Inspection Reports for
Brandon Community Carew Center
355 Crossgate Boulevard, Brandon, MS, 39042
Back to Facility ProfileDeficiencies (last 5 years)
Deficiencies (over 5 years)
9.6 deficiencies/year
Deficiencies are regulatory violations found during state inspections.
153% worse than Mississippi average
Mississippi average: 3.8 deficiencies/yearDeficiencies per year
24
18
12
6
0
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jan 12, 2026
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted following a complaint investigation related to a resident fall incident involving inadequate supervision and environmental safety hazards.
Complaint Details
The investigation was substantiated. Resident #1 fell on a wet floor that lacked wet floor signage, resulting in serious injuries including facial trauma and an orbital fracture. The housekeeper responsible was disciplined and terminated.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards and adequate supervision for residents, resulting in a resident sustaining multiple lacerations and an orbital fracture after slipping on a wet floor without wet floor signage. The housekeeper responsible was disciplined and terminated for noncompliance with facility policy.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0689: The facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent falls, resulting in a resident sustaining multiple lacerations and an orbital fracture after slipping on a wet floor without wet floor signage.
Report Facts
Residents Affected: 4
Residents Affected: 1
Laceration size: 2
Laceration size: 0.75
Laceration size: 0.25
Sutures received: 6
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Housekeeper #1 | Housekeeper | Responsible for mopping floor without placing wet floor signs, leading to resident fall |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Provided interview confirming details of the fall and disciplinary actions |
| Environmental Services Supervisor | Environmental Services Supervisor | Notified of fall and responsible for reminding housekeeper about wet floor signage |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #1 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Witnessed resident after fall and assisted until EMS arrived |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assessed resident after fall and notified resident representative and EMS |
| Licensed Nursing Home Administrator | Licensed Nursing Home Administrator | Confirmed incident details and disciplinary actions during interview |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Nov 18, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to timely report suspected abuse involving Resident #1.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was substantiated. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse involving Resident #1 within the required two-hour timeframe. The investigation was initiated after CNA #2 notified the Director of Nursing on 9/8/25, but the State Agency was not notified until 9/12/25.
Findings
The facility failed to report allegations of abuse for Resident #1 within the required two-hour timeframe. Interviews and record reviews revealed that CNA #1 hit the resident during care, and CNA #2 did not immediately report the incident to nursing staff. The facility delayed reporting to the State Agency until several days after the incident.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0609: The facility failed to timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities. The abuse allegation involving Resident #1 was not reported within two hours as required.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 3
Residents affected: 1
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Census: 35
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Jul 31, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate complaints regarding failure to honor resident preferences, unsafe resident transport, dietary preference issues, and improper food handling practices at Brandon Community Care Center.
Complaint Details
The investigation was complaint-driven, focusing on Resident #216's repeated complaints about not being returned to bed after therapy, Resident #11's unsafe transport, Resident #42's unmet dietary preferences, and unsanitary food handling practices. The complaints were substantiated with observations, interviews, and record reviews.
Findings
The facility failed to honor a resident's preference to be put back to bed after therapy, resulting in pain and emotional distress. Unsafe transport practices were observed, placing a resident at risk of falling. The facility also failed to accommodate dietary preferences for a resident and did not practice proper hand hygiene in food service, risking contamination.
Deficiencies (4)
F 0561: The facility failed to ensure staff honored Resident #216's preference to be put back to bed after therapy, causing pain and emotional distress. Some CNAs delayed assistance despite multiple requests.
F 0689: The facility failed to ensure safe transfer of Resident #11, who was transported in a wooden chair without wheels, posing a fall risk. Proper wheelchair use was not followed.
F 0800: The facility failed to accommodate Resident #42's dietary preferences, repeatedly serving unwanted meals and metal silverware despite requests for alternatives and plastic utensils.
F 0812: The facility failed to practice proper hand hygiene in food service as the District Dietary Manager handled food and plates with bare hands, risking contamination.
