Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
204
75 employees · 129 contractors · 45 on an average day Artesia Christian Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Artesia, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Artesia Christian Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Artesia, CA
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 82 / 100, a B- — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Artesia Christian Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Artesia Christian Home offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing in Artesia, CA. Independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living includes help with bathing, dressing, medication, and other daily tasks. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision, and nursing home and skilled nursing services provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Several care levels are available in one community, which may suit a resident whose needs could grow over time without requiring a move elsewhere. The home has 143 beds and opened in 1951. Michelle Robison serves as the administrator.
Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families different ways to cover care based on eligibility and personal resources. Total nurse staffing is 5h 43m per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Rehabilitation services, short-term rehab, and respite care are available, with respite providing a short stay when a usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. Programs include LifeLoop, Eldergrow, volunteer opportunities, and a Women’s Auxiliary. An 85 / 100 Walk Score means the area is very walkable, with most errands possible on foot, so a resident who no longer drives can still get out independently.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 43m
This nursing home is ranked 16th out of 291 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 43mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +57% above California average
3 of 6 metrics below California average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
25m
↓ 36% · CA 39mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 36% below the California average of 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 49 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 34 agency contractors.
49 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
1h 55m
↑ 57% · CA 1h 13mThis facility: 1h 55m per resident per day, 57% above the California average of 1h 13m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 49 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 34 agency contractors.
49 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 112 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 70 agency contractors.
112 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
3h 24m
↑ 29% · CA 2h 38mThis facility: 3h 24m per resident per day, 29% above the California average of 2h 38m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 112 total: 42 of the facility's own employees and 70 agency contractors.
112 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 34% · CA 5mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 34% below the California average of 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 50m
↑ 18% · CA 4h 5mThis facility: 4h 50m per resident per day, 18% above the California average of 4h 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
15m
↓ 52% · CA 30mThis facility: 15m per resident per day, 52% below the California average of 30m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
204
75 employees · 129 contractors · 45 on an average day
204 total staff / 46 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
4.43 : 1
↑ 154% · CA 1.75This facility: 4.43 staff per resident, 154% above the California average of 1.75 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
204 staff ÷ 46 residents
See full California ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.1 h
↓ 8% · CA 7.7 hThis facility: 7.1 h, 8% below the California average of 7.7 h (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
29,131 staff hours this quarter
See full California ranking →86.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
California average: 95.5% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (70), Licensed Practical Nurse (34), Speech Language Pathologist (7), Respiratory Therapy Technician (7), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Qualified Social Worker (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
209
Rank #78 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
209
Rank #78 / 344Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 78th out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
66 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 143 state-licensed beds.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #10 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #10 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
55
years
Walk Score
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #53 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
Rank #53 / 343Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 53rd out of 343 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
85
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #274 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 274th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #274 / 302Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 274th out of 302 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 302. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
55.9%
This home usually has availability
Lower than the California average: 82.2%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
223
days
About This Community
Facility TypeRCFE-Continuing Care Retirement Community
IssuanceJuly 1, 1971
CountyLos Angeles
License NumberSkilled Nursing LIC#940000136
RCFE NumberRCFE LIC#191500146
AccreditationsCCRC Certificate Number #288
Artesia Christian Home is legally operated by Artesia Christian Home, Inc., and administered by Michelle Robison.
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
ALM Inspection Grade
82 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
California inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 32% of the grade
D- · 60/100
22 points below the California average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100).
66 certified beds, 32% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Concern
219 severity-weighted points (47 citations) · 2× higher than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 95)
Enforcement
Concern
$98,079 in fines · 2 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
37 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified CA facility (median: 25)
California state-licensed beds · 68% of the grade
A- · 92/100
9 points above the California average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
143 licensed beds, 68% of the grade. Graded with California state-licensed facilities on the California scale.
