High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
The Ivy at Great Falls
The Ivy at Great Falls sits at 1130 17th Ave S in Great Falls, Montana, and it’s a big place. With 278 beds, it’s built to handle a lot of different people at once: someone recovering from surgery who just needs a few weeks of rehab, and someone who’s going to call this place home for a long while.
The average resident stays about 152 days, somewhere between a short rehab stint and a long-term placement. Right now the facility is running at 39% occupancy, so there’s real room here. If your family is trying to move fast, that matters; since you’re not going to end up on a waiting on a waitlist.
Getting around the neighborhood on foot is doable but limited. The Walk Score sits at 43 out of 100, somewhat walkable, so you might reach a handful of nearby spots without a car, but plan on driving for most errands or visits.
Money-wise, The Ivy works with Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, so there’s flexibility depending on your situation. Medicaid covers the largest share of new residents, 37%, and those stays tend to run long, averaging 10 to 11 months. That tells you something real: this is a place built around steady, ongoing nursing care for people settling in for a while, not just a quick stop on the way somewhere else.
Community insights.
ALM Inspection Grade Unavailable
Not publishedWe don't have enough verified data to publish an inspection grade for this facility — a missing grade reflects what we've been able to verify, not the facility's quality.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Money and staffing.
The Ivy at Great Falls’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending 2023. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Latest cost report is for the fiscal year ending 2023, older than most Montana homes. Rankings are not shown because peers report different years.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−40.7% operating margin
+2.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Montana homes
61.9% payroll share of revenue
MT average 49.9%
Payroll rose $0.8M while revenue rose $0.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2023 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2023 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Montana homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2023Trend | MT median | Compared with MT homesRank in MT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.9M | +$0.2M | Trend 20152023 | MT median $8.2M | Rank in MT Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.4M | +$0.1M | Trend 20152023 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.5M | +$0.1M | Trend 20152023 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −40.7% | +2.0 pts | Trend 20152023 | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$2.5M | +$1.5M | Trend — | MT median — | Rank in MT Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Montana homes
| Metric | FY 2023 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2023Trend | MT median | Compared with MT homesRank in MT | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.8M | +$0.8M | Trend 20152023 | MT median $4.3M | Rank in MT Not ranked | Not ranked No state rank for this year: homes are ranked only when their latest cost report is recent enough to compare. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 61.9% | +6.1 pts | Trend 20152023 | MT median 48.8% | Rank in MT Not ranked | 12.0 pts over MT average The MT average is 49.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2023 2 charts · MT benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Montana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MT payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2023 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020no report | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $15.9M | $14.9M | $14.9M | $13.2M | $13.7M | $13.1M | $10.7M | $10.9M | |
| Operating expenses | $15.3M | $14.9M | $14.8M | $15.0M | $15.9M | $13.8M | $15.3M | $15.4M | |
| Net patient income | $0.6M | $0.0M | $0.1M | −$1.8M | −$2.2M | −$0.6M | −$4.6M | −$4.5M | |
| Operating margin | 3.8% | 0.0% | 0.7% | −13.5% | −15.9% | −4.7% | −42.7% | −40.7% | |
| Net income | $1.2M | $0.6M | $0.6M | −$1.2M | −$1.6M | $3.3M | −$4.1M | −$2.5M | |
| Payroll costs | $6.6M | $6.8M | $6.7M | $6.4M | $6.4M | $6.3M | $6.0M | $6.8M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 41.7% | 45.3% | 44.8% | 48.2% | 46.9% | 47.8% | 55.8% | 61.9% | |
| Beds | 278 | 278 | 278 | 278 | 278 | 278 | 278 | 278 | |
| Gross revenue | $24.8M | $23.0M | $23.5M | $21.0M | $20.6M | $14.1M | $10.8M | $11.3M | |
| Salaries | $5.6M | $5.8M | $5.7M | $5.5M | $5.5M | $5.4M | $5.1M | $5.7M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | $0.9M | $3.1M | $2.2M | |
| Other operating costs | $8.6M | $8.2M | $8.1M | $8.6M | $9.5M | $7.5M | $9.3M | $8.6M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $255 | $263 | $255 | $255 | $262 | $281 | $279 | $276 | |
| Cost per day | $245 | $263 | $253 | $290 | $304 | $294 | $398 | $388 | |
| Average length of stay | 101.4 days | 112.7 days | 141.0 days | 155.9 days | 142.3 days | 148.2 days | 213.6 days | 152.3 days |
Showing 2023–2021 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near The Ivy at Great Falls
1.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Great Falls's city center to The Ivy at Great Falls's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to The Ivy at Great Falls
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Great Falls
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 49.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindred Transitional Care & Rehab – Park Place | NH SNF | Great Falls | 189
Facility
189
MT AVG
97
Rank
#3 / 37 |
82.4%
Facility
82.4%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#10 / 25 | +15% | 3.93
Facility
3.93
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#13 / 29 | +13% | -18% | $130.3k
Facility
$130.3k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#26 / 30 | 36
Facility
36
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#18 / 30 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#9 / 30 | 5 | 156 | - |
46
Facility
46
MT AVG
47
Rank
#19 / 40 | Reid Crickmore | $16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#1 / 26 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#1 / 26 | 47%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#20 / 26 | 275030 | ||||
| Benefis Extended Care Center | NH MC | Great Falls | 64
Facility
64
MT AVG
97
Rank
#25 / 37 |
93.4%
Facility
93.4%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#4 / 25 | +30% | 4.95
Facility
4.95
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#7 / 29 | -10% | +4% | $99.1k
Facility
$99.1k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#24 / 30 | 40
Facility
40
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#19 / 30 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#17 / 30 | 3 | 60 | - |
58
Facility
58
MT AVG
47
Rank
#11 / 40 | - | - | - | - | 275012 | ||||
| The Ivy at Great Falls | - | NH AL IL MC | Great Falls | 278
Facility
278
MT AVG
97
Rank
#1 / 37 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
43
Facility
43
MT AVG
47
Rank
#23 / 40 | $10.9M*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $6.8M*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 61.9%*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 275026 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Montana
The Ivy at Great Falls is located in Great Falls, Montana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Ivy at Great Falls
Is The Ivy at Great Falls in a walkable area?
The Ivy at Great Falls has a walk score of 43. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at The Ivy at Great Falls?
The Ivy at Great Falls's occupancy is 37.3%.
Are pets allowed at The Ivy at Great Falls?
No, The Ivy at Great Falls has a no-pet policy.
How many beds does The Ivy at Great Falls have?
The Ivy at Great Falls has 278 beds.
Are there photos of The Ivy at Great Falls?
Yes — there are 4 photos of The Ivy at Great Falls in the photo gallery on this page.
What levels of care does The Ivy at Great Falls provide?
The Ivy at Great Falls offers Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Memory Care.
What is the address of The Ivy at Great Falls?
The Ivy at Great Falls is located at 1130 17Th Ave S, Great Falls, MT 59405.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
The Ivy at Great Falls is permanently closed
This community stopped operating and is no longer accepting residents. We've kept its profile online so you can still review its information, but we can't connect you with its staff or pricing.
See 5 open communities in Great Falls



