Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
249
240 employees · 9 contractors · 119 on an average day Immanuel Campus of Care
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Peoria, AZ
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Immanuel Campus of Care
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Peoria, AZ
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Immanuel Campus of Care accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Immanuel Campus of Care
Immanuel Campus of Care is a continuing care retirement community in Peoria, Arizona, with independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care. Assisted living adds help with tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication, while memory care provides a secured setting with supervision. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Multiple care levels share one campus. That may suit a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move to another community. The campus has 228 beds, with total nurse staffing of 5 hours and 44 minutes per resident per day. This represents the daily hands on nursing time allocated per resident. Susan Mccarthy-Robinson serves as the administrator.
Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay are accepted. Medicare covers skilled care for a limited period after a hospital stay, Medicaid may help when savings do not cover a long stay, and private pay allows a family to pay directly. Respite care offers a short stay when a usual caregiver needs to travel or recover. The Counseling Clinic and Medical & Mental Health programs provide access to counseling and medical or mental health support, while rehabilitation services give residents access to rehabilitation as part of the care offered on campus. Immanuel Campus of Care may be a good fit for a resident who may need changing support or for a family caregiver who needs temporary coverage.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 44m
This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Arizona for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 44mStandout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +54% above Arizona average
3 of 6 metrics below Arizona average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
35m
↓ 20% · AZ 43mThis facility: 35m per resident per day, 20% below the Arizona average of 43m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 56 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
56 staff · 9.3-hour shifts
1h 30m
↑ 42% · AZ 1h 3mThis facility: 1h 30m per resident per day, 42% above the Arizona average of 1h 3m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 56 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
56 staff · 9.3-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 133 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
133 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
3h 39m
↑ 54% · AZ 2h 22mThis facility: 3h 39m per resident per day, 54% above the Arizona average of 2h 22m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 133 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
133 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
1m
↓ 82% · AZ 6mThis facility: 1m per resident per day, 82% below the Arizona average of 6m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 9m
↑ 42% · AZ 3h 38mThis facility: 5h 9m per resident per day, 42% above the Arizona average of 3h 38m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
29m
↓ 8% · AZ 31mThis facility: 29m per resident per day, 8% below the Arizona average of 31m (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
249
240 employees · 9 contractors · 119 on an average day
249 total staff / 169 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.47 : 1
↓ 12% · AZ 1.67This facility: 1.47 staff per resident, 12% below the Arizona average of 1.67 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
249 staff ÷ 169 residents
See full Arizona ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.9 h
↓ 7% · AZ 8.5 hThis facility: 7.9 h, 7% below the Arizona average of 8.5 h (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
85,855 staff hours this quarter
See full Arizona ranking →98.9% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Arizona average: 94.4% · Contractors this quarter: Qualified Social Worker (3), Speech Language Pathologist (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Other Physician (1), Medical Director (1), Physical Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
228
Rank #5 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.
228
Rank #5 / 80Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Arizona for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Arizona facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.High-capacity home · May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #62 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #62 / 82Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 82 nursing homes we track in Arizona for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Arizona facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
28
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #33 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #33 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 55 nursing homes we track in Arizona for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Arizona average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
73.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 168 residents and 228 beds. Source: state inspection report (Mar 2026)
Similar to the Arizona average: 75.4%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
242
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Facility TypeNursing Care Institution
StatusActive
IssuanceJanuary 1, 1900
ExpirationApril 30, 2027
License NumberNCI-066
CMS Certification Number035250
QualificationHealth Care
Immanuel Campus of Care is legally operated by Immanuel Campus Of Care, and administered by Susan Mccarthy-Robinson.
OwnerImmanuel Caring Ministries, Inc.
Resident Council
Counseling Clinic
Behavioral Health
Medical & Mental Health
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Two inspection records, one home. Arizona inspects it under state rules; CMS inspects its nursing-home beds under federal rules.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each counts its own visits and findings over its own dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Arizona, the Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Care Licensing performs regular onsite inspections and investigates complaints for all licensed residential and nursing facilities.
The figures below cover inspections recorded between June 12, 2023 and May 16, 2026.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Arizona state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. AZ average
2 Worse
Metrics worse than Arizona average:
• Total deficiencies (590% above)
• Enforcement actions (122% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (39% below)
• Total deficiencies (590% above)
• Enforcement actions (122% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Arizona average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (39% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 69 | 10.0 | This facility has 590% more total deficiencies than a typical Arizona nursing home (69 vs. AZ avg 10).↑ 590% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 1.4 | 2.3 | This facility has 39% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Arizona nursing home (1.4 vs. AZ avg 2.3).↓ 39% better |
|
Enforcement actions
Formal penalties or interventions imposed by Arizona regulators — directed plans of correction, civil monetary penalties, denial of payment, or appointment of temporary management.
| 2 | 0.9 | This facility has 122% more enforcement actions than a typical Arizona nursing home (2 vs. AZ avg 0.9).↑ 122% worse |
Inspections
| This Facility | AZ Average | vs. AZ Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 51 | 5.0 | This facility has had 920% more total inspections than the Arizona average (51 vs. AZ avg 5). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 920% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
16
↑ 139% · AZ 6.7This facility: 16, 139% above the Arizona average of 6.7 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
31
Rank #54 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 54th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Arizona State average, with a ranking across all 61 AZ facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 46% · AZ 21.2This facility: 31, 46% above the Arizona average of 21.2 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
1.94
Rank #6 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Arizona mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 42% · AZ 3.34This facility: 1.94, 42% below the Arizona average of 3.34 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
31 of 31 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 300% · AZ 0.5This facility: 2, 300% above the Arizona average of 0.5 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
29
↑ 41% · AZ 20.6This facility: 29, 41% above the Arizona average of 20.6 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · AZ 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Arizona average of 0.1 (among Arizona facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 22, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, 13 of 31 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 22, 2026
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2026
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 02, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 15, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 03, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 27, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 24, 2025
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 20, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 31, 2025
3 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 20, 2024
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 05, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 10, 2024
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 19, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 08, 2024
2 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 03, 2023
6 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 20, 2023
1 citation
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 31 citations
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
13 deficiencies (42%)
Resident Rights
7 deficiencies (23%)
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (16%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (13%)
Administration
1 deficiency (3%)
Pharmacy Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
10 of 31 citations resulted from standard inspections; 20 of 31 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 31 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jan 31, 2025 · $9,110 civil money penalty
Jan 31, 2025 · $9,110 civil money penalty
Mar 7, 2024 · $9,419 civil money penalty
Total fines
$18,529
↓ 41% · AZ $32KThis facility: $18,529, 41% below the Arizona average of $31,656. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #58 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Arizona average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 27% · AZ 1.58This facility: 2, 27% above the Arizona average of 1.58. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
AZ avg 0.1Arizona average: 0.1. Average among the 40 Arizona facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jan 31, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,110
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,110
Mar 7, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,419
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$9,419Fine amount comparison
This facility
$18,529
Arizona average
$31,656
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Arizona and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Arizona average.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.8
Score · lower is better
↑ 48% · AZ 6.7This facility: 9.8, 48% above the AZ average of 6.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 23% · AZ 14.4This facility: 17.7, 23% above the AZ average of 14.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.10 long-stay measures: 4 better, 3 worse, 3 near AZ average
3 short-stay measures: 2 near AZ average, 1 without a benchmark
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 10 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.1%
↑ 43% · AZ 10.6This facility: 15.1, 43% above the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
15.1%
↑ 43% · AZ 10.6This facility: 15.1, 43% above the AZ average of 10.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.5%
↑ 101% · AZ 11.7This facility: 23.5, 101% above the AZ average of 11.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.5%
↑ 101% · AZ 11.7This facility: 23.5, 101% above the AZ average of 11.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.4%
↓ 29% · AZ 20.3This facility: 14.4, 29% below the AZ average of 20.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.4%
↓ 29% · AZ 20.3This facility: 14.4, 29% below the AZ average of 20.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 146% · AZ 1.2This facility: 3.0, 146% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
↑ 146% · AZ 1.2This facility: 3.0, 146% above the AZ average of 1.2 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
↓ 38% · AZ 2.3This facility: 1.4, 38% below the AZ average of 2.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
