Inspection Reports for
Prestige Post-Acute and Rehab Center – Centralia

WA, 98531

Back to Facility Profile

14 CMS Surveys

Inspection Report — Dec 29, 2025

Enforcement
Date: Dec 29, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate the facility's compliance with timely and quality laboratory services/tests as required by physician orders.

Findings
The facility failed to obtain ordered laboratory tests (CBC and BMP) for one resident, resulting in actual harm that required hospital ICU admission. The ordered labs were not collected despite multiple attempts, and the failure to obtain labs contributed to delayed treatment and transfer.

Deficiencies (1)
WAC 388-97-1620(2)(b)(i)(ii) - The facility failed to obtain ordered CBC and BMP laboratory tests timely for one resident, resulting in harm including hospital ICU admission. Multiple attempts to collect labs were unsuccessful and not properly documented or communicated.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1 Sampled residents: 4

Inspection Report — Dec 2, 2025

Date: Dec 2, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to assess compliance with pharmaceutical services requirements and medication administration for residents, specifically reviewing medication orders and administration for Resident 1.

Findings
The facility failed to ensure that medications ordered by a provider were administered for 1 of 5 sampled residents, placing residents at risk of delayed healing and unmet care needs. The medication order for Meropenem was not entered or activated in the medical record, resulting in Resident 1 receiving the wrong antibiotic.

Deficiencies (1)
F 0755 - Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist. The facility failed to administer provider-ordered medication Meropenem to Resident 1 due to a medication order entry and activation error.
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 5 Residents affected: 1

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Staff CResidential Care Manager/Registered NurseDescribed the medication order entry and review process and possible reasons for the medication order omission
Staff DMedical DoctorReviewed Resident 1's discharge summary and medication orders, noted confusion about antibiotic administration
Staff BResidential Care Manager/Infection Preventionist/Licensed Practical NurseExplained the medication order entry and activation process and identified communication errors

Inspection Report — Sep 9, 2025

Complaint Investigation
Date: Sep 9, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding the facility's failure to thoroughly investigate a fall incident involving Resident 1.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on a fall incident involving Resident 1. The investigation found that the fall was not properly witnessed as initially reported, and staff left the resident unattended during smoking assistance. The allegation was substantiated with discrepancies noted in the facility's fall investigation.
Findings
The facility failed to properly investigate a fall for one resident, resulting in discrepancies between the fall investigation report and interviews with staff and the resident. The fall was incorrectly documented as witnessed when the resident was left unattended, placing residents at risk of unmet care needs.

Deficiencies (1)
WAC 388-97-0640 (6)(a)(b) - The facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for one resident, inaccurately documenting the fall as witnessed despite evidence that the resident was left unattended during the incident.
Report Facts
Residents sampled: 3 Date of fall investigation: Jul 12, 2025

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Staff CResidential Care Manager/Registered NurseProvided interview details about the fall and smoking assistance
Staff BDirector of Nursing/Registered NurseProvided interview details about fall investigation responsibilities and findings

Inspection Report — Jul 24, 2025

Complaint Investigation
Date: Jul 24, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding failure to obtain and document vital signs upon admission and before administration of blood pressure medication for a sampled resident.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on failure to obtain and document vital signs for Resident 1 upon admission and before administration of Metoprolol. Interviews with multiple nursing staff confirmed the vital signs were not documented in the electronic medical record. The allegation was substantiated with citations.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure vital signs were obtained and documented upon admission and prior to administering blood pressure medication for one of four sampled residents. Interviews with nursing staff confirmed the absence of vital signs documentation in the resident's electronic medical record, placing residents at risk of unmet care needs.

Deficiencies (1)
F 0684 - The facility failed to obtain and document vital signs upon admission and before administration of blood pressure medication for one sampled resident, risking unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.
Report Facts
Sampled residents: 4 Residents affected: 1

Inspection Report — Jul 1, 2025

Enforcement
Date: Jul 1, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with state and local laws regarding the administration of medications by nurse technicians at the facility.

Findings
The facility failed to comply with regulations by allowing two nurse technicians with expired credentials to administer scheduled and intravenous medications, placing residents at risk of medication errors and harm. The findings document unauthorized medication administration by these staff members.

Deficiencies (1)
F 0836 - The facility allowed two nurse technicians with expired credentials to administer scheduled opioid and intravenous medications, which is not authorized under state administrative code 246-840-870. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors and diminished quality of life.
Report Facts
Medication administrations by Staff D: 11 IV medication administrations by Staff D: 3 Medication administrations by Staff E: 20 IV medication administrations by Staff E: 1

Inspection Report — Apr 17, 2025

Complaint Investigation
Date: Apr 17, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted following a public complaint alleging that the facility's dietary manager did not have the required dietary management certification.

