Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
199
199 employees · 0 contractors · 75 on an average day Lexington Park Assisted Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Topeka, KS
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lexington Park Assisted Living
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living & Skilled Nursing · Topeka, KS
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Lexington Park Assisted Living accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Lexington Park Assisted Living
Lexington Park Assisted Living offers nursing home, skilled nursing, assisted living, and independent living in Topeka, KS. Its range of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time and who may be able to remain in the community as care changes.
Nursing home and skilled nursing services provide licensed nursing care on site around the clock. Assisted living includes help with daily tasks such as dressing, bathing, and medication while a resident keeps an apartment, while independent living provides private living with community services and no daily care. The community has 60 beds, and total nurse staffing is 5h 4m per resident/day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated per resident.
Medicare and private pay are accepted, giving families those two payment paths for eligible services. Pets are allowed, so residents may keep a pet at the community. A Walk Score of 60 places the area in the somewhat walkable band, meaning some errands can be done on foot and a resident who no longer drives may be able to manage certain outings independently. Ben Rigdon serves as the administrator.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 141 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 4m
This nursing home is ranked 44th out of 141 nursing homes we track in Kansas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
5h 4mStandout metric: LPN / LVN is +20% above Kansas average
2 of 5 metrics below Kansas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.8-hour shifts
44m
↓ 10% · KS 49mThis facility: 44m per resident per day, 10% below the Kansas average of 49m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 8 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
8 staff · 8.8-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 10-hour shifts
54m
↑ 20% · KS 45mThis facility: 54m per resident per day, 20% above the Kansas average of 45m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 14 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
14 staff · 10-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 80 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
80 staff · 6.8-hour shifts
3h 26m
↑ 11% · KS 3h 6mThis facility: 3h 26m per resident per day, 11% above the Kansas average of 3h 6m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 80 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
80 staff · 6.8-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 6.7-hour shifts
14m
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation. All 19 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
19 staff · 6.7-hour shifts
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 40m
↑ 14% · KS 4h 5mThis facility: 4h 40m per resident per day, 14% above the Kansas average of 4h 5m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
30m
↓ 2% · KS 30mThis facility: 30m per resident per day, 2% below the Kansas average of 30m (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
199
199 employees · 0 contractors · 75 on an average day
199 total staff / 76 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.62 : 1
↑ 17% · KS 2.24This facility: 2.62 staff per resident, 17% above the Kansas average of 2.24 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
199 staff ÷ 76 residents
See full Kansas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
6.9 h
↓ 10% · KS 7.7 hThis facility: 6.9 h, 10% below the Kansas average of 7.7 h (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
47,329 staff hours this quarter
See full Kansas ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Kansas average: 91.7% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #8 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
150
Rank #8 / 151Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 151 nursing homes we track in Kansas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Kansas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
90 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 60 state-licensed beds.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #24 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #24 / 37Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 37 nursing homes we track in Kansas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Kansas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
23
years
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #50 / 159Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #50 / 159Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 159 nursing homes we track in Kansas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Kansas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
60
/ 100
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
80
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
96
days
About This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$2,995/Month
StatusActive
CountyShawnee
License NumberN089041
Lexington Park Assisted Living is administered by Ben Rigdon.
OwnerLexington Park LLC
Assisted Living
60 units
Total beds
60 units
Resident Council
Occupational TherapyListed as: Short-term rehabilitation (physical and occupational therapy)
Diabetes Management
Emergency Communication System
HousekeepingListed as: Weekly housekeeping and laundry services
Laundry & Linen
TransportationListed as: Scheduled transportation
- Three home-cooked meals per day with special dietary accommodations
Pets Allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Landscaped Grounds
Studio Floor plans as listed by the community: Deluxe Studio · Studio (Independent Living)
Floor plans: Deluxe
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: One Bed Deluxe · One Bed (Independent Living)
Floor plans: Deluxe
2 Bedroom
In-Room Features
In-Unit Kitchenette With Mini Fridge And Microwave
Private Bathroom With Step-In Shower
Individual Heating & Air Conditioning
Ample Closet Space
Full Kitchen With Full-Size Appliances (Independent Living Units)
Two inspection records, one community. Kansas inspects its 60 state-licensed beds; CMS inspects its 90 nursing-home beds.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each covers only its own beds, visits and dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Kansas, the Department for Aging and Disability Services, Survey and Certification Commission performs the unannounced inspections required for facility licensing and federal certification.
Since 2014 · 12 years of data
These figures come from state-published inspection data.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 16 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 16 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Kansas state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2014 vs. Kansas state average
Overall vs. KS average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
0 Better
No metrics in this bucket.
Inspections
| This Facility | KS Average | vs. KS Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 16 | 19.0 | This facility has had 16% fewer total inspections than the Kansas average (16 vs. KS avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 16% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
3
↓ 29% · KS 4.2This facility: 3, 29% below the Kansas average of 4.2 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
8
Rank #5 / 144Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Kansas State average, with a ranking across all 144 KS facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 71% · KS 27.6This facility: 8, 71% below the Kansas average of 27.6 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.67
Rank #3 / 144Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Kansas mean across 144 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 59% · KS 6.52This facility: 2.67, 59% below the Kansas average of 6.52 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
8 of 8 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Kansas average of 0.7 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · KS 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Kansas average of 0.8 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 76% · KS 25.3This facility: 6, 76% below the Kansas average of 25.3 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
2
↑ 186% · KS 0.7This facility: 2, 186% above the Kansas average of 0.7 (among Kansas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 29, 2026 · 3 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 3 of 8 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 29, 2026
3 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 17, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 28, 2023
3 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 8 citations
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (38%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (25%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (25%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (13%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
6 of 8 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 2 of 8 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
KS avg $41KKansas average: $41,033. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
KS avg 2.13Kansas average: 2.13. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
KS avg 0.26Kansas average: 0.26. Average among the 145 Kansas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Kansas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 25% · KS 9.0This facility: 6.7, 25% below the KS average of 9.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
15.5
Score · lower is better
↓ 13% · KS 17.8This facility: 15.5, 13% below the KS average of 17.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 2 worse, 3 near KS average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 48% · KS 17.4This facility: 9.0, 48% below the KS average of 17.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
↓ 48% · KS 17.4This facility: 9.0, 48% below the KS average of 17.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.3%
↑ 5% · KS 14.5This facility: 15.3, 5% above the KS average of 14.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.3%
↑ 5% · KS 14.5This facility: 15.3, 5% above the KS average of 14.5 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.4%
↑ 4% · KS 21.6This facility: 22.4, 4% above the KS average of 21.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
22.4%
↑ 4% · KS 21.6This facility: 22.4, 4% above the KS average of 21.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↓ 48% · KS 2.8This facility: 1.5, 48% below the KS average of 2.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.5%
↓ 48% · KS 2.8This facility: 1.5, 48% below the KS average of 2.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 32% · KS 4.2This facility: 2.9, 32% below the KS average of 4.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.9%
↓ 32% · KS 4.2This facility: 2.9, 32% below the KS average of 4.2 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6%
↑ 5% · KS 4.4This facility: 4.6, 5% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
4.6%
↑ 5% · KS 4.4This facility: 4.6, 5% above the KS average of 4.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 59% · KS 4.8This facility: 2.0, 59% below the KS average of 4.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.0%
↓ 59% · KS 4.8This facility: 2.0, 59% below the KS average of 4.8 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 6.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 6.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 6.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 6.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.7%
↓ 18% · KS 17.9This facility: 14.7, 18% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.7%
↓ 18% · KS 17.9This facility: 14.7, 18% below the KS average of 17.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.4%
↓ 3% · KS 92.9This facility: 90.4, 3% below the KS average of 92.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.4%
↓ 3% · KS 92.9This facility: 90.4, 3% below the KS average of 92.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 2% · KS 94.9This facility: 96.4, 2% above the KS average of 94.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.4%
↑ 2% · KS 94.9This facility: 96.4, 2% above the KS average of 94.9 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · KS 1.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the KS average of 1.6 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
↑ 23% · KS 77.0This facility: 94.5, 23% above the KS average of 77.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
↑ 23% · KS 77.0This facility: 94.5, 23% above the KS average of 77.0 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
↑ 26% · KS 75.4This facility: 95.0, 26% above the KS average of 75.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
95.0%
↑ 26% · KS 75.4This facility: 95.0, 26% above the KS average of 75.4 (among KS facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Lexington Park Assisted Living’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 144 Kansas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.7% operating margin
+11.2 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 3 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.7M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Kansas homes
46.5% payroll share of revenue
