Providence Mount St. Vincent
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.

Providence Mount St. Vincent

Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Respite Care & Skilled Nursing · Seattle, WA
CMS overall rating Info CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Calculator: See prices in your area
Providence Mount St. Vincent accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.

Inspection History

In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.

Since 2022 · 4 years of data These figures come from state-published and/or federal inspection records. The period covered can vary depending on document availability. 16 deficiencies 5 inspections

Inspection Scorecard Info This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.

Since 2022 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average 0 Worse No metrics in this bucket. 2 Better Metrics better than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (48% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (29% below)

Deficiencies Info Deficiencies are formal regulatory issues recorded during state inspections.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total deficiencies Info Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types. 1631 This facility has 48% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (16 vs. WA avg 31).↓ 48% better
Deficiencies per inspection Info Average deficiencies per inspection. 3.24.51 This facility has 29% fewer deficiencies per inspection than a typical Washington nursing home (3.2 vs. WA avg 4.51).↓ 29% better

Inspections Info State inspections evaluate whether the facility meets health and safety standards.

This FacilityWA Averagevs. WA Avg
Total inspections Info Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility. 59 This facility has had 44% fewer total inspections than the Washington average (5 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 44% fewer

CMS Health Inspection History

Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.

Inspections Since 2022 · 4 years of data
Total health inspections 8

Washington average 7.8


Last Health inspection on Aug 2025

Total health citations
63 Rank #46 / 61Health citations — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 46th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Washington average 48.9

Citations per inspection
7.88 Rank #43 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 43rd out of 61 homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.

Washington average 6.92


Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.

49 of 63 citations resulted from standard inspections; 9 of 63 resulted from complaint investigations; and 5 of 63 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).

Breakdown of citation severity (last 4 years)
Critical health citations
0
100% better than Washington average

Washington average: 0.3


Serious health citations
4
135% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 1.7

0 critical citations Washington average: 0.3

4 serious citations Washington average: 1.7

59 moderate citations Washington average: 46.3

0 minor citations Washington average: 0.5
Citations history (last 4 years)
Infection Control moderate citation Aug 08, 2025
Corrected

Abuse/Neglect serious citation Jun 10, 2025
Corrected

Abuse/Neglect moderate citation Jun 10, 2025
Corrected

Abuse/Neglect moderate citation Jun 10, 2025
Corrected

Staffing Data

Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.

Total staff 217
Employees 193
Contractors 24
Staff to resident ratio 1.23 : 1
34% fewer staff per resident than Washington average
Washington average ratio: 1.86 : 1 Washington average ratio: 1.86 : 1See full Washington ranking
Avg staff/day 100
Average shift 8.8 hours
9% better than Washington average
Washington average: 8.1 hours Washington average shift: 8.1 hoursSee full Washington ranking
Total staff hours (quarter) 80,582

Nursing staff breakdown

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse

Manages medical care and health needs.

RN Staff Info All 47 RN Staff are full-time employees. No contractors work on this role. 47
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9.2 hours
Licensed Practical Nurse

Assists with medical care and medications.

LPN Staff Info 25 total: 12 full-time employees and 13 contractors. 25
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 9 hours
Certified Nursing Assistant

Helps with daily care and mobility.

CNA Staff Info 113 total: 102 full-time employees and 11 contractors. 113
Average shift length Info Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day. 8.8 hours

Contractor staffing

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.

Total hours from contractors

9.3%

7,461 contractor hours this quarter

Licensed Practical Nurse: 13 Certified Nursing Assistant: 11

Staff by category

Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31 More info This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Certified Nursing Assistant1021111343,19192100%8.8
Registered Nurse4704716,65892100%9.2
Licensed Practical Nurse1213258,90092100%9
Mental Health Service Worker6062,5096672%8
RN Director of Nursing3031,5498997%8.8
Physical Therapy Aide3031,4697683%8.7
Other Social Services Staff3031,4547076%7.7
Nurse Practitioner3031,3206672%8
Qualified Social Worker4049076470%7.9
Physical Therapy Assistant5058686672%8.2
Administrator2027926672%8
Dietitian1014966267%8
Clinical Nurse Specialist1012643336%8
Therapeutic Recreation Specialist1012052527%8.2
113 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days 100%
47 Registered Nurse
% of Days 100%
25 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days 100%
6 Mental Health Service Worker
% of Days 72%

Penalties and fines

Includes penalties issued in 2024-2025

Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.

Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total fines amount $87K Rank #55 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 55th out of 61 homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
7% higher than Washington average

Washington average: $82K

Number of fines 2
8% more fines than Washington average

Washington average: 1.8

Payment Denials Info Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed. 0
100% fewer payment denials than Washington average

Washington average: 0.3

Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility $87K
Washington average $82K
Penalty History

Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.

