3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Found in the charming Greenwood Village, Colorado, Brookdale Greenwood Village offers an exceptional senior living experience with a focus on luxury and care. Nestled just south of Denver, this community enjoys convenient access to Highway 87 and boasts over 300 acres of parks and open space, providing a serene and scenic environment for residents. They are most known as a continuing care retirement community (CCRC) that caters to a variety of needs with independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing all available on one campus.
Their seamless integration ensures that residents can remain in the same community even if their care requirements change over time. Brookdale Greenwood Village is designed to help residents live their best lives, offering a range of amenities that promote both comfort and engagement. The beautifully landscaped grounds feature courtyards and gardens, while the interiors include pet-friendly apartments, a fitness center, a beauty/barber shop, and private dining rooms. Whether it’s engaging in new hobbies, exploring the surrounding parks, or simply enjoying the tranquil environment, Brookdale Greenwood Village is the perfect place to call home.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 41st out of 198 nursing homes we track in Colorado for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 16mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +204% above Colorado average
1 of 6 metrics below Colorado average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 15 total: 14 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
15 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 15 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
15 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 35 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
35 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
102
73 employees · 29 contractors · 33 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.2 h
↓ 2% · CO 8.4 hThis facility: 8.2 h, 2% below the Colorado average of 8.4 h (among Colorado facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,796 staff hours this quarter
See full Colorado ranking →88.5% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Colorado average: 92.3% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (11), Physical Therapy Assistant (7), Speech Language Pathologist (4), Occupational Therapy Assistant (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Registered Nurse (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
90
Rank #111 / 219Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 219 nursing homes we track in Colorado for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Colorado facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #44 / 50Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 50 nursing homes we track in Colorado for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Colorado facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #87 / 242Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 242 nursing homes we track in Colorado for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Colorado facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #116 / 139Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 139 nursing homes we track in Colorado for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Colorado average, with its Statewide rank out of 139. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 52.3 residents and 90 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Lower than the Colorado average: 76%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
The below pricing was updated on
Brookdale Greenwood Village is administered by Tabetha Houston.
Sourced directly from the team at Brookdale Greenwood Village.This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
In Colorado, the Department of Public Health and Environment, Health Facilities Division is the regulatory body that performs unannounced surveys and publishes facility inspection findings.
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Colorado state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | CO Average | vs. CO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 43 | 22.0 | This facility has 95% more total deficiencies than a typical Colorado nursing home (43 vs. CO avg 22).↑ 95% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.6 | 2.5 | This facility has 36% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Colorado nursing home (1.6 vs. CO avg 2.5).↓ 36% better |
Per-category split of the 43 deficiencies recorded across all inspections. Counts are compared against the Colorado state average for each category. A green dot means this facility is below the state average for that category; an amber dot means it is above.
Inspections
| This Facility | CO Average | vs. CO Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 27 | 11.0 | This facility has had 145% more total inspections than the Colorado average (27 vs. CO avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 145% more |
|
Reported occurrences
Serious events a facility is required by Colorado law to report to the state, including abuse, neglect, deaths, brain or spinal injuries, burns, diverted drugs, and missing residents. Occurrences are self-reported and separate from inspection findings, so a higher count can reflect more diligent reporting.
| 10 | 15.7 | This facility has had 36% fewer reported occurrences than the Colorado average (10 vs. CO avg 15.7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 36% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
100% corrected
32 of 32 citations corrected Latest inspection: Apr 09, 2026 · 10 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 12 of 32 citations · 7 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
26 of 32 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 32 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 32 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Aug 2026)
12% lower than Colorado averageColorado average: $37K
6% more fines than Colorado averageColorado average: 1.9
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Colorado averageColorado average: 0.2
Penalties imposed by CMS in the past 3 years.
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Apr 9, 2026
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Apr 9, 2026Last updated: Aug 2026
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Colorado average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
3.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 59% · CO 7.6This facility: 3.2, 59% below the CO average of 7.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 28% · CO 16.0This facility: 11.6, 28% below the CO average of 16.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
5.1%
↓ 62% · CO 13.4This facility: 5.1, 62% below the CO average of 13.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
↓ 15% · CO 21.2This facility: 18.0, 15% below the CO average of 21.2 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.9%
↑ 28% · CO 1.4This facility: 1.9, 28% above the CO average of 1.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
↓ 18% · CO 3.4This facility: 2.8, 18% below the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
↑ 5% · CO 3.4This facility: 3.6, 5% above the CO average of 3.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.1%
↓ 76% · CO 4.7This facility: 1.1, 76% below the CO average of 4.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · CO 8.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CO average of 8.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.9%
↓ 66% · CO 20.0This facility: 6.9, 66% below the CO average of 20.0 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.2%
↓ 23% · CO 93.5This facility: 72.2, 23% below the CO average of 93.5 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.3%
↓ 12% · CO 94.7This facility: 83.3, 12% below the CO average of 94.7 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
52.0%
↓ 3% · US 53.7This facility: 52.0, 3% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
48.1%
↓ 5% · US 50.6This facility: 48.1, 5% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
↓ 76% · CO 1.6This facility: 0.4, 76% below the CO average of 1.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.2%
↓ 24% · CO 76.4This facility: 58.2, 24% below the CO average of 76.4 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
55.5%
↓ 27% · CO 75.6This facility: 55.5, 27% below the CO average of 75.6 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
15.1%
↓ 26% · CO 20.3This facility: 15.1, 26% below the CO average of 20.3 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
12.0%
↓ 6% · CO 12.8This facility: 12.0, 6% below the CO average of 12.8 (among CO facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
17% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
83% of new residents, often for short stays.
Historical financial and operational data for Brookdale Greenwood Village from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #15 / 176Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 176 nursing homes we track in Colorado. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #99 / 176Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 99th out of 176 nursing homes we track in Colorado. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Colorado average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Colorado that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (83% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 2 - 3 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
3.9 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Greenwood Village's city center to Brookdale Greenwood Village's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Brookdale Greenwood Village is located in Greenwood Village, Colorado.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Colorado.
Brookdale Greenwood Village is legally operated by Arc Greenwood Village, Inc., and administered by Tabetha Houston.
Brookdale Greenwood Village has a walk score of 71. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Brookdale Greenwood Village's occupancy is 58.1%.
Brookdale Greenwood Village has been operating for approximately 12 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Brookdale Greenwood Village on this page.
Yes, Brookdale Greenwood Village allows residents to bring their pets.
The team at Brookdale Greenwood Village can be reached at ccfeedback@brookdale.com.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
