Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
96
39 employees · 57 contractors · 26 on an average day Mirabella Seattle
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mirabella Seattle
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Mirabella Seattle accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Mirabella Seattle is a continuing care retirement community in Seattle’s South Lake Union neighborhood, offering independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing. Independent living provides a private home without daily care, assisted living includes help with bathing, dressing, and medication, memory care offers a secured setting with supervision, and skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care around the clock. The range of care levels may suit a resident whose needs grow over time, since moving between levels can happen within one community.
The community has 63 beds, with one bedroom, two bedroom, and three bedroom apartments. A one bedroom apartment provides one private living space, while two and three bedroom apartments add rooms for a couple or household. The $10,000 entrance fee is an upfront amount to include in the move in budget, and accepted payment sources are Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Total nurse staffing is 4 hours and 46 minutes per resident each day, representing the daily nurse staffing time available to each resident. An indoor saline pool supports aqua aerobics, water exercise, and water volleyball, while rehabilitation services provide therapy at the community. Chef prepared meals, in room dining, and a bistro or café offer different ways to eat, including private dining for family events, and a Walk Score of 99 places the area in the walker’s paradise band, so daily errands do not require a car and a resident who no longer drives can still get out independently.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46m
This nursing home is ranked 22nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 46mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +127% above Washington average
2 of 6 metrics below Washington average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 14 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
14 staff · 9.5-hour shifts
1h 48m
↑ 104% · WA 53mThis facility: 1h 48m per resident per day, 104% above the Washington average of 53m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 14 total: 11 of the facility's own employees and 3 agency contractors.
14 staff · 9.5-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 3 total: 1 of the facility's own employee and 2 agency contractors.
3 staff · 9-hour shifts
24m
↓ 52% · WA 49mThis facility: 24m per resident per day, 52% below the Washington average of 49m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 3 total: 1 of the facility's own employee and 2 agency contractors.
3 staff · 9-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 37 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
37 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
2h 34m
↓ 4% · WA 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 34m per resident per day, 4% below the Washington average of 2h 41m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 37 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 17 agency contractors.
37 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
11m
↑ 127% · WA 5mThis facility: 11m per resident per day, 127% above the Washington average of 5m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 3m
↑ 7% · WA 3h 47mThis facility: 4h 3m per resident per day, 7% above the Washington average of 3h 47m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 22m
↑ 117% · WA 38mThis facility: 1h 22m per resident per day, 117% above the Washington average of 38m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
96
39 employees · 57 contractors · 26 on an average day
96 total staff / 35 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.74 : 1
↑ 52% · WA 1.80This facility: 2.74 staff per resident, 52% above the Washington average of 1.80 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
96 staff ÷ 35 residents
See full Washington ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.8 h
↓ 3% · WA 8 hThis facility: 7.8 h, 3% below the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
18,746 staff hours this quarter
See full Washington ranking →80.7% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.8% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (17), Respiratory Therapy Technician (11), Speech Language Pathologist (8), Physical Therapy Aide (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (4), Qualified Social Worker (4), Registered Nurse (3), Licensed Practical Nurse (2), Medical Director (2), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
63
Rank #48 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
63
Rank #48 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #15 / 17Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 17 nursing homes we track in Washington for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Washington facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #15 / 17Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 17 nursing homes we track in Washington for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Washington facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
17
years
Walk Score
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #1 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
Rank #1 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
99
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #45 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #45 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
66.7%
This home usually has availability
Based on 42 residents and 63 beds. Source: state inspection report (Apr 2026)
Lower than the Washington average: 77.6%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
92
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
Pricing & Financial Information
The below pricing was updated on
$10,000
Facility TypeBoarding Home
StatusOperating
ExpirationMarch 31, 2027
CountyKing
License Number2034
CMS Certification Number505520
ContactKuhlman, Max (per state records, record updated Jul 2026)
Groundskeeping
Technology Assistance
Valet for Underground Parking
Fitness Trainer
Wellness Plans
Housekeeping
Laundry & LinenListed as: Flat-linen service
MaintenanceListed as: General maintenance
ConciergeListed as: Front desk concierge · Concierge relocation services
Transportation
Fax(206) 254-1417
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Swimming Pool
Hot Tub
Business Center
Beauty Salon
Game Room
Courtyard
Auditorium
Movie Theater
Library
Workshop
Wi-Fi
Parking
Computers
Banking
Fitness Center
Dance Studio
Resident Intranet
Storage Lockers
Two Pools
Stationary Exercise Bicycles
Treadmills
Seated Elliptical Trainers
Fitness Equipment
Stability Balls and Balance Enhancers
Exercise Mats and Resistance Bands
Trx Bands and Weights
Private Dining Room
Activities
Monthly Wine Dinners
Cooking Demonstrations by Executive Chef
Water Aerobics
Water Volleyball Club
Yoga Classes
Tai Chi
Exercise Classes
People with Parkinson's Class
On-Campus Seminars and Lectures
Book and Discussion Groups
Brain Health Seminars and Games
Visiting Musicians, Performers, and Artists
Community Events and Parties
Recreational and Hobby Groups
Walking Activities
Woodworking
Arts & Crafts
Highlights
- Journaling, meditation, and contemplation spaces
Non-Denominational Services
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Mirabella Seattle.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Mirabella Seattle.- In-room dining available.