Complaint Details
The complaint was that the dietary manager lacked dietary management certification. Interviews confirmed the Dietary Manager was uncertified but was in the process of obtaining certification and awaiting a proctor for the final test.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager had the required certification to perform their duties, placing residents at risk of receiving menus prepared by unqualified staff. The Dietary Manager was in the process of obtaining certification but had not yet completed it.

Deficiencies (1)
WAC 388-97-1160 (1) - The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager had the required qualifications and certification to perform their duties for one facility kitchen. This placed residents at risk of receiving menus prepared by staff without the necessary competencies and skills.

Inspection Report — Apr 11, 2025

Routine
Date: Apr 11, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was a routine survey conducted to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care, safety, and facility operations at South Creek Post Acute.

Findings
The facility was found to have multiple deficiencies including failure to maintain advance directives, incomplete assessments and consents for physical restraints, inadequate coordination of PASARR evaluations, lack of person-centered care plans and activities, inaccurate enteral nutrition pump settings, missed medication documentation, inadequate assistance with activities of daily living, failure to initiate bowel protocols, incomplete respiratory care documentation, improper medication storage, failure to disinfect shared medical equipment, and unsafe bed rails. All deficiencies were cited with minimal harm and affected few residents.

Deficiencies (14)
F 0578 - The facility failed to obtain and/or maintain Advance Directives for 2 of 20 sampled residents, risking residents' rights to have healthcare preferences honored.
F 0604 - The facility failed to obtain assessment, consent, and physician's order for bed rails for 2 of 3 sampled residents, risking injury and diminished quality of life.
F 0644 - The facility failed to coordinate PASARR Level II assessments for 2 of 7 sampled residents, risking lack of necessary mental health services.
F 0645 - The facility failed to ensure PASARR assessments reflected accurate mental health diagnoses for 1 of 7 sampled residents, risking lack of appropriate mental health services.
F 0656 - The facility failed to develop a person-centered activities care plan for 1 of 6 sampled residents, risking unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.
F 0658 - The facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice with inaccurate enteral nutrition pump settings and missing medication administration documentation for 1 sampled resident.
F 0677 - The facility failed to provide assistance with shaving for 1 of 3 sampled residents, risking unmet care needs and decreased self-esteem.
F 0679 - The facility failed to provide resident-centered activities incorporating preferences for 1 sampled resident, risking decreased quality of life.
F 0684 - The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care related to bowel management for 6 of 7 sampled residents, risking health complications.
F 0695 - The facility failed to ensure continuous supplemental oxygen was provided and properly documented for 1 of 4 sampled residents, risking discomfort and medical decline.
F 0758 - The facility failed to complete behavior monitoring and intervention assessments for 1 of 5 sampled residents on psychotropic medications, risking unnecessary medication use.
F 0761 - The facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled in 1 of 4 medication carts, risking medication errors and adverse outcomes.
F 0880 - The facility failed to comply with infection prevention and control guidelines by not disinfecting shared medical equipment between resident use on 2 hallways, risking potential infection.
F 0909 - The facility failed to ensure bed rails were securely fastened and without gaps for 1 of 3 sampled residents, risking injury and entrapment.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 6 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Medication carts: 1 Hallways: 2 Residents affected: 1

Inspection Report — Mar 11, 2025

Date: Mar 11, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to evaluate compliance with care plan update requirements following changes in resident conditions, specifically focusing on whether care plans were revised after a resident's change in condition.

Findings
The facility failed to update the care plan for one of three sampled residents after a change in condition related to a penile lesion. The deficiency was cited with minimal harm potential and affected a few residents.

Deficiencies (1)
F 0657 - Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepare, review, and revise it by a team of health professionals. The facility failed to update Resident 1's care plan after a penile lesion was identified on 01/31/2025.

Inspection Report — Feb 19, 2025

Complaint Investigation
Date: Feb 19, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding the facility's failure to permit a resident to return after hospitalization or therapeutic leave exceeding the bed-hold policy.

Complaint Details
The complaint involved Resident 1 who was not readmitted after leg amputation surgery. Staff interviews revealed the facility denied readmission due to insurance changes and concerns about drugs found in the resident's belongings. The facility did not provide a discharge plan or written explanation to the resident. The complaint was substantiated with citations.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure that Resident 1 was readmitted after hospitalization, placing residents at risk for increased anxiety and diminished quality of life. The resident's discharge plan was not addressed, and the facility cited insurance issues and concerns about substances in the resident's belongings as reasons for non-admission.

