Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
165
132 employees · 33 contractors · 57 on an average day Bradford Village Healthcare Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Edmond, OK
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bradford Village Healthcare Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Edmond, OK
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Bradford Village Healthcare Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Bradford Village Healthcare Center
Bradford Village Healthcare Center is a nursing home and skilled nursing community in Edmond, Oklahoma. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while therapy and rehabilitation services support residents working toward recovery. The combination may suit a resident who needs ongoing nursing care alongside rehabilitation services.
The community has 55 beds. Its smaller size can give staff and residents more opportunity to know one another. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 46 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time assigned to each resident. Staffing is available around the clock, and a doctor is on staff.
Skilled therapy and medical transportation are available, so residents can receive therapy in the care setting and use transportation for medical needs. Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted, giving families public coverage options or the ability to pay directly. Astrid Chatham serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46m
This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +174% above Oklahoma average
0 of 6 metrics below Oklahoma average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
41m
↑ 107% · OK 20mThis facility: 41m per resident per day, 107% above the Oklahoma average of 20m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 29 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
29 staff · 8.3-hour shifts
1h 15m
↑ 33% · OK 56mThis facility: 1h 15m per resident per day, 33% above the Oklahoma average of 56m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 29 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
29 staff · 8.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 51 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
51 staff · 8.2-hour shifts
2h 50m
↑ 11% · OK 2h 34mThis facility: 2h 50m per resident per day, 11% above the Oklahoma average of 2h 34m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 51 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
51 staff · 8.2-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↑ 174% · OK 1mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 174% above the Oklahoma average of 1m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 8m
↑ 19% · OK 3h 29mThis facility: 4h 8m per resident per day, 19% above the Oklahoma average of 3h 29m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
31m
↑ 80% · OK 17mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 80% above the Oklahoma average of 17m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
165
132 employees · 33 contractors · 57 on an average day
165 total staff / 81 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.04 : 1
↑ 26% · OK 1.62This facility: 2.04 staff per resident, 26% above the Oklahoma average of 1.62 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
165 staff ÷ 81 residents
See full Oklahoma ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↓ 2% · OK 8.2 hThis facility: 8 h, 2% below the Oklahoma average of 8.2 h (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
41,424 staff hours this quarter
See full Oklahoma ranking →87.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oklahoma average: 93.9% · Contractors this quarter: Qualified Social Worker (8), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (7), Occupational Therapy Assistant (5), Respiratory Therapist (5), Respiratory Therapy Technician (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
55
Rank #38 / 44Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 44 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
55
Rank #38 / 44Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 44 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #45 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #45 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
5
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #19 / 39Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 39. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #19 / 39Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 39 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 39. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
76.4%
This home usually has availability
Based on 42 residents and 55 beds. Source: state inspection report (Nov 2025)
Higher than the Oklahoma average: 72.5%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
49
days
About This Community
CountyOklahoma
CMS Certification Number375498
2025 Silver – Achievement in Quality Award recipient by the American Health Care Association and National Center for Assisted Living (AHCA/NCAL)
Bradford Village Healthcare Center is administered by Astrid Chatham.
Resident Council
Family Council
Doctor on Staff
Physician Services
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Medical Transportation
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Two inspection records, one home. Oklahoma inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Oklahoma, the State Department of Health, Protective Health Services is the regulatory body responsible for conducting unannounced inspections and reporting on facility compliance.
Since 2019 · 7 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 19 deficiencies 8 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 19 deficiencies 8 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Oklahoma state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2019 vs. Oklahoma state average
Overall vs. OK average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Oklahoma average:
• Total deficiencies (171% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (243% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
• Total deficiencies (171% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (243% above) 0 Better No metrics in this bucket.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 19 | 7.0 | This facility has 171% more total deficiencies than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (19 vs. OK avg 7).↑ 171% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 2.4 | 0.7 | This facility has 243% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Oklahoma nursing home (2.4 vs. OK avg 0.7).↑ 243% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | OK Average | vs. OK Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 8 | 11.0 | This facility has had 27% fewer total inspections than the Oklahoma average (8 vs. OK avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 27% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 39% · OK 4.9This facility: 3, 39% below the Oklahoma average of 4.9 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
11
Rank #13 / 42Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oklahoma State average, with a ranking across all 42 OK facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 52% · OK 22.8This facility: 11, 52% below the Oklahoma average of 22.8 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3.67
Rank #18 / 42Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oklahoma mean across 42 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 23% · OK 4.78This facility: 3.67, 23% below the Oklahoma average of 4.78 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
11 of 11 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.7 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.4 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
11
↓ 49% · OK 21.6This facility: 11, 49% below the Oklahoma average of 21.6 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.1 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 12, 2025 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 2 of 11 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 12, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 30, 2023
3 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 01, 2022
5 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 11 citations
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (18%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (18%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (18%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (9%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (9%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
1 deficiency (9%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
9 of 11 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 11 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
OK avg $34KOklahoma average: $33,889. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
OK avg 1.55Oklahoma average: 1.55. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OK avg 0.36Oklahoma average: 0.36. Average among the 149 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oklahoma average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 8% · OK 3.7This facility: 4.0, 8% above the OK average of 3.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 5% · OK 2.9This facility: 3.0, 5% above the OK average of 2.9 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · OK 7.8This facility: 4.2, 47% below the OK average of 7.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 71% · OK 14.3This facility: 4.1, 71% below the OK average of 14.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 11 better, 1 worse, 1 near OK average
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 2 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.0%
↓ 86% · OK 13.6This facility: 2.0, 86% below the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.0%
↓ 86% · OK 13.6This facility: 2.0, 86% below the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.8%
↓ 78% · OK 13.0This facility: 2.8, 78% below the OK average of 13.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
2.8%
↓ 78% · OK 13.0This facility: 2.8, 78% below the OK average of 13.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.5%
↓ 54% · OK 16.4This facility: 7.5, 54% below the OK average of 16.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
7.5%
↓ 54% · OK 16.4This facility: 7.5, 54% below the OK average of 16.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 48% · OK 2.7This facility: 1.4, 48% below the OK average of 2.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
↓ 48% · OK 2.7This facility: 1.4, 48% below the OK average of 2.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.5%
↑ 142% · OK 4.8This facility: 11.5, 142% above the OK average of 4.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
11.5%
↑ 142% · OK 4.8This facility: 11.5, 142% above the OK average of 4.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
↓ 18% · OK 4.7This facility: 3.8, 18% below the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.8%
↓ 18% · OK 4.7This facility: 3.8, 18% below the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.7%
↓ 80% · OK 3.2This facility: 0.7, 80% below the OK average of 3.2 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.7%
↓ 80% · OK 3.2This facility: 0.7, 80% below the OK average of 3.2 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · OK 3.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · OK 3.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.1%
↓ 4% · OK 17.8This facility: 17.1, 4% below the OK average of 17.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.1%
↓ 4% · OK 17.8This facility: 17.1, 4% below the OK average of 17.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · OK 91.3This facility: 100.0, 9% above the OK average of 91.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · OK 91.3This facility: 100.0, 9% above the OK average of 91.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OK 94.7This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OK average of 94.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OK 94.7This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OK average of 94.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.14
