Inspection Reports for
Chateau III

The complaint involved two allegations: 1) Resident sustained a broken arm while in care, and 2) Facility failed to provide adequate care to the resident. The investigation included document review, interviews with staff, residents, and witnesses, and assessment of care plans and incident reports. The findings were unsubstantiated, meaning there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to prove neglect or inadequate care related to the resident's fall and injury. Both allegations were determined to be unsubstantiated after review of records, interviews, and observations.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The facility was found to have adequate safety measures, proper documentation, and compliance with regulatory standards.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The facility was toured and various safety and care aspects were reviewed, including resident apartments, bathrooms, activity rooms, and medication storage.

No deficiencies were cited during this visit. The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed the resident's file and obtained a copy of the death certificate, which listed cardiopulmonary arrest as the immediate cause of death.

The complaint involved a $3000 check cashed fraudulently by a staff member (S1). The incident was substantiated by the arrest of the staff member following police involvement.

The Licensing Program Analyst interviewed involved parties and collected relevant documents including a cashed check and police report. The staff member implicated was arrested by police during the visit. No deficiencies were issued during this investigation.

The facility is following public health guidance for Covid testing, quarantine, and PPE use. Staff and residents who test positive follow quarantine protocols, and no deficiencies were cited during this visit.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies cited. Safety features such as fire clearance, smoke detectors, and emergency preparedness were verified. Resident and staff records were current and complete.

The complaint involved allegations including residents left in soiled clothing, severe dehydration, medication administration errors, delayed medical care, improper charges for services, poor room maintenance, and inadequate resident care. The investigation concluded these allegations were unsubstantiated.

The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated, meaning there was insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred despite some concerns raised.

The complaint alleging improper assessment of a resident's health conditions was investigated and found unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence and the individual not being a resident.

The allegation was found to be unsubstantiated after review of records and interviews. The individual in question was never a resident, and proper paperwork and assessments were on file for current residents.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The facility was found to have adequate lighting, appropriate hot water temperature, safety features in bathrooms, sufficient food supplies, and secure medication storage.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with infection control requirements. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

The complaint involved allegations of questionable death and failure to contact authorized representatives timely. The investigation concluded the complaint was unfounded, meaning the allegations were false or without reasonable basis.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to substantiate that the facility contributed to the resident's death. The facility provided proper care and timely notifications to the family regarding changes in the resident's health. The complaint was determined to be unfounded and dismissed.