Deficiencies (1)
F 0626 - The facility failed to permit a resident to return after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeded the bed-hold policy, violating the requirement that residents be allowed to return regardless of payer source.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Staff CAdmission DirectorStated the resident's insurance was no longer accepted and expressed concerns about drugs in the resident's belongings affecting readmission.
Staff AAdministratorReported awareness of empty canisters in resident's belongings and discussed insurance claim denials affecting readmission.
Staff BDirector of Nursing Services and Registered NurseReviewed resident's medical record and confirmed no discharge plan was implemented.

Inspection Report — Jan 17, 2025

Complaint Investigation
Date: Jan 17, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding the facility's failure to properly assess a resident after an unwitnessed fall on 12/31/2024.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on Resident 1's fall on 12/31/2024. The facility substantiated that the nurse on duty did not assess the resident after the fall despite being informed. Resident 1 and witnesses reported the nurse failed to respond appropriately. The facility set expectations for nurses to investigate falls and initiate interventions promptly.
Findings
The facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was assessed immediately after a fall on 12/31/2024, resulting in delayed neurological checks and assessment. The investigation substantiated that the nurse on duty did not perform due diligence to assess the resident after the fall was reported.

Deficiencies (1)
WAC 388-97-1060 (1) - The facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and care by not assessing a resident after an unwitnessed fall, placing the resident at risk of undiagnosed injuries and decreased quality of life.

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Staff DRegistered NurseNamed in the finding for failing to assess Resident 1 after the fall on 12/31/2024.
Staff ECertified Nursing AssistantProvided statement about responding to call light and reporting Resident 1's fall.
Staff BDirector of Nursing Services and RNProvided expert statement on expected nursing assessment and fall investigation procedures.
Staff CInfection Preventionist and RNProvided statement on facility's substantiation of the complaint and expectations for nursing documentation.

Inspection Report — Jan 7, 2025

Routine
Date: Jan 7, 2025

Visit Reason
The inspection was a routine survey to assess the facility's compliance with food safety, cleanliness, and maintenance standards.

Findings
The facility was found to have deficiencies in food storage cleanliness, juice dispensing area sanitation, and kitchen floor maintenance. Management acknowledged the issues and had plans to address them promptly.

Deficiencies (2)
F 0812 - The facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a clean, dry, and sanitary manner in the dry storage room and juice dispensing area, risking foodborne illness and contamination.
F 0921 - The facility failed to maintain safe, clean, and comfortable nursing home areas due to broken linoleum tiles exposing bare concrete in the kitchen floor, risking infection.
Report Facts
Residents Affected: 1 Residents Affected: 1

Inspection Report — May 24, 2024

Routine
Date: May 24, 2024

Visit Reason
The inspection was a routine survey to assess compliance with regulatory requirements related to resident care, physical restraints, activities of daily living, food safety, and immunization policies at South Creek Post Acute.

Findings
The facility was found deficient in multiple areas including failure to obtain consent, evaluation, and physician orders for physical restraints; failure to develop comprehensive care plans for residents using restraints; inadequate restorative services for residents; failure to maintain cleanliness and proper labeling in food storage areas; and failure to provide follow-up education for pneumococcal vaccination. All deficiencies were cited with minimal harm potential and affected few to many residents.

Deficiencies (5)
F 0604 - The facility failed to obtain consent, evaluation assessment, and physician order for physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents, placing residents at risk for injury and diminished quality of life.
F 0656 - The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing physical restraints for 1 of 3 sampled residents, risking unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.
F 0676 - The facility failed to ensure preventative measures for contractures and consistent restorative services for 2 of 3 sampled residents, risking further decline and diminished quality of life.
F 0812 - The facility failed to maintain cleanliness of kitchen ice machine and vent fan covers, and failed to ensure stored food and reusable items were labeled and dated when opened, risking foodborne illness.
F 0883 - The facility failed to provide follow-up education for pneumococcal vaccination for 1 of 5 sampled residents, increasing risk of exposure to contagious diseases and respiratory complications.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: Many Residents affected: 1

Inspection Report — May 2, 2024

Complaint Investigation
Date: May 2, 2024

Visit Reason
The inspection was conducted to investigate an allegation that the facility failed to initiate a facility investigation after a resident was sent to the emergency room and later admitted with a diagnosis of narcotic overdose.

