Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
100
98 employees · 2 contractors · 37 on an average day Park Place Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Georgetown, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Park Place Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Georgetown, TX
ALM Inspection Grade
C-
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 70 / 100, a C- — 12 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
1/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Park Place Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Park Place Care Center
Park Place Care Center provides skilled nursing, nursing home care, and respite care in Georgetown, TX. Skilled nursing gives residents access to licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while respite care offers a short stay for someone whose usual caregiver needs time to travel or recover.
The home has 116 beds, with total nurse staffing of 3 hours and 3 minutes per resident each day. That figure represents the daily nursing time available for each resident. Park Place Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families several listed ways to cover care.
Rehabilitation services support residents who need therapy, including people recovering from surgery or managing stroke, neurological, cardiac related, or diabetes related conditions. Podiatry, dentistry, optometry, nutritional services, and religious services are available, while salon and barber services allow residents to receive personal grooming on site. Transportation is available through the community, and Krista De Leon serves as administrator. Park Place Care Center may be a good fit for a resident who needs skilled nursing or a family seeking a short term respite stay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 156th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m
This nursing home is ranked 156th out of 233 nursing homes we track in Texas for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 3m6 of 6 metrics below Texas average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.9-hour shifts
21m
↓ 20% · TX 26mThis facility: 21m per resident per day, 20% below the Texas average of 26m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 7 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
7 staff · 9.9-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
53m
↓ 8% · TX 57mThis facility: 53m per resident per day, 8% below the Texas average of 57m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 20 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
20 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 31 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
31 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
1h 50m
↓ 9% · TX 2h 1mThis facility: 1h 50m per resident per day, 9% below the Texas average of 2h 1m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 31 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
31 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
3m
↓ 16% · TX 4mThis facility: 3m per resident per day, 16% below the Texas average of 4m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 42m
↓ 9% · TX 2h 59mThis facility: 2h 42m per resident per day, 9% below the Texas average of 2h 59m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
14m
↓ 32% · TX 21mThis facility: 14m per resident per day, 32% below the Texas average of 21m (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
100
98 employees · 2 contractors · 37 on an average day
100 total staff / 94 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.06 : 1
↓ 28% · TX 1.47This facility: 1.06 staff per resident, 28% below the Texas average of 1.47 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
100 staff ÷ 94 residents
See full Texas ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
9.1 h
↑ 12% · TX 8.1 hThis facility: 9.1 h, 12% above the Texas average of 8.1 h (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
30,472 staff hours this quarter
See full Texas ranking →99.8% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Texas average: 94.3% · Contractors this quarter: Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
116
Rank #172 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 172nd out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
116
Rank #172 / 258Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 172nd out of 258 nursing homes we track in Texas for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Texas facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Years of operating
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #82 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 82nd out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A longer operating history, which may indicate experience navigating regulations and delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #82 / 147Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 82nd out of 147 nursing homes we track in Texas for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Texas facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
29
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #164 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
Rank #164 / 276Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 164th out of 276 nursing homes we track in Texas for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Texas facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
39
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #52 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #52 / 178Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 52nd out of 178 nursing homes we track in Texas for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Texas average, with its Statewide rank out of 178. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
83.3%
This home usually has availability
Based on 96.6 residents and 116 beds. Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Higher than the Texas average: 72.9%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
124
days
About This Community
Facility TypeNursing
IssuanceJanuary 4, 2023
CountyWilliamson
License Number149122
Year Opened7/22/1997
Park Place Care Center is administered by Krista De Leon.
Management Company121 FM 971 MANAGEMENT LLC
OwnerGuadalupe County Hospital Board
Ownership TypeHOSPITAL DISTRICT/AUTHORITY
Medicare
6 units
Medicaid and Medicare
110 units
Total beds
116 units
Resident Council
Administrator Emaildavide@coralltc.net
CNA Training Program
Diabetes Management
Podiatry Services
Dentistry
Optometry Services
Stroke and Neurological Conditions
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Housekeeping
Laundry & Linen
Pets not allowed
Beauty Salon
Religious AffiliationYes
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
70 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
12 points below the Texas average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Concern
305 severity-weighted points (37 citations) · 4× higher than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 85)
Enforcement
Concern
5 enforcement actions · 5× more than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 1) · $114,392 in fines
Persistence
Strong
6 days to fix issues · much faster than the typical CMS-certified TX facility (median: 16)
Total health inspections
15
↑ 88% · TX 8This facility: 15, 88% above the Texas average of 8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
37
Rank #184 / 234Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 184th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Texas State average, with a ranking across all 234 TX facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 32% · TX 28This facility: 37, 32% above the Texas average of 28 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.47
Rank #48 / 234Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 234 nursing homes we track in Texas for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Texas mean across 234 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 32% · TX 3.65This facility: 2.47, 32% below the Texas average of 3.65 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
