Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
50
35 employees · 15 contractors · 19 on an average day Gran Gran’s Place
Nursing Home · Yukon, OK
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 81 / 100, a B- — 1 point below the Oklahoma average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 81 / 100, a B- — 1 point below the Oklahoma average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Community photos aren’t available yet.
To request photos, use the contact form below.
Gran Gran’s Place
Nursing Home · Yukon, OK
ALM Inspection Grade
B-
ALM's inspection grade is 81 / 100, a B- — 1 point below the Oklahoma average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 81 / 100, a B- — 1 point below the Oklahoma average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Gran Gran’s Place accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Gran Gran’s Place in Yukon, OK, is a nursing home that offers rehabilitation and skilled nursing. Promoting a nurturing and welcoming environment, the community ensures older adults can keep their peace of mind in retirement. Residents also experience a worry-free retirement, with round-the-clock care, nutritious meals, and recreational programs. Through individualized care plans, the community ensures older adults receive the utmost attention and care to recover and return to their routines with ease.
Themed events, games, and a variety of recreational activities provide residents with more opportunities to make friends and live actively. Lively gathering areas and cozy rooms are also available, so residents can rest and connect with their surroundings. Residents also have quick access to their necessities and leisure, with a bank, restaurants, shops, and a pharmacy in the area. This nursing home has exceptional services dedicated to older adults’ welfare, making it one of the best options for senior living in Oklahoma.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 37m
This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 37mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +53% above Oklahoma average
2 of 6 metrics below Oklahoma average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 3.9-hour shifts
31m
↑ 53% · OK 20mThis facility: 31m per resident per day, 53% above the Oklahoma average of 20m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 3 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
3 staff · 3.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
1h 5m
↑ 16% · OK 56mThis facility: 1h 5m per resident per day, 16% above the Oklahoma average of 56m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
29 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
3h 1m
↑ 18% · OK 2h 34mThis facility: 3h 1m per resident per day, 18% above the Oklahoma average of 2h 34m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 29 total: 15 of the facility's own employees and 14 agency contractors.
29 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.8-hour shifts
0m
↓ 100% · OK 1mThis facility: 0m per resident per day, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 1m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 1 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
1 staff · 4.8-hour shiftsUS average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 51m
↑ 10% · OK 3h 29mThis facility: 3h 51m per resident per day, 10% above the Oklahoma average of 3h 29m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
13m
↓ 24% · OK 17mThis facility: 13m per resident per day, 24% below the Oklahoma average of 17m (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
50
35 employees · 15 contractors · 19 on an average day
50 total staff / 32 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.56 : 1
↓ 2% · OK 1.60This facility: 1.56 staff per resident, 2% below the Oklahoma average of 1.60 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
50 staff ÷ 32 residents
See full Oklahoma ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↓ 5% · OK 8.2 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 5% below the Oklahoma average of 8.2 h (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13,697 staff hours this quarter
See full Oklahoma ranking →98.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Oklahoma average: 93.8% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (14), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
69
Rank #30 / 40Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
69
Rank #30 / 40Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 30th out of 40 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Oklahoma facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #3 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #3 / 46Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 46 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Oklahoma facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
69
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #34 / 37Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 37. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #34 / 37Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 34th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Oklahoma average, with its Statewide rank out of 37. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
48.1%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 69 beds.
