Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
81
78 employees · 3 contractors · 37 on an average day Bayshire Yorba Linda
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Yorba Linda, CA
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bayshire Yorba Linda
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Yorba Linda, CA
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bayshire Yorba Linda accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Bayshire Yorba Linda
Bayshire Yorba Linda is a nursing home and continuing care retirement community in Yorba Linda, CA, offering assisted living, memory care and skilled nursing. Assisted living provides help with daily tasks, memory care offers a secured setting with supervision, and skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock. The range of care levels may be a good fit for a resident whose needs grow over time and who may be able to remain within the same community.
The community has 114 beds. Housing includes studios, one bedroom apartments and two bedroom apartments, giving residents the choice of a private space or a larger layout for a couple or companion. Respite care provides a short stay for someone whose usual caregiver needs to travel or recover.
Total nurse staffing is 3h 51m per resident/day, representing the daily hands on nursing time assigned to each resident. Medicare and private pay are accepted, with Medicare applying to covered skilled care and private pay allowing a family to pay directly. Pets are allowed, so a resident can consider bringing a pet when moving in.
A Walk Score of 65 places the area in the somewhat walkable category. Some errands can be completed on foot, and a resident who no longer drives may be able to handle certain nearby trips independently. Five acres of landscaped grounds include gardens and walking paths for outdoor use, while rehabilitation services provide therapy on site and a salon/spa offers personal grooming services. Austin Morris is the administrator, and Yorba Linda Care operates the community.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 174th out of 290 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51m
This nursing home is ranked 174th out of 290 nursing homes we track in California for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 51mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +58% above California average
4 of 6 metrics below California average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
24m
↓ 40% · CA 39mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 40% below the California average of 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 6.5-hour shifts
1h 23m
↑ 14% · CA 1h 13mThis facility: 1h 23m per resident per day, 14% above the California average of 1h 13m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 16 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
16 staff · 6.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 6.6-hour shifts
2h 5m
↓ 22% · CA 2h 39mThis facility: 2h 5m per resident per day, 22% below the California average of 2h 39m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 30 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
30 staff · 6.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
8m
↑ 58% · CA 5mThis facility: 8m per resident per day, 58% above the California average of 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 51m
↓ 6% · CA 4h 5mThis facility: 3h 51m per resident per day, 6% below the California average of 4h 5m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↓ 2% · CA 30mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 2% below the California average of 30m (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
81
78 employees · 3 contractors · 37 on an average day
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7 h
↓ 9% · CA 7.7 hThis facility: 7 h, 9% below the California average of 7.7 h (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
23,684 staff hours this quarter
See full California ranking →98.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
California average: 95.3% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
114
Rank #164 / 341Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 341 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
114
Rank #164 / 341Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 341 nursing homes we track in California for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other California facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #189 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 189th out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A newer community that may feature more recent facilities and programs. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #189 / 198Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 189th out of 198 nursing homes we track in California for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other California facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
2
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #161 / 344Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 161st out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #161 / 344Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 161st out of 344 nursing homes we track in California for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across California facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
65
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #120 / 299Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 299 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 299. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #120 / 299Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 120th out of 299 nursing homes we track in California for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the California average, with its Statewide rank out of 299. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
90.4%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on 103 residents and 114 beds. Source: state inspection report (Nov 2025)
Higher than the California average: 82.2%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
40
days
About This Community
IssuanceApril 1, 2024
CountyOrange
Bayshire Yorba Linda is legally operated by Yorba Linda Care LLC, and administered by Austin Morris.
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Transportation
Pets Allowed
Activities
Social Gatherings
Building TypeTwo-story
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
2 Bed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In California, the Department of Social Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) conduct inspections to ensure resident safety and regulatory compliance.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the California state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. CA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 At Avg
Metrics at California average:
• Serious citations (Type A) (at CA avg) 3 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Total citations (14% below)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (25% below)
• Citations per inspection (40% below)
• Serious citations (Type A) (at CA avg) 3 Better Metrics better than California average:
• Total citations (14% below)
• Moderate citations (Type B) (25% below)
• Citations per inspection (40% below)
Citations
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 6 | 7.0 | This facility has 14% fewer total citations than a typical California nursing home (6 vs. CA avg 7).↓ 14% better |
|
Serious citations (Type A)
Citations that pose an immediate risk to resident health or safety. Type A citations are the most serious and typically require prompt corrective action.
