We arrange tours, appointments, and even moving support so you don’t have to
2
Ranked on Data, Not Dollars
We rank communities on objective measures like inspection records, quality scores, and care data, so you can find trusted options without the guesswork.
3
Personalized Guidance
From lifestyle matching to help with insurance and financial assistance, we make sure the community is the right fit
Kline Galland Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Home Care, Hospice Care, Memory Care, Palliative Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating
3/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Kline Galland Home accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Kline Galland Home
Conveniently located in a serene area in Seattle, WA, Kline Galland Home is a peaceful retreat for those needing short-term rehabilitation, long-term care, and memory care. With a high caregiver-to-resident ratio, the community guarantees personalized and truly one-on-one attention. Those affected by Alzheimer’s and memory loss are cared for by a specially trained care team in an environment tailored to their unique needs.
Residents’ daily lives are filled with an array of fun and enriching activities like exercise classes, games, and holiday celebrations. Meals are carefully prepared and served daily with accommodations for unique dietary needs and preferences. At Kline Galland Home, residents achieve their maximum potential in a safe and healing environment.
Measured by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Overall ratingThe Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Health InspectionBased on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
StaffingMeasures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Quality MeasuresBased on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
StaffingData period: Q3 2025 (July 1 – September 30, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
This facility
WA avg 4h 14m
↑ 14% · WA 4h 14mThis facility: 4h 50m per resident per day, 14% above the Washington average of 4h 14m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rank#10 / 60Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 10th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Washington average, with a ranking across 60 Washington facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 10th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Washington average, with a ranking across 60 Washington facilities. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
4h 50m
Standout metric: RN, weekends is +64% above Washington average
2 of 6 metrics below Washington average
Daily care time per resident, by role
WA average · US = national average
Registered nurse (RN) RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 51 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.51 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
1h 1m↑ 14% · WA 53mThis facility: 1h 1m per resident per day, 14% above the Washington average of 53m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 41m
LPN / LVN Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 27 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.27 staff · 9.7-hour shifts
32m↓ 34% · WA 49mThis facility: 32m per resident per day, 34% below the Washington average of 49m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 52m
Certified nursing assistant Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 166 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.166 staff · 8.9-hour shifts
3h 17m↑ 23% · WA 2h 41mThis facility: 3h 17m per resident per day, 23% above the Washington average of 2h 41m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 2h 21m
Physical therapist Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m↓ 2% · WA 5mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 2% below the Washington average of 5m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 4m
Total nursing, weekends Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
4h 15m↑ 12% · WA 3h 47mThis facility: 4h 15m per resident per day, 12% above the Washington average of 3h 47m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 3h 26m
RN, weekends Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.Sat–Sun
1h 2m↑ 64% · WA 38mThis facility: 1h 2m per resident per day, 64% above the Washington average of 38m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US 29m
Headcount
Total staffEvery person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.329
326 employees · 3 contractors · 153 on an average day Staff per resident329 total staff / 201 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q3 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.1.64 : 1↓ 9% · WA 1.80This facility: 1.64 staff per resident, 9% below the Washington average of 1.80 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
329 staff ÷ 201 residents See full Washington ranking →Average shiftAverage hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.8.8 h↑ 10% · WA 8 hThis facility: 8.8 h, 10% above the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
123,344 staff hours this quarter See full Washington ranking →
99.9%
of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.8% · Contractors this quarter: Occupational Therapy Assistant (2), Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Bed count
A large-scale community that may provide a wide range of amenities, services, and structured programs.205Rank#1 / 69Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 1st out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Bed count — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 1st out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
High-capacity home
· May provide extensive amenities, services and programs.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.Rank#49 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 49th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 49th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
44/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.Rank#5 / 55Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 5th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 5th out of 55 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 55. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
94.2%This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 205 beds.
Higher than the Washington average: 77.5%
Residents per day (avg) The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
193
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Aug 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
66days
About This Community
Certifications & Programs
We Honor Veterans – Level One Partner — We Honor VeteransA partner in the We Honor Veterans program run by the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization with the VA - staff are trained in veteran-specific needs at end of life, from service-related conditions to benefits navigation.
Safety & Compliance
Grab Bars
Therapy & Rehabilitation
2 services
Short-Term Rehab
Post-Acute Rehabilitative Care
Staffing & Medical
1 service
Medication ManagementSupport with organizing, administering, and monitoring medicines can help prevent missed or incorrect doses.
Memory & Specialized Care
2 services
Palliative CareCare focused on relieving pain, symptoms, and stress while supporting quality of life. It can be provided alongside treatment for a serious illness.
Bereavement Counseling and Grief Support
Additional Services
6 services
HousekeepingListed as: Light housekeeping
Laundry & LinenListed as: Laundry and ironing
Errands & ShoppingListed as: Errand running
TransportationListed as: Transportation escort for activities and appointments
Concierge
Beauty Services
Additional Policies & Features
Pets not allowed
Amenities & Lifestyle
Fitness Center
Spa
Bistro
Patio
Wi-Fi
Volunteer Program
Touring Hoursmo-fr 08:00-17:00
Faith & Spiritual Life
Religious AffiliationJewish
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Kline Galland Home.
Food DescriptionMeals are thoughtfully prepared according to kosher standards, and Jewish holidays are celebrated.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data · Last health inspection May 2026
Total health inspections
4↓ 54% · WA 8.7This facility: 4, 54% below the Washington average of 8.7 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
35Rank#20 / 61Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 20th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Health citations — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 20th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 29% · WA 49.6This facility: 35, 29% below the Washington average of 49.6 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.75Rank#50 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 50th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 50th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 42% · WA 6.18This facility: 8.75, 42% above the Washington average of 6.18 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
35 of 35 citations corrected
Bar = mix of this home's 35 citations, not a state comparison
Moderate (D–F, no harm, more than minimal risk): 35 citations, corrected
Lighter shade = corrected
CriticalJ–L
0↓ 100% · WA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.3 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
SeriousG–I
0↓ 100% · WA 1.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 1.8 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
ModerateD–F
35↓ 26% · WA 47.1This facility: 35, 26% below the Washington average of 47.1 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
MinorA–C
0↓ 100% · WA 0.5This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.5 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 13 of 35 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 28, 20261 citation
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Mar 04, 202618 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Nov 21, 202413 citations
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Aug 04, 20233 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 35 citations
Quality of Life & Care13 deficiencies (37%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning8 deficiencies (23%)
Infection Control4 deficiencies (11%)
Resident Rights4 deficiencies (11%)
Nutrition & Dietary2 deficiencies (6%)
Pharmacy Services2 deficiencies (6%)
Administration1 deficiency (3%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
33 of 35 citations resulted from standard inspections; 1 of 35 resulted from complaint investigations; and 1 of 35 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious).
Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines)
and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials were reported in the last 3 years.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
Data as of Aug 2026 · CMS Care Compare
Long-stay quality ratingCMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.5/ 5★★★★★Significantly above average↑ 40% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 40% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay quality ratingCMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.5/ 5★★★★★Significantly above average↑ 38% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 38% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.High-risk clinical eventsAverage of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.8.8Score · lower is better↑ 3% · WA 8.5This facility: 8.8, 3% above the WA average of 8.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Functional declineAverage of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.19.7Score · lower is better↑ 10% · WA 18.0This facility: 19.7, 10% above the WA average of 18.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
13 long-stay measures:7 better, 2 worse, 3 near WA average, 1 without a benchmark
8 short-stay measures:2 better, 2 worse, 1 near WA average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
WA average
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activitiesPercent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased17.2%↑ 21% · WA 14.2This facility: 17.2, 21% above the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsenedPercent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened17.4%↑ 1% · WA 17.2This facility: 17.4, 1% above the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder24.6%↑ 9% · WA 22.5This facility: 24.6, 9% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infectionPercent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%↓ 78% · WA 1.6This facility: 0.4, 78% below the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injuryPercent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury2.4%↓ 5% · WA 2.6This facility: 2.4, 5% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers3.1%↓ 29% · WA 4.3This facility: 3.1, 29% below the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Physical & mental health
Lost too much weightPercent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%↓ 28% · WA 5.5This facility: 4.0, 28% below the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptomsPercent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms93.8%
Antipsychotic usePercent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication13.9%↓ 8% · WA 15.1This facility: 13.9, 8% below the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine94.1%↓ 2% · WA 96.0This facility: 94.1, 2% below the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine92.5%↓ 1% · WA 93.8This facility: 92.5, 1% below the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 daysNumber of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.1.12↓ 19% · WA 1.38This facility: 1.12, 19% below the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 daysNumber of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.0.64↓ 58% · WA 1.51This facility: 0.64, 58% below the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
WA or US average
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at dischargePercentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.43.5%↓ 19% · US 53.7This facility: 43.5, 19% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the communityRate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.65.9%↑ 30% · US 50.6This facility: 65.9, 30% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.0.3%↓ 62% · US 0.8This facility: 0.3, 62% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medicationPercent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication1.4%↑ 10% · WA 1.3This facility: 1.4, 10% above the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine98.1%↑ 11% · WA 88.3This facility: 98.1, 11% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccinePercent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine83.0%↑ 1% · WA 82.0This facility: 83.0, 1% above the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admissionPercentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.21.9%↑ 10% · WA 19.9This facility: 21.9, 10% above the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visitsPercentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.7.0%↓ 47% · WA 13.2This facility: 7.0, 47% below the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Breakdown by payment type
Medicare
33% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Typical stay17 days
Private pay
59% of new residents, often for short stays.
