Harmony Village of Beverly Hills
Harmony Village of Beverly Hills is a nursing home in Beverly Hills, MI, focusing on short-term and physical rehabilitation. Fostering comfort and healing, the community ensures older adults are well-cared for throughout their stay. Excellent services, including well-balanced meals, comprehensive therapies, and recreational activities, are also provided to enrich residents’ living experiences. The community also doubles its efforts to provide the best possible care tailored to residents’ unique needs and habits to ensure their recovery.
Stretching exercises and fun gatherings ensure residents can stay active and connect with peers. State-of-the-art rehabilitation gym and spacious common areas also ensure residents can focus on their wellness and rest comfortably. Surrounded by restaurants, shops, and public transportation in Beverly Hills, the community ensures residents have easy access to necessities and leisure. Providing high standards of care, this nursing home is one of the best choices for senior living in Michigan.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Standout metric: LPN / LVN is +53% above Michigan average
3 of 6 metrics below Michigan average
Daily care time per resident, by role
US average: 43m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 43m
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
US average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
US average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
95.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Michigan average: 91.4% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (3), Qualified Social Worker (3), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Community insights.
Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Based on residents per day and 96 beds.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
14 points below the Michigan average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
156 severity-weighted points (54 deficiencies) · 2× higher than the typical CMS-certified MI facility (median: 78)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified MI facility (median: 0) · $0 in fines
Persistence
Concern
39 days to fix issues · slower than the typical CMS-certified MI facility (median: 28)
Citation severity
Latest inspection: Jun 03, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 15 of 54 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent firstShowing the 50 most recent of 54 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 54 citationsHow citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
16 of 54 citations resulted from standard inspections; 36 of 54 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 54 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: May 15, 2024 · 39-day payment denial
Penalty history · past 3 years
Fine amount comparison
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Michigan and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Michigan average.
11 long-stay measures: 9 better, 2 worse
2 short-stay measures: 2 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 2 measures
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Harmony Village of Beverly Hills’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 124 Michigan nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−27.5% operating margin
−3.7 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.2M) trims the net loss to −$1.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Michigan homes
59.8% payroll share of revenue
MI average 55.9%Rank #26 / 124Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $1.6M while revenue fell $2.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Michigan homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | MI median | Compared with MI homesRank in MI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.7M | −$2.1M | Trend 20162024 | MI median $12.5M | Rank in MI Rank #118 / 124Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Below MI median Higher net patient revenue than 5% of MI homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.3M | −$2.4M | Trend 20162024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.6M | +$0.3M | Trend 20162024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −27.5% | −3.7 pts | Trend 20162024 | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.2M | — | Trend — | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.4M | −$0.2M | Trend — | MI median — | Rank in MI Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Michigan homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | MI median | Compared with MI homesRank in MI | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.4M | −$1.6M | Trend 20162024 | MI median $6.7M | Rank in MI Rank #118 / 124Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Below MI median Higher payroll than 5% of MI homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 59.8% | −3.8 pts | Trend 20162024 | MI median 52.7% | Rank in MI Rank #26 / 124Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 124 nursing homes we track in Michigan for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Michigan average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Michigan that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | 3.9 pts over MI average The MI average is 55.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · MI benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Michigan payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MI payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021no report | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $7.3M | $7.2M | $6.2M | $5.9M | $5.6M | $7.1M | $7.9M | $5.7M | |
| Operating expenses | $8.0M | $7.6M | $7.4M | $7.3M | $7.6M | $8.0M | $9.7M | $7.3M | |
| Net patient income | −$0.6M | −$0.4M | −$1.1M | −$1.3M | −$2.1M | −$0.9M | −$1.9M | −$1.6M | |
| Operating margin | −8.8% | −5.5% | −18.2% | −22.7% | −37.3% | −12.3% | −23.8% | −27.5% | |
| Net income | −$0.6M | −$0.4M | −$1.1M | −$1.3M | −$1.1M | −$0.7M | −$1.2M | −$1.4M | |
| Payroll costs | $3.2M | $3.3M | $3.4M | $3.8M | $4.0M | $4.0M | $5.0M | $3.4M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 43.8% | 46.1% | 55.3% | 63.6% | 72.5% | 56.8% | 63.6% | 59.8% | |
| Beds | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 102 | 115 | 96 | 96 | |
| Gross revenue | $21.6M | $24.9M | $22.4M | $21.4M | $17.5M | $13.6M | $16.4M | $12.6M | |
| Salaries | $2.7M | $2.8M | $3.0M | $3.3M | $3.5M | $3.5M | $4.4M | $3.2M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M | $0.2M | |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | $0.6M | $0.5M | |
| Other operating costs | $4.7M | $4.3M | $3.9M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $3.9M | $4.7M | $3.9M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $241 | $237 | $230 | $233 | $291 | $312 | $279 | $326 | |
| Cost per day | $263 | $250 | $272 | $286 | $400 | $351 | $346 | $416 | |
| Average length of stay | 97.0 days | 125.4 days | 129.4 days | 148.9 days | 92.5 days | 88.7 days | 144.4 days | 65.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Harmony Village of Beverly Hills
2.7 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Beverly Hills's city center to Harmony Village of Beverly Hills's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Harmony Village of Beverly Hills
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Michigan
Harmony Village of Beverly Hills is located in Beverly Hills, Michigan.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Michigan.