Serious citations
Typical
1 serious citation in 9 inspections
Moderate citations
Strong
0 moderate citations per inspection · better than the typical state-licensed CA facility (median: 0.15)
Complaint visits
Typical
0.7 complaint visits per 100 resident beds (1 across 143 beds) · 91% fewer than the typical state-licensed CA facility (median: 7.9)
How the final grade is calculated
B- · 82/100
60 × 32% + 92 × 68% = 82 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 66 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (32%) and 143 California state-licensed beds (68%). The result, 82 out of 100, is a B- on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. CA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
4 Better
Metrics better than California average:
• Total citations (86% below)
• Serious citations (Type A) (67% below)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (100% below)
• Citations per inspection (80% below)
• Total citations (86% below)
• Serious citations (Type A) (67% below)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (100% below)
• Citations per inspection (80% below)
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 1 | 7.0 | This facility has 86% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (1 vs. CA avg 7).↓ 86% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Citations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 1 | 3.0 | This facility has 67% fewer serious citations (type a) than a typical California nursing home (1 vs. CA avg 3).↓ 67% better Rank #235 / 294 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 235th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among the 294 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Citations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 0 | 4.0 | This facility has 100% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (0 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 100% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.1 | 0.5 | This facility has 80% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.1 vs. CA avg 0.5).↓ 80% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of official scheduled inspections, complaint visits and other regulatory visits. California counts each evaluation report, so one trip can count twice when it serves two purposes.
| 9 | 19.0 | This facility has had 53% fewer total inspections than the California average (9 vs. CA avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 53% fewer |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 1 | 6.0 | This facility has had 83% fewer complaint visits than the California average (1 vs. CA avg 6). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 83% fewer |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 3 | 5.0 | This facility has had 40% fewer other visits than the California average (3 vs. CA avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 40% fewer |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 5 | 4.0 | This facility has had 25% more official inspections than the California average (5 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 25% more |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 1 | 8.0 | This facility has had 88% fewer complaint investigations than the California average (1 vs. CA avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 88% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
8
↓ 33% · CA 12This facility: 8, 33% below the CA average of 12 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
47
Rank #180 / 294Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 180th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the California State average, with a ranking across all 294 CA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 5% · CA 49.7This facility: 47, 5% below the CA average of 49.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.88
Rank #226 / 294Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 226th out of 294 nursing homes we track in California for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the California mean across 294 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 23% · CA 4.77This facility: 5.88, 23% above the CA average of 4.77 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
47 of 47 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
3
↑ 900% · CA 0.3This facility: 3, 900% above the CA average of 0.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 122% · CA 0.9This facility: 2, 122% above the CA average of 0.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
39
↓ 17% · CA 47.1This facility: 39, 17% below the CA average of 47.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
3
↑ 100% · CA 1.5This facility: 3, 100% above the CA average of 1.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jan 23, 2026 · 15 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 10 of 47 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jan 23, 2026
15 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 18, 2025
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 26, 2025
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 09, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 31, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 15, 2024
19 citations
Pharmacy critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 25, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 17, 2023
7 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 47 citations
Quality of Life & Care
10 deficiencies (21%)
Infection Control
8 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
5 deficiencies (11%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (11%)
Environmental
4 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
3 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
37 of 47 citations resulted from standard inspections; 6 of 47 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 47 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Oct 25, 2024 · $98,079 civil money penalty
Oct 25, 2024 · $98,079 civil money penalty
Oct 25, 2024 · 36-day payment denial
Total fines
$98,079
↑ 72% · CA $57KThis facility: $98,079, 72% above the California average of $56,949. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #284 / 296Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 284th out of 296 nursing homes we track in California for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the California average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 296 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 46% · CA 1.85This facility: 1, 46% below the California average of 1.85. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