37 of 37 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
9
↑ 400% · TX 1.8This facility: 9, 400% above the Texas average of 1.8 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
28
↑ 10% · TX 25.4This facility: 28, 10% above the Texas average of 25.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · TX 0.4This facility: 0, 100% below the Texas average of 0.4 (among Texas facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Mar 05, 2026 · 5 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 10 of 37 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Mar 05, 2026
5 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 09, 2026
2 citations
Resident Rights critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 06, 2025
2 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 10, 2025
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
May 21, 2025
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 10, 2025
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 28, 2025
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jan 11, 2025
2 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 12, 2024
8 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 25, 2024
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 31, 2024
1 citation
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 15, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 12, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nov 11, 2023
1 citation
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Oct 26, 2023
2 citations
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 37 citations
Resident Rights
10 deficiencies (27%)
Quality of Life & Care
10 deficiencies (27%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
7 deficiencies (19%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (11%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (8%)
Infection Control
1 deficiency (3%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (3%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (3%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
15 of 37 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 22 of 37 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
5 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Jan 9, 2026 · $52,964 civil money penalty
Jan 9, 2026 · $52,964 civil money penalty
Oct 6, 2025 · $12,618 civil money penalty
May 21, 2025 · $19,630 civil money penalty
Jan 11, 2025 · $15,538 civil money penalty
Oct 26, 2023 · $14,518 civil money penalty
Total fines
$115,268
↑ 82% · TX $63KThis facility: $115,268, 82% above the Texas average of $63,404. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #205 / 236Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 205th out of 236 nursing homes we track in Texas for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Texas average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 236 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
5
↑ 138% · TX 2.1This facility: 5, 138% above the Texas average of 2.1. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
TX avg 0.18Texas average: 0.18. Average among the 798 Texas facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jan 9, 2026
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$52,964
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$52,964
Oct 6, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$12,618
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$12,618
May 21, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$19,630
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$19,630
Jan 11, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,538
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$15,538
Oct 26, 2023
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,518
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$14,518Fine amount comparison
This facility
$115,268
Texas average
$63,404
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Texas and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Texas average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 23% · TX 4.1This facility: 5.0, 23% above the TX average of 4.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
2
/ 5
Below average
↓ 35% · TX 3.1This facility: 2.0, 35% below the TX average of 3.1 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
6.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 16% · TX 7.6This facility: 6.4, 16% below the TX average of 7.6 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
12.4
Score · lower is better
↓ 10% · TX 13.8This facility: 12.4, 10% below the TX average of 13.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 8 better, 2 worse, 3 near TX average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.6%
↑ 17% · TX 15.8This facility: 18.6, 17% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.6%
↑ 17% · TX 15.8This facility: 18.6, 17% above the TX average of 15.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.9%
↓ 46% · TX 12.9This facility: 6.9, 46% below the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.9%
↓ 46% · TX 12.9This facility: 6.9, 46% below the TX average of 12.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
↓ 5% · TX 12.5This facility: 11.8, 5% below the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.8%
↓ 5% · TX 12.5This facility: 11.8, 5% below the TX average of 12.5 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · TX 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the TX average of 0.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
↑ 3% · TX 3.2This facility: 3.3, 3% above the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
↑ 3% · TX 3.2This facility: 3.3, 3% above the TX average of 3.2 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.2%
↓ 67% · TX 3.7This facility: 1.2, 67% below the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
1.2%
↓ 67% · TX 3.7This facility: 1.2, 67% below the TX average of 3.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
↓ 26% · TX 2.9This facility: 2.2, 26% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
↓ 26% · TX 2.9This facility: 2.2, 26% below the TX average of 2.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↑ 105% · TX 2.3This facility: 4.8, 105% above the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↑ 105% · TX 2.3This facility: 4.8, 105% above the TX average of 2.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.5%
↓ 14% · TX 9.8This facility: 8.5, 14% below the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.5%
↓ 14% · TX 9.8This facility: 8.5, 14% below the TX average of 9.8 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 99.7, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.7%
↑ 4% · TX 96.3This facility: 99.7, 4% above the TX average of 96.3 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · TX 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · TX 97.0This facility: 100.0, 3% above the TX average of 97.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.74
↓ 18% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.74, 18% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.74
↓ 18% · TX 2.13This facility: 1.74, 18% below the TX average of 2.13 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.27
↓ 39% · TX 2.07This facility: 1.27, 39% below the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
1.27
↓ 39% · TX 2.07This facility: 1.27, 39% below the TX average of 2.07 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.6%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.6, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
58.6%
↑ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 58.6, 9% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.8%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.8, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
45.8%
↓ 9% · US 50.6This facility: 45.8, 9% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↑ 144% · TX 1.4This facility: 3.5, 144% above the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.5%