Typical stay1 - 2 months
Medicaid
7% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Typical stay1 years
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics
(Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents201
Medicare
24
11.9% of residents
Medicaid
87
43.3% of residents
Private pay or other
90
44.8% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Nurse Aide Training
State-approved Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program on-site
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for Kline Galland Home from 2011–2024, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Net Patient Income$809.0K↑ ~$1.7M vs 2023
Payroll Costs$39.2M↑ ~$2.5M vs 2023
Operating Margin1.5%↑ 3.2pp vs 2023
Financial Performance
Net patient revenueOperating expensesNet patient income
Payroll & Labor Costs
SalariesStaff salaries from the home's own payroll records.Wage CostsWage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement. Together with salaries, these make up payroll.Contract LaborPay for temporary or agency staff. Counted under other operating costs, not payroll.
Payer Mix (percentage)
MedicareMedicaidPrivate Pay/Other
Metric
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Occupancy %
93.8%
92.7%
95.6%
96.5%
95.5%
96.3%
95.5%
95.3%
94.8%
91.1%
90.9%
92.8%
93.5%
94.8%
Beds
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
205
Net Income
$952,692
-$112,141
-$383,836
-$537,496
$159,006
-$159,755
-$2,035,462
$2,283,052
$112,550
$37,921
$3,294,933
-$275,139
$2,381,287
$5,942,434
Gross Revenue
$25,537,721
$28,067,859
$29,893,132
$36,293,550
$40,624,071
$43,022,409
$44,887,409
$47,056,500
$50,147,622
$45,791,854
$48,267,229
$50,542,973
$54,480,150
$59,102,380
Operating Expenses
$22,393,153
$23,693,759
$25,732,529
$29,789,769
$32,953,444
$36,110,034
$38,736,214
$40,147,432
$43,854,831
$44,536,632
$45,723,629
$47,628,970
$52,036,586
$55,102,457
Net Patient Income
-$841,209
-$2,123,440
-$3,181,338
-$1,141,183
-$508,827
-$1,426,344
-$2,720,698
-$1,036,668
-$1,032,388
-$3,109,392
-$2,000,923
-$1,600,203
-$896,995
$808,977
Net Patient Revenue
$21,551,944
$21,570,319
$22,551,191
$28,648,586
$32,444,617
$34,683,690
$36,015,516
$39,110,764
$42,822,443
$41,427,240
$43,722,706
$46,028,767
$51,139,591
$55,911,434
Payroll Costs
$16,486,198
$17,360,544
$18,951,279
$21,464,097
$23,051,294
$24,527,554
$26,231,651
$27,394,687
$28,071,618
$26,822,494
$28,761,746
$33,282,295
$36,614,406
$39,151,868
Operating Margin %
-3.9%
-9.8%
-14.1%
-4.0%
-1.6%
-4.1%
-7.6%
-2.7%
-2.4%
-7.5%
-4.6%
-3.5%
-1.8%
1.5%
Medicare %
12.5%
14.4%
13.9%
12.1%
14.9%
13.6%
13.8%
13.3%
12.0%
9.2%
12.0%
11.7%
11.9%
9.0%
Medicaid %
34.9%
40.3%
41.1%
42.8%
40.9%
40.0%
43.6%
42.8%
43.9%
48.9%
44.2%
50.7%
46.2%
48.4%
Private %
52.5%
45.2%
45.1%
45.1%
44.2%
46.4%
42.6%
43.8%
44.1%
41.9%
43.9%
37.5%
41.9%
42.5%
Net Patient Revenue/Day
$307
$310
$315
$397
$454
$480
$504
$548
$604
$606
$643
$663
$731
$786
Cost/Day
$319
$341
$360
$413
$461
$500
$542
$563
$618
$651
$672
$686
$744
$775
Avg Length of Stay
86.2 days
56.1 days
53.4 days
75.8 days
77.8 days
76.7 days
81.1 days
73.5 days
70.9 days
89.0 days
77.3 days
78.8 days
71.2 days
65.9 days
Finances and operations
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2024.
Nonprofit
Operated by a nonprofit corporation.
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$55.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$809.0KFiscal year ending 12/2024
Nonprofit Operated by a nonprofit corporation.