KS average 57.2%Rank #116 / 144Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.6M while revenue rose $2.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Kansas homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $10.7M | +$2.3M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.6M | Rank in KS Rank #37 / 144Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 75% of homes | Above KS median Higher net patient revenue than 75% of KS homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $10.0M | +$1.2M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $6.5M | Rank in KS Rank #46 / 144Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 46th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.7M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | KS median −$0.1M | Rank in KS Rank #11 / 144Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 11th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.7% | +11.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median −0.8% | Rank in KS Rank #25 / 144Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 83% of homes | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | KS median $0.0M | Rank in KS Rank #82 / 142Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 82nd out of 142 nursing homes we track in Kansas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 43% of homes | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.7M | +$1.1M | Trend — | KS median $0.2M | Rank in KS Rank #22 / 144Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Kansas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Kansas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | KS median | Compared with KS homesRank in KS | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $5.0M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | KS median $3.5M | Rank in KS Rank #52 / 144Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 64% of homes | Above KS median Higher payroll than 64% of KS homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 46.5% | −4.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | KS median 54.5% | Rank in KS Rank #116 / 144Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 116th out of 144 nursing homes we track in Kansas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Kansas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Kansas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | 10.7 pts under KS average The KS average is 57.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · KS benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Kansas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin KS payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.8M | $9.1M | $8.9M | $7.8M | $7.1M | $7.5M | $8.4M | $10.7M |
| Operating expenses | $8.5M | $8.7M | $8.9M | $8.3M | $7.6M | $8.3M | $8.8M | $10.0M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | $0.4M | −$0.0M | −$0.4M | −$0.5M | −$0.8M | −$0.4M | $0.7M |
| Operating margin | 3.2% | 4.3% | −0.1% | −5.7% | −7.1% | −10.4% | −4.5% | 6.7% |
| Net income | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.0M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | −$0.7M | −$0.3M | $0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $3.9M | $3.9M | $3.9M | $3.8M | $3.6M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $5.0M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 44.2% | 42.5% | 43.1% | 48.3% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 51.3% | 46.5% |
| Beds | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 |
| Gross revenue | $12.1M | $12.3M | $12.1M | $10.1M | $9.3M | $9.7M | $10.9M | $13.6M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $3.4M | $3.5M | $3.3M | $3.2M | $3.6M | $3.8M | $4.4M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.5M | $0.5M | $0.6M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.6M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $4.5M | $4.0M | $4.2M | $4.5M | $5.0M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $313 | $325 | $328 | $316 | $323 | $324 | $345 | $380 |
| Cost per day | $303 | $311 | $328 | $334 | $346 | $357 | $360 | $355 |
| Average length of stay | 76.9 days | 69.1 days | 78.6 days | 89.9 days | 86.8 days | 100.8 days | 101.3 days | 96.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
294 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
204 · 69%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
90 · 31%
Resident snapshot
76 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
19 · 25%
Medicaid
39 · 51%
Private pay & other
18 · 24%
Leaving
292 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
209 · 72%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
83 · 28%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Lexington Park Assisted Living
Places of interest near Lexington Park Assisted Living
3.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Topeka's city center to Lexington Park Assisted Living's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.6 miles to nearest hospital (Stormont Vail Health)
Calculate Travel Distance to Lexington Park Assisted Living
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Topeka
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the KS Dept. for Aging & Disability Services (KDADS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Kansas average is: 57.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brewster Place | NH AL IL MC RC SNF | Topeka | 141
Facility
141
KS AVG
74
Rank
#9 / 151 | - | - | 6.85
Facility
6.85
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#4 / 141 | -65% | +46% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 19
Facility
19
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#40 / 144 | 6.3
Facility
6.3
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#70 / 144 | - | 71 | A+ |
56
Facility
56
KS AVG
49
Rank
#65 / 159 | City Of Topeka | $23.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$23.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.5M
Rank
#5 / 144 | $15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#4 / 144 | 66.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
66.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#20 / 144 | 175044 | ||||
| Lexington Park Assisted Living | NH AL IL SNF | Topeka | 150
Facility
150
KS AVG
74
Rank
#8 / 151 | - | - | 5.07
Facility
5.07
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#44 / 141 | -62% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 8
Facility
8
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#5 / 144 | 2.7
Facility
2.7
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#3 / 144 | - | 80 | - |
60
Facility
60
KS AVG
49
Rank
#50 / 159 | Lexington Park LLC | $10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$10.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.5M
Rank
#37 / 144 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#52 / 144 | 46.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
46.5%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#116 / 144 | 175154 | ||||
| Osage Nursing Center | NH HC HOS SNF | Osage City | 56
Facility
56
KS AVG
74
Rank
#90 / 151 | - | - | 4.98
Facility
4.98