Lower than the Oklahoma average: 71.9%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
33
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
284
days
About This Community
Resident Council
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
81 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
1 point below the Oklahoma average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
65 severity-weighted points (22 deficiencies) · 41% higher than the typical CMS-certified OK facility (median: 46)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Typical
34 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified OK facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
4
↓ 17% · OK 4.8This facility: 4, 17% below the Oklahoma average of 4.8 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
22
Rank #27 / 42Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Oklahoma State average, with a ranking across all 42 OK facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 3% · OK 22.7This facility: 22, 3% below the Oklahoma average of 22.7 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
5.5
Rank #36 / 42Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 42 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Oklahoma mean across 42 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 13% · OK 4.85This facility: 5.5, 13% above the Oklahoma average of 4.85 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
22 of 22 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.7 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · OK 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Oklahoma average of 0.4 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
22
↑ 2% · OK 21.6This facility: 22, 2% above the Oklahoma average of 21.6 (among Oklahoma facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
Oklahoma avg 0 (In line with Oklahoma average)
No harm, minimal riskOklahoma avg 0 (In line with Oklahoma average)Latest inspection: Apr 23, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Infection Control, 5 of 22 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 23, 2026
6 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 10, 2024
9 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 09, 2023
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 23, 2023
6 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 22 citations
Infection Control
5 deficiencies (23%)
Pharmacy Services
5 deficiencies (23%)
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (18%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
2 deficiencies (9%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (9%)
Administration
2 deficiencies (9%)
Resident Rights
1 deficiency (5%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (5%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
21 of 22 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 22 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Total fines
$0
OK avg $37KOklahoma average: $36,744. Average among the 150 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
OK avg 1.84Oklahoma average: 1.84. Average among the 150 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
OK avg 0.37Oklahoma average: 0.37. Average among the 150 Oklahoma facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Oklahoma average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.2
Score · lower is better
↓ 47% · OK 8.0This facility: 4.2, 47% below the OK average of 8.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
2.3
Score · lower is better
↓ 84% · OK 14.8This facility: 2.3, 84% below the OK average of 14.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 10 better, 3 worse
1 short-stay measure: 1 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8%
↓ 72% · OK 13.6This facility: 3.8, 72% below the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.8%
↓ 72% · OK 13.6This facility: 3.8, 72% below the OK average of 13.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.6%
↓ 88% · OK 13.7This facility: 1.6, 88% below the OK average of 13.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
1.6%
↓ 88% · OK 13.7This facility: 1.6, 88% below the OK average of 13.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
1.5%
↓ 91% · OK 17.1This facility: 1.5, 91% below the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
1.5%
↓ 91% · OK 17.1This facility: 1.5, 91% below the OK average of 17.1 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↓ 13% · OK 2.8This facility: 2.4, 13% below the OK average of 2.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
↓ 13% · OK 2.8This facility: 2.4, 13% below the OK average of 2.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2%
↑ 54% · OK 4.7This facility: 7.2, 54% above the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.2%
↑ 54% · OK 4.7This facility: 7.2, 54% above the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4%
↓ 8% · OK 4.7This facility: 4.4, 8% below the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.4%
↓ 8% · OK 4.7This facility: 4.4, 8% below the OK average of 4.7 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↑ 22% · OK 3.3This facility: 4.0, 22% above the OK average of 3.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.0%
↑ 22% · OK 3.3This facility: 4.0, 22% above the OK average of 3.3 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.7%
↑ 161% · OK 3.4This facility: 8.7, 161% above the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.7%
↑ 161% · OK 3.4This facility: 8.7, 161% above the OK average of 3.4 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
↓ 10% · OK 17.5This facility: 15.7, 10% below the OK average of 17.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.7%
↓ 10% · OK 17.5This facility: 15.7, 10% below the OK average of 17.5 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 10% · OK 91.0This facility: 100.0, 10% above the OK average of 91.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 10% · OK 91.0This facility: 100.0, 10% above the OK average of 91.0 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OK 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OK average of 94.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · OK 94.6This facility: 100.0, 6% above the OK average of 94.6 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.33
↓ 86% · OK 2.28This facility: 0.33, 86% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.33
↓ 86% · OK 2.28This facility: 0.33, 86% below the OK average of 2.28 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.44
↓ 85% · OK 2.91This facility: 0.44, 85% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.44
↓ 85% · OK 2.91This facility: 0.44, 85% below the OK average of 2.91 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 1 measures
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.0%
↑ 19% · OK 75.8This facility: 90.0, 19% above the OK average of 75.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.0%
↑ 19% · OK 75.8This facility: 90.0, 19% above the OK average of 75.8 (among OK facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Gran Gran’s Place’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 41 Oklahoma nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