Net patient revenueNet patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$55.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024Rank#2 / 51Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient incomeNet patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
$809.0KFiscal year ending 12/2024
Other incomeMoney the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Payroll costsStaff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.Rank#1 / 51Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 1st out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 1st out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$39.2MFiscal year ending 12/2024
70% of net patient revenue
Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay.Rank#6 / 51Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 6th out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis nursing home is ranked 6th out of 51 nursing homes we track in Washington. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costsEverything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$16.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Total costsThe home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$55.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Certification details
CMS Certification Number:505442
Owner Name:Jeanie Alhadeff
Rural vs. Urban:Urban
County:King
Type of Control:Nonprofit — Operated by a nonprofit corporation.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and State data
How we calculate these figures
We use the home's most recent CMS SNF Cost Report — the annual financial statement every Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home is required to file — to show how it earns and spends on resident care.
This includes
Net patient revenue — what the home collects for resident care after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts.
Payroll — staff salaries plus wage-related benefits. Contract and agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs.
Net patient income — what's left after the home's total operating expenses.
How we calculate net patient income and payroll %
Net patient income is net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. Payroll % is payroll divided by net patient revenue — the share of each revenue dollar that goes to staff pay.
Net patient revenue vs. other income
Net patient revenue is money earned from resident care only. Anything the home earns outside of care — investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources — is reported separately as other income. Other income is not part of net patient revenue, and it is not included in net patient income.
Who this home usually serves
TYPE OF STAY
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (59% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 1 - 2 months.
Admissions
1,123 total
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Medicare33%
Private pay59%
Medicaid7%
Discharges
1,079 total
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Medicare22%
Private pay67%
Medicaid12%
How we assess these insights
We analyze official CMS data on admissions and discharges to understand the types of residents a nursing home most often serves.
This includes
Medicare, Medicaid, and private-pay admissions and discharges
Number of nights covered by each payment type
Typical length of stay
How length of stay is calculated
Average length of stay comes from the facility's Medicare cost report: total resident days in the year divided by total discharges, across all residents and payment types. Homes that mostly provide long-term care show long averages, because few residents leave in a given year.
Managed by Min An
Chief Operating Officer
30 years of experience
Min An is a licensed Nursing Home Administrator with 30 years of experience in long-term care. Since 2010, she has served as Chief Operating Officer at Kline Galland, overseeing long-term care, hospice, palliative, home care, and home health services. Min also taught quality assurance and improvement courses for Nursing Leadership and Management at the University of Washington. She holds a bachelor’s degree in nursing from Seattle University and completed the Geriatric Nurse Practitioner program at the University of Washington.
Places of interest near Kline Galland Home
5.8 miles from city center Estimated distance in miles from Seattle's city center to Kline Galland Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Quick search
Calculate Travel Distance to Kline Galland Home
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Seattle
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This TableAL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WA nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Covers Part B premiums ($174.70/month)Deductibles ($240/year)Copays (~20%)
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
Washington VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound
Age65+ or disabled veteran/spouse
GeneralWA resident, wartime service, ADL help (A&A) or homebound.
Income Limits (2025)Net income < ~$1,984/month (veteran with dependent, A&A); pension offsets income.
Asset Limits~$155,356net worth
WA
High veteran use; supports rural/urban needs.
Benefits
Cash (~$1,433-$2,642/month veteran, ~$951-$1,318 spouse) for care costs
Senior Citizens Property Tax Exemption
Washington Senior Property Tax Exemption
Age61+ or disabled retiree
GeneralWA resident, homeowner, income-based.
Income Limits (2025)~$45,000-$70,000/yearvaries by county, e.g., King: $70,000
Asset LimitsNot assessed; home value cap varies~$250,000-$400,000
WA
Saves ~$500-$1,500/year; offered statewide.
Benefits
Tax exemption (~$500-$1,500/year depending on county)
Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP)
Washington SFMNP
Age60+
GeneralWA resident, low-income.
Income Limits (2025)~$2,322/month185% FPL
Asset LimitsNot assessed.
WA
Vouchers (~$80/season); serves ~20,000 via AAAs.
Benefits
Vouchers (~$80/season) for produce at farmers’ markets
Frequently Asked Questions about Kline Galland Home
What neighborhood is Kline Galland Home in?
Kline Galland Home is in the Seward Park neighborhood of Seattle.
Is Kline Galland Home in a walkable area?
Kline Galland Home has a walk score of 44. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Kline Galland Home?
Kline Galland Home's occupancy is 94.2%.
Are pets allowed at Kline Galland Home?
No, Kline Galland Home has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Kline Galland Home?
The team at Kline Galland Home can be reached at EmilyC@klinegalland.org.
Does Kline Galland Home operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Kline Galland Home is registered as a non-profit.
What is the overall rating for Kline Galland Home?
Kline Galland Home received a 3-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
329
326 employees · 3 contractors · 153 on an average day 
