We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Experience exceptional care at Bonaventure of Lacey, a distinct community in Lacey, WA, offering independent living, assisted living, and memory care. With a kind and highly skilled team available around the clock, residents receive the highest quality of care tailored to their needs. Here, residents can feel at ease with weekly housekeeping and linen services.
Stimulating programs and enriching activities are conducted, dedicated to improving residents’ cognition and living experiences. With multiple dining options, residents enjoy mealtimes that cater to their dietary needs and preferences. The community is equipped with an activities center, an exercise center, a billiard room, a salon, and cozy sitting areas with a fire place, creating the ideal setting for residents to flourish in their golden years.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
This home is ranked 70th out of 89 homes in Washington. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Weekend Total Nursing
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 26m per day | ▼ 11% State avg: 3h 50m per day · National avg: 3h 25m per day |
Similar to the Washington average: 72.5%Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 98 | 31 | This facility has 216% more total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (98 vs. WA avg 31).↑ 216% worse |
|
Deficiencies per year
Average deficiencies per year since 2022.
| 24.5 | 7.8 | This facility has 214% more deficiencies per year than a typical Washington nursing home (24.5 vs. WA avg 7.8).↑ 214% worse |
An editor-reviewed summary of the themes and findings across this facility's recent inspection reports.
Washington average 7.8
Last Health inspection on Jun 2025
Washington average 48.9
Washington average 6.92
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
27 of 33 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 6 of 33 resulted from complaint investigations.
100% better than Washington averageWashington average: 0.3
41% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.7
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
14% better than Washington average
0% compared with Washington average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
44 total: 15 full-time employees and 29 contractors.
44
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.7 hoursAssists with medical care and medications.
58 total: 30 full-time employees and 28 contractors.
58
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
9.2 hoursHelps with daily care and mobility.
90 total: 79 full-time employees and 11 contractors.
90
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.7 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
2,370 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 79 | 11 | 90 | 23,049 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 30 | 28 | 58 | 9,681 | 92 | 100% | 9.2 |
| Registered Nurse | 15 | 29 | 44 | 4,845 | 92 | 100% | 8.7 |
| Physical Therapist | 10 | 0 | 10 | 3,744 | 92 | 100% | 7.6 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 5 | 0 | 5 | 2,356 | 74 | 80% | 7.9 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 5 | 0 | 5 | 1,576 | 66 | 72% | 7.9 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,479 | 64 | 70% | 8.8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,171 | 92 | 100% | 7.7 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,060 | 78 | 85% | 7.7 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 4 | 0 | 4 | 977 | 80 | 87% | 7.6 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 712 | 74 | 80% | 7.3 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 4 | 0 | 4 | 642 | 78 | 85% | 6.7 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 559 | 64 | 70% | 8.7 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 472 | 59 | 64% | 8 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 458 | 58 | 63% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 431 | 63 | 68% | 4.5 |
Includes penalties issued in 2023
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
91% lower than Washington averageWashington average: $82K
46% fewer fines than Washington averageWashington average: 1.8
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Washington averageWashington average: 0.3
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Sep 7, 2023 · $7K
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Sep 7, 2023Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
7.8
23% better than Washington averageWashington average: 10.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
14.8
29% better than Washington averageWashington average: 20.9
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.0%
52% better than Washington averageWashington average: 16.4%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.3%
39% better than Washington averageWashington average: 21.8%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.1%
5% better than Washington averageWashington average: 24.3%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.8%
71% better than Washington averageWashington average: 2.6%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.2%
6% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 4.9%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
56% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.6%
100% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 5.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.9%
51% better than Washington averageWashington average: 16.2%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.0%
17% better than Washington averageWashington average: 14.5%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.3%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 96.2%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
90.0%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 93.8%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.2%
6% better than Washington averageWashington average: 88.1%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
17% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.4%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
86.5%
5% better than Washington averageWashington average: 82.0%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
37% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
53% of new residents, often for short stays.
10% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
114Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Bonaventure of Lacey based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #31 / 93Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 31st out of 93 homes in Washington. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Washington average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Housing Options: 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: Mid-rise
Beauty Services
Transportation Services
Housekeeping Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Exercise Programs
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
The Senior Living Executive Director at Bonaventure of Lacey is an exceptional leader who fosters expertise, courtesy, and compassion among the team. They possess an administrator's license and bring strong customer service, hospitality, and personnel management skills to ensure residents enjoy a fulfilling and empowered retirement experience.
3.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lacey's city center to Bonaventure of Lacey's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Bonaventure of Lacey is located in Lacey, Washington.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington.
Bonaventure of Lacey has a walk score of 55. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
According to WA state health department records, Bonaventure of Lacey's license number is 2036.
According to WA state health department records, Bonaventure of Lacey's license expires on June 30, 2026.
Bonaventure of Lacey's occupancy is 71%.
Yes — see the floorplan options available at Bonaventure of Lacey on this page.
Bonaventure of Lacey has 126 beds.
Yes — there are 81 photos of Bonaventure of Lacey in the photo gallery on this page.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
