Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
78 employees · 24 contractors · 33 on an average day Brookdale Greenwood Village
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Greenwood Village, CO
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Brookdale Greenwood Village
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Greenwood Village, CO
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Brookdale Greenwood Village accepts Medicare and private pay.
Found in the charming Greenwood Village, Colorado, Brookdale Greenwood Village offers an exceptional senior living experience with a focus on luxury and care. Nestled just south of Denver, this community enjoys convenient access to Highway 87 and boasts over 300 acres of parks and open space, providing a serene and scenic environment for residents. They are most known as a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that caters to a variety of needs with independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing all available on one campus.
Their seamless integration ensures that residents can remain in the same community even if their care requirements change over time. Brookdale Greenwood Village is designed to help residents live their best lives, offering a range of amenities that promote both comfort and engagement. The beautifully landscaped grounds feature courtyards and gardens, while the interiors include pet-friendly apartments, a fitness center, a beauty/barber shop, and private dining rooms. Whether it’s engaging in new hobbies, exploring the surrounding parks, or simply enjoying the tranquil environment, Brookdale Greenwood Village is the perfect place to call home.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 193 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 33m
This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 193 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 33mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +164% above Colorado average
1 of 6 metrics below Colorado average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
1h 19m
↑ 58% · CO 50mThis facility: 1h 19m per resident per day, 58% above the Colorado average of 50m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 10-hour shifts
1h 8m
↑ 66% · CO 41mThis facility: 1h 8m per resident per day, 66% above the Colorado average of 41m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
2h 6m
↓ 5% · CO 2h 12mThis facility: 2h 6m per resident per day, 5% below the Colorado average of 2h 12m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
13m
↑ 164% · CO 5mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 164% above the Colorado average of 5m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 43m
↑ 14% · CO 3h 16mThis facility: 3h 43m per resident per day, 14% above the Colorado average of 3h 16m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
49m
↑ 35% · CO 36mThis facility: 49m per resident per day, 35% above the Colorado average of 36m (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
78 employees · 24 contractors · 33 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.6 h
↑ 2% · CO 8.4 hThis facility: 8.6 h, 2% above the Colorado average of 8.4 h (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
25,928 staff hours this quarter
See full Colorado ranking →89.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Colorado average: 92.5% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (8), Physical Therapy Assistant (6), Occupational Therapy Assistant (4), Qualified Social Worker (2), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
90
Rank #109 / 212Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 212 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
90
Rank #109 / 212Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 109th out of 212 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #44 / 49Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 49 nursing homes we track in Colorado for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Colorado facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #44 / 49Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 49 nursing homes we track in Colorado for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Colorado facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
12
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #83 / 232Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 232 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #83 / 232Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 83rd out of 232 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
71
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #144 / 149Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 144th out of 149 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 149. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #144 / 149Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 144th out of 149 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 149. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
52.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 47.4 residents and 90 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Colorado average: 80.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
35
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$4,575/Month
StatusActive
Clare Bridge® Memory Care — Brookdale Senior LivingBrookdale Senior Living's branded memory-care program: a structured daily flow of cognitive, physical and social programming for residents with dementia. An operator-developed program, not an external certification.
Brookdale Greenwood Village is administered by Tabetha Houston.
OwnerArc Greenwood Village, Inc.
Wheelchair Accessible
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Concierge
Housekeeping
Pets Allowed
Linen ServiceYes
Utilities IncludedYes
Fitness Center
Wi-Fi
Beauty Salon
Game Room
Library
Movie Theater
Walking Paths
Courtyard
Garden
Bar
Sun Room
Bistro
Café
General Store
Fireside Living Rooms
Landscaped Porches and Patios
Emergency Call System
Activities
Arts and Crafts
Yoga Classes
Book Club
Outings To Local Museums
Signature ProgramsBrookdale HealthPlus®
Touring HoursMon - Fri: 8am - 9pm; Sat: 9am - 5:30pm
Chapel
Religious AffiliationYes
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Brookdale Greenwood Village.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Brookdale Greenwood Village.- Bistro / café on site.
