Mirabella Seattle
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.

Mirabella Seattle

Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Calculator: See prices in your area
Mirabella Seattle accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.

Overview of Mirabella Seattle

Mirabella Seattle is a high-rise senior living community in Seattle, Washington, offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, and nursing home services with skilled nursing. Its range of care may be a good fit for a resident whose support needs could grow over time.

One-bedroom and two-bedroom housing is available. The community has 63 beds and 46% occupancy, along with rehabilitation services.

Located in South Lake Union, the neighborhood has a Walk Score of 99 out of 100. Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 41 minutes per resident each day, including 1 hour and 50 minutes from licensed RNs and LPNs.

Payment options include Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay. These choices cover the community’s accepted payment types.

Quality ratings

Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Overall rating Info The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
▲ 24.0% Above WA avg. ▲ 24.0% Above WA avg.WA average: 3.2Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Health Inspection Info Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
▲ 6.5% Above WA avg. ▲ 6.5% Above WA avg.WA average: 2.8Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Staffing Info Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
▲ 46.1% Above WA avg. ▲ 46.1% Above WA avg.WA average: 3.4Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Quality Measures Info Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
▲ 1.7% Above WA avg. ▲ 1.7% Above WA avg.WA average: 3.9Click the badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Staffing hours Info Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.

Hours per resident per day vs Washington averages

Rank #10 / 61Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 10th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Washington average, with a ranking across 61 Washington facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Total nursing care Info This home is ranked 10th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.

4h 41m

11% above state avg
Staff type
Hours / day / resident
vs state avg
Registered Nurse (RN) Info RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes.
1h 24m
+59% State avg: 53m per day · National avg: 41m per day
LPN / LVN Info Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care.
25m
−48% State avg: 49m per day · National avg: 52m per day
Nurse Aide Info Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life.
2h 44m
Avg State avg: 2h 41m per day · National avg: 2h 20m per day
Weekend Total Nursing Info Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
4h 12m
+11% State avg: 3h 47m per day · National avg: 3h 26m per day
Physical Therapist Info Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
6m
+27% State avg: 5m per day · National avg: 4m per day
Weekend RN Info Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
1h 6m
+73% State avg: 38m per day · National avg: 28m per day

1 of 6 metrics below state avg

Capacity and availability

Residents per day
29
Avg. Length of Stay Info Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
133 days
Bed community size
63-bed community Rank #228 / 356Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 228th out of 356 homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A moderately sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
Years in operation
17 years in operation
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care.
Walk Score
Walk Score: 99 / 100 Rank #1 / 618Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1st out of 618 homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
BBB Rating
BBB Rating: A+ (Not Accredited)
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
How BBB ratings work

About this community

Occupancy

Occupancy rate
46%
Rank #261 / 283Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 261st out of 283 homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 283. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Lower than the Washington average: 72.5%
Occupied beds
29 / 63
Average occupied beds in Washington homes 73 beds

License Details

Facility TypeBoarding Home
StatusOperating
ExpirationMarch 31, 2027
CountyKing
License Number2034
CMS Certification Number505520

Staffing

Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.

Leadership

ContactKuhlman, Max (per state records, record updated Jul 2026)

Therapy & Rehabilitation

1 service
Rehabilitation Services

Contact Information

Fax(206) 254-1417

Contact Mirabella Seattle

Inspection History

In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.

Since 2023 · 3 years of data These figures come from state-published and/or federal inspection records. The period covered can vary depending on document availability. 43 deficiencies 6 inspections

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Since 2023 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average 2 Worse Metrics worse than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (39% above)
• Deficiencies per inspection (112% above)
0 Better No metrics in this bucket.

Deficiencies Info Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total deficiencies Info Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types. 4331 This facility has 39% more total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (43 vs. WA avg 31).↑ 39% worse
Deficiencies per inspection Info Average deficiencies per inspection. 7.23.4 This facility has 112% more deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (7.2 vs. WA avg 3.4).↑ 112% worse

Inspections Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility. 69 This facility has had 33% fewer total inspections than the Washington average (6 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 33% fewer

CMS Health Inspection History

Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.