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#48 / 141 | +1% | +6% | $0
Facility
$0
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#1 / 145 | 27
Facility
27
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#81 / 144 | 9.0
Facility
9.0
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#119 / 144 | - | 38 | - |
29
Facility
29
KS AVG
49
Rank
#119 / 159 | Osage Nursing LLC | $4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.5M
Rank
#116 / 144 | $2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#125 / 144 | 49.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
49.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#100 / 144 | 175256 | ||||
| Rolling Hills Retirement Community | NH AL RC SNF | Topeka (Southwest Topeka) | 70
Facility
70
KS AVG
74
Rank
#64 / 151 |
59.9%
Facility
59.9%
KS AVG
84.7%
Rank
#122 / 130 | -29% | 4.51
Facility
4.51
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#73 / 141 | -41% | -3% | $14.2k
Facility
$14.2k
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#87 / 145 | 42
Facility
42
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#114 / 144 | 10.5
Facility
10.5
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#129 / 144 | 1 | 42 | - |
33
Facility
33
KS AVG
49
Rank
#113 / 159 | Rolling Hills Health Center Real Estate LLC | $4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.5M
Rank
#107 / 144 | $2.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.4MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#108 / 144 | 53.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
53.9%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#75 / 144 | 175165 | ||||
| Brighton Place West Health Center LLC | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Topeka | 50
Facility
50
KS AVG
74
Rank
#102 / 151 |
98.4%
Facility
98.4%
KS AVG
84.7%
Rank
#19 / 130 | +16% | 2.54
Facility
2.54
KS AVG
4.68
Rank
#141 / 141 | +23% | -46% | $10.9k
Facility
$10.9k
KS AVG
$41.2k
Rank
#76 / 145 | 20
Facility
20
KS AVG
27.6
Rank
#47 / 144 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
KS AVG
6.5
Rank
#38 / 144 | 2 | 49 | - |
43
Facility
43
KS AVG
49
Rank
#98 / 159 | Shkiyas Hachama Snf Realty LLC | $4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$8.5M
Rank
#118 / 144 | $1.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$1.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
$4.9M
Rank
#138 / 144 | 41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
41.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
KS AVG
57.2%
Rank
#137 / 144 | 175547 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other KS nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Kansas
Lexington Park Assisted Living is in Topeka, Kansas. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Pension Aid and Attendance and Housebound Benefits (Federal)
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- No single monthly income cutoff. VA compares countable annual income, after permitted deductions, with the applicable Maximum Annual Pension Rate for the household and benefit category.
- Asset limit
- Net-worth limit is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus annual income; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Veterans or eligible survivors who qualify for VA Pension or Survivors Pension and meet the additional Aid and Attendance or Housebound criteria. Service, discharge, family status and pension eligibility rules also apply.
- KS specifics
- A federal VA pension benefit; Aid and Attendance and Housebound enhancements cannot be received together.
What it provides
- A higher pension ceiling for eligible Aid and Attendance or Housebound recipients. Actual pension equals the applicable annual maximum minus countable income; the two enhancements cannot be paid together.
Frail Elderly Waiver
Kansas Medicaid FE Waiver
Eligibility
- General
- Kansas residents age 65 or older who meet Medicaid financial rules and the long-term-care functional assessment.
- KS specifics
- Begin with the Aging and Disability Resource Center; service types and amounts depend on current waiver rules and assessment.
What it provides
- Authorized home/community services under the Frail Elderly Waiver instead of nursing-facility care.
Senior Care Act
Kansas SCA
- Income limit
- Cost sharing uses a sliding scale based on income and assets.
Eligibility
- General
- Kansas residents age 60 or older with functional limitations who can remain in a community residence with support.
What it provides
- In-home support services under a needs assessment; services vary by county and available program resources.
Family Caregiver Support Program
Family Caregiver Support Program (Kansas)
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
Eligibility
- General
- Adult family or informal caregivers of adults age 60 or older or people of any age with Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder. The federal program also supports specified older-relative caregiver categories.
What it provides
- Caregiver information and access assistance; counseling and training; support groups; respite and limited supplemental services under the federal caregiver-support framework.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Kansas Medicare Savings Program
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiaries meeting the applicable state Medicare Savings Program eligibility rules.
- KS specifics
- Applications are administered by the state Medicaid program.
What it provides
- Assistance with Medicare premiums and; for qualified QMB beneficiaries; Medicare-covered deductibles and coinsurance. The qualifying category determines which costs are paid.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Lexington Park Assisted Living
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Lexington Park Assisted Living?
Lexington Park Assisted Living is legally operated by Lexington Park LLC, and administered by Ben Rigdon.
02 Is Lexington Park Assisted Living in a walkable area?
Lexington Park Assisted Living has a walk score of 60. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
03 What is the license number of Lexington Park Assisted Living?
According to KS state health department records, Lexington Park Assisted Living's license number is N089041.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Lexington Park Assisted Living?
Lexington Park Assisted Living's occupancy is 96.1%.
05 How long has Lexington Park Assisted Living been in business?
Lexington Park Assisted Living has been operating for approximately 23 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Lexington Park Assisted Living?
Yes, Lexington Park Assisted Living allows residents to bring their pets.
07 Does Lexington Park Assisted Living operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Lexington Park Assisted Living is registered as a for-profit in KS.
Updated on