↑ 144% · TX 1.4This facility: 3.5, 144% above the TX average of 1.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.9%
↑ 10% · TX 88.7This facility: 97.9, 10% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.9%
↑ 10% · TX 88.7This facility: 97.9, 10% above the TX average of 88.7 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 17% · TX 85.4This facility: 100.0, 17% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 17% · TX 85.4This facility: 100.0, 17% above the TX average of 85.4 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.6%
↑ 22% · TX 25.9This facility: 31.6, 22% above the TX average of 25.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
31.6%
↑ 22% · TX 25.9This facility: 31.6, 22% above the TX average of 25.9 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.4%
↓ 5% · TX 12.0This facility: 11.4, 5% below the TX average of 12.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
11.4%
↓ 5% · TX 12.0This facility: 11.4, 5% below the TX average of 12.0 (among TX facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Park Place Care Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending September 2024, compared with 225 Texas nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Sep 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−17.9% operating margin
−19.5 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.4M) trims the net loss to −$0.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Texas homes
73.2% payroll share of revenue
TX average 68.8%Rank #32 / 202Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 202 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $3.1M while revenue fell $15.4M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Texas homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $6.7M | −$15.4M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $9.3M | Rank in TX Rank #176 / 225Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 176th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 22% of homes | Below TX median Higher net patient revenue than 22% of TX homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $7.8M | −$13.9M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $9.8M | Rank in TX Rank #169 / 225Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 169th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 25% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.2M | −$1.6M | Trend 20162024 | TX median −$0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #165 / 225Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 165th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 27% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −17.9% | −19.5 pts | Trend 20162024 | TX median −5.0% | Rank in TX Rank #171 / 225Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 171st out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.4M | — | Trend — | TX median $0.4M | Rank in TX Rank #108 / 214Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 108th out of 214 nursing homes we track in Texas for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 50% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.8M | −$2.1M | Trend — | TX median $0.3M | Rank in TX Rank #163 / 207Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 163rd out of 207 nursing homes we track in Texas for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Texas homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 21% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Texas homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | TX median | Compared with TX homesRank in TX | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.9M | +$3.1M | Trend 20162024 | TX median $4.9M | Rank in TX Rank #118 / 225Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 118th out of 225 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 48% of homes | Below TX median Higher payroll than 48% of TX homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 73.2% | +65.2 pts | Trend 20162024 | TX median 57.6% | Rank in TX Rank #32 / 202Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 202 nursing homes we track in Texas for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Texas average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Texas that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 85% of homes | 4.4 pts over TX average The TX average is 68.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · TX benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Texas payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin TX payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017no report | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $6.5M | $4.3M | $4.0M | $6.3M | $6.7M | $7.7M | $22.1M | $6.7M | |
| Operating expenses | $6.0M | $4.9M | $4.3M | $5.8M | $7.0M | $8.1M | $21.7M | $7.8M | |
| Net patient income | $0.5M | −$0.6M | −$0.2M | $0.6M | −$0.3M | −$0.4M | $0.4M | −$1.2M | |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | −14.4% | −5.1% | 9.1% | −4.1% | −5.5% | 1.6% | −17.9% | |
| Net income | $0.5M | −$0.3M | $0.2M | $1.8M | $0.2M | $0.1M | $1.3M | −$0.8M | |
| Payroll costs | $3.0M | $2.3M | $2.4M | $2.9M | $3.5M | $4.1M | $1.8M | $4.9M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 46.2% | 54.7% | 58.2% | 46.4% | 51.8% | 53.4% | 8.0% | 73.2% | |
| Beds | 115 | 115 | 115 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | 116 | |
| Gross revenue | $7.4M | $4.9M | $4.7M | $7.0M | $7.2M | $8.7M | $20.8M | $7.2M | |
| Salaries | $2.6M | $2.1M | $2.1M | $2.6M | $3.1M | $3.7M | $1.7M | $4.4M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.0M | $0.4M | |
| Contract labor | $0.7M | $0.6M | $0.4M | $0.7M | $0.8M | — | — | — | |
| Other operating costs | $3.0M | $2.5M | $1.9M | $2.8M | $3.5M | $4.0M | $19.9M | $3.0M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $211 | $155 | $155 | $221 | $222 | $231 | $702 | $166 | |
| Cost per day | $195 | $177 | $163 | $201 | $232 | $244 | $690 | $196 | |
| Average length of stay | 136.2 days | 141.0 days | 182.4 days | 130.7 days | 151.4 days | 146.7 days | 196.7 days | 124.2 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
291 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
57 · 20%
Medicaid
92 · 32%
Private pay & other
142 · 49%
Resident snapshot
94 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
0 · 0%
Medicaid
74 · 79%
Private pay & other
20 · 21%
Leaving
322 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
40 · 12%
Medicaid
125 · 39%
Private pay & other
157 · 49%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Park Place Care Center
2.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Georgetown's city center to Park Place Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Park Place Care Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Texas
Park Place Care Center is located in Georgetown, Texas.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Texas.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Park Place Care Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Park Place Care Center?
Park Place Care Center is legally operated by Guadalupe County Hospital Board, and administered by Krista De Leon.
02 Is Park Place Care Center in a walkable area?
Park Place Care Center has a walk score of 39. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
03 What is the license number of Park Place Care Center?
According to TX state health department records, Park Place Care Center's license number is 149122.
04 What is the occupancy rate at Park Place Care Center?
Park Place Care Center's occupancy is 83.3%.
05 How long has Park Place Care Center been in business?
Park Place Care Center has been operating for approximately 29 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
06 Are pets allowed at Park Place Care Center?
No, Park Place Care Center has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Park Place Care Center?
The team at Park Place Care Center can be reached at info_parkplace@csnhc.com.
Updated on
