Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
136
131 employees · 5 contractors · 55 on an average day Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Bowling Green, VA
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — in line with the Virginia average for CMS-certified facilities (78/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — in line with the Virginia average for CMS-certified facilities (78/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Bowling Green, VA
ALM Inspection Grade
C+
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — in line with the Virginia average for CMS-certified facilities (78/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 78 / 100, a C+ — in line with the Virginia average for CMS-certified facilities (78/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation in Bowling Green, VA, does two things, nursing home care and skilled nursing. A resident under either designation needs the kind of care a nurse’s license covers.
Two programs carry names of their own, Recovery from Planned Surgeries and Recovery from Accidents & Illnesses. Rehabilitation services belong to that same list, for a resident working back from surgery, an accident, or an illness. Medicare and private pay are accepted here.
A fitness center and dining are the two recorded amenities. Nursing across the 121 beds averages 2 hours and 59 minutes per resident per day.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 59m
This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Georgia for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
2h 59mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +151% above Georgia average
5 of 6 metrics below Georgia average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.6-hour shifts
28m
↓ 8% · GA 30mThis facility: 28m per resident per day, 8% below the Georgia average of 30m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.6-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 23 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
23 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
52m
↓ 6% · GA 55mThis facility: 52m per resident per day, 6% below the Georgia average of 55m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 23 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
23 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 66 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
66 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
1h 39m
↓ 23% · GA 2h 9mThis facility: 1h 39m per resident per day, 23% below the Georgia average of 2h 9m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 66 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
66 staff · 9.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
9m
↑ 151% · GA 3mThis facility: 9m per resident per day, 151% above the Georgia average of 3m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 35m
↓ 16% · GA 3h 6mThis facility: 2h 35m per resident per day, 16% below the Georgia average of 3h 6m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
17m
↓ 16% · GA 21mThis facility: 17m per resident per day, 16% below the Georgia average of 21m (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
136
131 employees · 5 contractors · 55 on an average day
136 total staff / 120 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.13 : 1
↓ 21% · GA 1.43This facility: 1.13 staff per resident, 21% below the Georgia average of 1.43 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
136 staff ÷ 120 residents
See full Georgia ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.1 h
↑ 10% · GA 8.3 hThis facility: 9.1 h, 10% above the Georgia average of 8.3 h (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
45,765 staff hours this quarter
See full Georgia ranking →98.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Georgia average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (2), Clinical Nurse Specialist (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #35 / 74Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 74 nursing homes we track in Virginia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Virginia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #35 / 74Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 74 nursing homes we track in Virginia for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Virginia facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Occupancy rate
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #6 / 60Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Virginia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Virginia average, with its Statewide rank out of 60. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #6 / 60Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Virginia for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Virginia average, with its Statewide rank out of 60. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
95.6%
This home is often near full
Based on residents per day and 120 beds.
Higher than the Georgia average: 83.6%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
115
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
128
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Fitness Center
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
78 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
In line with the Georgia average for CMS-certified facilities (78/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
94 severity-weighted points (53 citations) · 19% higher than the typical CMS-certified VA facility (median: 79)
Enforcement
Concern
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified VA facility (median: 0) · $8,278 in fines
Persistence
Typical
40 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified VA facility (median: 41)
Total health inspections
5
↑ 43% · GA 3.5This facility: 5, 43% above the Georgia average of 3.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
53
Rank #58 / 68Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Virginia State average, with a ranking across all 68 VA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 214% · GA 16.9This facility: 53, 214% above the Georgia average of 16.9 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
10.6
Rank #45 / 68Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Virginia mean across 68 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 126% · GA 4.7This facility: 10.6, 126% above the Georgia average of 4.7 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
53 of 53 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · GA 0.6This facility: 0, 100% below the Georgia average of 0.6 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
1
↑ 100% · GA 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Georgia average of 0.5 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
51
↑ 225% · GA 15.7This facility: 51, 225% above the Georgia average of 15.7 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 900% · GA 0.1This facility: 1, 900% above the Georgia average of 0.1 (among Georgia facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 29, 2025 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 15 of 53 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 29, 2025
5 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 06, 2025
5 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 28, 2024
9 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 21, 2022
10 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 13, 2020
21 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 53 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 53 citations