36 days
↑ 69% · CA 0.59This facility: 1, 69% above the California average of 0.59. Average among the 478 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Oct 25, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$98,079
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$98,079
Oct 25, 2024
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
36 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
36 daysFine amount comparison
This facility
$98,079
California average
$56,949
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. California and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the California average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 29% · CA 4.2This facility: 3.0, 29% below the CA average of 4.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 42% · CA 3.5This facility: 5.0, 42% above the CA average of 3.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 86% · CA 5.7This facility: 10.6, 86% above the CA average of 5.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
14.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 53% · CA 9.5This facility: 14.6, 53% above the CA average of 9.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 2 better, 9 worse, 2 near CA average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near CA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
↑ 58% · CA 10.2This facility: 16.0, 58% above the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
↑ 58% · CA 10.2This facility: 16.0, 58% above the CA average of 10.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
↑ 41% · CA 8.9This facility: 12.5, 41% above the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.5%
↑ 41% · CA 8.9This facility: 12.5, 41% above the CA average of 8.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.2%
↑ 55% · CA 9.8This facility: 15.2, 55% above the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.2%
↑ 55% · CA 9.8This facility: 15.2, 55% above the CA average of 9.8 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↑ 81% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.2, 81% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.2%
↑ 81% · CA 1.2This facility: 2.2, 81% above the CA average of 1.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↑ 132% · CA 1.6This facility: 3.7, 132% above the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
↑ 132% · CA 1.6This facility: 3.7, 132% above the CA average of 1.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3%
↑ 118% · CA 4.3This facility: 9.3, 118% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
9.3%
↑ 118% · CA 4.3This facility: 9.3, 118% above the CA average of 4.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.6%
↑ 185% · CA 4.1This facility: 11.6, 185% above the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.6%
↑ 185% · CA 4.1This facility: 11.6, 185% above the CA average of 4.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4%
↓ 56% · CA 7.6This facility: 3.4, 56% below the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.4%
↓ 56% · CA 7.6This facility: 3.4, 56% below the CA average of 7.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5%
↑ 10% · CA 12.3This facility: 13.5, 10% above the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.5%
↑ 10% · CA 12.3This facility: 13.5, 10% above the CA average of 12.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 100.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 1% · CA 98.7This facility: 100.0, 1% above the CA average of 98.7 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · CA 97.9This facility: 100.0, 2% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · CA 97.9This facility: 100.0, 2% above the CA average of 97.9 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.37
↑ 5% · CA 2.25This facility: 2.37, 5% above the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.37
↑ 5% · CA 2.25This facility: 2.37, 5% above the CA average of 2.25 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.23
↓ 86% · CA 1.59This facility: 0.23, 86% below the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.23
↓ 86% · CA 1.59This facility: 0.23, 86% below the CA average of 1.59 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.7%
↑ 21% · US 53.7This facility: 64.7, 21% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
64.7%
↑ 21% · US 53.7This facility: 64.7, 21% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
46.9%
↓ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 46.9, 7% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
46.9%
↓ 7% · US 50.6This facility: 46.9, 7% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · CA 1.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the CA average of 1.3 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 5% · CA 94.6This facility: 99.4, 5% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 5% · CA 94.6This facility: 99.4, 5% above the CA average of 94.6 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.9%
↑ 2% · CA 93.1This facility: 94.9, 2% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.9%
↑ 2% · CA 93.1This facility: 94.9, 2% above the CA average of 93.1 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.8%
↓ 49% · CA 23.2This facility: 11.8, 49% below the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.8%
↓ 49% · CA 23.2This facility: 11.8, 49% below the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.6%
↓ 68% · CA 11.2This facility: 3.6, 68% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
3.6%
↓ 68% · CA 11.2This facility: 3.6, 68% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Artesia Christian Home’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 289 California nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−13.8% operating margin
+5.6 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($2.0M) turns it into a net profit to $0.1M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most California homes
73.6% payroll share of revenue