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 35
Residents reviewed for accident hazards: 3
Residents affected: 1
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Certified Nursing Assistant #1 | CNA | Confirmed Resident #216's preference to be laid back after therapy and acknowledged staff refusal to honor it |
| Certified Nursing Assistant #2 | CNA | Acknowledged awareness of Resident #216's preference but delayed returning resident to bed |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Acknowledged responsibility of CNAs to honor resident preferences and confirmed risk in unsafe transport |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Acknowledged expectations for staff to follow resident preferences and infection prevention policies |
| Dietary Manager | Dietary Manager | Confirmed dietary preferences should be honored and acknowledged failure to provide requested meals and proper silverware |
| District Dietary Manager | DDM | Observed handling food with bare hands and acknowledged lack of glove use during food service |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #1 | LPN | Confirmed proper resident transport should use wheelchair or rolling chair, not wooden chair |
| Infection Preventionist Nurse | IP Nurse | Confirmed dietary staff should wear gloves during food plating and serving to prevent contamination |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 6
Date: May 12, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding Resident #5's elopement from the facility unnoticed and unsupervised on 05/01/2025, and related allegations of neglect, inadequate supervision, failure to report, and failure to investigate.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation was triggered by Resident #5's elopement on 05/01/25 when she exited the facility unnoticed and unsupervised and was found sitting in a staff member's car in the parking lot. The facility failed to supervise adequately, report the incident timely, investigate thoroughly, and update care plans. The investigation confirmed multiple failures in care and supervision.
Findings
The facility failed to prevent Resident #5 from exiting the facility unsupervised, failed to report the incident timely to appropriate authorities, failed to conduct a thorough investigation, failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for residents with wandering and exit-seeking behaviors, failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent elopement, and failed to provide appropriate nephrostomy tube care for Resident #6.
Deficiencies (6)
F600: The facility failed to protect residents from neglect by not ensuring adequate supervision to prevent Resident #5's elopement on 05/01/25, placing residents at risk of serious injury or death.
F609: The facility failed to timely report the allegation of neglect and elopement of Resident #5 to the State Agency as required by law.
F610: The facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation of Resident #5's elopement and neglect incident on 05/01/25.
F656: The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan addressing wandering and exit-seeking behaviors for Resident #5 and failed to develop a care plan for Resident #6's nephrostomy tube care.
F689: The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a secure environment to prevent the elopement of Resident #5 on 05/01/25, exposing residents to risk of harm.
F691: The facility failed to provide appropriate nephrostomy tube care for Resident #6, including dressing changes and flushing, increasing risk of infection and complications.
Report Facts
Immediate Jeopardies: 5
Residents at risk for elopement: 18
Vehicles observed: 125
Temperature: 81
Wander guard supervision duration: 72
BIMS score: 14
Distance Resident #5 able to walk with supervision: 150
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #9 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Assigned to Resident #5 on 05/01/25, documented exit seeking behaviors but did not update care plan or complete incident report. |
| CNA #9 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Found Resident #5 sitting in his car on 05/01/25 and escorted her back into the facility. |
| LPN #7 | Unit Manager | Responsible for Resident #5's unit, confirmed no care plan update or elopement drills after incident. |
| Executive Director | Notified of Resident #5's elopement, confirmed no report to State Agency initially, and participated in corrective actions. | |
| Social Services Director | Notified of Resident #5's behaviors and elopement, updated elopement binders but did not update care plan. | |
| MDS Coordinator | Responsible for care plan updates, unaware of Resident #5's elopement until 05/09/25. | |
| Former Director of Nursing | DON | Aware of Resident #5's elopement but did not participate in investigation or report. |
| Director of Nursing | DON | Confirmed failure to update care plan for Resident #5 and lack of nephrostomy tube care plan for Resident #6. |
| Medical Director | Not contacted for nephrostomy tube care orders for Resident #6, confirmed standard care expectations. | |
| LPN #5 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Cared for Resident #6, unaware of nephrostomy tube care plan or orders. |
| RN | Registered Nurse | Responsible for Resident #6's unit, confirmed no nephrostomy tube care plan or documentation. |
| Receptionist | Manned front desk on 05/01/25, familiar with Resident #5's behaviors, notified Executive Director after elopement. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Apr 22, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to implement a resident's care plan interventions related to daily skin and foot assessments, resulting in untreated wounds for Resident #1.
Complaint Details
The investigation was triggered by a complaint regarding failure to implement care plan interventions for Resident #1's foot wounds. The complaint was substantiated as the facility did not perform timely assessments or treatments despite notification from the dialysis center.
Findings
The facility failed to identify and address wounds on Resident #1's foot for five days after notification from the dialysis center. Staff did not complete required skin assessments or initiate timely treatment, resulting in delayed wound care and risk of worsening condition.
Deficiencies (2)
F 0656: The facility failed to implement Resident #1's care plan interventions for daily skin and foot assessments, resulting in untreated wounds for five days after discovery at the dialysis center.
F 0684: The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and respond to changes in Resident #1's condition when wounds were identified and treated by the dialysis clinic, delaying care and risking worsening infection.
Report Facts
Wound measurement: 0.4
Wound measurement: 5
Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score: 6
Assessment Reference Date: Mar 12, 2025
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse #2 | Wound Care Nurse | Interviewed regarding failure to complete skin checks and audits on 04/16/25 |
| Wound Care Physician | Contracted Specialist | Reported first evaluation of Resident #1 on 04/22/25 |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Acknowledged failure to implement wound care interventions and follow-up |
| Licensed Nursing Home Administrator | LNHA | Stated expectation for prompt reporting of resident condition changes |
| Registered Nurse #2 | Dialysis Nurse | Documented wounds and notified facility on 04/16/25 |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Apr 1, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted due to a complaint investigation regarding the facility's failure to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention related to the removal of a pressure dressing from a dialysis access site for Resident #4.
Complaint Details
The complaint investigation found substantiated failure to follow the care plan and physician orders regarding removal of pressure dressings for Resident #4. The issue was confirmed by multiple staff interviews and observations.
Findings
The facility failed to timely remove pressure dressings from a dialysis access site for Resident #4, despite physician orders and dialysis unit instructions. Multiple staff, including the Director of Nursing and Administrator, confirmed the failure to follow the care plan and physician orders, posing immediate jeopardy to resident health.
Deficiencies (2)
F 0656: The facility failed to develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, including timely removal of a pressure dressing from a dialysis access site for Resident #4. Staff did not remove the dressing as ordered, resulting in immediate jeopardy to resident health.
F 0698: The facility failed to provide safe, appropriate dialysis care by not ensuring timely removal of a pressure dressing from a dialysis access site for Resident #4. This failure could lead to complications such as clotting or stenosis.
Report Facts
Resident BIMS score: 6
Resident admission date: Oct 4, 2017
Physician order date: Aug 1, 2024
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing (DON) | Confirmed staff failed to remove bandage and follow care plan |
| LPN #2 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Confirmed failure to follow care plan by not removing bandage |
| LPN #3 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Admitted failure to review care plan for Resident #4 |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Unaware of failure to remove bandages, expects staff to follow orders |
| Unit Manager | Unit Manager | Observed bandage still in place on Resident #4 |
| Dialysis Nurse | Dialysis Nurse | Educated facility staff on importance of timely bandage removal |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Mar 6, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory standards related to resident dignity, care planning, hygiene, and physician orders at Brandon Community Care Center.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity, specifically Resident #5's urinary catheter bag was left uncovered. Care plans were incomplete for Residents #5 and #6, resulting in missed showers and lack of catheter care. Resident #5 had no physician order for the indwelling catheter. These deficiencies indicated lapses in care planning, hygiene, and adherence to physician orders.
