Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
164
162 employees · 2 contractors · 37 on an average day Benefis Extended Care Center
Nursing Home & Memory Care · Great Falls, MT
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 77 / 100, a C+ — 6 points below the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 77 / 100, a C+ — 6 points below the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Benefis Extended Care Center
Nursing Home & Memory Care · Great Falls, MT
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 77 / 100, a C+ — 6 points below the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 77 / 100, a C+ — 6 points below the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Benefis Extended Care Center is situated in Great Falls, Montana, and is dedicated to providing exceptional care and support to senior residents in need of skilled nursing services.
They have skilled nurses, therapists, and licensed care professionals who are committed to guiding each resident through a personalized therapy plan, helping them regain their independence. Whether recovering from a hospital visit or requiring ongoing medical support, Benefis Extended Care Center is devoted to assisting individuals in achieving their personal goals and facilitating a speedy recovery.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 57m
This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Montana for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 57mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +47% above Montana average
1 of 6 metrics below Montana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 23 total: 21 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
23 staff · 9-hour shifts
1h 22m
↑ 47% · MT 56mThis facility: 1h 22m per resident per day, 47% above the Montana average of 56m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 23 total: 21 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
23 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 7.9-hour shifts
42m
↑ 40% · MT 30mThis facility: 42m per resident per day, 40% above the Montana average of 30m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 7.9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 80 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
80 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
2h 53m
↑ 14% · MT 2h 32mThis facility: 2h 53m per resident per day, 14% above the Montana average of 2h 32m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 80 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
80 staff · 8.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
1m
↓ 69% · MT 4mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 69% below the Montana average of 4m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 13 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
13 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 23m
↑ 26% · MT 3h 29mThis facility: 4h 23m per resident per day, 26% above the Montana average of 3h 29m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
49m
↑ 20% · MT 41mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 20% above the Montana average of 41m (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
164
162 employees · 2 contractors · 37 on an average day
164 total staff / 60 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.73 : 1
↑ 57% · MT 1.74This facility: 2.73 staff per resident, 57% above the Montana average of 1.74 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
164 staff ÷ 60 residents
See full Montana ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
↓ 6% · MT 8.6 hThis facility: 8.1 h, 6% below the Montana average of 8.6 h (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
27,513 staff hours this quarter
See full Montana ranking →98% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Montana average: 89.5% · Contractors this quarter: Registered Nurse (2)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
64
Rank #25 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
64
Rank #25 / 37Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Montana for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Montana facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #11 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #11 / 40Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Montana for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Montana facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
58
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #4 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #4 / 25Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 25 nursing homes we track in Montana for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Montana average, with its Statewide rank out of 25. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
93.4%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 64 beds.
Higher than the Montana average: 71.9%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
60
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
Resident Council
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
77 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
6 points below the Montana average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
123 severity-weighted points (40 deficiencies) · 15% higher than the typical CMS-certified MT facility (median: 107)
Enforcement
Concern
$99,129 in fines · 3 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
20 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified MT facility (median: 34)
Total health inspections
7
↑ 27% · MT 5.5This facility: 7, 27% above the Montana average of 5.5 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
40
Rank #19 / 30Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Montana State average, with a ranking across all 30 MT facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 29% · MT 31This facility: 40, 29% above the Montana average of 31 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.71
Rank #17 / 30Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Montana mean across 30 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 1% · MT 5.66This facility: 5.71, 1% above the Montana average of 5.66 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
40 of 40 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MT 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Montana average of 0.3 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 58% · MT 1.9This facility: 3, 58% above the Montana average of 1.9 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
35
↑ 25% · MT 28.1This facility: 35, 25% above the Montana average of 28.1 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 186% · MT 0.7This facility: 2, 186% above the Montana average of 0.7 (among Montana facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Dec 16, 2025 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 19 of 40 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Dec 16, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 23, 2025
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 19, 2025
12 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 31, 2024
2 citations
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 09, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 29, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 23, 2023
17 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 40 citations
Quality of Life & Care
19 deficiencies (48%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (10%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (5%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (5%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
29 of 40 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 11 of 40 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 23, 2025 · $36,377 civil money penalty
Oct 23, 2025 · $36,377 civil money penalty
Jul 29, 2024 · $62,752 civil money penalty
Jul 29, 2024 · 64-day payment denial
Total fines
$99,129
↑ 23% · MT $81KThis facility: $99,129, 23% above the Montana average of $80,691. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #24 / 30Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 30 nursing homes we track in Montana for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Montana average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 30 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Montana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↓ 8% · MT 2.16This facility: 2, 8% below the Montana average of 2.16. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
64 days
↑ 207% · MT 0.33This facility: 1, 207% above the Montana average of 0.33. Average among the 43 Montana facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Oct 23, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$36,377
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$36,377
Jul 29, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$62,752