CA average 61.6%Rank #30 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.2M while revenue rose $2.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with California homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $13.7M | +$2.0M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $15.3M | Rank in CA Rank #171 / 289Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 171st out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 41% of homes | Below CA median Higher net patient revenue than 41% of CA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $15.6M | +$1.7M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $16.0M | Rank in CA Rank #149 / 289Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 149th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 49% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.9M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $0.5M | Rank in CA Rank #232 / 289Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 232nd out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −13.8% | +5.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 3.3% | Rank in CA Rank #237 / 289Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 237th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 18% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.0M | — | Trend — | CA median $0.1M | Rank in CA Rank #46 / 283Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 283 nursing homes we track in California for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.1M | +$0.9M | Trend — | CA median $1.1M | Rank in CA Rank #197 / 289Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 197th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other California homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 32% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most California homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $10.1M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | CA median $8.8M | Rank in CA Rank #117 / 289Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 117th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | Above CA median Higher payroll than 60% of CA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 73.6% | −2.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | CA median 53.8% | Rank in CA Rank #30 / 289Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 289 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | 12.0 pts over CA average The CA average is 61.6% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · CA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the California payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.9M | $10.8M | $11.1M | $10.7M | $10.1M | $10.6M | $11.7M | $13.7M |
| Operating expenses | $10.8M | $11.1M | $12.0M | $12.5M | $11.7M | $12.7M | $13.9M | $15.6M |
| Net patient income | −$0.9M | −$0.3M | −$0.9M | −$1.9M | −$1.7M | −$2.1M | −$2.3M | −$1.9M |
| Operating margin | −9.4% | −3.1% | −8.2% | −17.6% | −16.7% | −19.6% | −19.4% | −13.8% |
| Net income | −$0.1M | $0.8M | $0.3M | −$0.3M | $0.2M | −$0.3M | −$0.7M | $0.1M |
| Payroll costs | $7.4M | $7.9M | $8.2M | $8.0M | $7.4M | $8.3M | $8.9M | $10.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 74.7% | 73.2% | 73.6% | 75.0% | 73.2% | 77.7% | 76.4% | 73.6% |
| Beds | 66 | 66 | 66 | 159 | 180 | 180 | 159 | 159 |
| Gross revenue | $10.5M | $11.6M | $12.0M | $11.4M | $10.4M | $11.2M | $12.6M | $15.1M |
| Salaries | $5.8M | $6.2M | $6.5M | $6.9M | $6.4M | $7.4M | $7.8M | $8.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.6M | $1.7M | $1.6M | $1.1M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.1M | $1.2M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.2M | $0.3M | — | $0.3M | $0.5M |
| Other operating costs | $3.4M | $3.2M | $3.8M | $4.5M | $4.4M | $4.5M | $5.0M | $5.5M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $168 | $188 | $183 | $211 | $193 | $191 | $232 | $640 |
| Cost per day | $184 | $194 | $197 | $248 | $225 | $229 | $277 | $729 |
| Average length of stay | 232.8 days | 195.1 days | 204.0 days | 268.1 days | 208.2 days | 201.9 days | 225.0 days | 222.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
99 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
26 · 26%
Medicaid
9 · 9%
Private pay & other
64 · 65%
Resident snapshot
46 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
5 · 11%
Medicaid
29 · 63%
Private pay & other
12 · 26%
Leaving
96 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
24 · 25%
Medicaid
15 · 16%
Private pay & other
57 · 59%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Reviews (1)
Artesia Christian Home Reviews
Noelle
What do you like most about living here?
Where else can you go and genuinely be cared for and loved like family? This is what we as residents receive at Artesia Christian Home! There is no other place that I would rather be!
Rating Their Experiences
Are there enough caregivers to handle the residents' needs, especially during emergencies?
Yes
Are the common areas pleasant and comfortable for socializing or relaxing?
Yes
How would you rate the quality and variety of the meals? (1-5)
5
How was the units offered in this community?
As available
Do you feel safe living in this community?
Yes
How well do you think the community handles emergencies or unexpected events?
Very well.
Are special diets handled well?
Yes
Is the dining schedule flexible enough to meet your preferences?
Yes
How do you feel about the level of social interaction available with other residents?
Good
Are there any hidden fees or unexpected charges?
No
Would you recommend this community to others looking for senior living options?
Yes, definitely!
Places of interest near Artesia Christian Home
0.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Artesia's city center to Artesia Christian Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.47 miles to nearest hospital (Kaiser Permanente Downey Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Artesia Christian Home
Add your location
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Artesia Christian Home
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Artesia Christian Home in a walkable area?
Artesia Christian Home has a walk score of 85. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
02 What is the license number of Artesia Christian Home?
Artesia Christian Home's license number is Skilled Nursing LIC#940000136.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Artesia Christian Home?
Artesia Christian Home's occupancy is 55.9%.
04 How long has Artesia Christian Home been in business?
Artesia Christian Home has been operating for approximately 55 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Artesia Christian Home?
No, Artesia Christian Home has a no-pet policy.
06 Does Artesia Christian Home operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Artesia Christian Home is registered as a non-profit in CA.
07 Who is the administrator of Artesia Christian Home?
Michelle Robison is the administrator of Artesia Christian Home.
Updated on
