2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge is focused on promoting an active lifestyle for their skilled nursing and rehabilitation residents. The award-winning senior care promotes an environment where residents are able to celebrate their individuality and independence. Avamere at Pacific Ridge has welcomed seniors and families to their beautiful community that has been thoughtfully designed to have a wonderful time during their golden years.
The lifestyle at Avamere is enriching and engaging with daily activities for seniors to take part in as a way to stimulate their holistic development. Personalized care is delivered with compassion, regular wellness checks, and safety and security in every room; as well as having a 24-hour healthcare professional on-site, a nurse call system, and an on-site therapist– all designed to enhance the lives of residents.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs Washington averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 3rd out of 61 homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 33m
31% above state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
3 of 6 metrics below state avg
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
28% more staff per resident than Washington average
5% worse than Washington average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
All 9 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
9
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.9 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
All 19 LPN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
19
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.6 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
All 76 CNA Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role.
76
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.4 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
70 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 76 | 0 | 76 | 22,267 | 92 | 100% | 7.4 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 19 | 0 | 19 | 6,300 | 92 | 100% | 9.6 |
| Registered Nurse | 9 | 0 | 9 | 2,960 | 92 | 100% | 8.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,166 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 23 | 0 | 23 | 983 | 88 | 96% | 7.6 |
| Medication Aide/Technician | 2 | 0 | 2 | 704 | 73 | 79% | 7.4 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 490 | 64 | 70% | 7.6 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 451 | 61 | 66% | 7.4 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 4 | 0 | 4 | 429 | 64 | 70% | 6.3 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 3 | 0 | 3 | 416 | 51 | 55% | 8 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 360 | 44 | 48% | 8.2 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 2 | 0 | 2 | 313 | 41 | 45% | 6.8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 215 | 44 | 48% | 4.8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 210 | 60 | 65% | 3.5 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 2 | 0 | 2 | 195 | 45 | 49% | 4.2 |
| Nurse Aide in Training | 1 | 0 | 1 | 181 | 28 | 30% | 6.5 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 168 | 21 | 23% | 8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 98 | 25 | 27% | 3.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 87 | 17 | 18% | 5.1 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 42 | 6 | 7% | 7 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 14 | 15% | 2 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1% | 1.5 |
Includes penalties issued in 2024-2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
29% lower than Washington averageWashington average: $82K
62% more fines than Washington averageWashington average: 1.8
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Washington averageWashington average: 0.3
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jan 17, 2025
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Oct 4, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Jul 19, 2024Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
9.7
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 10.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
17.1
18% better than Washington averageWashington average: 20.9
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.5%
18% better than Washington averageWashington average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.3%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 21.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.4%
37% better than Washington averageWashington average: 24.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.0%
92% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 2.6%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.9%
61% better than Washington averageWashington average: 4.9%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.5%
74% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.7%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 5.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.9%
58% better than Washington averageWashington average: 16.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
50.9%
252% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 14.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
80.8%
16% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 96.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.4%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 93.8%
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
64.5%
27% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 88.1%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.7%
160% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.0%
28% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 82.0%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
28.8%
45% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 19.9%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
27.8%
111% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 13.2%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
38.8%
23% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
10% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
67% of new residents, often for short stays.
23% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
70Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Avamere at Pacific Ridge from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #31 / 51Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 31st out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #20 / 51Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 20th out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (67% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 24 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tacoma's city center to Avamere at Pacific Ridge's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.63 miles to nearest hospital (St Joseph Medical Center)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Life Care Center of South Hill | NH SNF | Puyallup | 100
Facility
100
WA AVG
81
Rank
#91 / 356 |
97.6%
Facility
97.6%
WA AVG
75
Rank
#13 / 276 | +30% | 3.74
Facility
3.74
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#45 / 61 | -15% | -11% | $17.4k
Facility
$17.4k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#31 / 61 | 29
Facility
29
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#10 / 61 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#17 / 61 | - | 98 | - |
32
Facility
32
WA AVG
51
Rank
#459 / 619 | Alexander Medina | $20.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#10 / 51 | $10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#15 / 51 | 52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#31 / 51 | 505526 | ||||
| Life Care Center of Puyallup | NH SNF | Puyallup (Meeker) | 102
Facility
102
WA AVG
81
Rank
#86 / 356 |
92.1%
Facility
92.1%
WA AVG
75
Rank
#41 / 276 | +23% | 4.14
Facility
4.14
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#29 / 61 | +18% | -2% | $0
Facility
$0
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 50
Facility
50
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#36 / 61 | 5.6
Facility
5.6
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#23 / 61 | - | 94 | - |
65
Facility
65
WA AVG
51
Rank
#189 / 619 | Paul Nimz | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#42 / 51 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#42 / 51 | 54.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
54.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#27 / 51 | 505324 | ||||
| Avamere at Pacific Ridge | NH MC SNF | Tacoma (Eastside) | 102
Facility
102
WA AVG
81
Rank
#86 / 356 |
64.1%
Facility
64.1%
WA AVG
75
Rank
#216 / 276 | -14% | 5.54
Facility
5.54
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#3 / 61 | -62% | +31% | $57.8k
Facility
$57.8k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#43 / 61 | 76
Facility
76
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#49 / 61 | 8.4
Facility
8.4
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#46 / 61 | 2 | 65 | - |
56
Facility
56
WA AVG
51
Rank
#282 / 619 | Christine Miller | $11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#31 / 51 | $6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$6.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#31 / 51 | 59.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
59.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#20 / 51 | 505264 | ||||
| North Auburn Rehabilitation & Health Center | NH SNF | Auburn (Christopher) | 125
Facility
125
WA AVG
81
Rank
#37 / 356 |
55.2%
Facility
55.2%
WA AVG
75
Rank
#246 / 276 | -26% | 3.91
Facility
3.91
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#37 / 61 | -35% | -8% | $54.0k
Facility
$54.0k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#42 / 61 | 100
Facility
100
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#57 / 61 | 12.5
Facility
12.5
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#56 / 61 | 5 | 69 | - |
58
Facility
58
WA AVG
51
Rank
#272 / 619 | Joseph Denor | $10.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$10.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#35 / 51 | $5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$5.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#43 / 51 | 48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
48.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#40 / 51 | 505195 |
Avamere at Pacific Ridge is located in Tacoma, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge is in the Eastside neighborhood of Tacoma.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge has a walk score of 56. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge's occupancy is 75.6%.
No, Avamere at Pacific Ridge has a no-pet policy.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge is registered as a for-profit.
Yes — there are 7 photos of Avamere at Pacific Ridge in the photo gallery on this page.
Avamere at Pacific Ridge is located at 3625 E B St, Tacoma, WA 98404.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
