Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
101
74 employees · 27 contractors · 30 on an average day Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Meyersdale, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
Nursing Home, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Meyersdale, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 83 / 100, a B — 3 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
Nestled in Meyersdale, Pennsylvania, Casselman Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center is a distinguished senior living facility catering to a spectrum of resident needs, encompassing long-term care, skilled nursing, and memory care. Embracing a team of seasoned and empathetic professionals, the center is committed to delivering the utmost care to its residents.
Casselman offers a suite of amenities, including a beauty salon, a well-stocked library, and a tranquil chapel, enhancing the resident experience. Moreover, the center curates diverse activities and events, ensuring residents stay stimulated and entertained within the community’s embrace.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 142nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 20m
This nursing home is ranked 142nd out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 20m5 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 11 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
11 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
34m
↓ 29% · PA 47mThis facility: 34m per resident per day, 29% below the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 11 total: 7 of the facility's own employees and 4 agency contractors.
11 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 21 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
21 staff · 8-hour shifts
57m
↑ 4% · PA 55mThis facility: 57m per resident per day, 4% above the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 21 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 6 agency contractors.
21 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 45 total: 33 of the facility's own employees and 12 agency contractors.
45 staff · 7.4-hour shifts
1h 50m
↓ 17% · PA 2h 12mThis facility: 1h 50m per resident per day, 17% below the Pennsylvania average of 2h 12m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 45 total: 33 of the facility's own employees and 12 agency contractors.
45 staff · 7.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 83% · PA 6mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 83% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 5m
↓ 12% · PA 3h 31mThis facility: 3h 5m per resident per day, 12% below the Pennsylvania average of 3h 31m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
33m
↓ 1% · PA 33mThis facility: 33m per resident per day, 1% below the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
101
74 employees · 27 contractors · 30 on an average day
101 total staff / 57 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.77 : 1
↓ 2% · PA 1.81This facility: 1.77 staff per resident, 2% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.81 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
101 staff ÷ 57 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 5% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 5% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
20,217 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →90.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.6% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (12), Licensed Practical Nurse (6), Registered Nurse (4), Feeding Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1), Other Physician (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #151 / 201Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 201 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
99
Rank #151 / 201Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 151st out of 201 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #121 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #121 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 121st out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
45
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #149 / 165Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 149th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 165. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #149 / 165Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 149th out of 165 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 165. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
51.2%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 99 beds.
Lower than the Pennsylvania average: 75.8%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
51
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
162
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A-
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
CMS Certification Number395661
Resident Council
Short-Term Rehab
Stroke Recovery
Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
Wound CareCare for wounds such as pressure sores, surgical wounds, or ulcers, including assessment, dressing changes, and monitoring for infection.
IV Therapy
Pain Management
Post-Surgical Care
Diabetic Care and Monitoring
Telemedicine
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Rehabilitation Center
Religious AffiliationYes
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab.Food DescriptionThree daily meals and snacks, therapeutic and modified diets, dietitian consultation, in-room dining options.
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
83 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
3 points above the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
79 severity-weighted points (39 citations) · 2× higher than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 40)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
24 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Total health inspections
16
↑ 119% · PA 7.3This facility: 16, 119% above the Pennsylvania average of 7.3 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
39
Rank #140 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 140th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 23% · PA 31.8This facility: 39, 23% above the Pennsylvania average of 31.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.44
Rank #50 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 41% · PA 4.11This facility: 2.44, 41% below the Pennsylvania average of 4.11 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
39 of 39 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
39
↑ 31% · PA 29.7This facility: 39, 31% above the Pennsylvania average of 29.7 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Aug 06, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 11 of 39 citations · 9 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Aug 06, 2026
6 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 29, 2026
1 citation
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 05, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 18, 2026
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 17, 2025
2 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 31, 2025
7 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 02, 2025
2 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 01, 2025
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 31, 2025
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 08, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 15, 2024
4 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 21, 2024
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 15, 2024
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 26, 2024
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 29, 2023
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 02, 2023
5 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 39 citations
Quality of Life & Care
11 deficiencies (28%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
9 deficiencies (23%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (13%)
Nutrition & Dietary
4 deficiencies (10%)
Resident Rights
3 deficiencies (8%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (5%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (5%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
13 of 39 citations resulted from standard inspections; 22 of 39 resulted from complaint investigations; and 4 of 39 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
PA avg $58KPennsylvania average: $58,340. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
PA avg 1.82Pennsylvania average: 1.82. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.15Pennsylvania average: 0.15. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 7% · PA 3.7This facility: 4.0, 7% above the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
11.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 21% · PA 9.1This facility: 11.0, 21% above the PA average of 9.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
22.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 19% · PA 19.0This facility: 22.6, 19% above the PA average of 19.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 4 better, 5 worse, 2 near PA average
4 short-stay measures: 3 better, 1 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.1%
↓ 8% · PA 16.4This facility: 15.1, 8% below the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.1%
↓ 8% · PA 16.4This facility: 15.1, 8% below the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.1%
↑ 70% · PA 15.4This facility: 26.1, 70% above the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
26.1%
↑ 70% · PA 15.4This facility: 26.1, 70% above the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
↑ 6% · PA 25.0This facility: 26.6, 6% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.6%
↑ 6% · PA 25.0This facility: 26.6, 6% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 16% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 16% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
↓ 16% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 16% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
↓ 63% · PA 3.1This facility: 1.2, 63% below the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.2%
↓ 63% · PA 3.1This facility: 1.2, 63% below the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
≈ 0% · PA 4.7This facility: 4.7, level with the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.7%
≈ 0% · PA 4.7This facility: 4.7, level with the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
↑ 29% · PA 6.0This facility: 7.7, 29% above the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
↑ 29% · PA 6.0This facility: 7.7, 29% above the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
44.3%
↑ 221% · PA 13.8This facility: 44.3, 221% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
44.3%
↑ 221% · PA 13.8This facility: 44.3, 221% above the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5%
↑ 5% · PA 17.6This facility: 18.5, 5% above the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5%
↑ 5% · PA 17.6This facility: 18.5, 5% above the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.8%
↑ 8% · PA 87.8This facility: 94.8, 8% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.8%
↑ 8% · PA 87.8This facility: 94.8, 8% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 95.5, 2% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.5%
↑ 2% · PA 93.7This facility: 95.5, 2% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 4 measures
Daily care & independence
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
40.2%
↓ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 40.2, 21% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
40.2%
↓ 21% · US 50.6This facility: 40.2, 21% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 1.4This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 40% · PA 70.8This facility: 99.0, 40% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.0%
↑ 40% · PA 70.8This facility: 99.0, 40% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.9%
↑ 18% · PA 70.9This facility: 83.9, 18% above the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
83.9%
↑ 18% · PA 70.9This facility: 83.9, 18% above the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−51.3% operating margin
−3.1 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($1.0M) trims the net loss to −$1.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
65.5% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #48 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.3M while revenue rose $0.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $4.7M | +$0.1M | Trend 20152024 | PA median $17.4M | Rank in PA Rank #175 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 175th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Below PA median Higher net patient revenue than 1% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.1M | +$0.3M | Trend 20152024 | PA median $20.7M | Rank in PA Rank #176 / 177Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 176th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 1% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$2.4M | −$0.2M | Trend 20152024 | PA median −$1.3M | Rank in PA Rank #111 / 177Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 111th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 38% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −51.3% | −3.1 pts | Trend 20152024 | PA median −7.4% | Rank in PA Rank #148 / 177Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 148th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 16% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.0M | — | Trend — | PA median $1.1M | Rank in PA Rank #89 / 172Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 89th out of 172 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 49% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.4M | +$0.1M | Trend — | PA median $0.4M | Rank in PA Rank #152 / 177Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 152nd out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2015 → 2024Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.1M | +$0.3M | Trend 20152024 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #177 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 177th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Below PA median Higher payroll than 0% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 65.5% | +5.4 pts | Trend 20152024 | PA median 54.6% | Rank in PA Rank #48 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 73% of homes | 4.6 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2015–2024 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2015–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2015 | 2016no report | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023no report | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.7M | $5.2M | $5.2M | $4.6M | $4.3M | $4.1M | $4.6M | $4.7M | ||
| Operating expenses | $6.1M | $7.4M | $6.8M | $6.5M | $6.3M | $6.3M | $6.8M | $7.1M | ||
| Net patient income | −$0.5M | −$2.2M | −$1.6M | −$1.8M | −$2.1M | −$2.2M | −$2.2M | −$2.4M | ||
| Operating margin | −8.3% | −42.5% | −29.9% | −39.4% | −48.1% | −54.0% | −48.2% | −51.3% | ||
| Net income | −$0.2M | −$1.0M | −$0.4M | −$0.7M | −$0.2M | −$0.8M | −$1.5M | −$1.4M | ||
| Payroll costs | $3.3M | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $2.7M | $2.4M | $2.8M | $3.1M | ||
| Payroll share of revenue | 58.0% | 62.0% | 63.7% | 67.7% | 63.9% | 57.9% | 60.1% | 65.5% | ||
| Beds | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | 99 | ||
| Gross revenue | $7.4M | $8.0M | $8.1M | $7.6M | $7.0M | $6.2M | $7.2M | $4.9M | ||
| Salaries | $2.5M | $2.5M | $2.7M | $2.5M | $2.2M | $1.9M | $2.3M | $2.7M | ||
| Wage-related costs | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M | ||
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.7M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.9M | $1.0M | $0.7M | ||
| Other operating costs | $2.8M | $4.2M | $3.5M | $3.3M | $3.6M | $4.0M | $4.0M | $4.0M | ||
| Net patient revenue per day | $184 | $201 | $212 | $198 | $195 | $240 | $232 | $243 | ||
| Cost per day | $200 | $286 | $275 | $276 | $289 | $369 | $344 | $368 | ||
| Average length of stay | 232.4 days | 1,516.2 days | 1,174.4 days | 1,676.1 days | 1,823.7 days | 660.5 days | 449.4 days | 161.8 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 7 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
99 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
15 · 15%
Medicaid
32 · 32%
Private pay & other
52 · 53%
Resident snapshot
57 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
3 · 5%
Medicaid
42 · 74%
Private pay & other
12 · 21%
Leaving
120 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
9 · 8%
Medicaid
62 · 52%
Private pay & other
49 · 41%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
0.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Meyersdale's city center to Casselman Healthcare and Rehab's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.03 miles to nearest hospital (Conemaugh Meyersdale Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Somerset County
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 70.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casselman Healthcare and Rehab | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Meyersdale | 99
Facility
99
PA AVG
160
Rank
#151 / 201 | B |
51.2%
Facility
51.2%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#149 / 165 | -32% | 3.34
Facility
3.34
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#142 / 180 | -9% | -16% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 39
Facility
39
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#140 / 179 | 2.4
Facility
2.4
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#50 / 179 | - | 51 | A- |
45
Facility
45
PA AVG
50
Rank
#121 / 207 | Amy Kemp | $4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#175 / 177 | $3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#177 / 177 | 65.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
65.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#48 / 177 | 395661 | ||||
| Somerset Health and Rehabilitation | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Somerset (Somerset Township) | 120
Facility
120
PA AVG
160
Rank
#123 / 201 | C |
64.2%
Facility
64.2%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#122 / 165 | -15% | 3.01
Facility
3.01
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#161 / 180 | -48% | -24% | $24.2k
Facility
$24.2k
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#157 / 183 | 77
Facility
77
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#176 / 179 | 4.8
Facility
4.8
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#141 / 179 | 2 | 77 | A |
21
Facility
21
PA AVG
50
Rank
#164 / 207 | Paul Kovacs | $8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#154 / 177 | $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#171 / 177 | 48.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
48.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#123 / 177 | 395398 | ||||
| The Patriot, a Choice Community | NH HOS MC PC RC SNF | Somerset | 176
Facility
176
PA AVG
160
Rank
#65 / 201 | C+ |
51.3%
Facility
51.3%
PA AVG
75.8%
Rank
#148 / 165 | -32% | 2.96
Facility
2.96
PA AVG
3.96
Rank
#161 / 180 | -5% | -25% | $132.6k
Facility
$132.6k
PA AVG
$60.8k
Rank
#181 / 183 | 49
Facility
49
PA AVG
31.8
Rank
#159 / 179 | 8.2
Facility
8.2
PA AVG
4.1
Rank
#173 / 179 | 3 | 39 | - |
55
Facility
55
PA AVG
50
Rank
#94 / 207 | Patriot Senior Living Operating Company LLC | $10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$19.6M
Rank
#142 / 177 | $4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
$11.9M
Rank
#165 / 177 | 47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
PA AVG
70.1%
Rank
#133 / 177 | 395840 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other PA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 3 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Pennsylvania
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab is in Meyersdale, Pennsylvania. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Community HealthChoices (CHC)
Community HealthChoices (CHC)
Eligibility
- General
- Age 21+ and enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid, or receiving qualifying Medicaid long-term services and supports, subject to listed exclusions. Nursing-facility level of care is not a requirement for every dual-eligible CHC enrollee.
- PA specifics
- CHC is a managed-care coordination program; separate service and financial criteria govern long-term supports. Certain developmental-disability program participants and state-facility residents are excluded.
What it provides
- Coordination of health coverage and authorized long-term services and supports when eligible.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- PA specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
Pennsylvania OPTIONS Program
Pennsylvania OPTIONS Program
- Income limit
- No income requirement to participate; income-based sliding copayments may apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania resident age 60+ needing help to remain at home, subject to assessment and program availability.
What it provides
- Assessed support to help remain at home; service mix and copayment depend on individual assessment.
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
- Income limit
- Financial reimbursement is income-based: care-receiver household income up to 200% of federal poverty guidelines receives the full applicable percentage; 200%–380% receives reduced reimbursement; above 380% no reimbursement, although nonreimbursable services may remain available.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania caregivers and care recipients in qualifying categories: adult caregivers of functionally dependent adults age 60+ or people with dementia; and eligible relative caregivers age 55+ caring for children or disabled adults. Enrollment in Medicaid long-term-care programs excludes participation.
What it provides
- Reimbursement of approved caregiving services and supplies up to $600/month; multiplied by the applicable income-based reimbursement percentage; care management; education and support. No fixed respite-hours package is guaranteed.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- PA specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households responsible for home heating or energy costs
Eligibility
- General
- Income-eligible households with qualifying home-energy costs; the administering agency applies household-size and program eligibility rules.
What it provides
- Grants to help eligible households pay heating bills.
Property Tax/Rent Rebate Program (PTRR)
Property Tax/Rent Rebate Program (PTRR)
- Income limit
- 2025 claims filed in 2026 · Eligible annual household income no more than $48,110, applying program exclusions including one-half of Social Security income.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania homeowners or renters age 65+; widows or widowers age 50+; or adults age 18+ with disabilities, subject to household-income and tax or rent-payment requirements.
- PA specifics
- The deadline to apply for a rebate of 2025 property taxes or rent is December 31, 2026. A future tax-year ceiling is not interchangeable with this application year.
What it provides
- Standard rebate up to $1,000; based on eligible income and property tax or rent paid; special supplemental rules may apply.
PACE and PACENET Prescription Assistance
PACE and PACENET Prescription Assistance
- Income limit
- PACE: up to $14,500 single or $17,700 married. PACENET: $14,501–$33,500 single or $17,701–$41,500 married; based on the prior calendar year.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania residents 65+ who lived in the state at least 90 days before applying and are not enrolled in the state Medicaid prescription benefit. Prior-calendar-year income determines eligibility.
What it provides
- Prescription-cost assistance coordinated with Medicare Part D and other drug coverage; PACE and PACENET use different income tiers.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Casselman Healthcare and Rehab
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Casselman Healthcare and Rehab in a walkable area?
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has a walk score of 45. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab?
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab's occupancy is 51.2%.
03 Are pets allowed at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab?
No, Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has a no-pet policy.
04 What is the best email address for Casselman Healthcare and Rehab?
The team at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab can be reached at bblough@casselmanhc.com.
05 Does Casselman Healthcare and Rehab operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab is registered as a for-profit in PA.
06 What is the overall rating for Casselman Healthcare and Rehab?
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
07 How many beds does Casselman Healthcare and Rehab have?
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has 99 beds.
Updated on
