ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 14 points below the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Eddy Village Green is a nursing home offering skilled nursing care in Cohoes, NY. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, so the community may be a good fit for someone who needs ongoing nursing support.
Eddy Village Green has 192 beds, meaning the community includes more residents and staff and usually more programming. Capital Region Geriatric Center operates the community. Payment options are Medicare, Medicaid and private pay; Medicare covers short-term skilled care after a hospital stay rather than long-term residence, Medicaid can help when savings may not cover a long stay, and private pay means paying directly.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 42mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +53% above New York average
4 of 6 metrics below New York average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 25 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
25 staff · 6.4-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 196 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
196 staff · 8.4-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
313
288 employees · 25 contractors · 139 on an average day
313 total staff / 171 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.83 : 1
↑ 39% · NY 1.31This facility: 1.83 staff per resident, 39% above the New York average of 1.31 (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
313 staff ÷ 171 residents
See full New York ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8 h
↑ 4% · NY 7.7 hThis facility: 8 h, 4% above the New York average of 7.7 h (among New York facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
101,822 staff hours this quarter
See full New York ranking →96.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
New York average: 87.9% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Assistant (6), Respiratory Therapy Technician (6), Qualified Social Worker (5), Physical Therapy Aide (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Other Physician (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
93% of staff were vaccinated against the flu
Why it matters: staff move from resident to resident all day. When most of them are vaccinated, the flu is less likely to reach the people it is most dangerous for. Source: state health department data.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
192
Rank #218 / 566Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 218th out of 566 nursing homes we track in New York for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other New York facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #386 / 442Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 386th out of 442 nursing homes we track in New York for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across New York facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy higher than 95% suggests steady demand, but availability may be limited.
Rank #338 / 507Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 338th out of 507 nursing homes we track in New York for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the New York average, with its Statewide rank out of 507. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Based on 186 residents and 192 beds. Source: state licensing agency resident count
Higher than the New York average: 85.3%
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
The below pricing was updated on
Eddy Village Green is legally operated by Capital Region Geriatric Center, Inc (Not for Profit).
14 points below the New York average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
118 severity-weighted points (26 citations) · 3× higher than the typical CMS-certified NY facility (median: 43)
$97,383 in fines · 1 enforcement action
47 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified NY facility (median: 51)
100% corrected
26 of 26 citations corrected Latest inspection: Apr 03, 2025 · 15 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 5 of 26 citations · 7 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
20 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; 5 of 26 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection ReportsSummary of court-record activity tied to this facility, compiled from publicly available case dockets.
Source: State court e-filing records
Every lawsuit on record involving this facility since the earliest filing. Long-term volume signals overall legal exposure.
4
Lawsuits still moving through the courts. Active claims can affect day-to-day operations, settlement risk, and insurance posture.
2
Cases that have been disposed of — dismissed, settled, or decided. Shows how the facility has historically resolved disputes.
2
Year of the earliest case on record. A long history with steady filings suggests persistent issues; a recent first filing means newer exposure.
2011
Most recent filing on record. Recent activity means legal disputes are still being raised against this facility.
2025
Most recent court appearance scheduled on record. Court dates are captured when the report is compiled and are not updated as dockets move, so later hearings may have been set since.
Jul 22, 2026
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 24, 2025 · $97,383 civil money penalty
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$97,383Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. New York and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the New York average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 25% · NY 4.0This facility: 5.0, 25% above the NY average of 4.0 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
1
/ 5
Significantly below average
↓ 72% · NY 3.5This facility: 1.0, 72% below the NY average of 3.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 20% · NY 8.4This facility: 6.7, 20% below the NY average of 8.4 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.1
Score · lower is better
↑ 12% · NY 15.4This facility: 17.1, 12% above the NY average of 15.4 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 3 worse, 2 near NY average
7 short-stay measures: 4 better, 2 compared with US only, 1 without a benchmark
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.2%
↓ 35% · NY 14.1This facility: 9.2, 35% below the NY average of 14.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.0%
↑ 4% · NY 12.5This facility: 13.0, 4% above the NY average of 12.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.2%
↑ 50% · NY 19.5This facility: 29.2, 50% above the NY average of 19.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.0%
↓ 20% · NY 1.3This facility: 1.0, 20% below the NY average of 1.3 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.8%
↑ 89% · NY 3.1This facility: 5.8, 89% above the NY average of 3.1 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.5%
↓ 62% · NY 6.5This facility: 2.5, 62% below the NY average of 6.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.9%
↓ 51% · NY 5.8This facility: 2.9, 51% below the NY average of 5.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.6%
↓ 97% · NY 19.5This facility: 0.6, 97% below the NY average of 19.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.5%
↑ 13% · NY 13.7This facility: 15.5, 13% above the NY average of 13.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.3%
↑ 6% · NY 91.5This facility: 97.3, 6% above the NY average of 91.5 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.5%
↑ 4% · NY 95.3This facility: 99.5, 4% above the NY average of 95.3 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.12
↓ 35% · NY 1.71This facility: 1.12, 35% below the NY average of 1.71 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.72
↓ 47% · NY 1.35This facility: 0.72, 47% below the NY average of 1.35 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 7 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
18.5%
↓ 66% · US 53.7This facility: 18.5, 66% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.3%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.3%
↑ 18% · NY 77.4This facility: 91.3, 18% above the NY average of 77.4 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 27% · NY 78.8This facility: 100.0, 27% above the NY average of 78.8 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
9.4%
↓ 54% · NY 20.6This facility: 9.4, 54% below the NY average of 20.6 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
7.4%
↓ 24% · NY 9.7This facility: 7.4, 24% below the NY average of 9.7 (among NY facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
14% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
64% of new residents, often for short stays.
22% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
171Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Eddy Village Green’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 454 New York nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−4.0% operating margin
+12.7 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($1.6M) turns it into a net profit to $0.6M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most New York homes
65.6% payroll share of revenue
NY average 56.1%Rank #72 / 452Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 452 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.8M while revenue rose $4.2M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with New York homes.
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $26.1M | +$4.2M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $23.7M | Rank in NY Rank #203 / 454Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 203rd out of 454 nursing homes we track in New York for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 55% of homes | Above NY median Higher net patient revenue than 55% of NY homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $27.1M | +$1.6M | Trend 20172024 | NY median — | Rank in NY Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.0M | +$2.6M | Trend 20172024 | NY median — | Rank in NY Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −4.0% | +12.7 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median — | Rank in NY Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $1.6M | — | Trend — | NY median — | Rank in NY Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.6M | +$2.8M | Trend — | NY median — | Rank in NY Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Spends more of revenue on staff than most New York homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | NY median | Compared with NY homesRank in NY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $17.1M | +$1.8M | Trend 20172024 | NY median $12.4M | Rank in NY Rank #132 / 454Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 132nd out of 454 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 71% of homes | Above NY median Higher payroll than 71% of NY homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 65.6% | −4.5 pts | Trend 20172024 | NY median 52.6% | Rank in NY Rank #72 / 452Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 72nd out of 452 nursing homes we track in New York for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the New York average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in New York that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 84% of homes | 9.5 pts over NY average The NY average is 56.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the New York payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin NY payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $24.4M | $24.8M | $25.3M | $23.8M | $20.9M | $20.6M | $21.8M | $26.1M |
| Operating expenses | $23.2M | $24.1M | $25.3M | $24.6M | $23.6M | $23.8M | $25.5M | $27.1M |
| Net patient income | $1.2M | $0.7M | $0.1M | −$0.8M | −$2.7M | −$3.2M | −$3.7M | −$1.0M |
| Operating margin | 5.1% | 2.9% | 0.3% | −3.4% | −13.1% | −15.5% | −16.7% | −4.0% |
| Net income | $2.1M | $0.9M | $2.9M | $2.8M | −$0.2M | −$4.6M | −$2.2M | $0.6M |
| Payroll costs | $13.1M | $13.5M | $14.3M | $14.2M | $13.1M | $13.3M | $15.3M | $17.1M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 53.5% | 54.3% | 56.3% | 59.4% | 62.7% | 64.5% | 70.1% | 65.6% |
| Beds | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 | 192 |
| Gross revenue | $34.9M | $35.5M | $36.1M | $34.5M | $27.9M | $30.3M | $32.4M | $36.5M |
| Salaries | $10.5M | $11.1M | $11.6M | $11.5M | $10.8M | $11.0M | $12.7M | $14.2M |
| Wage-related costs | $2.6M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $2.3M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.9M |
| Contract labor | $0.2M | $0.4M | $0.2M | — | $0.2M | $0.9M | $0.4M | $0.8M |
| Other operating costs | $10.1M | $10.6M | $11.0M | $10.5M | $10.5M | $10.5M | $10.2M | $10.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $358 | $363 | $368 | $357 | $328 | $371 | $384 | $394 |
| Cost per day | $340 | $353 | $367 | $369 | $371 | $429 | $448 | $410 |
| Average length of stay | 710.5 days | 682.7 days | 747.8 days | 611.9 days | 730.8 days | 942.8 days | 632.3 days | 695.9 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Most residents stay long-term, while a smaller portion are admitted for short-term rehab.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (64% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 10 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Cohoes's city center to Eddy Village Green's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the NY State Dept. of Health (NYSDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The New York average is: 56.1% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Our Lady of Mercy Life Center | NH SNF | Guilderland | 160
Facility
160
NY AVG
177
Rank
#255 / 566 | B- |
98.1%
Facility
98.1%
NY AVG
85.3%
Rank
#287 / 507 | +15% | 4.09
Facility
4.09
NY AVG
3.67
Rank
#164 / 490 | -9% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#1 / 496 | 25
Facility
25
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#351 / 495 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#394 / 495 | - | 157 | - |
25
Facility
25
NY AVG
64
Rank
#381 / 442 | Our Lady Of Mercy Life Center (Not For Profit) | $19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$19.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#270 / 454 | $11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#247 / 454 | 59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
59.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#133 / 452 | 335767 | ||||
| Eddy Village Green | NH SNF | Cohoes | 192
Facility
192
NY AVG
177
Rank
#218 / 566 | C- |
96.9%
Facility
96.9%
NY AVG
85.3%
Rank
#338 / 507 | +14% | 4.70 | -37% | +28% | $97.4k
Facility
$97.4k
NY AVG
$77.8k
Rank
#461 / 496 | 26
Facility
26
NY AVG
20.3
Rank
#367 / 495 | 5.2
Facility
5.2
NY AVG
4.8
Rank
#316 / 495 | 2 | 186 | - |
24
Facility
24
NY AVG
64
Rank
#386 / 442 | Capital Region Geriatric Center, Inc (Not For Profit) | $26.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$26.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$28.8M
Rank
#203 / 454 | $17.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$17.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
$15.2M
Rank
#132 / 454 | 65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
65.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
NY AVG
56.1%
Rank
#72 / 452 | 335697 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other NY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Eddy Village Green is located in Cohoes, New York State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in New York State.
Eddy Village Green is legally operated by Capital Region Geriatric Center, Inc (Not for Profit).
Eddy Village Green has a walk score of 24. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
According to NY state health department records, Eddy Village Green's license number is 0102001N.
Eddy Village Green's occupancy is 96.9%.
No, Eddy Village Green has a no-pet policy.
The team at Eddy Village Green can be reached at pricerequest@sphp.com.
Eddy Village Green is registered as a non-profit in NY.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