2 penalties in the past 3 years

Multiple penalties were reported in the last 3 years.

Civil Money Penalty Info Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation. Jan 10, 2025
$77K
Civil Money Penalty Info Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation. May 14, 2024
$11K

Last updated: Jan 2026

Quality of care over time

These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.

High-risk clinical events score Info A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline. 10.5
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 10.0

Functional decline score Info A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence. 21.2
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 20.9

Long-stay resident measures
Above average Washington avg: 3.6 Info CMS star rating based on long-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = significantly above average, 1 star = significantly below average.
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased Info Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased 17.1%
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 16.4%

Walking Ability Worsened Info Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened 18.7%
14% better than Washington average

Washington average: 21.8%

Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence Info Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder 27.7%
14% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 24.3%

Falls with Major Injury Info Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury 3.3%
28% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 2.6%

High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers Info Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers 5.3%
8% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 4.9%

Urinary Tract Infection Info Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection 2.9%
63% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 1.7%

Lost Too Much Weight Info Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight 7.8%
35% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 5.8%

Depressive Symptoms Info Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms 3.0%
81% better than Washington average

Washington average: 16.2%

Antipsychotic Use Info Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication 9.6%
33% better than Washington average

Washington average: 14.5%

Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 94.7%
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 96.2%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 94.1%
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 93.8%

Hospitalizations per 1,000 days Info Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days. 0.94
32% better than Washington average

Washington average: 1.38

ED visits per 1,000 days Info Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days. 1.52
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 1.51

Short-stay resident measures
Average Washington avg: 3.6 Info CMS star rating based on short-stay quality measure performance. 5 stars = much above average, 1 star = much below average.
Pneumococcal Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine 91.0%
In line with Washington average

Washington average: 88.1%

Antipsychotic medication increase Info Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication 2.7%
87% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 1.4%

Influenza Vaccine Info Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine 87.0%
6% better than Washington average

Washington average: 82.0%

Re-hospitalized after SNF stay Info Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission. 25.3%
27% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 19.9%

Emergency department visits Info Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit. 15.1%
14% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 13.2%

Falls with major injury Info Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay. 0.5%
39% better than Washington average

Washington average: 0.8%

Ability to care for self at discharge Info Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge. 47.1%
12% worse than Washington average

Washington average: 53.7%

Successful return to home or community Info Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility. 60.7%
20% better than Washington average

Washington average: 50.6%

Breakdown by payment type

Medicare

31% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.

Typical stay 21 days

Private pay

66% of new residents, often for short stays.

Typical stay 6 - 7 months

Medicaid

4% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.

Typical stay 4 years

Facility Characteristics

Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)

Total residents 177
Medicare
12
6.8% of residents
Medicaid
92
52% of residents
Private pay or other
73
41.2% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group

Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities

Active Resident Council

Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.

Finances and operations

Based on CMS SNF Cost Report for fiscal year ending in 12/2023.

Nonprofit
Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$32.3M
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$10.7M
Nonprofit Nonprofit Corporation
Net patient revenue Info Net patient revenue — what the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts are subtracted from its gross charges (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It covers resident care only; money the home earns from other sources is shown separately as "Other income."
$32.3M Rank #4 / 51Net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 4th out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Net patient income Info Net patient income: net patient revenue minus the home's total operating expenses. A positive figure means it earns more from resident care than it spends to deliver it; a negative figure means the opposite. It excludes non-operating "other income."
-$10.7M
Other income Info Money the home earns outside of resident care — such as investments, grants, rentals and other non-operating sources (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3). It is tracked separately from net patient revenue: it is not part of that figure, and it is not included in net patient income.
$4.1M
Payroll costs Info Staff salaries plus wage-related costs — benefits such as payroll taxes, health insurance and retirement — from the home's own accounting records (CMS cost report, Worksheet A). Contract or agency labor is counted separately, under other operating costs. Rank #4 / 51Payroll costs — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 4th out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
$16.8M 52.2% of net patient revenue Info Payroll as a share of revenue: staff salaries and wage-related benefits divided by net patient revenue. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Rank #32 / 51Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 32nd out of 51 homes we track in Washington. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings.Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings cover every community we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Communities without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Other operating costs Info Everything it costs to run the home apart from payroll — food, utilities, supplies, maintenance, contract labor and administration. Calculated as total operating expense minus payroll (staff salaries and wage-related benefits).
$26.1M
Total costs Info The home's total operating expense for the year — all the costs of running it, salaries included (CMS cost report, Worksheet G-3).
$43.0M

Who this home usually serves

TYPE OF STAY

Primarily short stays

Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.