Inspections Since 2023 · 3 years of data
Total health inspections 4

Washington average 7.8


Last Health inspection on Sep 2025

Total health citations
41 Rank #25 / 61Health citations — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 25th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Washington average 48.9

Citations per inspection
10.25 Rank #53 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 53rd out of 61 homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Washington average 6.92


Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.

40 of 41 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 1 of 41 resulted from complaint investigations.

Breakdown of citation severity (last 3 years)
Critical health citations
0
100% better than Washington average

Washington average: 0.3


Serious health citations
0
100% better than Washington average

Washington average: 1.7

0 critical citations Washington average: 0.3

0 serious citations Washington average: 1.7

40 moderate citations Washington average: 46.3

1 minor citation Washington average: 0.5
Citations history (last 3 years)
Pharmacy moderate citation Sep 18, 2025
Corrected

Abuse/Neglect moderate citation Jun 27, 2025
Corrected

Administration minor citation Jun 27, 2025
Corrected

Environmental moderate citation Jun 27, 2025
Corrected

Staffing Data

Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.

Total staff 96
Employees 39
Contractors 57
Staff to resident ratio 2.74 : 1
48% more staff per resident than Washington average
Washington average ratio: 1.86 : 1 Washington average ratio: 1.86 : 1See full Washington ranking
Avg staff/day 26
Average shift 7.8 hours
0% compared with Washington average
Washington average: 8.1 hours Washington average shift: 8.1 hoursSee full Washington ranking
Total staff hours (quarter) 18,746

Nursing staff breakdown

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse

Manages medical care and health needs.

RN Staff Info 14 total: 11 full-time employees and 3 contractors. 14
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9.5 hours
Licensed Practical Nurse

Assists with medical care and medications.

LPN Staff Info 3 total: 1 full-time employee and 2 contractors. 3
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9 hours
Certified Nursing Assistant

Helps with daily care and mobility.

CNA Staff Info 37 total: 20 full-time employees and 17 contractors. 37
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 8.1 hours

Contractor staffing

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.

Total hours from contractors

19.3%

3,624 contractor hours this quarter

Certified Nursing Assistant: 17 Respiratory Therapy Technician: 11 Speech Language Pathologist: 8 Physical Therapy Aide: 4 Physical Therapy Assistant: 4 Qualified Social Worker: 4 Registered Nurse: 3 Licensed Practical Nurse: 2 Medical Director: 2 Occupational Therapy Aide: 1 Occupational Therapy Assistant: 1

Staff by category

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Certified Nursing Assistant2017379,04092100%8.1
Registered Nurse113143,71392100%9.5
Speech Language Pathologist0889767379%7.3
Licensed Practical Nurse1238117379%9
RN Director of Nursing1015795560%10.5
Dietitian1014956672%7.5
Nurse Practitioner1014806470%7.5
Administrator1014656267%7.5
Clinical Nurse Specialist1014506065%7.5
Mental Health Service Worker1013905257%7.5
Respiratory Therapy Technician011113505964%4.6
Physical Therapy Assistant0443354549%7.4
Physical Therapy Aide0443255257%6.2
Qualified Social Worker044993134%3.1
Other Dietary Services Staff101931314%7.1
Occupational Therapy Aide011651820%3.6
Medical Director022633336%1.9
Occupational Therapy Assistant0111978%2.7
37 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days 100%
14 Registered Nurse
% of Days 100%
8 Speech Language Pathologist
% of Days 79%
3 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days 79%

Penalties and fines

Includes penalties issued in 2025

Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.

Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total fines amount $0 Rank #25 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 25th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
100% lower than Washington average

Washington average: $82K

Number of fines 0
100% fewer fines than Washington average

Washington average: 1.8

Payment Denials Info Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed. 1
261% more payment denials than Washington average

Washington average: 0.3

Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility $0
Washington average $82K
Penalty History

Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.