- Gluten-free options.
- Private dining room for family events.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
- Outdoor dining option.
Building TypeHigh-rise
Room Sizes
762 sq. ft.
1169 sq. ft.
1202 sq. ft.
1 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Rose · Willow · Cottonwood · Rhododendron
Floor plans: Rose, Willow, Cottonwood, Rhododendron
2 Bedroom Floor plans as listed by the community: Alder · Noble · Manzanita · Hydrangea · Snoqualmie · Columbia · Evergreen
Floor plans: Alder, Noble, Manzanita, Hydrangea, Snoqualmie +2 more
3+ Bedroom
Floor plans: Adams
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 29 deficiencies 10 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 29 deficiencies 10 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average
1 Worse
Metrics worse than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (4% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Washington average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (6% below)
• Total deficiencies (4% above) 1 Better Metrics better than Washington average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (6% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 29 | 28.0 | This facility has 4% more total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (29 vs. WA avg 28).↑ 4% worse |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 2.9 | 3.1 | This facility has 6% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (2.9 vs. WA avg 3.1).↓ 6% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 10 | 9.0 | This facility has had 11% more total inspections than the Washington average (10 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 11% more |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
7
↓ 20% · WA 8.7This facility: 7, 20% below the Washington average of 8.7 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
48
Rank #32 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 3% · WA 49.6This facility: 48, 3% below the Washington average of 49.6 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.86
Rank #39 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 39th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 11% · WA 6.18This facility: 6.86, 11% above the Washington average of 6.18 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
48 of 48 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.3 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
2
↑ 11% · WA 1.8This facility: 2, 11% above the Washington average of 1.8 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
45
↓ 4% · WA 47.1This facility: 45, 4% below the Washington average of 47.1 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
1
↑ 100% · WA 0.5This facility: 1, 100% above the Washington average of 0.5 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Apr 29, 2026 · 1 citation (Quality of Care, serious), corrected
Most cited category: Resident Assessment & Care Planning, 10 of 48 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Apr 29, 2026
1 citation
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 18, 2025
1 citation
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 27, 2025
14 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 14, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 13, 2025
3 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jun 28, 2024
14 citations
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 22, 2023
12 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 48 citations
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
10 deficiencies (21%)
Quality of Life & Care
9 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Rights
8 deficiencies (17%)
Pharmacy Services
6 deficiencies (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
5 deficiencies (10%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (6%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
Environmental
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
40 of 48 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 8 of 48 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
3 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Apr 29, 2026 · $15,185 civil money penalty
Apr 29, 2026 · $15,185 civil money penalty
May 14, 2025 · $8,278 civil money penalty
Jun 27, 2025 · 12-day payment denial
Total fines
$23,463
↓ 73% · WA $87KThis facility: $23,463, 73% below the Washington average of $86,517. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $67KUS average: $67,417, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #35 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
2
↑ 4% · WA 1.93This facility: 2, 4% above the Washington average of 1.93. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.96US average: 1.96, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
1
12 days
↑ 290% · WA 0.26This facility: 1, 290% above the Washington average of 0.26. Average among the 121 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 0.36US average: 0.36, among the 6,775 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Apr 29, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,185
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,185
Jun 27, 2025
Payment denial
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
12 days
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
New admissions not paid
12 days
May 14, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,278Fine amount comparison
This facility
$23,463
Washington average
$86,517
US average
$67,417
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Washington and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 16% · WA 3.6This facility: 3.0, 16% below the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 38% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 38% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
9.0
Score · lower is better
↑ 6% · WA 8.5This facility: 9.0, 6% above the WA average of 8.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.4
Score · lower is better
↑ 2% · WA 18.0This facility: 18.4, 2% above the WA average of 18.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 4 worse, 1 near WA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.4%
↓ 20% · WA 14.2This facility: 11.4, 20% below the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.4%
↓ 20% · WA 14.2This facility: 11.4, 20% below the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.6%
↓ 33% · WA 17.2This facility: 11.6, 33% below the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.6%
↓ 33% · WA 17.2This facility: 11.6, 33% below the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.3%
↑ 43% · WA 22.5This facility: 32.3, 43% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.3%
↑ 43% · WA 22.5This facility: 32.3, 43% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
↑ 61% · WA 1.6This facility: 2.5, 61% above the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.5%
↑ 61% · WA 1.6This facility: 2.5, 61% above the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.5%
↑ 306% · WA 2.6This facility: 10.5, 306% above the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
10.5%
↑ 306% · WA 2.6This facility: 10.5, 306% above the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 46% · WA 4.3This facility: 2.3, 46% below the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.3%
↓ 46% · WA 4.3This facility: 2.3, 46% below the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3%
↑ 69% · WA 5.5This facility: 9.3, 69% above the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.3%
↑ 69% · WA 5.5This facility: 9.3, 69% above the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
↓ 78% · WA 17.7This facility: 4.0, 78% below the WA average of 17.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.0%
↓ 78% · WA 17.7This facility: 4.0, 78% below the WA average of 17.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 15.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 15.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.0This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · WA 93.8This facility: 100.0, 7% above the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · WA 93.8This facility: 100.0, 7% above the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
51.0%
↓ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 51.0, 5% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
51.0%
↓ 5% · US 53.7This facility: 51.0, 5% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
60.7%
↑ 20% · US 50.6This facility: 60.7, 20% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
60.7%
↑ 20% · US 50.6This facility: 60.7, 20% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.5%
↑ 88% · US 0.8This facility: 1.5, 88% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
1.5%
↑ 88% · US 0.8This facility: 1.5, 88% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
↓ 12% · WA 1.3This facility: 1.1, 12% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.1%
↓ 12% · WA 1.3This facility: 1.1, 12% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · WA 88.3This facility: 100.0, 13% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 13% · WA 88.3This facility: 100.0, 13% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 22% · WA 82.0This facility: 100.0, 22% above the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 22% · WA 82.0This facility: 100.0, 22% above the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.1%
↑ 36% · WA 19.9This facility: 27.1, 36% above the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
27.1%
↑ 36% · WA 19.9This facility: 27.1, 36% above the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.8%
↑ 42% · WA 13.2This facility: 18.8, 42% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.8%
↑ 42% · WA 13.2This facility: 18.8, 42% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Mirabella Seattle’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 60 Washington nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−338.1% operating margin