Deficiencies (4)
F 0550: The facility failed to honor the resident's right to dignity when Resident #5's urinary catheter bag was left uncovered with visible urine in a public area.
F 0656: The facility failed to develop and implement complete care plans for Residents #5 and #6, including lack of catheter care plan and missed showers.
F 0676: The facility failed to ensure residents did not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living by not providing necessary hygiene, bathing, and grooming care for Residents #4 and #6.
F 0684: The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders as Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter with no physician order.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed: 8
Urine volume in catheter bag: 80
BIMS score: 3
Shower frequency: 3
Weight limit: 500
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Registered Nurse (RN) #1 | Unit 2 Manager | Confirmed Resident #5 had an indwelling urinary catheter upon arrival and no physician order for catheter |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Confirmed Resident #5 did not have a cover on urine collection bag and was new to facility |
| Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #5 | Certified Nurse Aide | Reported Resident #6 missed showers due to scheduling and staffing issues |
| Director of Nurses (DON) | Director of Nurses | Confirmed lack of catheter care plan for Resident #5 and care discrepancies for Resident #6 |
| Administrator | Facility Administrator | Confirmed expectations for resident assessment, care planning, and physician order reconciliation |
| Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse | MDS Nurse | Confirmed Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter and lack of care plan and physician orders |
Inspection Report
Routine
Capacity: 129
Deficiencies: 4
Date: Jan 31, 2025
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care, housekeeping, staffing, and feeding tube management at Brandon Community Care Center.
Findings
The facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment, ensure timely incontinence care for a resident, provide appropriate feeding tube care, and maintain adequate nursing staffing levels on multiple days in December 2024.
Deficiencies (4)
F 0584: The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary environment for residents, with observations of clutter, trash, pest presence, and unclean surfaces in multiple resident rooms and common areas.
F 0690: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #6 received timely assistance with toilet use and hygiene, with a monitoring gap of approximately three and a half hours.
F 0693: The facility failed to provide care consistent with physician orders for Resident #7 reliant on enteral feeding, with feeding held for over four hours instead of the ordered 30 minutes prior to meals.
F 0725: The facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs on eight days in December 2024, including late arrivals, call-ins, and pulling CNAs from resident care to laundry duties.
Report Facts
Number of resident rooms: 129
Number of housekeeping staff: 2
Number of floor technicians: 6
Number of laundry aides: 4
Number of new housekeepers hired: 6
Number of CNAs needed per day: 54
Number of licensed nurses needed per day: 26
Number of CNAs on 12/16/24: 53
Number of CNAs on 12/23/24: 51
Number of CNAs on 12/25/24: 50
Number of CNAs on 12/26/24: 53
Number of CNAs on 12/27/24: 49
Number of CNAs on 12/28/24: 50
Number of CNAs on 12/31/24: 50
Number of licensed nurses on 12/24/24: 24
Duration feeding held: 4
Number of spots observed: 25
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| LPN #6 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Confirmed enteral feeding for Resident #7 had been turned off since 3:00 PM |
| Administrator | Interviewed regarding housekeeping, staffing, and feeding tube care expectations | |
| Assistant Administrator | Interviewed about cleanliness and pest control observations | |
| DON | Director of Nurses | Interviewed about incontinence care expectations and staffing issues |
| Housekeeping Director | Interviewed about housekeeping procedures and staffing | |
| Maintenance Director | Interviewed about air conditioner maintenance and pest control | |
| CNA #1 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Reported not providing incontinence care to Resident #6 between 1:30 PM and 4:00 PM |
| CNA #2 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Provided incontinence care to Resident #6 at approximately 4:00 PM |
| CNA #3 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Assigned to Resident #6 until 1:30 PM, left for the day then care was missed |
| LPN #8 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Confirmed CNA #3's assignment and lack of monitoring for Resident #6 |
| Primary Healthcare Provider | Medical Director | Confirmed enteral feeding orders for Resident #7 |
| Staff Development Director | Interviewed about staffing challenges and use of Facility Assessment Tool | |
| Housekeeping Supervisor | Reported CNAs pulled from resident care to work in laundry due to staffing |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jun 12, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with facility housekeeping policies and to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents.
