Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Garden Villas of Lenexa
Operated by Delmar Gardens of Lenexa Inc, Garden Villas of Lenexa is a senior living community in Lenexa, Kansas. Mark Sutton serves as the administrator. The Johnson County community is close to central Lenexa and less than a mile from Overland Park Regional Medical Center. It offers nursing home care, assisted living, independent living, memory care, and skilled nursing services in one location.
The community has been serving residents for 27 years and offers 78 beds in a three-story building. Housing is available in suite-style layouts. The community currently has an occupancy rate of about 80%. Nursing staff provides an average of 4.38 hours of care per resident daily. This gives families a sense of the hands-on nursing support available across the community’s different levels of care.
Residents have access to an on-site therapy team and chef-prepared meals. Transportation services help residents get to appointments and run errands outside the community. Social, educational, cultural, and recreational programs give residents several ways to stay active and engaged. Pets are welcome here.
The area has a Walk Score of 75, which is considered very walkable. Many everyday errands can be completed on foot, which can benefit residents who enjoy getting outside and family members visiting from nearby.
State inspections are conducted by the Kansas Department for Aging and Disability Services. Records show periods with no findings as well as periods when issues were identified. Reviews have mainly focused on documentation, emergency planning, and staff training. The community has addressed issues found during earlier inspections over time.
Community insights.
About this community
Garden Villas of Lenexa is administered by Mark Sutton.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2015 vs. Kansas state average• Total deficiencies (46% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (23% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 58 | 108 | This facility has 46% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Kansas nursing home (58 vs. KS avg 108).↓ 46% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 3.2 | 4.18 | This facility has 23% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Kansas nursing home (3.2 vs. KS avg 4.18).↓ 23% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 18 | 24 | This facility has had 25% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (18 vs. KS avg 24). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 25% fewer |
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Housing Options: Suite
Building Type: 3-story
Transportation Services
Fitness and Recreation
Places of interest near Garden Villas of Lenexa
0.6 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Lenexa's city center to Garden Villas of Lenexa's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.94 miles to nearest hospital (Overland Park Regional Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Garden Villas of Lenexa
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Lenexa
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delmar Gardens of Lenexa | NH AL MC RC SNF | Monrovia Lenexa | 222
Facility
222
KS AVG
69
Rank
#1 / 223 |
75.5%
Facility
75.5%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#130 / 203 | -2% | 4.87
Facility
4.87
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#42 / 137 | -22% | +5% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#1 / 143 | 14
Facility
14
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#17 / 143 | 4.7
Facility
4.7
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#43 / 143 | - | 168 | - |
75
Facility
75
KS AVG
47
Rank
#39 / 352 | Kathryn Allen | $14.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$14.7MFiscal year ending 03/2024
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#15 / 139 | $8.4MFiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 03/2024
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#13 / 139 | 57.3%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
Facility
57.3%Fiscal year ending 03/2024
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#61 / 139 | 175122 | ||||
| Lakeview Village | NH AL IL SNF | Lenexa | 184
Facility
184
KS AVG
69
Rank
#3 / 223 |
69.6%
Facility
69.6%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#150 / 203 | -10% | 7.34
Facility
7.34
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#1 / 137 | -23% | +58% | $35.6k
Facility
$35.6k
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#113 / 143 | 18
Facility
18
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#37 / 143 | 4.5
Facility
4.5
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#38 / 143 | 2 | 128 | A+ |
54
Facility
54
KS AVG
47
Rank
#138 / 352 | Lakeview Village, Inc | $44.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$44.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#1 / 139 | $29.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$29.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#1 / 139 | 66.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
66.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#27 / 139 | 175242 | ||||
| Westchester Village of Lenexa | NH AL IL SNF | Lenexa | 34
Facility
34
KS AVG
69
Rank
#216 / 223 |
90.0%
Facility
90.0%
KS AVG
77.3%
Rank
#36 / 203 | +16% | 5.56
Facility
5.56
KS AVG
4.63
Rank
#18 / 137 | -9% | +20% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$49.2k
Rank
#1 / 143 | 22
Facility
22
KS AVG
26.9
Rank
#60 / 143 | 7.3
Facility
7.3
KS AVG
6.1
Rank
#106 / 143 | - | 31 | - |
70
Facility
70
KS AVG
47
Rank
#57 / 352 | Haley Nickles | $8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$8.4MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$8.3M
Rank
#51 / 139 | $3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$3.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
$4.8M
Rank
#62 / 139 | 45.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
45.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
KS AVG
57.8%
Rank
#116 / 139 | 175536 |
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Kansas
Garden Villas of Lenexa is located in Lenexa, Kansas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Kansas.
Frequently Asked Questions about Garden Villas of Lenexa
Who is the owner of Garden Villas of Lenexa?
Garden Villas of Lenexa is legally operated by Delmar Gardens Of Lenexa Inc, and administered by Mark Sutton.
Is Garden Villas of Lenexa in a walkable area?
Garden Villas of Lenexa has a walk score of 75. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the license number of Garden Villas of Lenexa?
According to KS state health department records, Garden Villas of Lenexa's license number is N046078.
What is the occupancy rate at Garden Villas of Lenexa?
Garden Villas of Lenexa's occupancy is 80%.
How long has Garden Villas of Lenexa been in business?
Garden Villas of Lenexa has been operating for approximately 27 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Garden Villas of Lenexa?
Yes, Garden Villas of Lenexa allows residents to bring their pets.
Who is the administrator of Garden Villas of Lenexa?
Mark Sutton is the administrator of Garden Villas of Lenexa.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