+44.8 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($18.9M) trims the net loss to −$11.6M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Washington homes
171.3% payroll share of revenue
WA average 64.4%Rank #2 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $1.7M while revenue rose $1.1M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Washington homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $9.0M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $13.7M | Rank in WA Rank #50 / 60Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 50th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 17% of homes | Below WA median Higher net patient revenue than 17% of WA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $39.6M | +$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$30.6M | −$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −338.1% | +44.8 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $18.9M | — | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$11.6M | −$6.9M | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Washington homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $15.5M | +$1.7M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $8.4M | Rank in WA Rank #10 / 60Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | Above WA median Higher payroll than 85% of WA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 171.3% | −1.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median 58.9% | Rank in WA Rank #2 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | 106.9 pts over WA average The WA average is 64.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Washington payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $24.7M | $26.6M | $27.6M | $26.2M | $29.2M | $28.8M | $7.9M | $9.0M |
| Operating expenses | $35.4M | $35.6M | $36.7M | $37.2M | $33.8M | $35.6M | $38.3M | $39.6M |
| Net patient income | −$10.7M | −$9.0M | −$9.1M | −$11.0M | −$4.6M | −$6.8M | −$30.4M | −$30.6M |
| Operating margin | −43.2% | −33.7% | −33.1% | −41.8% | −15.6% | −23.8% | −382.8% | −338.1% |
| Net income | $0.7M | −$5.0M | −$4.3M | −$4.6M | −$2.5M | −$3.2M | −$4.7M | −$11.6M |
| Payroll costs | $13.3M | $13.6M | $14.2M | $14.9M | $14.5M | $13.9M | $13.8M | $15.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 53.8% | 51.1% | 51.6% | 56.7% | 49.6% | 48.4% | 173.2% | 171.3% |
| Beds | 127 | 46 | 377 | 377 | 92 | 92 | 92 | 92 |
| Gross revenue | $28.8M | $27.5M | $28.2M | $26.4M | $29.9M | $29.6M | $8.5M | $9.8M |
| Salaries | $10.5M | $10.7M | $11.4M | $12.1M | $11.8M | $11.8M | $11.6M | $12.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $2.9M | $2.9M | $2.9M | $2.8M | $2.8M | $2.2M | $2.1M | $2.6M |
| Contract labor | $0.9M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.6M | $0.6M | $1.0M | $1.0M | $0.6M |
| Other operating costs | $22.1M | $22.0M | $22.5M | $22.3M | $19.3M | $21.7M | $24.6M | $24.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $894 | $162 | $173 | $258 | $1,172 | $2,782 | $318 | $375 |
| Cost per day | $1,280 | $216 | $230 | $366 | $1,356 | $3,442 | $1,536 | $1,645 |
| Average length of stay | 61.5 days | 65.6 days | 80.5 days | 104.3 days | 83.8 days | 166.9 days | 132.7 days | 91.6 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Jun 2026
Arriving
126 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
71 · 56%
Medicaid
4 · 3%
Private pay & other
51 · 40%
Resident snapshot
35 residents · Jun 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
12 · 34%
Medicaid
5 · 14%
Private pay & other
18 · 51%
Leaving
125 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
54 · 43%
Medicaid
3 · 2%
Private pay & other
68 · 54%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Living Spaces & Floor Plans for Mirabella Seattle
Places of interest near Mirabella Seattle
1.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Seattle's city center to Mirabella Seattle's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.35 miles to nearest hospital (Harborview medical center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Mirabella Seattle
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Seattle
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 64.4% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirabella Seattle | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Seattle (South Lake Union) | 63
Facility
63
WA AVG
90
Rank
#48 / 69 |
66.7%
Facility
66.7%
WA AVG
77.6%
Rank
#45 / 56 | -14% | 4.76
Facility
4.76
WA AVG
4.29
Rank
#22 / 60 | +2% | +11% | $23.5k
Facility
$23.5k
WA AVG
$89.5k
Rank
#35 / 61 | 48
Facility
48
WA AVG
49.6
Rank
#32 / 61 | 6.9
Facility
6.9
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#39 / 61 | 2 | 42 | A+ |
99
Facility
99
WA AVG
51
Rank