Building Type3-story
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
Semi-Private
Private
Two inspection records, one home. Colorado inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Colorado, the Department of Public Health and Environment, Health Facilities Division is the regulatory body that performs unannounced surveys and publishes facility inspection findings.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Colorado state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. CO average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Colorado average:
• Total deficiencies (153% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (23% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (153% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (23% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | CO Average | vs. CO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 43 | 17.0 | This facility has 153% more total deficiencies than a typical Colorado nursing home (43 vs. CO avg 17).↑ 153% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.6 | 1.3 | This facility has 23% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Colorado nursing home (1.6 vs. CO avg 1.3).↑ 23% worse |
Deficiency breakdown
Per-category split of the 43 deficiencies recorded across all inspections. Counts are compared against the Colorado state average for each category. A green dot means this facility is below the state average for that category; an amber dot means it is above.
Per-category split of the 43 deficiencies recorded across all inspections. Counts are compared against the Colorado state average for each category. A green dot means this facility is below the state average for that category; an amber dot means it is above.
0
Immediate jeopardy
CO avg: 0.0
0
Actual harm
CO avg: 0.3
24
Potential harm
CO avg: 6.0
1
Minor
CO avg: 8.1
18
Unclassified
CO avg: 2.8
Inspections
| This Facility | CO Average | vs. CO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 27 | 12.0 | This facility has had 125% more total inspections than the Colorado average (27 vs. CO avg 12). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 125% more |
|
Reported occurrences
Serious events a facility is required by Colorado law to report to the state, including abuse, neglect, deaths, brain or spinal injuries, burns, diverted drugs, and missing residents. Occurrences are self-reported and separate from inspection findings, so a higher count can reflect more diligent reporting.
| 10 | 15.7 | This facility has had 36% fewer reported occurrences than the Colorado average (10 vs. CO avg 15.7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 36% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
5
≈ 0% · CO 5This facility: 5, level with the Colorado average of 5 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
32
Rank #140 / 195Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 140th out of 195 nursing homes we track in Colorado for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Colorado State average, with a ranking across all 195 CO facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 27% · CO 25.1This facility: 32, 27% above the Colorado average of 25.1 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.4
Rank #147 / 195Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 195 nursing homes we track in Colorado for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Colorado mean across 195 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 27% · CO 5.04This facility: 6.4, 27% above the Colorado average of 5.04 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
32 of 32 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CO 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Colorado average of 0.4 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 5% · CO 1.9This facility: 2, 5% above the Colorado average of 1.9 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
29
↑ 28% · CO 22.7This facility: 29, 28% above the Colorado average of 22.7 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 400% · CO 0.2This facility: 1, 400% above the Colorado average of 0.2 (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 09, 2026 · 10 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 12 of 32 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 09, 2026
10 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 01, 2025
4 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 28, 2024
14 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 30, 2024
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 21, 2022
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 32 citations
Quality of Life & Care
12 deficiencies (38%)
Infection Control
6 deficiencies (19%)
Nutrition & Dietary
5 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Rights
4 deficiencies (13%)
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (9%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
26 of 32 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 32 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 32 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Apr 9, 2026 · $16,350 civil money penalty
Apr 9, 2026 · $16,350 civil money penalty
Apr 9, 2026 · $16,350 civil money penalty
Total fines
$32,700
↓ 10% · CO $36KThis facility: $32,700, 10% below the Colorado average of $36,171. Average among the 126 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #151 / 196Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 196 nursing homes we track in Colorado for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Colorado average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 196 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 7% · CO 1.87This facility: 2, 7% above the Colorado average of 1.87. Average among the 126 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CO avg 0.19Colorado average: 0.19. Average among the 126 Colorado facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Apr 9, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,350
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,350
Apr 9, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,350
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$16,350Fine amount comparison
This facility
$32,700
Colorado average
$36,171
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Colorado and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Colorado average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 55% · CO 7.2This facility: 3.2, 55% below the CO average of 7.2 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
8.8
Score · lower is better
↓ 42% · CO 15.1This facility: 8.8, 42% below the CO average of 15.1 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 7 better, 3 worse
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
↓ 49% · CO 12.8This facility: 6.6, 49% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.6%
↓ 49% · CO 12.8This facility: 6.6, 49% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.0%
↓ 47% · CO 20.6This facility: 11.0, 47% below the CO average of 20.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.0%
↓ 47% · CO 20.6This facility: 11.0, 47% below the CO average of 20.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
↑ 41% · CO 1.4This facility: 1.9, 41% above the CO average of 1.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
↑ 41% · CO 1.4This facility: 1.9, 41% above the CO average of 1.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 43% · CO 3.4This facility: 1.9, 43% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.9%
↓ 43% · CO 3.4This facility: 1.9, 43% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
↓ 5% · CO 3.4This facility: 3.2, 5% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
↓ 5% · CO 3.4This facility: 3.2, 5% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.2%
↓ 76% · CO 4.8This facility: 1.2, 76% below the CO average of 4.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.2%
↓ 76% · CO 4.8This facility: 1.2, 76% below the CO average of 4.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CO 8.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CO average of 8.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CO 8.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CO average of 8.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3%
↓ 53% · CO 19.9This facility: 9.3, 53% below the CO average of 19.9 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
9.3%
↓ 53% · CO 19.9This facility: 9.3, 53% below the CO average of 19.9 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
↓ 29% · CO 93.4This facility: 66.7, 29% below the CO average of 93.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
↓ 29% · CO 93.4This facility: 66.7, 29% below the CO average of 93.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6%
↓ 16% · CO 93.7This facility: 78.6, 16% below the CO average of 93.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.6%
↓ 16% · CO 93.7This facility: 78.6, 16% below the CO average of 93.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
52.0%
↓ 3% · US 53.7This facility: 52.0, 3% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
52.0%
↓ 3% · US 53.7This facility: 52.0, 3% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.1%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.1, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.1%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.1, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 82% · CO 1.6This facility: 0.3, 82% below the CO average of 1.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.3%
↓ 82% · CO 1.6This facility: 0.3, 82% below the CO average of 1.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.2%
↓ 34% · CO 77.0This facility: 51.2, 34% below the CO average of 77.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.2%
↓ 34% · CO 77.0This facility: 51.2, 34% below the CO average of 77.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
31.0%
↓ 58% · CO 73.6This facility: 31.0, 58% below the CO average of 73.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
31.0%
↓ 58% · CO 73.6This facility: 31.0, 58% below the CO average of 73.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.1%
↓ 26% · CO 20.3This facility: 15.1, 26% below the CO average of 20.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.1%
↓ 26% · CO 20.3This facility: 15.1, 26% below the CO average of 20.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.0%
↓ 6% · CO 12.8This facility: 12.0, 6% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.0%
↓ 6% · CO 12.8This facility: 12.0, 6% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Brookdale Greenwood Village’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 191 Colorado nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−5.5% operating margin
−2.6 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.0M) trims the net loss to −$0.9M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Colorado homes
60.8% payroll share of revenue
CO average 63.3%Rank #78 / 191Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.1M while revenue fell $0.5M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Colorado homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CO median | Compared with CO homesRank in CO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $17.6M | −$0.5M | Trend 20172024 | CO median $10.0M | Rank in CO Rank #19 / 191Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Top 9% in CO Higher net patient revenue than 91% of CO homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $18.5M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | CO median $10.4M | Rank in CO Rank #17 / 191Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Colorado homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 92% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.0M | −$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | CO median −$0.1M | Rank in CO Rank #141 / 191Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 141st out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Colorado homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 26% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −5.5% | −2.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | CO median −1.6% | Rank in CO Rank #112 / 191Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 112th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Colorado homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 42% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | CO median $0.0M | Rank in CO Rank #69 / 152Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 69th out of 152 nursing homes we track in Colorado for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Colorado homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.9M | −$0.4M | Trend — | CO median $0.1M | Rank in CO Rank #147 / 191Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 147th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Colorado homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 23% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Colorado homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CO median | Compared with CO homesRank in CO | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.7M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | CO median $6.0M | Rank in CO Rank #18 / 191Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 91% of homes | Top 9% in CO by size Higher payroll than 91% of CO homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 60.8% | +2.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | CO median 59.7% | Rank in CO Rank #78 / 191Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 191 nursing homes we track in Colorado for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 59% of homes | Near CO average The CO average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CO benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Colorado payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CO payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $14.3M | $12.7M | $11.9M | $11.0M | $13.3M | $15.5M | $18.1M | $17.6M |