Complaint Details
The complaint investigation focused on Resident 1's narcotic overdose incident. The allegation that the facility did not conduct a proper investigation was substantiated based on record review and staff interviews.
Findings
The facility failed to initiate a formal investigation into Resident 1's medication overdose despite evidence of the overdose and hospital admission. Staff interviews confirmed no formal investigation was conducted, placing residents at risk of medication errors and decreased quality of life.

Deficiencies (1)
WAC 388-97-0640 (6)(a)(b) - The facility failed to initiate a facility investigation after a resident was sent to the emergency room and admitted with a narcotic overdose. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors and decreased quality of life.
Report Facts
Sampled residents: 4 Narcan doses administered: 3 COWS score: 9

Employees mentioned
NameTitleContext
Staff BDirector of Nursing ServicesStated the facility did not initiate an investigation for Resident 1's medication overdose
Staff AAdministratorRecalled discussions about Resident 1's hospital admission but was unsure if an investigation was initiated
Staff CResidential Care Manager and Licensed Practical NursePerformed medication review and stated no formal investigation was conducted

Inspection Report — Jun 30, 2023

Routine
Date: Jun 30, 2023

Visit Reason
Routine state inspection of South Creek Post Acute nursing facility to assess compliance with resident rights, care planning, medication management, food service, and safety standards.

Findings
The facility was found to have multiple deficiencies including failure to respect resident dignity, incomplete consent and notification processes, inadequate care planning for medications and diagnoses, poor odor control, failure to monitor anticoagulant side effects, improper respiratory care orders, and food service issues including cold and unpalatable meals. Several deficiencies were noted as minimal harm with some residents affected. No overall approval status was stated.

Deficiencies (15)
WAC 388-97-0300 - Staff failed to knock and announce themselves before entering Resident 10's room multiple times, violating resident dignity and privacy.
WAC 388-97-0260 (1)-(3) - Facility failed to obtain consent from Resident 52 or representative before administering psychotropic medication hydroxyzine.
WAC 388-97-0580 (b)(i)(ii) - Facility failed to provide advance written notice and consent for room change to Resident 74.
WAC 388-97-0300 (1)(b), (3)(a-c) - Facility failed to obtain and maintain Power of Attorney documentation for Resident 71.
WAC 388-97-0880 - Facility failed to maintain a homelike environment free from incontinence odors in multiple halls, despite staff efforts.
WAC 388-97-1915 (1)(2)(a-c) - Facility failed to complete accurate PASARR assessments reflecting mental health diagnoses for multiple residents (71, 66, 33, 63).
WAC 388-97-1020 (1), (2)(a)(b)(c) - Facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans addressing respiratory care, mental health diagnoses, psychotropic and anticoagulant medication use for multiple residents.
WAC 388-97-1060 (2)(c) - Facility failed to provide shaving and document completion of personal hygiene tasks for Resident 14.
WAC 388-97-1060 (1) - Facility failed to implement physician orders for nebulizer tubing/mask changes for Residents 19 and 78; tubing lacked date and initials.
WAC 388-97-1060 (3)(h) - Facility failed to ensure weight measurements were obtained and nutritional supplements given as ordered for Resident 66.
WAC 388-97-1060 (3)(j)(vi) - Facility failed to have physician orders, cleaning schedules, and care plans for CPAP use for Resident 79 and failed to have oxygen order in place for Resident 87 prior to use.
WAC 388-97-1060 (3)(k)(i) - Facility failed to ensure anticoagulant medication side effect monitoring and care plans for Residents 14, 54, 66, and 101.
WAC 388-97-1060 (3)(k)(i) - Facility failed to ensure appropriate diagnosis and monitoring of target behaviors for psychotropic medication use for Residents 52 and 63.
WAC 388-97-1100 (1)(2) & -1120(4) - Facility failed to ensure food served was palatable, attractive, and at safe and appetizing temperatures; multiple resident complaints and observations of cold food.
WAC 388-97-1100 (3) & 2980 - Facility failed to maintain and document proper cold holding temperatures for milk on beverage carts and unit refrigerators; multiple temperature logs missing or showing temperatures above 41°F.
Report Facts
Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 1 Facility halls affected: 3 Residents affected: 4 Residents affected: 6 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 1 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 4 Residents affected: 2 Residents affected: 6 Beverage carts with milk temperature above 41F: 4 Unit refrigerators with missing or high temperature logs: 3

Loading inspection reports...