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$62,752
Jul 29, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
64 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
64 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$99,129
Montana average
$80,691
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Montana and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Montana average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.2
Score · lower is better
↑ 34% · MT 10.6This facility: 14.2, 34% above the MT average of 10.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
28.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 44% · MT 20.1This facility: 28.9, 44% above the MT average of 20.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 4 near MT average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
33.2%
↑ 77% · MT 18.7This facility: 33.2, 77% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
33.2%
↑ 77% · MT 18.7This facility: 33.2, 77% above the MT average of 18.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.5%
↑ 1% · MT 17.2This facility: 17.5, 1% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.5%
↑ 1% · MT 17.2This facility: 17.5, 1% above the MT average of 17.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.9%
↑ 49% · MT 24.1This facility: 35.9, 49% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
35.9%
↑ 49% · MT 24.1This facility: 35.9, 49% above the MT average of 24.1 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
↑ 8% · MT 2.9This facility: 3.1, 8% above the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
↑ 8% · MT 2.9This facility: 3.1, 8% above the MT average of 2.9 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6%
↑ 71% · MT 4.4This facility: 7.6, 71% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.6%
↑ 71% · MT 4.4This facility: 7.6, 71% above the MT average of 4.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
↓ 37% · MT 6.3This facility: 4.0, 37% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.0%
↓ 37% · MT 6.3This facility: 4.0, 37% below the MT average of 6.3 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
↑ 43% · MT 6.2This facility: 8.8, 43% above the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
↑ 43% · MT 6.2This facility: 8.8, 43% above the MT average of 6.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
↓ 9% · MT 5.6This facility: 5.1, 9% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.1%
↓ 9% · MT 5.6This facility: 5.1, 9% below the MT average of 5.6 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.1%
↑ 3% · MT 20.4This facility: 21.1, 3% above the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.1%
↑ 3% · MT 20.4This facility: 21.1, 3% above the MT average of 20.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 3% · MT 96.5This facility: 99.6, 3% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.6%
↑ 3% · MT 96.5This facility: 99.6, 3% above the MT average of 96.5 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
≈ 0% · MT 93.7This facility: 93.8, level with the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
≈ 0% · MT 93.7This facility: 93.8, level with the MT average of 93.7 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.77
↓ 39% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.77, 39% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.77
↓ 39% · MT 1.27This facility: 0.77, 39% below the MT average of 1.27 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.59
↓ 73% · MT 2.17This facility: 0.59, 73% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.59
↓ 73% · MT 2.17This facility: 0.59, 73% below the MT average of 2.17 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
61.7%
↑ 15% · US 53.7This facility: 61.7, 15% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
61.7%
↑ 15% · US 53.7This facility: 61.7, 15% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.5%
↑ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 54.5, 8% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
54.5%
↑ 8% · US 50.6This facility: 54.5, 8% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 1% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 1% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.8%
↑ 1% · US 0.8This facility: 0.8, 1% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 1.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · MT 1.2This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MT average of 1.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.0%
↑ 12% · MT 81.2This facility: 91.0, 12% above the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.0%
↑ 12% · MT 81.2This facility: 91.0, 12% above the MT average of 81.2 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 11% · MT 73.8This facility: 81.8, 11% above the MT average of 73.8 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.8%
↑ 11% · MT 73.8This facility: 81.8, 11% above the MT average of 73.8 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.6%
↑ 47% · MT 19.4This facility: 28.6, 47% above the MT average of 19.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.6%
↑ 47% · MT 19.4This facility: 28.6, 47% above the MT average of 19.4 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.3%
↓ 51% · MT 15.0This facility: 7.3, 51% below the MT average of 15.0 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.3%
↓ 51% · MT 15.0This facility: 7.3, 51% below the MT average of 15.0 (among MT facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Resident snapshot
60 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
2 · 3%
Medicaid
39 · 65%
Private pay & other
19 · 32%
Places of interest near Benefis Extended Care Center
2.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Great Falls's city center to Benefis Extended Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Benefis Extended Care Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Great Falls
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MT Dept. of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Montana average is: 49.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kindred Transitional Care & Rehab – Park Place | NH SNF | Great Falls | 189
Facility
189
MT AVG
97
Rank
#3 / 37 | B- |
82.4%
Facility
82.4%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#10 / 25 | +15% | 3.93
Facility
3.93
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#13 / 29 | +13% | -18% | $130.3k
Facility
$130.3k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#26 / 30 | 36
Facility
36
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#18 / 30 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#9 / 30 | 5 | 156 | - |
46
Facility
46
MT AVG
47
Rank
#19 / 40 | Reid Crickmore | $16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$8.1M
Rank
#1 / 26 | $7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
$4.0M
Rank
#1 / 26 | 47%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
MT AVG
49.9%
Rank
#20 / 26 | 275030 | ||||
| Benefis Extended Care Center | NH MC | Great Falls | 64
Facility
64
MT AVG
97
Rank
#25 / 37 | C+ |
93.4%
Facility
93.4%
MT AVG
71.9%
Rank
#4 / 25 | +30% | 4.95
Facility
4.95
MT AVG
4.78
Rank
#7 / 29 | -10% | +4% | $99.1k
Facility
$99.1k
MT AVG
$80.5k
Rank
#24 / 30 | 40
Facility
40
MT AVG
31.0
Rank
#19 / 30 | 5.7
Facility
5.7
MT AVG
5.7
Rank
#17 / 30 | 3 | 60 | - |
58
Facility
58
MT AVG
47
Rank
#11 / 40 | - | - | - | - | 275012 | ||||
| The Ivy at Great Falls | - | NH AL IL MC | Great Falls | 278
Facility
278
MT AVG
97
Rank
#1 / 37 | ? | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
43
Facility
43
MT AVG
47
Rank
#23 / 40 | $10.9M*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $6.8M*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 61.9%*Fiscal year ending 08/2023These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 275026 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other MT nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Montana
Benefis Extended Care Center is located in Great Falls, Montana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Montana.
Frequently Asked Questions about Benefis Extended Care Center
Is Benefis Extended Care Center in a walkable area?
Benefis Extended Care Center has a walk score of 58. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Benefis Extended Care Center?
Benefis Extended Care Center's occupancy is 93.4%.
Are pets allowed at Benefis Extended Care Center?
No, Benefis Extended Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Does Benefis Extended Care Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Benefis Extended Care Center is registered as a non-profit.
What is the overall rating for Benefis Extended Care Center?
Benefis Extended Care Center received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Benefis Extended Care Center have?
Benefis Extended Care Center has 64 beds.
Are there photos of Benefis Extended Care Center?
Yes — there are 3 photos of Benefis Extended Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