Findings
The facility failed to maintain cleanliness in residents' rooms, shower rooms, and hallways, including dirty floors, dusty windows and surfaces, strong urine odors, and unclean shower room floors. Staffing challenges in housekeeping were noted as contributing factors.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0584: The facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment in two residents' rooms, one shower room, and one hallway, with issues including dirty floors, dusty windowsills, trash, and strong urine odors.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 2
Shower rooms affected: 1
Hallways affected: 1
Housekeeper assigned rooms: 30
Quarter to half dollar brown stains: 6
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Housekeeping Supervisor | Confirmed housekeeping duties and staffing challenges. | |
| Housekeeper | Reported not cleaning shower room floor on 6/11/24 and 6/12/24. | |
| Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 | Confirmed odor of urine in Resident #4's room. | |
| Registered Nurse (RN) #1 | Confirmed strong urine odor inside and outside Resident #4's room. | |
| Administrator | Confirmed strong urine odor and housekeeping staffing challenges. |
Inspection Report
Routine
Deficiencies: 8
Date: Mar 15, 2024
Visit Reason
Routine inspection of Brandon Community Care Center to assess compliance with resident rights, medication administration, environment cleanliness, grievance resolution, incontinent care, medication error rates, food quality, and food safety.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure residents' rights to smoke breaks, timely medication administration, clean linens, grievance resolution, timely incontinent care, and medication error rates below 5%. Food served was bland and unappealing, and food storage practices did not meet safety standards.
Deficiencies (8)
F 0561: Facility failed to ensure residents who smoke were allowed to exercise their right to smoke during designated times for 2 of 38 residents.
F 0580: Facility failed to notify attending physician of repeated medication refusals for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for medications.
F 0584: Facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment by not ensuring clean linen was available for 2 of 35 residents.
F 0585: Facility failed to resolve a resident's grievance related to ADL care and showers for 1 of 35 residents.
F 0690: Facility failed to ensure residents were not left soiled for extended periods and received timely incontinent care for 1 of 4 dependent residents.
F 0759: Facility failed to maintain medication error rates below 5%, with 4 of 33 medications administered incorrectly.
F 0804: Facility failed to serve food in a manner that was appealing and palatable for 2 of 35 residents.
F 0812: Facility failed to ensure foods were stored safely in the walk-in refrigerator and freezer, with unlabeled foods and food stored on the floor.
Report Facts
Medication error rate: 12.12
Medication refusals: 8
Medication refusals: 10
Residents affected: 2
Residents affected: 2
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 1
Residents affected: 2
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Nurse Practitioner #2 | Nurse Practitioner | Interviewed regarding medication refusals of Resident #159 |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding smoking breaks, medication refusals, and medication administration |
| Administrator | Administrator | Interviewed regarding facility acclimation and staff expectations |
| Pharmacy Consultant | Pharmacy Consultant | Interviewed regarding medication administration and review |
| Assistant Director of Nursing | Assistant Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding grievance resolution and resident care |
| Registered Nurse #2 | Registered Nurse | Interviewed regarding linen availability and resident showers |
| Licensed Practical Nurse #4 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Observed administering medications via PEG tube |
| Registered Dietician #2 | Registered Dietician | Interviewed regarding food quality and kitchen observations |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 3
Date: Mar 15, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate complaints regarding resident rights to smoke during scheduled breaks, unresolved grievances related to activities of daily living and shower care, and appropriate incontinent care for dependent residents.
Complaint Details
The investigation was complaint-driven based on reports from residents and family members about smoking rights violations, unresolved grievances regarding shower care, and inadequate incontinent care. Substantiation status is not explicitly stated.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure residents who smoke were allowed to exercise their right to smoke during designated times, failed to resolve a resident's grievance about inconsistent shower care, and failed to provide timely incontinent care resulting in residents being left soiled for extended periods.