↓ 50% · OK 2.28This facility: 1.14, 50% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.14
↓ 50% · OK 2.28This facility: 1.14, 50% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.48
↓ 49% · OK 2.91This facility: 1.48, 49% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.48
↓ 49% · OK 2.91This facility: 1.48, 49% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
35.6%
↓ 34% · US 53.7This facility: 35.6, 34% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
35.6%
↓ 34% · US 53.7This facility: 35.6, 34% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.0%
↑ 1% · US 50.6This facility: 51.0, 1% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
51.0%
↑ 1% · US 50.6This facility: 51.0, 1% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.0%
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
4.0%
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 50% · OK 1.8This facility: 0.9, 50% below the OK average of 1.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 50% · OK 1.8This facility: 0.9, 50% below the OK average of 1.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
↑ 31% · OK 76.5This facility: 99.9, 31% above the OK average of 76.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.9%
↑ 31% · OK 76.5This facility: 99.9, 31% above the OK average of 76.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
↑ 31% · OK 74.6This facility: 97.4, 31% above the OK average of 74.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.4%
↑ 31% · OK 74.6This facility: 97.4, 31% above the OK average of 74.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.9%
↓ 11% · OK 27.0This facility: 23.9, 11% below the OK average of 27.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
23.9%
↓ 11% · OK 27.0This facility: 23.9, 11% below the OK average of 27.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.3%
↓ 16% · OK 17.1This facility: 14.3, 16% below the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
14.3%
↓ 16% · OK 17.1This facility: 14.3, 16% below the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Bradford Village Healthcare Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 41 Oklahoma nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−13.9% operating margin
−13.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($2.1M) turns it into a net profit to $0.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Payroll in line with Oklahoma homes
55.9% payroll share of revenue
OK average 56.7%Rank #11 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.3M while revenue fell $1.8M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oklahoma homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.0M | −$1.8M | Trend 20162024 | OK median $10.4M | Rank in OK Rank #26 / 41Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Below OK median Higher net patient revenue than 38% of OK homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.2M | −$0.7M | Trend 20162024 | OK median $11.3M | Rank in OK Rank #24 / 41Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.2M | −$1.2M | Trend 20162024 | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #33 / 41Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −13.9% | −13.2 pts | Trend 20162024 | OK median 0.5% | Rank in OK Rank #35 / 41Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 15% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.1M | — | Trend — | OK median $0.1M | Rank in OK Rank #5 / 29Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 29 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 86% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.8M | +$0.9M | Trend — | OK median $0.2M | Rank in OK Rank #9 / 41Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 9th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Oklahoma homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Staff spending in line with Oklahoma homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.0M | −$0.3M | Trend 20162024 | OK median $5.3M | Rank in OK Rank #25 / 41Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Below OK median Higher payroll than 40% of OK homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 55.9% | +7.0 pts | Trend 20162024 | OK median 50.1% | Rank in OK Rank #11 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Near OK average The OK average is 56.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · OK benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oklahoma payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OK payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018no report | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $11.8M | $11.2M | $7.6M | $8.6M | $9.2M | $9.9M | $10.8M | $9.0M | |
| Operating expenses | $13.4M | $13.2M | $7.2M | $8.5M | $9.5M | $10.1M | $10.9M | $10.2M | |
| Net patient income | −$1.6M | −$2.0M | $0.4M | $0.1M | −$0.3M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$1.2M | |
| Operating margin | −13.3% | −18.4% | 5.2% | 1.3% | −3.6% | −1.8% | −0.7% | −13.9% | |
| Net income | −$1.5M | −$2.0M | $0.4M | $0.8M | $0.3M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | $0.8M | |
| Payroll costs | $8.1M | $8.3M | $3.8M | $4.3M | $4.4M | $4.9M | $5.3M | $5.0M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 68.5% | 74.4% | 49.7% | 50.1% | 48.0% | 49.9% | 48.9% | 55.9% | |
| Beds | 148 | 148 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | 122 | |
| Gross revenue | $13.8M | $13.9M | $8.3M | $8.1M | $9.0M | $10.7M | $11.6M | $9.5M | |
| Salaries | $7.1M | $7.1M | $3.5M | $4.0M | $4.0M | $4.4M | $4.6M | $4.4M | |
| Wage-related costs | $1.0M | $1.2M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $0.6M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | $0.0M | — | — | — | — | |
| Other operating costs | $5.3M | $4.9M | $3.4M | $4.2M | $5.1M | $5.1M | $5.6M | $5.2M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $246 | $241 | $255 | $291 | $311 | $314 | $317 | $333 | |
| Cost per day | $278 | $286 | $242 | $287 | $322 | $320 | $319 | $379 | |
| Average length of stay | 63.0 days | 56.2 days | 45.5 days | 44.9 days | 54.6 days | 225.2 days | 55.0 days | 49.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
447 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
111 · 25%
Medicaid
77 · 17%
Private pay & other
259 · 58%
Resident snapshot
81 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
8 · 10%
Medicaid
44 · 54%
Private pay & other
29 · 36%
Leaving
547 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
83 · 15%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
464 · 85%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Bradford Village Healthcare Center
5.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Edmond's city center to Bradford Village Healthcare Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Bradford Village Healthcare Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Edmond