1 penalty in the past 3 years

Jun 27, 2025 · 12 days

Payment Denial Info Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed. Jun 27, 2025
12 days

Last updated: Jan 2026

Quality of care over time

These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.

High-risk clinical events score Info A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline. 10.2
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 10.0

Functional decline score Info A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence. 21.4
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 20.9

Long-stay resident measures
Above average Washington avg: 3.6 Info CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased Info Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 13.9%
15% better than Washington average

Washington average: 16.4%

Walking Ability Worsened Info Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened 14.2%
35% better than Washington average

Washington average: 21.8%

Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence Info Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 36.1%
48% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 24.3%

Falls with Major Injury Info Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 9.8%
274% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 2.6%

High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers Info Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers 0.0%
100% better than Washington average

Washington average: 4.9%

Urinary Tract Infection Info Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 6.6%
277% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 1.7%

Lost Too Much Weight Info Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 13.3%
128% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 5.8%

Depressive Symptoms Info Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 11.3%
31% better than Washington average

Washington average: 16.2%

Antipsychotic Use Info Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 3.3%
77% better than Washington average

Washington average: 14.5%

Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 100.0%
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 96.2%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 100.0%
7% better than Washington average

Washington average: 93.8%

Short-stay resident measures
Above average Washington avg: 3.6 Info CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 98.3%
12% better than Washington average

Washington average: 88.1%

Antipsychotic medication increase Info Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 0.0%
100% better than Washington average

Washington average: 1.4%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 100.0%
22% better than Washington average

Washington average: 82.0%

Re-hospitalized after SNF stay Info Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission. 27.1%
36% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 19.9%

Emergency department visits Info Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit. 18.8%
42% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 13.2%

Falls with major injury Info Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay. 1.5%
88% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 0.8%

Ability to care for self at discharge Info Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge. 51.0%
5% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 53.7%

Successful return to home or community Info Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility. 60.7%
20% better than Washington average

Washington average: 50.6%

Breakdown by payment type

Medicare

68% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.

Typical stay 1 - 2 months

Private pay

32% of new residents, often for short stays.

Typical stay 2 - 3 years

Facility Characteristics

Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total residents 35
Medicare
12
34.3% of residents
Medicaid
5
14.3% of residents
Private pay or other
18
51.4% of residents
Programs & Services
CCRC

Part of a Continuing Care Retirement Community offering multiple care levels

Finances and operations

Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 09/2023.

Nonprofit
Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$7.9M
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$30.4M
Nonprofit Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$7.9M Rank #45 / 51Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 45th out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$30.4M
Other income Info Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$25.7M
Payroll costs Info Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs. Rank #8 / 51Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 8th out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$13.8M 173.2% of net patient revenue Info Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Rank #2 / 51Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 2nd out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costs Info Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$24.6M
Total costs Info The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$38.3M

What does this home offer?

Pets allowed icon
Pets allowed icon

No pets allowed

Room sizes icon
Room sizes icon

Room Sizes: 762 / 1169 / 1202 sq. ft.

Housing options icon
Housing options icon

Housing Options: 1 Bed / 2 Bed

Building type icon
Building type icon

Building Type: High-rise

Fitness and recreation icon
Fitness and recreation icon

Fitness and Recreation

Who this home usually serves

TYPE OF STAY

Mostly short-term rehab stays

Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.

Most new residents arrive under Medicare (68% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 1 - 2 months.

Admissions
77 total

Coverage residents most often arrive under.

Medicare 68%
Private pay 32%
Discharges
79 total

Coverage residents most often leave under.