Most new residents arrive under private pay (66% of admissions), and a typical private pay stay runs around 6 - 7 months.

Admissions
500 total

Coverage residents most often arrive under.

Medicare 31%
Private pay 66%
Medicaid 4%
Discharges
468 total

Coverage residents most often leave under.

Medicare 28%
Private pay 60%
Medicaid 12%

Places of interest near Providence Mount St. Vincent

Address 2.8 miles from city center Info Estimated distance in miles from Seattle's city center to Providence Mount St. Vincent's address, calculated via Google Maps.

Calculate Travel Distance to Providence Mount St. Vincent

Add your location

Address

Compare Nursing Homes around Seattle

Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WA Dept. of Social & Health Services (DSHS), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.

Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.

The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
Care Types in This Table AL (Assisted Living): Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing. NH (Nursing Home): 24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs. SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility): Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness. MC (Memory Care): Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia. RC (Respite Care): Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break. IL (Independent Living): Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care. HC (Home Care): Professional care delivered in the person's own home, from companionship to skilled nursing.
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Washington average is: 62.6% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
Mirabella Seattle
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Seattle (South Lake Union)
63
Facility 63
WA AVG 81
Rank #228 / 356
46.0%
Facility 46.0%
WA AVG 75%
Rank #259 / 276
-39%
4.29
Facility 4.29
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #22 / 61
+2%+2%
$8.3k
Facility $8.3k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #25 / 61
41
Facility 41
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #25 / 61
10.3
Facility 10.3
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #53 / 61
-29A+
99
Facility 99
WA AVG 51
Rank #1 / 619
Lee Burnside
$7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $7.9MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #45 / 51
$13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $13.8MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #8 / 51
173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility 173.2%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #2 / 51
505520
Providence Mount St. Vincent
NH
AL
IL
RC
SNF
Sw Seattle (North Admiral)
122
Facility 122
WA AVG 81
Rank #43 / 356
62.3%
Facility 62.3%
WA AVG 75%
Rank #223 / 276
-17%
4.68
Facility 4.68
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #12 / 61
+52%+11%
$152.2k
Facility $152.2k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #55 / 61
63
Facility 63
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #46 / 61
7.9
Facility 7.9
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #43 / 61
476-
60
Facility 60
WA AVG 51
Rank #253 / 619
Maricor Gonzales - Lim
$32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $32.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #4 / 51
$16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $16.8MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #4 / 51
52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 52.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #32 / 51
505182
Skyline
NH
AL
IL
MC
SNF
Seattle
34
Facility 34
WA AVG 81
Rank #333 / 356
82.9%
Facility 82.9%
WA AVG 75%
Rank #95 / 276
+11%
5.33
Facility 5.33
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #6 / 61
+17%+26%
$0
Facility $0
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #1 / 61
52
Facility 52
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #37 / 61
17.3
Facility 17.3
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #59 / 61
-28-
98
Facility 98
WA AVG 51
Rank #7 / 619
Presbyterian Retirement Communities Northwest
$5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $5.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #50 / 51
$14.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility $14.4MFiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #7 / 51
266.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
Facility 266.3%Fiscal year ending 09/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #1 / 51
505469
Kin On
NH
AL
HC
SNF
Seattle (Rainier Valley)
100
Facility 100
WA AVG 81
Rank #91 / 356
91.0%
Facility 91.0%
WA AVG 75%
Rank #45 / 276
+21%
4.57
Facility 4.57
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #16 / 61
+41%+8%
$25.5k
Facility $25.5k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #34 / 61
47
Facility 47
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #31 / 61
7.8
Facility 7.8
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #42 / 61
191-
84
Facility 84
WA AVG 51
Rank #62 / 619
Dennis Lam
$14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $14.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #20 / 51
$9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $9.9MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #16 / 51
69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 69.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #7 / 51
505453
Washington Care Center
NH
MC
RC
SNF
Seattle (Rainier Valley)
165
Facility 165
WA AVG 81
Rank #7 / 356
27.9%
Facility 27.9%
WA AVG 75%
Rank #276 / 276
-63%
3.91
Facility 3.91
WA AVG 4.22
Rank #37 / 61
+30%-7%
$58.7k
Facility $58.7k
WA AVG $87.7k
Rank #44 / 61
68
Facility 68
WA AVG 48.9
Rank #48 / 61
7.6
Facility 7.6
WA AVG 6.9
Rank #41 / 61
546A+
77
Facility 77
WA AVG 51
Rank #97 / 619
Rayona Deanes
$20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $20.2MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $15.9M
Rank #11 / 51
$13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility $13.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG $9.2M
Rank #12 / 51
64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility 64.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
WA AVG 62.6%
Rank #13 / 51
505017

Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington

Providence Mount St. Vincent is located in SW Seattle, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.

Get Financial aid guidance

Community Options Program Entry System (COPES)

WA Medicaid COPES

Age 65+ or disabled
General Washington resident, Medicaid-eligible, nursing home-level care need.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,829/month 300% FBR, individual
Asset Limits $2,000 (individual), $3,000 (couple).
WA

High demand in urban areas (e.g., Seattle).

Benefits
Personal care (5-7 hours/day) Respite (240 hours/year) Adult day care ($70/day) Home modifications ($1,500 avg.)

Washington Family Caregiver Support Program

WA NFCSP

Age Caregiver of someone 60+ (or with dementia)
General Washington resident.
Income Limits No strict limit; prioritizes low-income.
Asset Limits Not applicable.
WA

High urban demand; rural outreach.

Benefits
In-home respite (4-6 hours/day) Adult day care (~$70/day) Short-term facility care (up to 5 days)

Community First Choice (CFC)

Washington Community First Choice

Age 65+ (or disabled 18+)
General WA resident, Medicaid-eligible, need help with 2+ ADLs/IADLs.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,829/month; QIT optional.
Asset Limits $2,000 (individual), $3,000 (couple).
WA

Broader than COPES; serves ~20,000; self-directed option.

Benefits
Personal care (4-6 hours/day) Respite (~240 hours/year) Assistive devices Training Transportation

Older Americans Act (OAA) Services

Washington OAA Services

Age 60+
General WA resident; no income/asset limits.
Income Limits (2025) None; donations encouraged.
Asset Limits Not assessed.
WA

13 AAAs; includes Meals on Wheels; rural focus.

Benefits
Meals (~$5-$7/meal) Transportation Homemaker services (~4 hours/week) Respite (~5 days/year) Legal aid

Medicare Savings Program (MSP)

Washington Medicare Savings Program

Age 65+ or disabled
General WA resident, Medicare Part A/B.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,510/month (QMB), ~$3,380/month (SLMB), ~$3,598/month (QI)—individual.
Asset Limits $9,430 (individual), $14,130 (couple).
WA

Includes Extra Help for Part D; no waitlist.

Benefits
Covers Part B premiums ($174.70/month) Deductibles ($240/year) Copays (~20%)

VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits

Washington VA Aid and Attendance/Housebound

Age 65+ or disabled veteran/spouse
General WA resident, wartime service, ADL help (A&A) or homebound.
Income Limits (2025) Net income < ~$1,984/month (veteran with dependent, A&A); pension offsets income.
Asset Limits ~$155,356 net worth
WA

High veteran use; supports rural/urban needs.

Benefits
Cash (~$1,433-$2,642/month veteran, ~$951-$1,318 spouse) for care costs

Senior Citizens Property Tax Exemption

Washington Senior Property Tax Exemption

Age 61+ or disabled retiree
General WA resident, homeowner, income-based.
Income Limits (2025) ~$45,000-$70,000/year varies by county, e.g., King: $70,000
Asset Limits Not assessed; home value cap varies ~$250,000-$400,000
WA

Saves ~$500-$1,500/year; offered statewide.

Benefits
Tax exemption (~$500-$1,500/year depending on county)

Senior Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP)

Washington SFMNP

Age 60+
General WA resident, low-income.
Income Limits (2025) ~$2,322/month 185% FPL
Asset Limits Not assessed.
WA

Vouchers (~$80/season); serves ~20,000 via AAAs.

Benefits
Vouchers (~$80/season) for produce at farmers’ markets

Frequently Asked Questions about Providence Mount St. Vincent

What neighborhood is Providence Mount St. Vincent in?

Providence Mount St. Vincent is in the North Admiral neighborhood of Seattle.

Is Providence Mount St. Vincent in a walkable area?

Providence Mount St. Vincent has a walk score of 60. Moderately walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.

What is the license number of Providence Mount St. Vincent?

According to WA state health department records, Providence Mount St. Vincent's license number is 198.

What is the occupancy rate at Providence Mount St. Vincent?

Providence Mount St. Vincent's occupancy is 62%.

Are pets allowed at Providence Mount St. Vincent?

No, Providence Mount St. Vincent has a no-pet policy.

Does Providence Mount St. Vincent operate as a for-profit or non-profit?

Providence Mount St. Vincent is registered as a non-profit in WA.

How many beds does Providence Mount St. Vincent have?

Providence Mount St. Vincent has 122 beds.

Guides for Better Senior Living

Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area

Nursing Home Data Explorer

Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now

The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It

Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance