5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Boasting a reputation for excellent rehabilitation and skilled nursing services, Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is a renowned senior care provider in Stoneham, MA. Residents here are provided with an excellent care team that offers a wide array of services, including round the clock supervision, physical, occupational and speech therapies. Comfortable accommodations and state-of-the-art technology is available to ensure residents have access to the tools they need to recover or maintain their overall well-being.
Residents feel right at home and comfortable as they recover with various amenities, such as a cozy lounge, pub, gazebo, and salon offered. An array of stimulating activities are available as well to help residents stay active, engaged, and stimulated. Here, residents are guaranteed to maintain the lifestyle they want with all the conveniences they need to live with comfort and ease.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 61st out of 86 homes in Massachusetts for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Registered Nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
| 29m per day | ▼ 25% State avg: 39m per day · National avg: 41m per day |
|
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
| 1h 5m per day | ▲ 12% State avg: 58m per day · National avg: 52m per day |
|
Nurse Aide
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
| 2h 27m per day | ▲ 8% State avg: 2h 16m per day · National avg: 2h 21m per day |
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 35m per day | ▲ 4% State avg: 3h 27m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day |
|
Physical Therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
| 7m per day | ▲ 77% State avg: 4m per day · National avg: 4m per day |
|
Weekend RN
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
| 19m per day | ▼ 31% State avg: 28m per day · National avg: 29m per day |
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Massachusetts, the Executive Office of Elder Affairs (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Public Health (for nursing homes) are the agencies authorized to inspect and report on facility safety.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Massachusetts state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
| This Facility | MA Average | vs. MA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 32 | 14 | This facility has 129% more total citations than a typical Massachusetts nursing home (32 vs. MA avg 14).↑ 129% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Massachusetts average 4.5
Last Health inspection on Dec 2024
Massachusetts average 32.7
Massachusetts average 7.24
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 34 citations resulted from standard inspections.
100% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 0.3
33% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 1.5
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
11% fewer staff per resident than Massachusetts average
8% better than Massachusetts average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
31 total: 12 full-time employees and 19 contractors.
31
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.7 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
51 total: 33 full-time employees and 18 contractors.
51
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.1 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
98 total: 91 full-time employees and 7 contractors.
98
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.7 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
2,521 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 91 | 7 | 98 | 33,309 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 33 | 18 | 51 | 13,930 | 92 | 100% | 9.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 12 | 19 | 31 | 4,718 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 10 | 0 | 10 | 2,021 | 92 | 100% | 7.4 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1,607 | 88 | 96% | 7.2 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,417 | 67 | 73% | 7.5 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 936 | 88 | 96% | 5.6 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 5 | 0 | 5 | 904 | 77 | 84% | 6.9 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 855 | 62 | 67% | 7.8 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 2 | 0 | 2 | 850 | 64 | 70% | 7.5 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 689 | 67 | 73% | 6.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 2 | 0 | 2 | 662 | 71 | 77% | 6.8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 528 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 528 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 396 | 57 | 62% | 6.9 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
78% lower than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: $72K
42% fewer fines than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 1.7
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 0.1
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Dec 14, 2023 · $16K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Dec 14, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
6.1
41% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 10.2
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
14.1
29% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 20.0
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.1%
57% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 18.7%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.5%
40% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 19.3%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.8%
In line with Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 22.1%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.6%
83% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 3.6%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
28% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 4.7%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.9%
58% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 2.1%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
21% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 5.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
27.7%
159% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 10.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.9%
16% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 20.3%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
8% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 91.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.3%
5% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 94.8%
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.03
9% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 1.86
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.00
35% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 1.54
CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.0%
20% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 76.7%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.8%
34% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 1.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.1%
18% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 77.7%
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
29.8%
16% worse than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 25.8%
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.9%
42% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 11.8%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
100% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 0.8%
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
68.7%
28% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 53.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.9%
14% better than Massachusetts averageMassachusetts average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
62% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
27% of new residents, often for short stays.
12% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
151Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Rank #36 / 89Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 36th out of 89 homes in Massachusetts for payroll. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Massachusetts average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Massachusetts that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Rank #63 / 89Payroll % — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 63rd out of 89 homes in Massachusetts for payroll %. Shows payroll as a percentage of revenue versus the Massachusetts average. Well-run Massachusetts facilities typically land around 54–65% — the top third Statewide. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Massachusetts that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
No pets allowed
Building Type: 2-story
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (62% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 24 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
1.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Stoneham's city center to Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the MA Executive Office of Elder Affairs, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
| Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Stoneham | 169
Facility
169
MA AVG
94
Rank
#14 / 276 |
21.3%
Facility
21.3%
MA AVG
78.3
Rank
#79 / 81 | -73% | 3.64
Facility
3.64
MA AVG
3.93
Rank
#61 / 86 | +9% | -7% | $16.1k
Facility
$16.1k
MA AVG
$76.6k
Rank
#63 / 87 | 34
Facility
34
MA AVG
32.7
Rank
#55 / 86 | 11.3
Facility
11.3
MA AVG
7.2
Rank
#79 / 86 | 2 | 36 | A+ |
40
Facility
40
MA AVG
53
Rank
#313 / 498 | Colev Gestetner | $21.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$21.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#28 / 89 | $11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$6.5M
Rank
#36 / 89 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
43.6%
Rank
#63 / 89 | 225272 | ||||
| Pilgrim Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Center | NH HOS RC | Peabody | 152
Facility
152
MA AVG
94
Rank
#28 / 276 |
80.6%
Facility
80.6%
MA AVG
78.3
Rank
#48 / 81 | +3% | 3.67
Facility
3.67
MA AVG
3.93
Rank
#52 / 86 | +7% | -7% | $0
Facility
$0
MA AVG
$76.6k
Rank
#1 / 87 | 16
Facility
16
MA AVG
32.7
Rank
#21 / 86 | 5.3
Facility
5.3
MA AVG
7.2
Rank
#30 / 86 | 1 | 123 | - |
22
Facility
22
MA AVG
53
Rank
#403 / 498 | Fairview Extended Care Services Inc | $16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#24 / 89 | $7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$7.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$6.5M
Rank
#29 / 89 | 43.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
43.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
43.6%
Rank
#68 / 89 | 225048 | ||||
| Adviniacare Salem | NH AL HOS MC | Salem | 114
Facility
114
MA AVG
94
Rank
#72 / 276 |
88.4%
Facility
88.4%
MA AVG
78.3
Rank
#33 / 81 | +13% | - | -43% | - | $0
Facility
$0
MA AVG
$76.6k
Rank
#1 / 87 | 42
Facility
42
MA AVG
32.7
Rank
#65 / 86 | 14.0
Facility
14.0
MA AVG
7.2
Rank
#82 / 86 | - | 101 | - |
71
Facility
71
MA AVG
53
Rank
#165 / 498 | Oc Eliot Center | $8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$17.4M
Rank
#85 / 89 | $4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
$6.5M
Rank
#78 / 89 | 48.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
48.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
MA AVG
43.6%
Rank
#12 / 89 | 225516 |
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is located in Stoneham, Massachusetts.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Massachusetts.
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a walk score of 40. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center's occupancy is 89.4%.
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has been operating for approximately 43 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
No, Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center has a no-pet policy.
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is registered as a for-profit in MA.
Yes — there are 8 photos of Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Bear Hill Rehabilitation and Nursing Center is located at 11 North St, Stoneham, MA 02180.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
