Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
46
45 employees · 1 contractor · 19 on an average day Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Bangs, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
Nursing Home, Hospice Care & Skilled Nursing · Bangs, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
A-
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 91 / 100, an A- — 9 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Overview of Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
Located in Bangs, Texas, Bangs Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is dedicated to enhancing individual wellness through skilled care services, including long term & short term care and recovery care. The community offers a range of personalized therapies including physical, occupational, and speech therapies tailored to support post-surgical recovery and independence goals. Seniors here can enjoy a supportive environment where they receive expert care to manage health needs comfortably.
Bangs Nursing and Rehabilitation Center aims to provide exceptional rehabilitation and skilled nursing care in a compassionate setting. The community offers an array of amenities and services, such as personalized care plans, social services, and specialized therapies like pain management and wound care. Bangs Nursing and Rehabilitation Center’s goal is to ensure every resident feels at home while receiving the highest quality of care and support.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 5m
This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 5mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +83% above Texas average
0 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
48m
↑ 83% · TX 26mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 83% above the Texas average of 26m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9-hour shifts
1h 8m
↑ 19% · TX 57mThis facility: 1h 8m per resident per day, 19% above the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
2h 9m
↑ 7% · TX 2h 1mThis facility: 2h 9m per resident per day, 7% above the Texas average of 2h 1m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↑ 30% · TX 4mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 30% above the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 16m
↑ 9% · TX 2h 59mThis facility: 3h 16m per resident per day, 9% above the Texas average of 2h 59m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
35m
↑ 66% · TX 21mThis facility: 35m per resident per day, 66% above the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
46
45 employees · 1 contractor · 19 on an average day
46 total staff / 34 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.35 : 1
↓ 8% · TX 1.47This facility: 1.35 staff per resident, 8% below the Texas average of 1.47 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
46 staff ÷ 34 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.1 h
≈ 0% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 8.1 h, level with the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13,951 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →99.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
48
Rank #243 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 243rd out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
48
Rank #243 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 243rd out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #1 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
55
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #260 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 260th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #260 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 260th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
9
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #157 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 157th out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #157 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 157th out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
56%
This home usually has availability
Based on 26.9 residents and 48 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Lower than the Texas average: 72.9%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
173
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing
StatusActive
IssuanceJanuary 4, 2025
ExpirationJanuary 4, 2028
CountyBrown
License Number308608
Year Opened9/1/1971
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center is administered by Charles Walters.
Management CompanyBANGS NURSING AND REHAB CENTER LLC
OwnerFannin County Hospital Authority
Ownership TypeHOSPITAL DISTRICT/AUTHORITY
Medicaid and Medicare
48 units
Total beds
48 units
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Total Employees
50
Full-Time Employees
50
Accept Medicaid
Accept Medicare
Short-Term Rehab
Pain Management
Dentistry
Dialysis
Podiatry Services
Pets not allowed
Building TypeSingle-story
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
91 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
9 points above the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
12 severity-weighted points (6 citations) · 7× lower than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 85)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Concern
31 days to fix issues · much slower than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 16)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 63% · TX 8This facility: 3, 63% below the Texas average of 8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #6 / 234Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 79% · TX 28This facility: 6, 79% below the Texas average of 28 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2
Rank #21 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 45% · TX 3.65This facility: 2, 45% below the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
6 of 6 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · TX 1.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 1.8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 76% · TX 25.4This facility: 6, 76% below the Texas average of 25.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 07, 2025 · 1 citation (Care Planning, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 2 of 6 citations · 5 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 07, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 02, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 24, 2023
3 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Quality of Life & Care
2 deficiencies (33%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (17%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (17%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (17%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
4 of 6 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 6 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
TX avg $63KTexas average: $63,404. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
TX avg 2.1Texas average: 2.1. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↓ 1% · TX 4.1This facility: 4.0, 1% below the TX average of 4.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 35% · TX 3.1This facility: 2.0, 35% below the TX average of 3.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
5.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 33% · TX 7.6This facility: 5.1, 33% below the TX average of 7.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 32% · TX 13.8This facility: 9.4, 32% below the TX average of 13.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 7 better, 4 worse, 2 near TX average
4 short-stay measures: 2 better, 1 near TX average, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↓ 7% · TX 15.8This facility: 14.7, 7% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
↓ 7% · TX 15.8This facility: 14.7, 7% below the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.1%
↓ 76% · TX 12.9This facility: 3.1, 76% below the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.1%
↓ 76% · TX 12.9This facility: 3.1, 76% below the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.3%
↓ 18% · TX 12.5This facility: 10.3, 18% below the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
10.3%
↓ 18% · TX 12.5This facility: 10.3, 18% below the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