↓ 38% · AZ 2.3This facility: 1.4, 38% below the AZ average of 2.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
↓ 4% · AZ 4.3This facility: 4.1, 4% below the AZ average of 4.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.1%
↓ 4% · AZ 4.3This facility: 4.1, 4% below the AZ average of 4.3 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
↓ 6% · AZ 5.4This facility: 5.1, 6% below the AZ average of 5.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
↓ 6% · AZ 5.4This facility: 5.1, 6% below the AZ average of 5.4 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · AZ 3.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the AZ average of 3.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
↑ 1% · AZ 96.8This facility: 97.8, 1% above the AZ average of 96.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
↑ 1% · AZ 96.8This facility: 97.8, 1% above the AZ average of 96.8 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
↑ 4% · AZ 94.7This facility: 98.3, 4% above the AZ average of 94.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
↑ 4% · AZ 94.7This facility: 98.3, 4% above the AZ average of 94.7 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.2%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
15.2%
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 4% · AZ 92.6This facility: 89.3, 4% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.3%
↓ 4% · AZ 92.6This facility: 89.3, 4% below the AZ average of 92.6 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.0%
≈ 0% · AZ 87.9This facility: 88.0, level with the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
88.0%
≈ 0% · AZ 87.9This facility: 88.0, level with the AZ average of 87.9 (among AZ facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Immanuel Campus of Care’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 61 Arizona nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
10.2% operating margin
+3.5 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 2 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $2.1M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Arizona homes
58.6% payroll share of revenue
AZ average 63.3%Rank #23 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $1.8M while revenue fell $2.2M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Arizona homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2013 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $27.3M | −$2.2M | Trend 20132024 | AZ median $13.7M | Rank in AZ Rank #8 / 61Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 88% of homes | Above AZ median Higher net patient revenue than 88% of AZ homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $24.5M | −$3.0M | Trend 20132024 | AZ median $14.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #10 / 61Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $2.8M | +$0.8M | Trend 20132024 | AZ median −$0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #8 / 61Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 88% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 10.2% | +3.5 pts | Trend 20132024 | AZ median 0.0% | Rank in AZ Rank #19 / 61Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 70% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $2.5M | — | Trend — | AZ median $0.0M | Rank in AZ Rank #8 / 58Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 58 nursing homes we track in Arizona for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 88% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $2.1M | +$0.4M | Trend — | AZ median $0.6M | Rank in AZ Rank #12 / 61Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Arizona homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 82% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Arizona homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2013 → 2024Trend | AZ median | Compared with AZ homesRank in AZ | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $16.0M | −$1.8M | Trend 20132024 | AZ median $7.5M | Rank in AZ Rank #5 / 61Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Top 7% in AZ by size Higher payroll than 93% of AZ homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.6% | −1.8 pts | Trend 20132024 | AZ median 55.2% | Rank in AZ Rank #23 / 61Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 61 nursing homes we track in Arizona for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Arizona average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Arizona that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 63% of homes | 4.7 pts under AZ average The AZ average is 63.3% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2013–2024 2 charts · AZ benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Arizona payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin AZ payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2013–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2013 | 2014 | 2015no report | 2016no report | 2017no report | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $12.3M | $12.7M | $13.1M | $12.2M | $13.7M | $14.2M | $29.4M | $27.3M | ||||
| Operating expenses | $13.8M | $13.5M | $14.0M | $15.1M | $18.7M | $23.6M | $27.5M | $24.5M | ||||
| Net patient income | −$1.5M | −$0.8M | −$0.9M | −$2.8M | −$5.0M | −$9.5M | $2.0M | $2.8M | ||||
| Operating margin | −12.3% | −5.9% | −7.0% | −23.2% | −36.3% | −67.0% | 6.7% | 10.2% | ||||
| Net income | −$1.5M | −$0.7M | $0.9M | $4.0M | $3.4M | $2.6M | $1.7M | $2.1M | ||||
| Payroll costs | $8.7M | $8.4M | $8.5M | $9.6M | $11.7M | $16.0M | $17.8M | $16.0M | ||||
| Payroll share of revenue | 70.3% | 66.4% | 65.2% | 78.1% | 85.1% | 113.4% | 60.4% | 58.6% | ||||
| Beds | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | ||||
| Gross revenue | $15.0M | $15.0M | $13.1M | $12.2M | $13.7M | $14.2M | $32.2M | $32.7M | ||||
| Salaries | $7.4M | $7.8M | $7.3M | $8.4M | $10.3M | $14.1M | $15.6M | $14.1M | ||||
| Wage-related costs | $1.2M | $0.6M | $1.2M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.9M | $2.2M | $1.9M | ||||
| Contract labor | $0.5M | $0.4M | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||
| Other operating costs | $5.2M | $5.0M | $5.5M | $5.5M | $7.0M | $7.6M | $9.7M | $8.5M | ||||
| Net patient revenue per day | $213 | $211 | $221 | $228 | $226 | $214 | $462 | $475 | ||||
| Cost per day | $240 | $224 | $237 | $280 | $309 | $357 | $431 | $427 | ||||
| Average length of stay | 130.4 days | 136.0 days | 205.1 days | 532.5 days | 208.5 days | 184.5 days | 271.1 days | 242.0 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 9 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
168 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
2 · 1%
Medicaid
123 · 73%
Private pay & other
43 · 26%
Resident snapshot
169 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
169 · 100%
Private pay & other
0 · 0%
Leaving
237 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
2 · 1%
Medicaid
182 · 77%
Private pay & other
53 · 22%
Mostly long-term care residents
Most residents stay for extended periods and receive ongoing daily care.