Deficiencies (3)
F 0561: The facility failed to ensure residents who smoke were allowed to exercise their right to smoke during designated smoking times for two of 38 residents who smoke.
F 0585: The facility failed to resolve a resident's grievance related to activities of daily living and shower care for one of 35 sampled residents reviewed for ADLs.
F 0690: The facility failed to ensure residents were not left soiled for extended periods and received incontinent care timely for one of four dependent residents reviewed.
Report Facts
Residents who smoke: 38
Residents affected by smoking rights deficiency: 2
Residents sampled for ADLs: 35
Residents affected by grievance deficiency: 1
Dependent residents reviewed for incontinent care: 4
Residents affected by incontinent care deficiency: 1
BIMS score: 15
BIMS score: 13
BIMS score: 5
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Director of Nursing | Interviewed regarding responsibility for assigning CNAs for smoke breaks and awareness of negative impact on residents | |
| Administrator | Interviewed about staff expectations to provide residents' preferences; new to facility | |
| Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 | Interviewed about residents ready for smoke breaks and agency work with Resident #167 | |
| Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 | Interviewed about shower schedules and resident complaints | |
| Social Service (SS) #1 | Interviewed about grievance filing and resident care complaints | |
| Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) | Interviewed about follow-up with resident's daughter and awareness of care issues | |
| Registered Nurse (RN) #2 | Interviewed about shower refusals and nurse notification procedures | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 | Interviewed about rounds and expectations for CNA care |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 1
Date: Jan 18, 2024
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted following complaints regarding the facility's failure to properly empty and care for urinary drainage bags for Resident #2, specifically concerns about nephrostomy and catheter bag care.
Complaint Details
The complaint was substantiated. Resident #2 and her family reported multiple occasions where the nephrostomy drainage bag was not emptied as required, leading to overfilling and potential health risks. The facility acknowledged the issue and discussed corrective strategies during meetings.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure appropriate care and timely emptying of Resident #2's nephrostomy drainage bag, which was found overfilled multiple times, risking urinary tract infections. Interviews and observations confirmed lapses in monitoring and emptying the bags according to physician instructions.
Deficiencies (1)
F 0690: The facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with urinary drainage tubes, as Resident #2's nephrostomy drainage bag was repeatedly left overfilled, contrary to physician and facility policy instructions.
Report Facts
Urine volume measured: 700
Bag capacity: 600
BIMS score: 15
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 | Emptied Resident #2's nephrostomy drainage bag and confirmed last emptying time. | |
| Resident #2's Nurse Practitioner (NP) | Reported concerns about nursing staff not emptying urine collection bags according to physician instructions. | |
| Resident #2's Urologist | Provided medical instructions for nephrostomy care and urine bag emptying frequency. | |
| Resident #2's Unit Manager | Reported that urine monitoring and bag emptying was assigned to the nurse each shift. | |
| Administrator, Director of Nurses (DON), and Vice President (VP) of Operations | Acknowledged the facility lacked a separate policy for nephrostomy care and drainage bag emptying. |
Inspection Report
Deficiencies: 2
Date: Apr 19, 2023
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with care standards related to activities of daily living assistance and pest control in the facility.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure proper grooming and personal hygiene care for one resident requiring assistance with activities of daily living. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in roach sightings in a resident's room.
Deficiencies (2)
F 0677: The facility failed to provide necessary grooming and personal hygiene care for Resident #2, who had long, dirty, and uneven fingernails with a dark substance underneath, and feet with dry skin and unpleasant odor. Licensed nurses confirmed the resident's fingernails were not cleaned or trimmed as required.
F 0925: The facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, as evidenced by multiple observations of roaches in Resident #3's bathroom and room despite having a pest control contract.