↑ 12% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.9, 12% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
↑ 12% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.9, 12% above the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 46% · TX 3.2This facility: 1.7, 46% below the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
↓ 46% · TX 3.2This facility: 1.7, 46% below the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6%
↑ 24% · TX 3.7This facility: 4.6, 24% above the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6%
↑ 24% · TX 3.7This facility: 4.6, 24% above the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 52% · TX 2.9This facility: 1.4, 52% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.4%
↓ 52% · TX 2.9This facility: 1.4, 52% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9%
↓ 61% · TX 2.3This facility: 0.9, 61% below the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.9%
↓ 61% · TX 2.3This facility: 0.9, 61% below the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
↑ 74% · TX 9.8This facility: 17.0, 74% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.0%
↑ 74% · TX 9.8This facility: 17.0, 74% above the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 100.0, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · TX 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · TX 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.36
↓ 36% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.36, 36% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.36
↓ 36% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.36, 36% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.39
↑ 64% · TX 2.07This facility: 3.39, 64% above the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
3.39
↑ 64% · TX 2.07This facility: 3.39, 64% above the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · TX 88.7This facility: 100.0, 13% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · TX 88.7This facility: 100.0, 13% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
↑ 3% · TX 85.4This facility: 87.5, 3% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.5%
↑ 3% · TX 85.4This facility: 87.5, 3% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending August 2025, compared with 225 Texas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Aug 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−7.2% operating margin
−2.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 4 of the last 8 reported years. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Texas homes
0.0% payroll share of revenue
TX average 68.8%
Payroll rose $0.0M while revenue rose $0.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Texas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.2M | +$0.4M | Trend 20162025 | TX median $9.3M | Rank in TX Rank #212 / 225Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 212th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 6% of homes | Below TX median Higher net patient revenue than 6% of TX homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $4.5M | +$0.5M | Trend 20162025 | TX median $9.8M | Rank in TX Rank #219 / 225Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 219th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.3M | −$0.1M | Trend 20162025 | TX median −$0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #107 / 225Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 107th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 53% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −7.2% | −2.4 pts | Trend 20162025 | TX median −5.0% | Rank in TX Rank #135 / 225Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 135th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.3M | — | Trend — | TX median $0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #118 / 214Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 214 nursing homes we track in Texas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 45% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Texas homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2025Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $0.0M | +$0.0M | Trend 20162025 | TX median $4.9M | Rank in TX Rank #203 / 225Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 10% of homes | Below TX median Higher payroll than 10% of TX homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 0.0% | +0.0 pts | Trend 20162025 | TX median 57.6% | Rank in TX Not ranked | 68.8 pts under TX average The TX average is 68.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2025 2 charts · TX benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Texas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TX payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022no report | 2023no report | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $2.6M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $3.8M | $4.2M | ||
| Operating expenses | $2.6M | $2.6M | $2.5M | $2.6M | $3.1M | $3.1M | $4.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Net patient income | $0.0M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.0M | −$0.4M | −$0.3M | −$0.2M | −$0.3M | ||
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 7.2% | 10.7% | 0.4% | −13.3% | −11.5% | −4.8% | −7.2% | ||
| Net income | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.0M | −$0.4M | $0.3M | — | — | ||
| Payroll costs | $1.5M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $1.5M | $0.0M | $0.0M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 55.8% | 47.6% | 49.5% | 55.8% | 56.5% | 53.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Beds | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | 48 | ||
| Gross revenue | $3.1M | $3.9M | $4.0M | $3.8M | $4.0M | $4.1M | $4.5M | $5.1M | ||
| Salaries | $1.3M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.3M | $0.0M | $0.0M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.2M | $0.0M | $0.0M | ||
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | $2.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Other operating costs | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.5M | $1.6M | $4.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $199 | $209 | $224 | $217 | $212 | $226 | $308 | $327 | ||
| Cost per day | $196 | $194 | $200 | $216 | $241 | $252 | $323 | $351 | ||
| Average length of stay | 221.9 days | 204.7 days | 189.1 days | 152.6 days | 152.1 days | 202.4 days | 317.3 days | 173.3 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
71 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
29 · 41%
Medicaid
15 · 21%
Private pay & other
27 · 38%
Resident snapshot
34 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
1 · 3%
Medicaid
22 · 65%
Private pay & other
11 · 32%
Leaving
74 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
21 · 28%
Medicaid
31 · 42%
Private pay & other
22 · 30%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
0.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bangs's city center to Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Texas
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center is located in Bangs, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center?
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center is legally operated by Fannin County Hospital Authority, and administered by Charles Walters.
02 Is Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 9. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the license number of Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center?
According to TX state health department records, Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center's license number is 308608.
04 When does Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center's license expire?
According to TX state health department records, Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center's license expires on January 4, 2028.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center?
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 56%.
06 How long has Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center been in business?
Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center has been operating for approximately 55 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
07 Are pets allowed at Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center?
No, Bangs Nursing Home and Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
Updated on