Medicare 58%
Private pay 41%
Medicaid 1%

Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Mirabella Seattle

mirabella-p3
mirabella-p1
mirabella-p2

Places of interest near Mirabella Seattle

Address 1.1 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from Seattle's city center to Mirabella Seattle's address, calculated via Google Maps. — 0.35 miles to nearest hospital (Harborview medical center)

Calculate Travel Distance to Mirabella Seattle

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around Seattle

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. RC (Respite Care): Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break. IL (Independent Living): Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care. HC (Home Care): Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level D or higher — meaning actual harm occurred or residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Mirabella Seattle
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Seattle (South Lake Union)
63
Facility 63
WA AVG 81
Rank #228 / 356
46.0%
Facility 46.0%
WA AVG 73.6
Rank #261 / 283
-38%
4.68
Facility 4.68
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #10 / 61
+2%+11%
$8.3k
Facility $8.3k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #25 / 61
41
Facility 41
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #25 / 61
10.3
Facility 10.3
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #53 / 61
-29A+
99
Facility 99
WA AVG 51
Rank #1 / 618
Lee Burnside
$7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #45 / 51
$13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #8 / 51
173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility 173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #2 / 51
505520
Washington Care Center
NH
MC
RC
SNF
Seattle (Rainier Valley)
165
Facility 165
WA AVG 81
Rank #7 / 356
27.9%
Facility 27.9%
WA AVG 73.6
Rank #278 / 283
-62%
4.21
Facility 4.21
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #32 / 61
+30%0%
$58.7k
Facility $58.7k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #44 / 61
68
Facility 68
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #48 / 61
7.6
Facility 7.6
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #41 / 61
546A+
77
Facility 77
WA AVG 51
Rank #97 / 618
Rayona Deanes
$20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #11 / 51
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #12 / 51
64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #13 / 51
505017
Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West
NH
RC
SNF
Seattle (North Admiral)
137
Facility 137
WA AVG 81
Rank #25 / 356
68.1%
Facility 68.1%
WA AVG 73.6
Rank #196 / 283
-8%
4.30
Facility 4.30
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #24 / 61
-31%+2%
$29.8k
Facility $29.8k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #35 / 61
60
Facility 60
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #43 / 61
7.5
Facility 7.5
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #38 / 61
493-
71
Facility 71
WA AVG 51
Rank #140 / 618
-$12.2M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.$7.6M*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.61.9%*Fiscal year ending 12/2022These figures are from this home's most recent complete cost report — an older period than most facilities report. Compare with that in mind.505270
Providence Mount St. Vincent
NH
AL
IL
RC
SNF
Sw Seattle (North Admiral)
122
Facility 122
WA AVG 81
Rank #43 / 356
62.3%
Facility 62.3%
WA AVG 73.6
Rank #221 / 283
-15%
4.63
Facility 4.63
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #14 / 61
+52%+10%
$152.2k
Facility $152.2k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #55 / 61
63
Facility 63
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #46 / 61
7.9
Facility 7.9
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #43 / 61
476-
60
Facility 60
WA AVG 51
Rank #253 / 618
Maricor Gonzales - Lim
$32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #4 / 51
$16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #4 / 51
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #32 / 51
505182
Kin On
NH
AL
HC
SNF
Seattle (Rainier Valley)
100
Facility 100
WA AVG 81
Rank #91 / 356
93.3%
Facility 93.3%
WA AVG 73.6
Rank #33 / 283
+27%
4.18
Facility 4.18
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #32 / 61
+41%-1%
$25.5k
Facility $25.5k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #34 / 61
47
Facility 47
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #31 / 61
7.8
Facility 7.8
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #42 / 61
193-
84
Facility 84
WA AVG 51
Rank #62 / 618
Dennis Lam
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #20 / 51
$9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #16 / 51
69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #7 / 51
505453

Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington

Mirabella Seattle is located in Seattle, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.

Get Financial aid guidance

Community Options Program Entry System (COPES)

WA Medicaid COPES

Age 65+ or disabled
General Washington resident, Medicaid-eligible, nursing home-level care need.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,829/month 300% FBR, individual
Asset Limits $2,000 (individual), $3,000 (couple).
WA

High demand in urban areas (e.g., Seattle).