| 3 | 3.0 | This facility has serious citations (type a) in line with the California average (3 vs. CA avg 3).— At avg Rank #1 / 293 Serious citations (Type A) — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 293 nursing homes we track in California for # of serious citations. Shows this facility's # of serious citations compared to the California average among the 293 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
|
Moderate citations (Type B)
Citations that do not pose an immediate risk but still represent a departure from required care or operational standards.
| 3 | 4.0 | This facility has 25% fewer moderate citations (type b) than a typical California nursing home (3 vs. CA avg 4).↓ 25% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 0.3 | 0.5 | This facility has 40% fewer citations per inspection than a typical California nursing home (0.3 vs. CA avg 0.5).↓ 40% better |
Inspections & Visits
| This Facility | CA Average | vs. CA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of official scheduled inspections, complaint visits and other regulatory visits. California counts each evaluation report, so one trip can count twice when it serves two purposes.
| 21 | 19.0 | This facility has had 11% more total inspections than the California average (21 vs. CA avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 11% more |
|
Complaint visits
On-site visits triggered by formal complaints filed by residents, families, or staff.
| 12 | 6.0 | This facility has had 100% more complaint visits than the California average (12 vs. CA avg 6). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 100% more |
|
Other visits
Regulatory visits that are neither routine inspections nor complaint investigations — administrative check-ins, follow-up reviews, licensing-related visits.
| 7 | 4.0 | This facility has had 75% more other visits than the California average (7 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 75% more |
|
Official inspections
Routine, scheduled inspections conducted by state regulators to evaluate whether the facility meets federal and state standards.
| 2 | 4.0 | This facility has had 50% fewer official inspections than the California average (2 vs. CA avg 4). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 50% fewer |
|
Complaint investigations
On-site investigations triggered by complaints filed with California regulators.
| 5 | 8.0 | This facility has had 38% fewer complaint investigations than the California average (5 vs. CA avg 8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 38% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↓ 51% · CA 12.2This facility: 6, 51% below the California average of 12.2 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
65
Rank #232 / 293Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 232nd out of 293 nursing homes we track in California for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the California State average, with a ranking across all 293 CA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 30% · CA 49.9This facility: 65, 30% above the California average of 49.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
10.83
Rank #290 / 293Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 290th out of 293 nursing homes we track in California for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the California mean across 293 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 128% · CA 4.75This facility: 10.83, 128% above the California average of 4.75 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
65 of 65 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · CA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 0.3 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · CA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the California average of 0.9 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
61
↑ 29% · CA 47.2This facility: 61, 29% above the California average of 47.2 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
4
↑ 167% · CA 1.5This facility: 4, 167% above the California average of 1.5 (among California facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jun 16, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 13 of 65 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jun 16, 2026
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 15, 2026
16 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 25, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 07, 2025
14 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 04, 2025
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 26, 2024
15 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 65 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 65 citations
Pharmacy Services
13 deficiencies (20%)
Quality of Life & Care
12 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
12 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
11 deficiencies (17%)
Resident Rights
6 deficiencies (9%)
Environmental
5 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
4 deficiencies (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
60 of 65 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 5 of 65 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Dec 26, 2023 · $4,368 civil money penalty
Dec 26, 2023 · $4,368 civil money penalty
Total fines
$4,368
↓ 92% · CA $58KThis facility: $4,368, 92% below the California average of $57,703. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #186 / 295Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 186th out of 295 nursing homes we track in California for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the California average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 295 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 52% · CA 2.06This facility: 1, 52% below the California average of 2.06. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
CA avg 0.57California average: 0.57. Average among the 498 California facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Dec 26, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,368
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$4,368Fine amount comparison
This facility
$4,368
California average
$57,703
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. California and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the California average.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 42% · CA 3.5This facility: 5.0, 42% above the CA average of 3.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 worse, 1 near CA average, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
78.0%
↑ 45% · US 53.7This facility: 78.0, 45% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
78.0%
↑ 45% · US 53.7This facility: 78.0, 45% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.4%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.4, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.4%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.4, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 36% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 36% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.5%
↓ 36% · US 0.8This facility: 0.5, 36% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 58% · CA 1.5This facility: 0.6, 58% below the CA average of 1.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.6%
↓ 58% · CA 1.5This facility: 0.6, 58% below the CA average of 1.5 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
↑ 6% · CA 94.4This facility: 99.9, 6% above the CA average of 94.4 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
↑ 6% · CA 94.4This facility: 99.9, 6% above the CA average of 94.4 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
↑ 4% · CA 93.2This facility: 96.8, 4% above the CA average of 93.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.8%
↑ 4% · CA 93.2This facility: 96.8, 4% above the CA average of 93.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.2%
↑ 34% · CA 23.2This facility: 31.2, 34% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.2%
↑ 34% · CA 23.2This facility: 31.2, 34% above the CA average of 23.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.4%
↓ 25% · CA 11.2This facility: 8.4, 25% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
8.4%
↓ 25% · CA 11.2This facility: 8.4, 25% below the CA average of 11.2 (among CA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bayshire Yorba Linda’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 288 California nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
11.3% operating margin
+36.9 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 1 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $1.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with California homes
61.7% payroll share of revenue
CA average 61.4%Rank #65 / 288Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $2.5M while revenue rose $4.7M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with California homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.3M | +$4.7M | Trend 20162024 | CA median $15.3M | Rank in CA Rank #251 / 288Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 251st out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 13% of homes | Below CA median Higher net patient revenue than 13% of CA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.3M | +$2.5M | Trend 20162024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $1.0M | +$2.2M | Trend 20162024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 11.3% | +36.9 pts | Trend 20162024 | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $1.3M | — | Trend — | CA median — | Rank in CA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with California homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | CA median | Compared with CA homesRank in CA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.7M | +$2.5M | Trend 20162024 | CA median $8.8M | Rank in CA Rank #238 / 288Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 238th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Below CA median Higher payroll than 17% of CA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 61.7% | −10.2 pts | Trend 20162024 | CA median 53.8% | Rank in CA Rank #65 / 288Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 65th out of 288 nursing homes we track in California for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the California average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in California that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 78% of homes | Near CA average The CA average is 61.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · CA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the California payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin CA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020no report | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $12.8M | $10.2M | $13.8M | $13.7M | $7.9M | $4.7M | $4.6M | $9.3M | |
| Operating expenses | $14.6M | $12.7M | $13.9M | $14.2M | $10.1M | $6.0M | $5.7M | $8.3M | |
| Net patient income | −$1.8M | −$2.5M | −$0.0M | −$0.5M | −$2.3M | −$1.3M | −$1.2M | $1.0M | |
| Operating margin | −13.8% | −24.5% | −0.2% | −3.8% | −28.8% | −28.7% | −25.6% | 11.3% | |
| Net income | −$1.7M | −$2.5M | −$0.0M | −$0.5M | — | — | — | $1.3M | |
| Payroll costs | $6.6M | $5.5M | $7.4M | $8.1M | $5.1M | $3.3M | $3.3M | $5.7M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 51.1% | 53.8% | 53.8% | 58.9% | 64.7% | 70.8% | 71.9% | 61.7% | |
| Beds | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | |
| Gross revenue | $9.2M | $11.0M | $14.6M | $15.1M | $8.0M | $4.6M | $4.2M | $9.4M | |
| Salaries | $5.8M | $4.7M | $6.5M | $7.1M | $4.5M | $2.8M | $2.7M | $5.3M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.5M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | $0.7M | $1.0M | $0.6M | $0.4M | |
| Other operating costs | $8.0M | $7.2M | $6.4M | $6.2M | $5.0M | $2.7M | $2.5M | $2.5M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $245 | $194 | $257 | $260 | $895 | $524 | $620 | $575 | |
| Cost per day | $278 | $241 | $257 | $270 | $1,153 | $674 | $779 | $511 | |
| Average length of stay | 22.7 days | 54.8 days | 24.8 days | 23.4 days | 24.2 days | 26.3 days | 28.3 days | 38.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Arriving
477 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
215 · 45%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
262 · 55%
Leaving
330 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
153 · 46%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
177 · 54%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Bayshire Yorba Linda
0.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Yorba Linda's city center to Bayshire Yorba Linda's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bayshire Yorba Linda
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in California
Bayshire Yorba Linda is located in Yorba Linda, California.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in California.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bayshire Yorba Linda
Who is the owner of Bayshire Yorba Linda?
Bayshire Yorba Linda is legally operated by Yorba Linda Care LLC, and administered by Austin Morris.
Is Bayshire Yorba Linda in a walkable area?
Bayshire Yorba Linda has a walk score of 65. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Bayshire Yorba Linda?
Bayshire Yorba Linda's occupancy is 90.4%.
How long has Bayshire Yorba Linda been in business?
Bayshire Yorba Linda has been operating for approximately 2 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Bayshire Yorba Linda?
Yes, Bayshire Yorba Linda allows residents to bring their pets.
Who is the administrator of Bayshire Yorba Linda?
Austin Morris is the administrator of Bayshire Yorba Linda.
What is the overall rating for Bayshire Yorba Linda?
Bayshire Yorba Linda received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
