5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
The license at Mt. Baker Care Center in Bellingham, WA, covers skilled nursing, respite care, assisted living, palliative care, and nursing home care. The building stands in the South Bellingham neighborhood, and at 47 beds, it’s on the small side.
Skilled nursing means licensed nurses working on the premises. Rehabilitation Services and Short-Term Rehab are also on the service list, so a resident’s therapy can happen in the building instead of at another facility.
Every room here is private. Assisted living provides help in that room for specific tasks, such as bathing, getting dressed, or managing medication. Palliative care is a different sort of help, aimed at comfort and at keeping symptoms under control for someone seriously ill.
Respite gets booked by whoever does the caregiving at home, for the duration when they’re traveling or getting over something of their own. With five kinds of care on one license, a resident whose needs change over time can stay put while the care changes around them.
Days can bring group excursions, gardening, sing-alongs, and a Sunday worship service, and Enrichment Activities is a named program on top of that. Nearly everything that reaches the table is cooked from scratch, much of it with locally grown produce.
Most errands mean a car or somebody driving, since 44 on Walk Score counts as car-dependent. The home takes private pay, Medicare, and Medicaid. Nursing time per resident runs to 4 hours and 22 minutes a day, and Catherine Reis-El Bara is the administrator in charge.
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
This nursing home is ranked 18th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 22mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +114% above Washington average
2 of 6 metrics below Washington average
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 17 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
17 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 11 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
11 staff · 6.9-hour shifts
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 59 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
59 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
132
131 employees · 1 contractor · 51 on an average day
132 total staff / 55 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q4 2025).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.40 : 1
↑ 33% · WA 1.80This facility: 2.40 staff per resident, 33% above the Washington average of 1.80 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
132 staff ÷ 55 residents
See full Washington ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.2 h
↓ 10% · WA 8 hThis facility: 7.2 h, 10% below the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
33,864 staff hours this quarter
See full Washington ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.8% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
47
Rank #60 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 60th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #49 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
100% corrected
20 of 20 citations corrected Latest inspection: May 12, 2026 · 1 citation (Abuse/Neglect, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 7 of 20 citations · 6 categories in total
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Corrected
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
16 of 20 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 4 of 20 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Aug 2023.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 40% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 40% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 38% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 38% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.6
Score · lower is better
↓ 12% · WA 8.5This facility: 7.6, 12% below the WA average of 8.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
18.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 3% · WA 18.0This facility: 18.5, 3% above the WA average of 18.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 5 worse, 2 near WA average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near WA average, 3 compared with US only
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
11.4%
↓ 20% · WA 14.2This facility: 11.4, 20% below the WA average of 14.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.2%
↓ 12% · WA 17.2This facility: 15.2, 12% below the WA average of 17.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.0%
↑ 29% · WA 22.5This facility: 29.0, 29% above the WA average of 22.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.3%
↓ 18% · WA 1.6This facility: 1.3, 18% below the WA average of 1.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
9.6%
↑ 273% · WA 2.6This facility: 9.6, 273% above the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.5%
↓ 64% · WA 4.3This facility: 1.5, 64% below the WA average of 4.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 5.5This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 5.5 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
40.0%
↑ 126% · WA 17.7This facility: 40.0, 126% above the WA average of 17.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.2%
↑ 47% · WA 15.1This facility: 22.2, 47% above the WA average of 15.1 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.7%
↑ 3% · WA 96.0This facility: 98.7, 3% above the WA average of 96.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.6%
↑ 4% · WA 93.8This facility: 97.6, 4% above the WA average of 93.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.95
↑ 41% · WA 1.38This facility: 1.95, 41% above the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
0.69
↓ 54% · WA 1.51This facility: 0.69, 54% below the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.0%
↑ 8% · US 53.7This facility: 58.0, 8% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
58.5%
↑ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 58.5, 16% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 13% · WA 88.3This facility: 99.4, 13% above the WA average of 88.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
↑ 18% · WA 82.0This facility: 96.9, 18% above the WA average of 82.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
19.4%
↓ 3% · WA 19.9This facility: 19.4, 3% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
6.4%
↓ 52% · WA 13.2This facility: 6.4, 52% below the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
59% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
39% of new residents, often for short stays.
2% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jun 2026)
Total residents
55Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Mt. Baker Care Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 60 Washington nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Profitable on care
6.4% operating margin
+2.2 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.8M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Washington homes
52.0% payroll share of revenue
WA average 64.4%Rank #52 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.1M while revenue rose $1.4M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Washington homes.
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $12.4M | +$1.4M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $13.7M | Rank in WA Rank #38 / 60Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 38th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 37% of homes | Below WA median Higher net patient revenue than 37% of WA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $11.6M | +$1.1M | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.8M | +$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 6.4% | +2.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Healthy margin More than 5% of revenue is left after operating expenses. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.8M | −$1.2M | Trend — | WA median — | Rank in WA Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Washington homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.5M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $8.4M | Rank in WA Rank #48 / 60Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Below WA median Higher payroll than 20% of WA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 52.0% | −7.1 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median 58.9% | Rank in WA Rank #52 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 14% of homes | 12.4 pts under WA average The WA average is 64.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Washington payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WA payroll average
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $8.6M | $8.4M | $8.9M | $8.4M | $9.3M | $9.7M | $11.0M | $12.4M |
| Operating expenses | $8.1M | $8.4M | $8.8M | $8.9M | $9.4M | $9.9M | $10.5M | $11.6M |
| Net patient income | $0.5M | $0.1M | $0.2M | −$0.5M | −$0.1M | −$0.3M | $0.5M | $0.8M |
| Operating margin | 5.5% | 0.9% | 1.7% | −6.2% | −0.6% | −2.8% | 4.2% | 6.4% |
| Net income | $0.5M | $0.1M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $1.1M | $0.8M | $2.0M | $0.8M |
| Payroll costs | $3.4M | $3.9M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $5.0M | $6.5M | $6.5M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 39.8% | 46.0% | 47.3% | 48.8% | 46.4% | 51.6% | 59.1% | 52.0% |
| Beds | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
| Gross revenue | $10.8M | $10.1M | $10.7M | $9.8M | $10.9M | $11.1M | $12.9M | $14.5M |
| Salaries | $3.4M | $3.9M | $4.2M | $4.1M | $4.3M | $5.0M | $5.2M | $6.5M |
| Wage-related costs | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.3M | — |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $4.7M | $4.5M | $4.6M | $4.8M | $5.1M | $5.0M | $4.0M | $5.2M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $435 | $417 | $455 | $451 | $477 | $489 | $534 | $613 |
| Cost per day | $411 | $413 | $447 | $479 | $480 | $502 | $512 | $574 |
| Average length of stay | 58.7 days | 76.3 days | 60.9 days | 85.9 days | 81.0 days | 88.4 days | 92.0 days | 79.1 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Most new residents arrive under Medicare (59% of admissions), and a typical Medicare stay runs around 28 days.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
Catherine Reis-El Bara has been the Administrator at Mt. Baker Care Center since 2014, bringing 25 years of long-term care experience, including 18 years as a facility Administrator. She oversees all facility operations, compliance, staff management, and financial reporting, ensuring quality care for residents.
3.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bellingham's city center to Mt. Baker Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Mt. Baker Care Center is located in Bellingham, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Mt. Baker Care Center is in the South Bellingham neighborhood of Bellingham.
Mt. Baker Care Center has a walk score of 44. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
According to WA state health department records, Mt. Baker Care Center's license number is 1606.
Mt. Baker Care Center's occupancy is 79.0%.
No, Mt. Baker Care Center has a no-pet policy.
Mt. Baker Care Center is registered as a for-profit in WA.
Mt. Baker Care Center received a 5-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