4.7% operating margin
+7.0 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.2M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Oklahoma homes
60.3% payroll share of revenue
OK average 56.7%Rank #7 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.2M while revenue rose $0.3M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Oklahoma homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $3.2M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $10.4M | Rank in OK Rank #40 / 41Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Below OK median Higher net patient revenue than 3% of OK homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $3.1M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | OK median — | Rank in OK Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.2M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | OK median — | Rank in OK Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 4.7% | +7.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | OK median — | Rank in OK Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.2M | +$0.2M | Trend — | OK median — | Rank in OK Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Oklahoma homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | OK median | Compared with OK homesRank in OK | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $1.9M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | OK median $5.3M | Rank in OK Rank #40 / 41Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 3% of homes | Below OK median Higher payroll than 3% of OK homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 60.3% | −1.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | OK median 50.1% | Rank in OK Rank #7 / 41Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 41 nursing homes we track in Oklahoma for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Oklahoma average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Oklahoma that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | 3.6 pts over OK average The OK average is 56.7% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · OK benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Oklahoma payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin OK payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $0.7M | $3.1M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $3.0M | $2.6M | $2.9M | $3.2M |
| Operating expenses | $2.9M | $3.1M | $3.5M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $3.0M | $2.9M | $3.1M |
| Net patient income | −$2.2M | −$0.0M | −$0.3M | $0.2M | $0.2M | −$0.4M | −$0.1M | $0.2M |
| Operating margin | −327.0% | −1.4% | −8.2% | 6.2% | 5.6% | −15.6% | −2.3% | 4.7% |
| Net income | −$2.2M | −$0.0M | −$0.3M | $1.1M | $0.6M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | $0.2M |
| Payroll costs | $1.9M | $2.1M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.9M | $1.8M | $1.9M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 274.6% | 69.2% | 53.7% | 55.7% | 60.6% | 73.5% | 62.2% | 60.3% |
| Beds | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 69 |
| Gross revenue | $0.7M | $3.1M | $3.3M | $3.1M | $3.0M | $2.6M | $2.9M | $3.2M |
| Salaries | $1.5M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | $0.0M | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $1.0M | $1.0M | $1.8M | $1.2M | $1.0M | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $39 | $177 | $1,523 | $192 | $211 | $230 | $223 | $240 |
| Cost per day | $165 | $179 | $1,647 | $180 | $199 | $266 | $228 | $229 |
| Average length of stay | 47.7 days | 26.3 days | 28.9 days | 29.9 days | 571.8 days | 205.3 days | 124.3 days | 283.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
41 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
14 · 34%
Medicaid
14 · 34%
Private pay & other
13 · 32%
Resident snapshot
32 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
27 · 84%
Private pay & other
5 · 16%
Leaving
47 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
10 · 21%
Medicaid
25 · 53%
Private pay & other
12 · 26%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Gran Gran’s Place
2.2 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Yukon's city center to Gran Gran’s Place's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Gran Gran’s Place
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Mustang
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the OK State Dept. of Health (OSDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Oklahoma average is: 56.7% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gran Gran’s Place | NH | Yukon | 69
Facility
69
OK AVG
97
Rank
#30 / 40 | B- |
48.1%
Facility
48.1%
OK AVG
71.9%
Rank
#34 / 37 | -33% | 4.62
Facility
4.62
OK AVG
4.57
Rank
#8 / 41 | -1% | +1% | $0
Facility
$0
OK AVG
$38.4k
Rank
#1 / 42 | 22
Facility
22
OK AVG
22.7
Rank
#27 / 42 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#36 / 42 | - | 33 | - |
69
Facility
69
OK AVG
40
Rank
#3 / 46 | Nell Lusty | $3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$3.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#40 / 41 | $1.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#40 / 41 | 60.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
60.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#7 / 41 | 375410 | ||||
| Ranchwood Nursing Center | NH RC SNF | Yukon (Oklahoma City) | 150 | ? | 68.8% | -4% | 4.06
Facility
4.06
OK AVG
4.57
Rank
#31 / 41 | -64% | -11% | $168.8k
Facility
$168.8k
OK AVG
$38.4k
Rank
#42 / 42 | 46
Facility
46
OK AVG
22.7
Rank
#40 / 42 | 4.2
Facility
4.2
OK AVG
4.8
Rank
#25 / 42 | 4 | 103 | - |
40
Facility
40
OK AVG
40
Rank
#25 / 46 | Sanctuary Ltc, LLC | $10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$11.8M
Rank
#17 / 41 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
$6.2M
Rank
#24 / 41 | 47.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.3%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
OK AVG
56.7%
Rank
#27 / 41 | 375229 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other OK nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Oklahoma
Gran Gran’s Place is located in Yukon, Oklahoma.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Oklahoma.
Frequently Asked Questions about Gran Gran’s Place
Is Gran Gran’s Place in a walkable area?
Gran Gran’s Place has a walk score of 69. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
What is the occupancy rate at Gran Gran’s Place?
Gran Gran’s Place's occupancy is 48.1%.
Are pets allowed at Gran Gran’s Place?
No, Gran Gran’s Place has a no-pet policy.
Does Gran Gran’s Place operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Gran Gran’s Place is registered as a for-profit.
What is the overall rating for Gran Gran’s Place?
Gran Gran’s Place received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Gran Gran’s Place have?
Gran Gran’s Place has 69 beds.
What levels of care does Gran Gran’s Place provide?
Gran Gran’s Place offers Nursing Home.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