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 | Observed and confirmed Resident #2's fingernail and foot hygiene issues. | |
| Director of Nurses (DON) | Confirmed Resident #2's fingernail care deficiencies and pest control issues. | |
| Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 | Confirmed Resident #2's scheduled bath days and lack of proper hygiene on 4/18/23. | |
| Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #1 | Observed roach in Resident #3's bathroom and disposed of it. | |
| Housekeeping Supervisor | Observed and confirmed roach in Resident #3's room. | |
| Maintenance Assistant #1 | Reported pest control contract and procedures. | |
| Maintenance Assistant #2 | Accompanied pest control technician and reported pest control procedures. |
Inspection Report
Complaint Investigation
Deficiencies: 9
Date: May 26, 2022
Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted based on complaints and concerns regarding resident care, including participation in care planning, resident council grievances, financial management, care plan development and implementation, significant change assessments, ADL assistance, transfer safety, catheter care, and infection control.
Complaint Details
The visit was complaint-related, triggered by multiple resident and family concerns including lack of resident participation in care planning, unresolved resident council grievances about missing laundry, improper financial management of resident funds, failure to complete required assessments, incomplete and unimplemented care plans, inadequate assistance with activities of daily living, unsafe transfer practices, improper catheter care, and infection control breaches.
Findings
The facility failed to allow a resident to participate in care planning, respond to resident council grievances about missing laundry, allow a resident to manage her financial affairs, complete a significant change MDS assessment for hospice admission, develop and implement comprehensive care plans, provide scheduled shower assistance, secure residents properly during transfers, secure catheter tubing, and maintain infection control during wound care and linen handling.
Deficiencies (9)
F 0553: The facility failed to allow Resident #30 to participate in the development and implementation of her person-centered plan of care, as there was no documentation of her participation in care planning.
F 0565: The facility failed to respond and resolve group grievances regarding missing laundry items in resident council meetings for six months.
F 0567: The facility failed to allow Resident #30 to manage her monthly income allotment, wrongfully withholding $44 monthly without her permission.
F 0637: The facility failed to submit a Significant Change in Status MDS assessment for Resident #62 upon hospice admission.
F 0656: The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident #119 and failed to implement care plans related to ADLs for Residents #9 and #200.
F 0677: The facility failed to provide scheduled shower assistance for Residents #129 and #9 as care planned.
F 0689: The facility failed to properly secure Resident #18 with a waist belt during transfer using a sit-to-stand lift.
F 0690: The facility failed to secure Resident #18's suprapubic catheter with a leg strap to prevent trauma.
F 0880: The facility failed to prevent contamination during wound care for Resident #119 and failed to handle soiled linen properly for Resident #18.
Report Facts
Residents reviewed for care plans: 35
Resident council meetings reviewed: 6
Residents reviewed for personal funds: 3
Residents reviewed for ADL assistance: 12
Resident #30 monthly income allotment withheld: 44
Resident #119 admission date: Admitted on 3/25/22 (date not numeric)
Resident #18 admission date: Admitted on 1/22/19 (date not numeric)
Employees mentioned
| Name | Title | Context |
|---|---|---|
| CNA #1 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Failed to fasten waist belt during transfer and improperly handled soiled linen |
| LPN #1 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Failed to ensure waist belt was fastened during transfer and did not place leg strap on catheter |
| Social Worker | Failed to facilitate resident participation in care planning for Resident #30 | |
| Director of Nursing | Director of Nursing | Confirmed failures in care plan development, transfer safety, catheter care, and infection control |
| Business Office Manager | Business Office Manager | Confirmed wrongful withholding of Resident #30's income allotment |
| Interim Administrator | Interim Administrator | Confirmed wrongful withholding of Resident #30's income allotment and acknowledged ongoing laundry issues |
| LPN #4 | Licensed Practical Nurse | Provided information on shower schedules and resident care |
| CNA #3 | Certified Nursing Assistant | Involved in wound care contamination incident |
Viewing
Loading inspection reports...



