Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (66% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 6 - 7 months.
Providence Mount St. Vincent is a 122-bed senior living community in Seattle’s North Admiral neighborhood, offering a full continuum of care that spans independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing. That range means a resident can move between levels of care on the same campus as their needs change, without relocating to a different facility across town. The community accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay, giving families several ways to structure coverage for either short-term rehabilitation or longer-term residential care.
On the clinical side, the campus includes a transitional care unit and outpatient rehabilitation services, along with a Wellness Clinic for ongoing health support. Rehabilitation and respite care are both available, and the community maintains 24-hour staffing. Total nursing care averages 4 hours and 38 minutes per resident each day, a meaningful level of hands-on support for residents in the skilled nursing setting. The average length of stay is 126 days, suggesting a mix of residents recovering from a hospital stay and those settling into longer-term care.
Inspection records for the community have most often centered on medication administration practices, staff screening and certification requirements, and administrative safety processes such as documentation and chemical storage. These are the kinds of operational details that regulators routinely check across skilled nursing communities, and families touring Providence Mount St. Vincent can ask staff how these areas are currently managed.
Life on campus includes an Intergenerational Learning Center, which brings younger generations into contact with residents, along with a barber and beauty salon, an on-site gift shop, and a thrift shop. Programming covers physical, social, cognitive, and spiritual care, giving residents a range of ways to stay engaged day to day. The neighborhood itself is moderately walkable, with a Walk Score of 60, meaning some errands and outings are accessible on foot while others will call for a short drive. With occupancy at 62 percent, out of 76 of 122 beds filled, the community currently has room to welcome new residents.
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 16 | 31 | This facility has 48% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (16 vs. WA avg 31).↓ 48% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 3.2 | 4.51 | This facility has 29% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (3.2 vs. WA avg 4.51).↓ 29% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 5 | 9 | This facility has had 44% fewer total inspections than the Washington average (5 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 44% fewer |
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Washington average 7.8
Last Health inspection on Aug 2025
Washington average 48.9
Washington average 6.92
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
49 of 63 citations resulted from standard inspections; 9 of 63 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 63 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Washington average: 0.3
Washington average: 1.7
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Manages medical care and health needs.
Assists with medical care and medications.
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total hours from contractors
7,461 contractor hours this quarter
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 102 | 11 | 113 | 43,191 | 92 | 100% | 8.8 |
| Registered Nurse | 47 | 0 | 47 | 16,658 | 92 | 100% | 9.2 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 12 | 13 | 25 | 8,900 | 92 | 100% | 9 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 6 | 0 | 6 | 2,509 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| RN Director of Nursing | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,549 | 89 | 97% | 8.8 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,469 | 76 | 83% | 8.7 |
| Other Social Services Staff | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,454 | 70 | 76% | 7.7 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1,320 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 4 | 0 | 4 | 907 | 64 | 70% | 7.9 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 5 | 0 | 5 | 868 | 66 | 72% | 8.2 |
| Administrator | 2 | 0 | 2 | 792 | 66 | 72% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 496 | 62 | 67% | 8 |
| Clinical Nurse Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 264 | 33 | 36% | 8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 205 | 25 | 27% | 8.2 |
Includes penalties issued in 2024-2025
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.
Last updated: Jan 2026
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
31% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
66% of new residents, often for short stays.
4% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Historical financial and operational data for Providence Mount St. Vincent from 2011–2023, based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Key figures below are for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Most new residents arrive under private pay (66% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 6 - 7 months.
Coverage residents most often arrive under.
Coverage residents most often leave under.
2.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Seattle's city center to Providence Mount St. Vincent's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Add your location
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HC (Home Care):
Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirabella Seattle | NH AL IL MC SNF | Seattle (South Lake Union) | 63
Facility
63
WA AVG
81
Rank
#228 / 356 |
46.0%
Facility
46.0%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#259 / 276 | -39% | 4.29
Facility
4.29
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#22 / 61 | +2% | +2% | $8.3k
Facility
$8.3k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#25 / 61 | 41
Facility
41
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#25 / 61 | 10.3
Facility
10.3
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#53 / 61 | - | 29 | A+ |
99
Facility
99
WA AVG
51
Rank
#1 / 619 | Lee Burnside | $7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#45 / 51 | $13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#8 / 51 | 173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#2 / 51 | 505520 | ||||
| Providence Mount St. Vincent | NH AL IL RC SNF | Sw Seattle (North Admiral) | 122
Facility
122
WA AVG
81
Rank
#43 / 356 |
62.3%
Facility
62.3%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#223 / 276 | -17% | 4.68
Facility
4.68
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#12 / 61 | +52% | +11% | $152.2k
Facility
$152.2k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#55 / 61 | 63
Facility
63
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#46 / 61 | 7.9
Facility
7.9
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#43 / 61 | 4 | 76 | - |
60
Facility
60
WA AVG
51
Rank
#253 / 619 | Maricor Gonzales - Lim | $32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#4 / 51 | $16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#4 / 51 | 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#32 / 51 | 505182 | ||||
| Skyline | NH AL IL MC SNF | Seattle | 34
Facility
34
WA AVG
81
Rank
#333 / 356 |
82.9%
Facility
82.9%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#95 / 276 | +11% | 5.33
Facility
5.33
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#6 / 61 | +17% | +26% | $0
Facility
$0
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#1 / 61 | 52
Facility
52
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#37 / 61 | 17.3
Facility
17.3
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#59 / 61 | - | 28 | - |
98
Facility
98
WA AVG
51
Rank
#7 / 619 | Presbyterian Retirement Communities Northwest | $5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#50 / 51 | $14.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
$14.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#7 / 51 | 266.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility
266.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#1 / 51 | 505469 | ||||
| Kin On | NH AL HC SNF | Seattle (Rainier Valley) | 100
Facility
100
WA AVG
81
Rank
#91 / 356 |
91.0%
Facility
91.0%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#45 / 276 | +21% | 4.57
Facility
4.57
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#16 / 61 | +41% | +8% | $25.5k
Facility
$25.5k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#34 / 61 | 47
Facility
47
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#31 / 61 | 7.8
Facility
7.8
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#42 / 61 | 1 | 91 | - |
84
Facility
84
WA AVG
51
Rank
#62 / 619 | Dennis Lam | $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#20 / 51 | $9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#16 / 51 | 69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#7 / 51 | 505453 | ||||
| Washington Care Center | NH MC RC SNF | Seattle (Rainier Valley) | 165
Facility
165
WA AVG
81
Rank
#7 / 356 |
27.9%
Facility
27.9%
WA AVG
75%
Rank
#276 / 276 | -63% | 3.91
Facility
3.91
WA AVG
4.22
Rank
#37 / 61 | +30% | -7% | $58.7k
Facility
$58.7k
WA AVG
$87.7k
Rank
#44 / 61 | 68
Facility
68
WA AVG
48.9
Rank
#48 / 61 | 7.6
Facility
7.6
WA AVG
6.9
Rank
#41 / 61 | 5 | 46 | A+ |
77
Facility
77
WA AVG
51
Rank
#97 / 619 | Rayona Deanes | $20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$15.9M
Rank
#11 / 51 | $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
$9.2M
Rank
#12 / 51 | 64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG
62.6%
Rank
#13 / 51 | 505017 |
Providence Mount St. Vincent is located in SW Seattle, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Providence Mount St. Vincent is in the North Admiral neighborhood of Seattle.
Providence Mount St. Vincent has a walk score of 60. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
According to WA state health department records, Providence Mount St. Vincent's license number is 198.
Providence Mount St. Vincent's occupancy is 62%.
No, Providence Mount St. Vincent has a no-pet policy.
Providence Mount St. Vincent is registered as a non-profit in WA.
Providence Mount St. Vincent has 122 beds.
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance