Inspection Reports for
Orangeburg Memory Care

The complaint included allegations that staff did not ensure clean and orderly floors, facility odorlessness, adequate night staffing, timely changing of residents in soiled clothing, and proper working order of resident call buttons. All allegations were investigated and found unsubstantiated.

After reviewing records, interviewing staff and residents, and observing the facility, all allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence to prove violations occurred.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff leaving a resident in soiled diapers/clothing, failure to notify the authorized representative of an incident, and lack of supervision resulting in a resident missing a tooth. The facility notified the resident's daughter of the missing tooth incident on 4/24/2025. No evidence supported the allegations.

The investigation found all allegations to be unsubstantiated based on facility records, staff interviews, and observations. No evidence was found to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The complaint investigation addressed two allegations: 1) staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident, and 2) staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in falls. Both allegations were found to be unsubstantiated after review of incident reports, interviews, and facility records.

Based on records reviewed and interviews with staff, the allegations that staff failed to prevent harm between residents and failed to provide adequate supervision resulting in falls were both deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations.

The complaint investigation addressed two allegations: 1) staff did not prevent resident from harming another resident, and 2) staff did not provide adequate supervision resulting in falls. Both allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Based on records reviewed and interviews, it was unclear if staff failed to prevent harm or provide adequate supervision resulting in falls; therefore, both allegations were deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations received on 12/20/2024. The investigation found all allegations unsubstantiated, meaning there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

After reviewing facility records, interviewing staff and residents, and observing the facility, all allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence to prove the violations occurred.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included rough handling causing bruising, failure to ensure medication administration, improper cleaning, residents not able to eat/drink after dinner, and forcing residents to get up at 5 AM. All were found unsubstantiated after review of records, interviews, and observations.

Based on facility records, staff and resident interviews, and observations, all allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with sufficient furniture, lighting, and food supplies. Fire safety equipment was current and compliant. Medications and toxins were securely stored. Staff and resident files reviewed were in compliance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with sufficient furniture, lighting, and food supplies. Fire safety equipment was current and medications were securely stored. Staff and resident files reviewed were in compliance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The facility is working with the public guardianship to obtain conservatorship for a resident (R1) following a 30-day notice. The facility will keep the Licensing Program Analyst updated on any changes. An exit interview was conducted and the report was left.

The facility is working with the public guardianship to obtain conservatorship for Resident 1 (R1) following a 30-day notice. The facility will keep the Licensing Program Analyst updated on any changes. An exit interview was conducted and the report was left.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with sufficient furniture, lighting, and food supplies. Fire safety equipment was current and medications were securely stored. Staff and resident files reviewed were in compliance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with sufficient furniture, lighting, and food supplies. Fire safety equipment was current and medications and toxins were securely stored. Staff and resident files reviewed were in compliance. No deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

Proper proof of correction documentation was received for the previously cited deficiency, and no new deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

Proper proof of correction documentation was received and no deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The complaint allegation was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there was not sufficient evidence to prove the violation occurred.

The investigation included review of facility records, staff and resident interviews. Repairs were documented on multiple dates and residents reported no impact on meals. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint was unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violation occurred.

The investigation found that repairs were made to the kitchen on multiple dates and interviews with staff and residents indicated that the repairs did not affect meal service. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of sufficient evidence.

Documentation for the two deficiencies' plans of correction was received and reviewed. An exit interview was conducted and the report was provided.

The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed documentation for the two deficiency plans of correction and conducted an exit interview. The report indicates the visit was completed with no further findings noted.

The complaint alleged that a resident's dietary needs were not being met. The investigation found that residents have the choice of sugar free or regular creamer, and staff encourage but do not require sugar free creamer for diabetic residents. The allegation was unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

Based on facility records, staff and resident interviews, and observation, it was unclear if the resident's dietary needs were unmet; therefore, the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.

The complaint allegation that residents' dietary needs were not being met was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove the violation.

Based on facility records, staff and resident interviews, and observation, it was determined that residents have the choice of sugar free or regular creamer and the allegation that dietary needs were not met was unsubstantiated.

No deficiencies were cited during this visit. The conference addressed multiple issues including resident elopements and fire department violations, and outlined corrective actions the licensee agreed to implement by 07/28/2023.

No deficiencies were cited during this visit. The facility was advised on future non-compliance consequences and agreed to implement corrective actions including additional dementia training, quality assurance checks, monitoring improvements, and resident safety measures.

The Licensing Program Analyst received training meeting records for case management dated the day of the visit and conducted an exit interview with the facility representative.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included non-adherence to COVID protocols and insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. Evidence did not support these claims.

The investigation found that the facility had appropriate infection control policies and sufficient PPE, and staffing levels were adequate with the use of a staffing agency. Both allegations were found to be unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.

The facility was found to be in substantial compliance with no deficiencies observed or cited. The environment was clean, odor-free, and in good repair with adequate safety measures and supplies.

The complaint allegations were unsubstantiated based on records review, staff interviews, and observations. The allegations included failure to adhere to COVID protocols and insufficient staffing impacting resident care. The facility was found to have sufficient staffing and proper infection control measures in place.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Facility staff adhered to COVID protocols with proper infection control policies and sufficient PPE. Staffing levels were adequate, supported by a staffing agency since 03/04/2023, and resident needs were met during the visit.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff retaining a resident needing higher level of care, failure to seek timely medical attention, and not following illness prevention protocols. The facility records and interviews supported that medical care was sought and protocols were followed.

The investigation found that the facility provided in-home support and hospice services to the resident and sought medical attention as needed. The resident's Power of Attorney, Resident Care Coordinator, and hospice agreed that the resident required a higher level of care. The allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff retaining a resident needing higher care, failure to seek timely medical attention, and not following illness prevention protocols. Evidence did not support these claims.

The investigation found all allegations to be unsubstantiated based on facility records, interviews with staff and witnesses, and review of incident reports. The facility had provided appropriate medical attention and in-home support services, and infection control protocols were followed.

The facility was observed to be clean, odor-free, in good repair, and compliant with safety and medication storage regulations. No deficiencies were cited during this visit, and the facility was found to be in substantial compliance.

The facility was observed to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with sufficient furniture, lighting, and safety equipment. No deficiencies were observed or cited, and the facility was found to be in substantial compliance on the date of the visit.

The visit was related to a complaint deficiency received on 12/17/2021. Administrator Alma Whitted acknowledged understanding the regulation and submitted a corrective email. The complaint deficiency was addressed and no further deficiencies were cited.

No deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit. The facility was found to be in substantial compliance on the date of the visit.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and documentation. Allegations included resident fracture, delayed medical attention, refusal to accept resident back from hospital, and denial of visitors. The facility was found to have complied with medical and visitation protocols.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Records and interviews showed the resident was taken to the Emergency Room the same day for shortness of breath and dizziness, had a contusion possibly from a mechanical fall, and visitors were allowed in designated areas with COVID-19 visitation restrictions. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint was unsubstantiated based on interviews, record reviews, and documentation. Allegations included resident fracture, delayed medical attention, refusal to accept resident back, and denial of visitors. The facility was found compliant with no deficiencies.

The investigation found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations. Records and interviews indicated the resident had a contusion possibly caused by a mechanical fall, medical attention was timely, the facility requested physician orders before accepting the resident back, and visitors were allowed in designated areas with possible COVID-related restrictions. No deficiencies were cited.