M | $2.8M | $1.8M | $2.2M | $2.7M | $3.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 45.1% | 37.1% | 39.6% | 49.0% | 44.8% | 52.7% | 52.1% | 47.4% |
| Beds | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 | 186 |
| Gross revenue | $8.9M | $8.3M | $8.0M | $6.9M | $4.9M | $5.0M | $6.2M | $6.7M |
| Salaries | $2.5M | $2.3M | $2.2M | $2.5M | $1.6M | $2.0M | $2.4M | $2.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.3M |
| Contract labor | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.5M |
| Other operating costs | $4.7M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.0M | $3.5M | $3.2M | $3.4M | $3.3M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $162 | $204 | $187 | $184 | $186 | $182 | $183 | $192 |
| Cost per day | $193 | $197 | $194 | $221 | $240 | $236 | $219 | $191 |
| Average length of stay | 81.3 days | 106.7 days | 71.1 days | 77.3 days | 73.3 days | 66.7 days | 62.3 days | 88.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
208 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
27 · 13%
Medicaid
59 · 28%
Private pay & other
122 · 59%
Resident snapshot
64 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
6 · 9%
Medicaid
37 · 58%
Private pay & other
21 · 33%
Leaving
297 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
19 · 6%
Medicaid
104 · 35%
Private pay & other
174 · 59%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lebanon's city center to Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Lebanon
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MO Dept. of Health & Senior Services (DHSS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Missouri average is: 54.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab | NH HOS SNF | Lebanon | 184
Facility
184
MO AVG
110
Rank
#20 / 288 | - | - | 3.66
Facility
3.66
MO AVG
3.63
Rank
#88 / 267 | +5% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#1 / 275 | 33
Facility
33
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#154 / 274 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#160 / 274 | 1 | 70 | - |
67
Facility
67
MO AVG
50
Rank
#65 / 296 | N & R Of Lebanon South, LLC | $6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#132 / 267 | $3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#158 / 267 | 47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
54.9%
Rank
#184 / 267 | 265428 | ||||
| Lebanon North Nursing & Rehab | NH SNF | Lebanon | 180
Facility
180
MO AVG
110
Rank
#23 / 288 |
36.7%
Facility
36.7%
MO AVG
67.8%
Rank
#244 / 272 | -46% | 3.60
Facility
3.60
MO AVG
3.63
Rank
#116 / 267 | -6% | -1% | $263.7k
Facility
$263.7k
MO AVG
$86.2k
Rank
#273 / 275 | 66
Facility
66
MO AVG
36.1
Rank
#253 / 274 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
MO AVG
5.6
Rank
#36 / 274 | 12 | 66 | - |
67
Facility
67
MO AVG
50
Rank
#65 / 296 | N & R Of Lebanon North, LLC | $4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$8.0M
Rank
#205 / 267 | $3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
$4.2M
Rank
#159 / 267 | 65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MO AVG
54.9%
Rank
#43 / 267 | 265123 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MO nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Missouri
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab is located in LEBANON, Missouri.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Missouri.
Frequently Asked Questions about Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab
Who is the owner of Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab?
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab is legally operated by N & R Of Lebanon South, LLC, and administered by Teresa Knight.
Is Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab in a walkable area?
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab has a walk score of 67. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the license number of Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab?
According to MO state health department records, Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab's license number is 051998, 051997.
What is the occupancy rate at Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab?
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab's occupancy is 48.3%.
How long has Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab been in business?
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab has been operating for approximately 2 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab?
No, Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab has a no-pet policy.
Does Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Lebanon South Nursing & Rehab is registered as a for-profit in MO.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