#1 / 80 | Lee Burnside | $9.0MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$9.0MFiscal year ending 09/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#50 / 60 | $15.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
$15.5MFiscal year ending 09/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#10 / 60 | 171.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
Facility
171.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#2 / 60 | 505520 | ||||
| Kline Galland Home | NH AL HC HOS MC PC SNF | Seattle (Seward Park) | 205
Facility
205
WA AVG
90
Rank
#1 / 69 |
94.0%
Facility
94.0%
WA AVG
77.6%
Rank
#5 / 56 | +21% | 4.76
Facility
4.76
WA AVG
4.29
Rank
#10 / 60 | +8% | +11% | $0
Facility
$0
WA AVG
$89.5k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 35
Facility
35
WA AVG
49.6
Rank
#21 / 61 | 8.8
Facility
8.8
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#50 / 61 | - | 193 | - |
44
Facility
44
WA AVG
51
Rank
#49 / 80 | Jeanie Alhadeff | $55.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$55.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#2 / 60 | $39.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$39.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#1 / 60 | 70%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
70%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#8 / 60 | 505442 | ||||
| Washington Care Center | NH MC RC SNF | Seattle (Rainier Valley) | 165
Facility
165
WA AVG
90
Rank
#2 / 69 |
77.1%
Facility
77.1%
WA AVG
77.6%
Rank
#27 / 56 | -1% | 3.96
Facility
3.96
WA AVG
4.29
Rank
#38 / 60 | +30% | -8% | $52.0k
Facility
$52.0k
WA AVG
$89.5k
Rank
#45 / 61 | 59
Facility
59
WA AVG
49.6
Rank
#44 / 61 | 7.4
Facility
7.4
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#43 / 61 | 3 | 127 | A+ |
77
Facility
77
WA AVG
51
Rank
#11 / 80 | Rayona Deanes | $20.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#12 / 60 | $13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$13.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#14 / 60 | 65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
65.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#17 / 60 | 505017 | ||||
| Kin On | NH AL HC SNF | Seattle (Rainier Valley) | 100
Facility
100
WA AVG
90
Rank
#28 / 69 |
91.8%
Facility
91.8%
WA AVG
77.6%
Rank
#12 / 56 | +18% | 4.25
Facility
4.25
WA AVG
4.29
Rank
#16 / 60 | +41% | -1% | $19.5k
Facility
$19.5k
WA AVG
$89.5k
Rank
#34 / 61 | 53
Facility
53
WA AVG
49.6
Rank
#35 / 61 | 6.6
Facility
6.6
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#36 / 61 | 2 | 92 | - |
84
Facility
84
WA AVG
51
Rank
#7 / 80 | Dennis Lam | $15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$15.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#23 / 60 | $11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#16 / 60 | 72.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
72.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#6 / 60 | 505453 | ||||
| Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West | NH RC SNF | Seattle (North Admiral) | 137
Facility
137
WA AVG
90
Rank
#9 / 69 |
70.8%
Facility
70.8%
WA AVG
77.6%
Rank
#47 / 56 | -9% | 4.33
Facility
4.33
WA AVG
4.29
Rank
#18 / 60 | -31% | +1% | $29.8k
Facility
$29.8k
WA AVG
$89.5k
Rank
#36 / 61 | 55
Facility
55
WA AVG
49.6
Rank
#39 / 61 | 7.9
Facility
7.9
WA AVG
6.2
Rank
#47 / 61 | 2 | 97 | - |
71
Facility
71
WA AVG
51
Rank
#17 / 80 | - | $14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$14.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$16.6M
Rank
#27 / 60 | $9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.6MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
$10.1M
Rank
#21 / 60 | 66%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
66%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WA AVG
64.4%
Rank
#14 / 60 | 505270 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington
Mirabella Seattle is located in Seattle, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Frequently Asked Questions about Mirabella Seattle
What neighborhood is Mirabella Seattle in?
Mirabella Seattle is in the South Lake Union neighborhood of Seattle.
Is Mirabella Seattle in a walkable area?
Mirabella Seattle has a walk score of 99. Walker's paradise. Daily errands do not require a car, with many shops and services nearby.
What is the license number of Mirabella Seattle?
According to WA state health department records, Mirabella Seattle's license number is 2034.
When does Mirabella Seattle's license expire?
According to WA state health department records, Mirabella Seattle's license expires on March 31, 2027.
What is the occupancy rate at Mirabella Seattle?
Mirabella Seattle's occupancy is 66.7%.
How long has Mirabella Seattle been in business?
Mirabella Seattle has been operating for approximately 17 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
Are pets allowed at Mirabella Seattle?
No, Mirabella Seattle has a no-pet policy.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Updated on
