| Salisbury | 82 | No | | Private Rooms | 29 | - |
75%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
75% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. An unusually high male share for assisted living, where most facilities skew heavily female. |
25%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
25% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. An unusually low female share — most assisted living facilities have 65–75% female residents. |
96%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
96% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. A higher White share than is typical for assisted living in Maryland in this dataset — compare with peer facilities for local context. |
4%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
4% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A lower African American share than is typical in Maryland; local markets still vary widely. |
8%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
8% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. Fewer younger seniors suggests the resident population skews older, likely requiring higher acuity care and more hands-on support. |
19%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
19% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. Below the state norm — the resident mix may skew either younger or older than this typical middle bracket. |
49%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
49% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. A high concentration of very elderly residents signals a higher-acuity facility with experience caring for advanced age-related needs. |
21%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
21% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. In line with the statewide profile for the oldest resident bracket. |
| Salisbury | 49 | No | | - | - | - |
60%
Male Residents — State Benchmarked
60% of residents are male, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. An unusually high male share for assisted living, where most facilities skew heavily female. |
40%
Female Residents — State Benchmarked
40% of residents are female, compared to the Maryland average of 69%. An unusually low female share — most assisted living facilities have 65–75% female residents. |
97%
White Residents — State Benchmarked
97% of residents are reported as White, compared to the Maryland average of 81%. A higher White share than is typical for assisted living in Maryland in this dataset — compare with peer facilities for local context. |
3%
African American Residents — State Benchmarked
3% of residents are reported as African American or Black, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. A lower African American share than is typical in Maryland; local markets still vary widely. |
7%
Residents Age 65–74 — State Benchmarked
7% of residents are 65–74, compared to the Maryland average of 13%. Fewer younger seniors suggests the resident population skews older, likely requiring higher acuity care and more hands-on support. |
40%
Residents Age 75–84 — State Benchmarked
40% of residents are 75–84, compared to the Maryland average of 31%. A high concentration in this mid-range bracket, where residents typically need moderate support with daily activities. |
33%
Residents Age 85–94 — State Benchmarked
33% of residents are 85–94, compared to the Maryland average of 44%. The population here skews younger than the statewide norm, which may indicate a more active, lower-acuity community. |
17%
Residents Age 95+ — State Benchmarked
17% of residents are 95 or older, compared to the Maryland average of 16%. In line with the statewide profile for the oldest resident bracket. |
| Salisbury (Nevins Addition) | 92 | No | | Suite / 1 Bed / 2 Bed | 26 | D- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Salisbury | 81 | Yes | | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |