3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Nestled in Meyersdale, Pennsylvania, Casselman Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center is a distinguished senior living facility catering to a spectrum of resident needs, encompassing long-term care, skilled nursing, and memory care. Embracing a team of seasoned and empathetic professionals, the center is committed to delivering the utmost care to its residents.
Casselman offers a suite of amenities, including a beauty salon, a well-stocked library, and a tranquil chapel, enhancing the resident experience. Moreover, the center curates diverse activities and events, ensuring residents stay stimulated and entertained within the community’s embrace.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Hours per resident per day vs Pennsylvania averages
Total nursing care
This home is ranked 142nd out of 180 homes in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 42m
11% below state avg
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
4 of 6 metrics below state avg
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
A composite 0–100 score combining this facility's inspections, citations, complaints, and enforcement actions relative to the Pennsylvania state average. The score below shows how many points this facility sits above or below the typical Pennsylvania nursing home score (the benchmark); higher is better.This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score.
6 points below the Pennsylvania average for nursing homes (83/100)
Rank #320 / 468 in Pennsylvania Inspection Score — State benchmarked This home is ranked 320th out of 468 homes in Pennsylvania for inspection score. Shows this facility's inspection score compared to the Pennsylvania average among 468 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine score. Inspection score: 77 out of 100. Letter grade C+. 6 points below the Pennsylvania average for nursing homes (83/100)
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Citations
|
This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
|
74 | 63 | This facility has 17% more total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (74 vs. PA avg 63).↑ 17% worse Rank #361 / 478 Total citations — State benchmarked This home is ranked 361st out of 478 homes in Pennsylvania for total citations. Shows this facility's total citations compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
|
4.6 | 5.7 | This facility has 19% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4.6 vs. PA avg 5.7).↓ 19% better Rank #284 / 478 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This home is ranked 284th out of 478 homes in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among 478 comparable communities in the ranking pool. Facilities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings are based only on facilities in Pennsylvania that report data for that category. Facilities without available data are excluded from the ranking. |
Inspections
|
This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
|
16 | 11 | This facility has had 45% more total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (16 vs. PA avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 45% more |
Pennsylvania average 6.7
Last Health inspection on Sep 2025
Pennsylvania average 31.3
Pennsylvania average 4.4
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 57 citations resulted from standard inspections; 27 of 57 resulted from complaint investigations; and 10 of 57 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
100% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 0.3
67% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 0.6
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
0% compared with Pennsylvania average
6% worse than Pennsylvania average
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Manages medical care and health needs.
12 total: 9 full-time employees and 3 contractors.
12
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.2 hours
Assists with medical care and medications.
15 total: 12 full-time employees and 3 contractors.
15
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hours
Helps with daily care and mobility.
36 total: 32 full-time employees and 4 contractors.
36
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
7.2 hours
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
965 contractor hours this quarter
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 32 | 4 | 36 | 7,938 | 92 | 100% | 7.2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 12 | 3 | 15 | 3,539 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Registered Nurse | 9 | 3 | 12 | 2,100 | 92 | 100% | 8.2 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 2 | 0 | 2 | 916 | 66 | 72% | 7.8 |
| Dietitian | 2 | 0 | 2 | 594 | 61 | 66% | 8.1 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 4 | 0 | 4 | 547 | 66 | 72% | 6.9 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 523 | 65 | 71% | 8 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 2 | 0 | 2 | 520 | 68 | 74% | 6.8 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 468 | 59 | 64% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 440 | 61 | 66% | 7.2 |
| Feeding Assistant | 0 | 1 | 1 | 99 | 11 | 12% | 9 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 3 | 0 | 3 | 76 | 33 | 36% | 2.3 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 63 | 9 | 10% | 7 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 1 | 0 | 1 | 49 | 25 | 27% | 1.9 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 0 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 24 | 26% | 2 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 45 | 12 | 13% | 3.7 |
| Other Physician | 0 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 6 | 7% | 5.3 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 12 | 13% | 2 |
| Occupational Therapy Assistant | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 14% | 1.3 |
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
95% lower than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: $59K
52% fewer fines than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 2.1
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 0.2
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
8.7
21% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 11.0
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
18.0
19% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 22.2
CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.5%
45% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 19.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.5%
8% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 21.1%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.0%
10% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 26.7%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.8%
14% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 3.2%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
6.7%
22% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 5.5%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.6%
68% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 1.8%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
43% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 6.6%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.3%
13% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 5.5%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.6%
8% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 17.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.7%
11% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 86.9%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.8%
5% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 93.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
72.9%
6% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 68.8%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
100% better than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 1.5%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
48.2%
30% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 68.7%
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
40.2%
21% worse than Pennsylvania average
Pennsylvania average: 50.6%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
20% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
57% of new residents, often for short stays.
24% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
50
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Historical financial and operational data for Casselman Healthcare and Rehab from 2011–2022, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2022 — the home's most recent complete cost report, an older period than most facilities report.
Based on the home's most recent complete CMS SNF Cost Report — fiscal year ending in 12/2022. This is an older period than most facilities report, so compare with that in mind.
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.
Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (57% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 23 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
0.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Meyersdale's city center to Casselman Healthcare and Rehab's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.03 miles to nearest hospital (Conemaugh Meyersdale Medical Center)
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casselman Healthcare and Rehab |
NH
HOS
MC
PC
RC
SNF
|
Meyersdale |
99
Facility
99
PA AVG
94
Rank
#225 / 552
|
44.1%
Facility
44.1%
PA AVG
68.1
Rank
#456 / 506
| -35% |
3.69
Facility
3.69
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#142 / 180
| +13% | -11% |
$0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183
|
77
Facility
77
PA AVG
83
Rank
#320 / 468
|
57
Facility
57
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#163 / 178
|
3.6
Facility
3.6
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#90 / 178
| 1 | 44 | A- |
45
Facility
45
PA AVG
47
Rank
#341 / 657
| Amy Kemp | $4.6M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $2.8M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 60.1%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 395661 | ||||
| Somerset Health and Rehabilitation |
NH
HOS
MC
PC
RC
SNF
|
Somerset (Somerset Township) |
120
Facility
120
PA AVG
94
Rank
#126 / 552
|
55.3%
Facility
55.3%
PA AVG
68.1
Rank
#386 / 506
| -19% |
3.17
Facility
3.17
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#172 / 180
| -26% | -24% |
$24.0k
Facility
$24.0k
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#154 / 183
|
77
Facility
77
PA AVG
83
Rank
#320 / 468
|
66
Facility
66
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#171 / 178
|
6.0
Facility
6.0
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#148 / 178
| 1 | 66 | A- |
21
Facility
21
PA AVG
47
Rank
#523 / 657
| Paul Kovacs | $8.3M*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | $5.0M*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 60.7%*Fiscal year ending 03/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind. | 395398 | ||||
| The Patriot, a Choice Community |
NH
HOS
MC
PC
RC
SNF
|
Somerset |
76
Facility
76
PA AVG
94
Rank
#317 / 552
|
53.9%
Facility
53.9%
PA AVG
68.1
Rank
#394 / 506
| -21% |
3.50
Facility
3.50
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#155 / 180
| -42% | -16% |
$132.6k
Facility
$132.6k
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#177 / 183
|
94
Facility
94
PA AVG
83
Rank
#72 / 468
|
57
Facility
57
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#163 / 178
|
9.5
Facility
9.5
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#175 / 178
| 3 | 41 | - |
55
Facility
55
PA AVG
47
Rank
#245 / 657
| Ronald Buterbaugh |
$9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#148 / 167
|
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$4.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#160 / 167
|
46.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
46.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#125 / 167
| 395840 |
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab is located in Meyersdale, Pennsylvania.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Pennsylvania.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has a walk score of 45. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab's occupancy is 71.2%.
No, Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has a no-pet policy.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab is registered as a for-profit in PA.
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab has had 74 reported citations since 2023 according to records from Pennsylvania Department of Human Services (DHS).
Casselman Healthcare and Rehab is located at 201 Hospital Dr, Meyersdale, PA 15552.
(814) 634-5966 will put you in contact with the team at Casselman Healthcare and Rehab.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