Places of interest near Immanuel Campus of Care
2.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Peoria's city center to Immanuel Campus of Care's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 5.53 miles to nearest hospital (Banner Thunderbird Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Immanuel Campus of Care
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Peoria
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the AZ Dept. of Health Services (ADHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Arizona average is: 63.3% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freedom Plaza Arizona | NH AL HOS IL MC SNF | Peoria | 111
Facility
111
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#38 / 80 |
51.0%
Facility
51.0%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#49 / 55 | -32% | 5.10
Facility
5.10
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#11 / 60 | +15% | +25% | $0
Facility
$0
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 14
Facility
14
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#21 / 61 | 7.0
Facility
7.0
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#60 / 61 | - | 57 | A+ |
28
Facility
28
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#62 / 82 | Freedom Plaza Operating Company, LLC | $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#28 / 61 | $14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#6 / 61 | 101.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
101.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#6 / 61 | 035256 | ||||
| Immanuel Campus of Care | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Peoria | 228
Facility
228
AZ AVG
102
Rank
#5 / 80 |
73.7%
Facility
73.7%
AZ AVG
75.4%
Rank
#33 / 55 | -2% | 5.73
Facility
5.73
AZ AVG
4.08
Rank
#8 / 60 | - | -47% | +40% | $18.5k
Facility
$18.5k
AZ AVG
$31.7k
Rank
#58 / 61 | 31
Facility
31
AZ AVG
21.2
Rank
#54 / 61 | 1.9
Facility
1.9
AZ AVG
3.3
Rank
#6 / 61 | 2 | 168 | A+ |
28
Facility
28
AZ AVG
42
Rank
#62 / 82 | Immanuel Caring Ministries, Inc | $27.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$27.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#8 / 61 | $16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
$8.9M
Rank
#5 / 61 | 58.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
58.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
AZ AVG
63.3%
Rank
#23 / 61 | 035250 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other AZ nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 2 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Arizona
Immanuel Campus of Care is in Peoria, Arizona. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Arizona Long Term Care System
ALTCS
- Who it is for
- Arizonans who meet ALTCS medical and Medicaid financial rules, mainly older adults and people with disabilities
- Income limit
- 2026 · For 2026, an individual applicant generally may have gross income up to $2,982/month; trust and spousal rules can affect eligibility.
- Asset limit
- $2,000 countable resources for an individual applicant; exclusions and community-spouse protections apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Arizona residents who meet ALTCS medical eligibility and applicable Medicaid requirements; older adults and people with qualifying disabilities may be served.
- AZ specifics
- An ALTCS medical assessment determines need for institutional level of care; eligibility alone does not prescribe a number of service hours.
What it provides
- Authorized long-term care through the ALTCS plan including home/community or institutional services according to assessed need.
Non-Medical Home and Community Based Services
AZ DES Non-Medical HCBS
- Who it is for
- Adults 60+, or adults 18–60 with disabilities, who need help to remain at home
Eligibility
- General
- Adults age 60+ or adults age 18–60 with disabilities who have functional limitations and need help remaining at home.
- AZ specifics
- Area Agencies on Aging assess needs and arrange available home and community services.
What it provides
- Assessed home support; meals; personal care; respite; adult day services and transportation where available; no fixed hour or trip allowance.
Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP)
AZ WAP
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households whose home needs energy-efficiency improvements
Eligibility
- General
- Arizona households qualifying for the state-administered Weatherization Assistance Program.
- AZ specifics
- The Arizona Department of Housing administers the program through weatherization providers.
What it provides
- Home energy-efficiency improvements through the Weatherization Assistance Program.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Immanuel Campus of Care
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Immanuel Campus of Care?
Immanuel Campus of Care is legally operated by Immanuel Caring Ministries, Inc., and administered by Susan Mccarthy-Robinson.
02 Is Immanuel Campus of Care in a walkable area?
Immanuel Campus of Care has a walk score of 28. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the license number of Immanuel Campus of Care?
According to AZ state health department records, Immanuel Campus of Care's license number is NCI-066.
04 When does Immanuel Campus of Care's license expire?
According to AZ state health department records, Immanuel Campus of Care's license expires on April 30, 2027.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Immanuel Campus of Care?
Immanuel Campus of Care's occupancy is 73.7%.
06 Are pets allowed at Immanuel Campus of Care?
No, Immanuel Campus of Care has a no-pet policy.
07 Does Immanuel Campus of Care operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Immanuel Campus of Care is registered as a non-profit in AZ.
Updated on