| Operating expenses | $15.6M | $14.9M | $15.3M | $15.1M | $16.2M | $18.6M | $18.6M | $18.5M |
| Net patient income | −$1.4M | −$2.2M | −$3.3M | −$4.1M | −$2.8M | −$3.0M | −$0.5M | −$1.0M |
| Operating margin | −9.5% | −17.4% | −28.0% | −37.1% | −21.4% | −19.6% | −2.9% | −5.5% |
| Net income | −$1.3M | −$2.2M | −$3.3M | −$2.5M | −$2.8M | −$2.3M | −$0.5M | −$0.9M |
| Payroll costs | $7.6M | $7.5M | $8.0M | $8.9M | $9.2M | $10.3M | $10.6M | $10.7M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 53.6% | 58.7% | 66.8% | 80.2% | 68.7% | 66.6% | 58.4% | 60.8% |
| Beds | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 | 178 |
| Gross revenue | $11.8M | $10.7M | $10.2M | $8.3M | $10.8M | $12.9M | $14.4M | $14.3M |
| Salaries | $6.5M | $6.5M | $6.8M | $7.7M | $8.1M | $9.2M | $9.2M | $9.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.0M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.3M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $8.0M | $7.5M | $7.3M | $6.3M | $7.0M | $8.2M | $8.0M | $7.9M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $292 | $271 | $317 | $295 | $306 | $296 | $317 | $321 |
| Cost per day | $319 | $318 | $406 | $404 | $372 | $354 | $326 | $339 |
| Average length of stay | 50.7 days | 46.6 days | 35.6 days | 44.5 days | 39.9 days | 39.5 days | 38.8 days | 35.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Type of Rooms Available
1 / 4
1 Bed
1
495 - 620 sq. ft
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
709 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
120 · 17%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
589 · 83%
Leaving
700 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
138 · 20%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
562 · 80%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Brookdale Greenwood Village
Places of interest near Brookdale Greenwood Village
3.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Greenwood Village's city center to Brookdale Greenwood Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Brookdale Greenwood Village
Add your location
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Colorado
Brookdale Greenwood Village is in Greenwood Village, Colorado. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Elderly, Blind, and Disabled Waiver
Colorado Medicaid EBD Waiver
- Income limit
- 2026 · Standard EBD financial pathway uses 300% of SSI ($2,982/month in 2026). Alternative working-disabled eligibility and trust rules require screening.
- Asset limit
- Standard individual countable-resource limit is $2,000; spousal protections and alternative eligibility categories require review.
Eligibility
- General
- Adults age 65+ with significant functional impairment or adults age 18–64 who are blind, physically disabled or have HIV/AIDS; Medicaid and nursing-facility level-of-care criteria apply.
- CO specifics
- Selected services transitioned to Community First Choice by July 1 2026; distinguish remaining waiver benefits from CFC services.
What it provides
- Waiver services authorized through an assessed care plan; selected home and community services transitioned to Community First Choice.
Home Care Allowance (HCA)
Colorado Home Care Allowance (HCA)
Eligibility
- General
- Colorado residents age 5+ with a disability who qualify for Home Care Allowance.
What it provides
- Cash assistance to pay a home-care provider for help with daily activities in the home.
Community First Choice
Colorado Health First Colorado Community First Choice (CFC)
Eligibility
- General
- In-home and community support for Health First Colorado members who meet CFC Medicaid and institutional-level-of-care requirements and have an assessed support plan.
- CO specifics
- Members whose Medicaid eligibility depends on a waiver must continue at least one qualifying waiver service monthly. Authorizations and current limits apply. This is not room-and-board coverage.
What it provides
- Authorized personal care; homemaker and other home/community supports; with agency or self-directed options. CFC does not pay room and board and does not duplicate services paid under another Medicaid benefit.
Old Age Pension (OAP) Health Care Program
Colorado OAP
Eligibility
- General
- Qualifying recipients of Colorado Old Age Pension assistance who are not eligible for Health First Colorado and meet the OAP medical-program requirements.
- CO specifics
- OAP Health and Medical Care is a limited state-funded medical-coverage program for eligible OAP recipients.
What it provides
- Limited medical benefits for eligible OAP recipients who are not eligible for Health First Colorado.
More homes from the same operator
Operated by
Brookdale
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Brookdale Greenwood Village
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Brookdale Greenwood Village?
Brookdale Greenwood Village is legally operated by Arc Greenwood Village, Inc., and administered by Tabetha Houston.
02 Is Brookdale Greenwood Village in a walkable area?
Brookdale Greenwood Village has a walk score of 71. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Brookdale Greenwood Village?
Brookdale Greenwood Village's occupancy is 52.7%.
04 How long has Brookdale Greenwood Village been in business?
Brookdale Greenwood Village has been operating for approximately 12 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Does Brookdale Greenwood Village have different floorplan options?
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Brookdale Greenwood Village on this page.
06 Are pets allowed at Brookdale Greenwood Village?
Yes, Brookdale Greenwood Village allows residents to bring their pets.
07 What is the best email address for Brookdale Greenwood Village?
The team at Brookdale Greenwood Village can be reached at ccfeedback@brookdale.com.
Updated on