Quality of Life & Care
15 deficiencies (28%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
9 deficiencies (17%)
Nutrition & Dietary
9 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (13%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
3 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
41 of 53 citations resulted from standard inspections; 11 of 53 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 53 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: May 29, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
May 29, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,278
↓ 77% · GA $35KThis facility: $8,278, 77% below the Georgia average of $35,339. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #58 / 71Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 71 nursing homes we track in Virginia for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Virginia average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 71 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 38% · GA 1.6This facility: 1, 38% below the Georgia average of 1.6. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
GA avg 0.35Georgia average: 0.35. Average among the 124 Georgia facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
May 29, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,278
Georgia average
$35,339
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Georgia and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Georgia average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 22% · GA 8.3This facility: 6.5, 22% below the GA average of 8.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
16.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 1% · GA 16.7This facility: 16.8, 1% above the GA average of 16.7 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 3 worse, 2 near GA average
3 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near GA average
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.0%
↓ 11% · GA 14.5This facility: 13.0, 11% below the GA average of 14.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.0%
↓ 11% · GA 14.5This facility: 13.0, 11% below the GA average of 14.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
↓ 2% · GA 14.2This facility: 13.9, 2% below the GA average of 14.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
↓ 2% · GA 14.2This facility: 13.9, 2% below the GA average of 14.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↑ 10% · GA 21.3This facility: 23.5, 10% above the GA average of 21.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.5%
↑ 10% · GA 21.3This facility: 23.5, 10% above the GA average of 21.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 83% · GA 1.6This facility: 0.3, 83% below the GA average of 1.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.3%
↓ 83% · GA 1.6This facility: 0.3, 83% below the GA average of 1.6 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 46% · GA 3.5This facility: 1.9, 46% below the GA average of 3.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 46% · GA 3.5This facility: 1.9, 46% below the GA average of 3.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6%
↓ 64% · GA 4.4This facility: 1.6, 64% below the GA average of 4.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.6%
↓ 64% · GA 4.4This facility: 1.6, 64% below the GA average of 4.4 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 62% · GA 5.3This facility: 2.0, 62% below the GA average of 5.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 62% · GA 5.3This facility: 2.0, 62% below the GA average of 5.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
36.2%
↑ 77% · GA 20.5This facility: 36.2, 77% above the GA average of 20.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
36.2%
↑ 77% · GA 20.5This facility: 36.2, 77% above the GA average of 20.5 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3%
↓ 34% · GA 14.2This facility: 9.3, 34% below the GA average of 14.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3%
↓ 34% · GA 14.2This facility: 9.3, 34% below the GA average of 14.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.8%
↓ 3% · GA 91.2This facility: 88.8, 3% below the GA average of 91.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
88.8%
↓ 3% · GA 91.2This facility: 88.8, 3% below the GA average of 91.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
↓ 6% · GA 93.3This facility: 87.5, 6% below the GA average of 93.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
↓ 6% · GA 93.3This facility: 87.5, 6% below the GA average of 93.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 80% · GA 1.3This facility: 0.3, 80% below the GA average of 1.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 80% · GA 1.3This facility: 0.3, 80% below the GA average of 1.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.2%
≈ 0% · GA 74.2This facility: 74.2, level with the GA average of 74.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.2%
≈ 0% · GA 74.2This facility: 74.2, level with the GA average of 74.2 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.4%
↑ 14% · GA 73.3This facility: 83.4, 14% above the GA average of 73.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.4%
↑ 14% · GA 73.3This facility: 83.4, 14% above the GA average of 73.3 (among GA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 68 Georgia nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
16.3% operating margin
+17.1 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $3.0M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Georgia homes
41.2% payroll share of revenue
VA average 64.1%Rank #57 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Virginia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.6M while revenue rose $1.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Georgia homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | VA median | Compared with VA homesRank in VA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $17.6M | +$1.4M | Trend 20162025 | VA median $21.0M | Rank in VA Rank #39 / 68Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Virginia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | Below VA median Higher net patient revenue than 43% of VA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.7M | −$1.6M | Trend 20162025 | VA median $23.7M | Rank in VA Rank #50 / 68Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Virginia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 27% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $2.9M | +$3.0M | Trend 20162025 | VA median −$0.1M | Rank in VA Rank #7 / 68Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Virginia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 16.3% | +17.1 pts | Trend 20162025 | VA median −0.4% | Rank in VA Rank #3 / 68Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Virginia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 97% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.1M | — | Trend — | VA median $0.6M | Rank in VA Rank #42 / 67Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 42nd out of 67 nursing homes we track in Virginia for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Virginia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $3.0M | +$2.9M | Trend — | VA median $1.7M | Rank in VA Rank #18 / 68Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Virginia homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Georgia homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | VA median | Compared with VA homesRank in VA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.2M | −$0.6M | Trend 20162025 | VA median $9.6M | Rank in VA Rank #49 / 68Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Virginia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Below VA median Higher payroll than 28% of VA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 41.2% | −7.2 pts | Trend 20162025 | VA median 49.2% | Rank in VA Rank #57 / 68Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 57th out of 68 nursing homes we track in Virginia for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Virginia average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Virginia that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 16% of homes | 22.9 pts under VA average The VA average is 64.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2025 2 charts · VA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Georgia payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin VA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021no report | 2022no report | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $10.0M | $9.7M | $9.9M | $10.3M | $10.8M | $14.2M | $16.2M | $17.6M | ||
| Operating expenses | $9.1M | $9.3M | $9.5M | $9.2M | $9.6M | $13.1M | $16.3M | $14.7M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.9M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.2M | −$0.1M | $2.9M | ||
| Operating margin | 8.8% | 4.5% | 4.1% | 11.3% | 11.1% | 8.1% | −0.8% | 16.3% | ||
| Net income | $0.9M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.6M | $0.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Payroll costs | $5.9M | $6.0M | $6.2M | $6.1M | $6.4M | $5.9M | $7.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.9% | 61.5% | 62.8% | 58.5% | 59.1% | 41.8% | 48.4% | 41.2% | ||
| Beds | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | ||
| Gross revenue | $15.1M | $14.8M | $15.3M | $15.0M | $14.9M | $18.4M | $19.6M | $19.8M | ||
| Salaries | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.4M | $5.2M | $5.5M | $5.3M | $7.0M | $6.4M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.8M | ||
| Contract labor | $0.0M | — | — | $0.1M | $0.0M | $0.8M | $0.1M | $0.0M | ||
| Other operating costs | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $3.2M | $7.1M | $8.5M | $7.5M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $242 | $244 | $250 | $253 | $267 | $352 | $392 | $431 | ||
| Cost per day | $220 | $233 | $240 | $224 | $237 | $323 | $395 | $361 | ||
| Average length of stay | 136.4 days | 114.0 days | 105.9 days | 104.0 days | 103.8 days | 101.2 days | 134.3 days | 128.2 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
318 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
37 · 12%
Medicaid
247 · 78%
Private pay & other
34 · 11%
Resident snapshot
120 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
120 · 100%
Leaving
318 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
37 · 12%
Medicaid
247 · 78%
Private pay & other
34 · 11%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation
0.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bowling Green's city center to Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Macon
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the GA Dept. of Community Health (DCH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Virginia average is: 64.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cherry Blossom Health & Rehabilitation | NH HOS | Macon | 82
Facility
82
GA AVG
113
Rank
#147 / 206 | B+ |
68.9%
Facility
68.9%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#143 / 161 | -18% | 3.48
Facility
3.48
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#74 / 169 | -15% | -3% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 21
Facility
21
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#108 / 170 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#140 / 170 | - | 57 | A+ |
3
Facility
3
GA AVG
44
Rank
#201 / 210 | Ryan Lawson | $6.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#139 / 164 | $3.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#128 / 164 | 61.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
61.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#32 / 164 | 115652 | ||||
| Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation | NH SNF | Bowling Green | 120 | C+ | 95.6% | +21% | 2.98 | 0% | -21% | $8.3k | 53 | 10.6 | 1 | 115 | - | - | Bowling Green Holdings I LLC | $17.6MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 06/2025 | 41.2%Fiscal year ending 06/2025 | 495297 | ||||
| Atrium Health Navicent Carlyle Place | NH AL IL MC SNF | Macon | 40
Facility
40
GA AVG
113
Rank
#195 / 206 | D+ |
80.8%
Facility
80.8%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#112 / 161 | -3% | 5.17
Facility
5.17
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#10 / 169 | -26% | +45% | $105.5k
Facility
$105.5k
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#167 / 172 | 14
Facility
14
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#70 / 170 | 3.5
Facility
3.5
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#45 / 170 | 5 | 32 | - |
6
Facility
6
GA AVG
44
Rank
#195 / 210 | David Biek | $2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#162 / 164 | $10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#15 / 164 | 394.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
394.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#1 / 164 | 115680 | ||||
| Zebulon Park Health and Rehabilitation | NH | Macon | 66
Facility
66
GA AVG
113
Rank
#169 / 206 | A- |
95.9%
Facility
95.9%
GA AVG
83.6%
Rank
#13 / 161 | +15% | 3.79
Facility
3.79
GA AVG
3.58
Rank
#43 / 169 | +51% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
GA AVG
$40.0k
Rank
#1 / 172 | 4
Facility
4
GA AVG
16.9
Rank
#9 / 170 | 1.3
Facility
1.3
GA AVG
4.7
Rank
#6 / 170 | - | 63 | - |
23
Facility
23
GA AVG
44
Rank
#164 / 210 | Madison Sapp | $7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$7.3MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$13.5M
Rank
#122 / 164 | $4.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$4.0MFiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
$6.0M
Rank
#122 / 164 | 54.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
54.5%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
GA AVG
56.1%
Rank
#62 / 164 | 115295 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other GA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Georgia
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation is located in Bowling Green, Georgia.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Georgia.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What is the occupancy rate at Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation's occupancy is 95.6%.
02 Are pets allowed at Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation?
No, Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation has a no-pet policy.
03 Does Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation is registered as a for-profit.
04 What is the overall rating for Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
05 How many beds does Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation have?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation has 120 beds.
06 What levels of care does Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation provide?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation offers Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing.
07 What is the address of Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation?
Bolingreen Health & Rehabilitation is located at 120 Anderson Ave, Bowling Green, VA 22427.
Updated on
