Inspection Reports for
Ivy Park at Bonita

The complaint alleged that Staff 1 was abusive towards Resident 1. Resident 1 was confused and disoriented at times. Interviews with residents and staff, as well as an outside source, did not support the allegation. The complaint was determined to be unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with residents, staff, and an outside source, as well as records review. The allegation of staff abuse was found to be unsubstantiated based on lack of evidence and conflicting statements.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies observed or cited. All required safety equipment, furnishings, and supplies were present and in working order. Staff and resident records were reviewed and found to be compliant.

The facility was found to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair with no deficiencies observed or cited. All required safety equipment and licensing postings were present and functional. Staff and resident records were reviewed and found to be in order.

The visit involved delivery of an amended complaint investigation report, but no deficiencies were found.

No deficiencies were cited or observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and appeal rights were provided to the facility representative.

The visit involved delivery of an amended complaint investigation report, but no deficiencies were found or cited.

No deficiencies were cited or observed during this visit. An exit interview was conducted and appeal rights were provided.

The complaint alleged that staff did not dispense Resident 1's medication as prescribed, specifically that medications were found in pill packs or bottles despite instructions to dispense them several times a day. The investigation found that medications were dispensed as prescribed, with exceptions due to resident refusal, being out in the community, or medication unavailability. The allegation was unsubstantiated.

The investigation included interviews with staff and review of medication administration records, which found no evidence of medication errors or missed medications for Resident 1. The allegation was determined to be unsubstantiated based on a preponderance of evidence.

The complaint was investigated and determined to be unfounded, meaning the allegations were false, could not have happened, or were without reasonable basis.

The investigation determined that the alleged victim was not a resident of the facility, and therefore the allegations were found to be unfounded and dismissed.

The complaint was investigated and determined to be unfounded as the alleged victim was not a resident of the facility.

The investigation determined that the alleged victim was not a resident of the facility, and therefore the allegations were found to be unfounded and dismissed.

During the visit, the analyst interacted with staff and residents and obtained facility records. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director, and licensing rights were provided.

During the visit, the Licensing Program Analyst interacted with staff and residents and obtained facility records. An exit interview was conducted with the Executive Director and a copy of the report along with Licensee Rights was provided.

The complaint involved a medication error where Resident 1 received the wrong medication. The physician was notified and instructed monitoring for side effects, but no adverse effects were expected.

The Licensing Program Analyst conducted an unannounced case management visit, reviewed records, interviewed staff, and completed a wellness check. No health or safety issues were identified, and no deficiencies were cited or observed.

The complaint involved a medication error for Resident 1, which was self-reported on January 30, 2025. The physician was notified and instructed monitoring for side effects, but no side effects were expected.

The Licensing Program Analyst conducted a wellness check and staff interviews, finding no health or safety issues and no deficiencies cited or observed during the visit.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and compliant with all applicable regulations. No deficiencies were identified during the inspection.

The facility was found to be clean, well-maintained, and in good condition with no deficiencies noted. Safety features such as smoke and carbon monoxide alarms were present, and hot water and ambient temperatures were within acceptable ranges.