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OK State Dept. of Health (OSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oklahoma average is: 56.7% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradford Village Healthcare Center | NH SNF | Edmond | 55
Facility
55
OK AVG
97
Rank
#38 / 44 |
76.4%
Facility
76.4%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#19 / 39 | +5% | 4.77
Facility
4.77
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#14 / 40 | +88% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 11
Facility
11
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#13 / 42 | 3.7
Facility
3.7
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#18 / 42 | - | 42 | - |
5
Facility
5
OK AVG
40
Rank
#45 / 46 | - | $9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#26 / 41 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#25 / 41 | 55.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
55.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#11 / 41 | 375498 | ||||
| The Timbers Skilled Nursing and Therapy | NH MC SNF | Edmond (Hederson Hills) | 129
Facility
129
OK AVG
97
Rank
#9 / 44 |
90.5%
Facility
90.5%
OK AVG
72.5%
Rank
#7 / 39 | +25% | 4.61
Facility
4.61
OK AVG
4.61
Rank
#22 / 40 | +111% | 0% | $34.7k
Facility
$34.7k
OK AVG
$34.9k
Rank
#37 / 42 | 10
Facility
10
OK AVG
22.8
Rank
#10 / 42 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#11 / 42 | 3 | 117 | - |
30
Facility
30
OK AVG
40
Rank
#31 / 46 | - | $11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#15 / 41 | $5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#17 / 41 | 51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
51.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#17 / 41 | 375158 | ||||
| The Fountains at Canterbury | - | NH AL IL MC | Oklahoma City (Northwest Oklahoma City) | 218
Facility
218
OK AVG
97
Rank
#1 / 44 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
27
Facility
27
OK AVG
40
Rank
#34 / 46 | $8.3M*Fiscal year ending 09/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $5.1M*Fiscal year ending 09/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 60.9%*Fiscal year ending 09/2021These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 375183 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OK nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Oklahoma
Bradford Village Healthcare Center is in EDMOND, Oklahoma. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- OK specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
ADvantage Waiver
ADvantage Waiver
Eligibility
- General
- Meet SoonerCare financial rules and nursing-facility level of care; be age 65+ or a qualifying disabled adult; needs must be safely met at home with waiver and community supports. Additional exclusions apply.
What it provides
- Assessed supports may include personal care; adult day health; respite; case management; home-delivered meals; environmental modifications; equipment and therapies.
DDS Respite Voucher Program
DDS Respite Voucher Program
Eligibility
- General
- The linked DDS Respite Voucher Program requires a care recipient with a developmental disability and other program criteria; it is not a general age-60+ caregiver benefit.
- OK specifics
- Care recipient must not receive services under a DDS home/community waiver. Provider eligibility and voucher rules apply.
What it provides
- Vouchers let approved caregivers pay another person to provide respite care; the caregiver selects the provider and agrees the rate.
State Plan Personal Care (SPPC)
State Plan Personal Care (SPPC)
Eligibility
- General
- Medicaid State Plan Personal Care serves individuals of any age, including children and older adults, who meet financial and medical level-of-care criteria.
- OK specifics
- A nursing assessment establishes care needs and a care plan.
What it provides
- Authorized assistance with bathing; grooming; transfers; toileting; meals; laundry; shopping and light housekeeping; nursing assessment and care-plan oversight.
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
Older Americans Act (OAA) Services
- Who it is for
- Adults 60+ looking for meals, in-home help or other local aging services
Eligibility
- General
- Services are offered through Area Agencies on Aging to adults age 60+ and other specified eligible groups; individual service criteria and availability vary.
What it provides
- Local programs may provide congregate or home-delivered meals; in-home assistance; transportation; health promotion; legal assistance and caregiver support.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- OK specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households responsible for home heating or energy costs
Eligibility
- General
- Income-eligible households with qualifying home-energy costs; the administering agency applies household-size and program eligibility rules.
- OK specifics
- Life-threatening energy-crisis assistance is available year-round. Winter-heating enrollment is anticipated to open December 15, 2026, subject to federal funding; later FY2027 application periods are separately scheduled.
What it provides
- Winter-heating; summer-cooling and energy-crisis assistance during designated application periods.
State Supplemental Payment (SSP)
State Supplemental Payment (SSP)
Eligibility
- General
- Oklahoma residents who are aged 65+, blind or disabled and meet SSI-related eligibility plus state income and resource requirements.
What it provides
- A state cash supplement for qualifying low-income people; the payment is determined through an individual eligibility review.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Bradford Village Healthcare Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Bradford Village Healthcare Center in a walkable area?
Bradford Village Healthcare Center has a walk score of 5. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Bradford Village Healthcare Center?
Bradford Village Healthcare Center's occupancy is 76.4%.
03 Are pets allowed at Bradford Village Healthcare Center?
No, Bradford Village Healthcare Center has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Bradford Village Healthcare Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Bradford Village Healthcare Center is registered as a for-profit in OK.
05 Who is the administrator of Bradford Village Healthcare Center?
Astrid Chatham is the administrator of Bradford Village Healthcare Center.
06 What is the overall rating for Bradford Village Healthcare Center?
Bradford Village Healthcare Center received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Bradford Village Healthcare Center have?
Bradford Village Healthcare Center has 55 beds.
Updated on