Benefits
Personal care (5-7 hours/day) Respite (240 hours/year) Adult day care ($70/day) Home modifications ($1,500 avg.)

Washington Family Caregiver Support Program

WA NFCSP

Age Caregiver of someone 60+ (or with dementia)
General Washington resident.
Income Limits No strict limit; prioritizes low-income.
Asset Limits Not applicable.
WA

High urban demand; rural outreach.

Benefits
In-home respite (4-6 hours/day) Adult day care (~$70/day) Short-term facility care (up to 5 days)

Community First Choice (CFC)

Washington Community First Choice

Age 65+ (or disabled 18+)
General WA resident, Medicaid-eligible, need help with 2+ ADLs/IADLs.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,829/month; QIT optional.
Asset Limits $2,000 (individual), $3,000 (couple).
WA

Broader than COPES; serves ~20,000; self-directed option.

Benefits
Personal care (4-6 hours/day) Respite (~240 hours/year) Assistive devices Training Transportation

Older Americans Act (OAA) Services

Washington OAA Services

Age 60+
General WA resident; no income/asset limits.
Income Limits (2025) None; donations encouraged.
Asset Limits Not assessed.
WA

13 AAAs; includes Meals on Wheels; rural focus.

Benefits
Meals (~$5-$7/meal) Transportation Homemaker services (~4 hours/week) Respite (~5 days/year) Legal aid

Medicare Savings Program (MSP)

Washington Medicare Savings Program

Age 65+ or disabled
General WA resident, Medicare Part A/B.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,510/month (QMB), ~$3,380/month (SLMB), ~$3,598/month (QI)—individual.
Asset Limits $9,430 (individual), $14,130 (couple).
WA

Includes Extra Help for Part D; no waitlist.

Benefits
Covers Part B premiums ($174.70/month) Deductibles ($240/year) Copays (~20%)

VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits

Washington VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound

Age 65+ or disabled veteran/spouse
General WA resident, wartime service, ADL help (A&A) or homebound.
Income Limits (2025) Net income < ~$1,984/month (veteran with dependent, A&A); pension offsets income.
Asset Limits ~$155,356 net worth
WA

High veteran use; supports rural/urban needs.

Benefits
Cash (~$1,433-$2,642/month veteran, ~$951-$1,318 spouse) for care costs

Senior Citizens Property Tax Exemption

Washington Senior Property Tax Exemption

Age 61+ or disabled retiree
General WA resident, homeowner, income-based.
Income Limits (2025) ~$45,000-$70,000/year varies by county, e.g., King: $70,000
Asset Limits Not assessed; home value cap varies ~$250,000-$400,000
WA

Saves ~$500-$1,500/year; offered statewide.

Benefits
Tax exemption (~$500-$1,500/year depending on county)

Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP)

Washington SFMNP

Age 60+
General WA resident, low-income.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,322/month 185% FPL
Asset Limits Not assessed.
WA

Vouchers (~$80/season); serves ~20,000 via AAAs.

Benefits
Vouchers (~$80/season) for produce at farmers’ markets

Frequently Asked Questions about Mirabella Seattle

What neighborhood is Mirabella Seattle in?

Mirabella Seattle is in the South Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle.

Is Mirabella Seattle in a walkable area?

Mirabella Seattle has a walk score of 99. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.

What is the license number of Mirabella Seattle?

According to WA state health department records, Mirabella Seattle's license number is 2034.

When does Mirabella Seattle's license expire?

According to WA state health department records, Mirabella Seattle's license expires on March 31, 2027.

What is the occupancy rate at Mirabella Seattle?

Mirabella Seattle's occupancy is 46%.

How long has Mirabella Seattle been in business?

Mirabella Seattle has been operating for approximately 17 years, based on available licensing and registration records.

Are pets allowed at Mirabella Seattle?

No, Mirabella Seattle has a no-pet policy.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance