Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
62 employees · 0 contractors · 25 on an average day Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Pocatello, ID
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Idaho average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Idaho average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
Nursing Home & Skilled Nursing · Pocatello, ID
ALM Inspection Grade
A+
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Idaho average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 97 / 100, an A+ — 14 points above the Idaho average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100) · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
2/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation and Care Center located in Pocatello, ID, is a skilled nursing home offering a wide range of skilled nursing services for adults of all ages. Their goal is to provide support and quality care for individuals who are recovering from surgery or injury, or are living with a serious illness. As part of their services, they provide residents with round the clock skilled nursing care, rehabilitation therapy, exercises, and daily activities that promote overall wellness.
Additionally, they also offer specialized services and therapies such as physical, occupational, speech, and intravenous therapy. They also have Alzheimer’s care, hospice care for individuals in their end-of-life stages, mental healthcare, and respite care services. Furthermore, they are Medicare and Medicaid certified and accept individuals who are eligible for either assistance.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 19m
This nursing home is ranked 13th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
3h 19mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +161% above Idaho average
5 of 6 metrics below Idaho average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
38m
↓ 23% · ID 50mThis facility: 38m per resident per day, 23% below the Idaho average of 50m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 5 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
5 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.2-hour shifts
41m
↓ 12% · ID 46mThis facility: 41m per resident per day, 12% below the Idaho average of 46m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.2-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.3-hour shifts
2h 0m
↓ 19% · ID 2h 28mThis facility: 2h 0m per resident per day, 19% below the Idaho average of 2h 28m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 33 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
33 staff · 7.3-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
16m
↑ 161% · ID 6mThis facility: 16m per resident per day, 161% above the Idaho average of 6m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
2h 52m
↓ 17% · ID 3h 28mThis facility: 2h 52m per resident per day, 17% below the Idaho average of 3h 28m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
25m
↓ 21% · ID 32mThis facility: 25m per resident per day, 21% below the Idaho average of 32m (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
62
62 employees · 0 contractors · 25 on an average day
62 total staff / 37 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.68 : 1
↓ 2% · ID 1.71This facility: 1.68 staff per resident, 2% below the Idaho average of 1.71 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
62 staff ÷ 37 residents
See full Idaho ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.5 h
↓ 7% · ID 8.1 hThis facility: 7.5 h, 7% below the Idaho average of 8.1 h (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
17,103 staff hours this quarter
See full Idaho ranking →100% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Idaho average: 93.7% · No agency contractors this quarter
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
41
Rank #24 / 24Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 24 nursing homes we track in Idaho for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Idaho facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
41
Rank #24 / 24Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 24th out of 24 nursing homes we track in Idaho for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Idaho facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #15 / 28Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 28 nursing homes we track in Idaho for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Idaho facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #15 / 28Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 15th out of 28 nursing homes we track in Idaho for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Idaho facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
50
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #12 / 22Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 22 nursing homes we track in Idaho for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Idaho average, with its Statewide rank out of 22. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #12 / 22Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 22 nursing homes we track in Idaho for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Idaho average, with its Statewide rank out of 22. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
84.4%
This home usually has availability
Based on residents per day and 41 beds.
Similar to the Idaho average: 80.4%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
35
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
45
days
About This Community
Resident Council
Joint Replacement Therapy
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
IV Therapy
Pain Management
Post-Surgical Stabilization
Non-Acute Cardiac Care
Dialysis Support
Respite CareRespite care provides families and unpaid caregivers with short-term relief from caregiving duties. Care can range from a few hours to a few weeks.
Activities
Arts and Crafts
Holiday Celebrations
Birthday Celebrations
Group Fitness Classes
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
97 / 100
Calculated from CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds
How it compares
14 points above the Idaho average for CMS-certified facilities (83/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Strong
49 severity-weighted points (26 deficiencies) · 34% lower than the typical CMS-certified ID facility (median: 74)
Enforcement
Strong
No fines on record · 0 enforcement actions
Persistence
Strong
27 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified ID facility (median: 37)
Total health inspections
3
↓ 6% · ID 3.2This facility: 3, 6% below the Idaho average of 3.2 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
26
Rank #10 / 26Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Idaho State average, with a ranking across all 26 ID facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 4% · ID 27This facility: 26, 4% below the Idaho average of 27 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
8.67
Rank #17 / 26Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Idaho mean across 26 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 3% · ID 8.41This facility: 8.67, 3% above the Idaho average of 8.41 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
26 of 26 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · ID 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Idaho average of 0.1 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · ID 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Idaho average of 0.8 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
26
≈ 0% · ID 26This facility: 26, level with the Idaho average of 26 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · ID 0.1This facility: 0, 100% below the Idaho average of 0.1 (among Idaho facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 24, 2026 · 6 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 7 of 26 citations · 7 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 24, 2026
6 citations
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 05, 2025
10 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 19, 2024
10 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 26 citations
Pharmacy Services
7 deficiencies (27%)
Resident Rights
5 deficiencies (19%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
4 deficiencies (15%)
Quality of Life & Care
4 deficiencies (15%)
Nutrition & Dietary
3 deficiencies (12%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (8%)
Administration
1 deficiency (4%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
16 of 26 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 10 of 26 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
ID avg $38KIdaho average: $37,594. Average among the 27 Idaho facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
ID avg 1.44Idaho average: 1.44. Average among the 27 Idaho facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Idaho average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 39% · ID 3.6This facility: 5.0, 39% above the ID average of 3.6 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↓ 6% · ID 4.3This facility: 4.0, 6% below the ID average of 4.3 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
4.7
Score · lower is better
↓ 45% · ID 8.5This facility: 4.7, 45% below the ID average of 8.5 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
20.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 18% · ID 17.5This facility: 20.5, 18% above the ID average of 17.5 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.9 long-stay measures: 5 better, 3 worse, 1 near ID average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 near ID average, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 9 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.7%
↓ 50% · ID 15.4This facility: 7.7, 50% below the ID average of 15.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.7%
↓ 50% · ID 15.4This facility: 7.7, 50% below the ID average of 15.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.4%
↑ 58% · ID 21.2This facility: 33.4, 58% above the ID average of 21.2 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.4%
↑ 58% · ID 21.2This facility: 33.4, 58% above the ID average of 21.2 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 2.0 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 2.0This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 2.0 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 3.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 3.1 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 3.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 3.1 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
↓ 37% · ID 3.4This facility: 2.1, 37% below the ID average of 3.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
↓ 37% · ID 3.4This facility: 2.1, 37% below the ID average of 3.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
↑ 72% · ID 5.1This facility: 8.8, 72% above the ID average of 5.1 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.8%
↑ 72% · ID 5.1This facility: 8.8, 72% above the ID average of 5.1 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.0%
↑ 21% · ID 15.7This facility: 19.0, 21% above the ID average of 15.7 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
19.0%
↑ 21% · ID 15.7This facility: 19.0, 21% above the ID average of 15.7 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 20.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 20.3 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
↓ 100% · ID 20.3This facility: 0.0, 100% below the ID average of 20.3 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · ID 97.8This facility: 100.0, 2% above the ID average of 97.8 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 2% · ID 97.8This facility: 100.0, 2% above the ID average of 97.8 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
39.3%
↓ 27% · US 53.7This facility: 39.3, 27% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
39.3%
↓ 27% · US 53.7This facility: 39.3, 27% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.2%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.2, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
59.2%
↑ 17% · US 50.6This facility: 59.2, 17% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 56% · ID 1.7This facility: 0.7, 56% below the ID average of 1.7 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
↓ 56% · ID 1.7This facility: 0.7, 56% below the ID average of 1.7 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · ID 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the ID average of 91.8 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 9% · ID 91.8This facility: 100.0, 9% above the ID average of 91.8 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5%
↑ 14% · ID 85.4This facility: 97.5, 14% above the ID average of 85.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.5%
↑ 14% · ID 85.4This facility: 97.5, 14% above the ID average of 85.4 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
16.9%
↓ 3% · ID 17.5This facility: 16.9, 3% below the ID average of 17.5 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
16.9%
↓ 3% · ID 17.5This facility: 16.9, 3% below the ID average of 17.5 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.7%
↓ 16% · ID 11.6This facility: 9.7, 16% below the ID average of 11.6 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
9.7%
↓ 16% · ID 11.6This facility: 9.7, 16% below the ID average of 11.6 (among ID facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 26 Idaho nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−1.4% operating margin
+1.2 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 5 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.5M) turns it into a net profit to $0.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Idaho homes
62.7% payroll share of revenue
ID average 54.2%Rank #4 / 26Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Idaho average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue fell $0.0M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Idaho homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | ID median | Compared with ID homesRank in ID | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $5.5M | −$0.0M | Trend 20172024 | ID median $11.1M | Rank in ID Rank #25 / 26Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 25th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Idaho average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | Below ID median Higher net patient revenue than 4% of ID homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $5.6M | −$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | ID median $10.6M | Rank in ID Rank #26 / 26Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 26th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Idaho homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 0% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$0.1M | +$0.1M | Trend 20172024 | ID median $1.0M | Rank in ID Rank #19 / 26Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Idaho homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −1.4% | +1.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | ID median 9.8% | Rank in ID Rank #19 / 26Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Idaho homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 28% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.5M | — | Trend — | ID median $0.0M | Rank in ID Rank #6 / 26Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Idaho homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 80% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.4M | −$0.5M | Trend — | ID median $1.0M | Rank in ID Rank #21 / 26Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Idaho homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Idaho homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | ID median | Compared with ID homesRank in ID | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $3.4M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | ID median $6.1M | Rank in ID Rank #23 / 26Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 23rd out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Idaho average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Below ID median Higher payroll than 12% of ID homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 62.7% | +8.3 pts | Trend 20172024 | ID median 51.8% | Rank in ID Rank #4 / 26Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 26 nursing homes we track in Idaho for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Idaho average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Idaho that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 88% of homes | 8.5 pts over ID average The ID average is 54.2% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · ID benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Idaho payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin ID payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $4.2M | $4.6M | $4.2M | $4.6M | $5.0M | $4.9M | $5.5M | $5.5M |
| Operating expenses | $4.3M | $4.5M | $4.5M | $4.3M | $4.7M | $5.1M | $5.7M | $5.6M |
| Net patient income | −$0.1M | $0.2M | −$0.3M | $0.3M | $0.3M | −$0.2M | −$0.1M | −$0.1M |
| Operating margin | −2.9% | 3.8% | −6.3% | 6.8% | 6.9% | −4.5% | −2.6% | −1.4% |
| Net income | −$0.1M | $0.2M | −$0.0M | $0.5M | $1.5M | $0.1M | $1.0M | $0.4M |
| Payroll costs | $2.4M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.6M | $2.8M | $3.0M | $3.0M | $3.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 57.8% | 57.4% | 63.7% | 55.8% | 56.4% | 61.7% | 54.4% | 62.7% |
| Beds | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 |
| Gross revenue | $4.1M | $5.3M | $3.6M | $4.7M | $5.0M | $4.9M | $5.5M | $6.0M |
| Salaries | $2.0M | $2.3M | $2.3M | $2.2M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.6M | $3.0M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M | $0.4M |
| Contract labor | $0.0M | — | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | $0.0M | — |
| Other operating costs | $1.9M | $1.8M | $1.8M | $1.7M | $1.8M | $2.1M | $2.7M | $2.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $351 | $386 | $375 | $382 | $397 | $387 | $450 | $422 |
| Cost per day | $361 | $372 | $399 | $356 | $369 | $404 | $462 | $428 |
| Average length of stay | 42.6 days | 40.7 days | 35.3 days | 40.7 days | 50.2 days | 71.1 days | 43.2 days | 45.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
274 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
111 · 41%
Medicaid
7 · 3%
Private pay & other
156 · 57%
Resident snapshot
37 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
15 · 41%
Medicaid
14 · 38%
Private pay & other
8 · 22%
Leaving
287 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
101 · 35%
Medicaid
15 · 5%
Private pay & other
171 · 60%
Mix of rehab and long-term care
This home supports both short-term rehab and long-term care, with residents staying for a wide range of durations.
Places of interest near Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
3.8 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Pocatello's city center to Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 1.1 miles to nearest hospital (Portneuf Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Idaho
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center is located in Pocatello, Idaho.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Idaho.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center in a walkable area?
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center has a walk score of 50. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the occupancy rate at Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center?
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center's occupancy is 84.4%.
03 Are pets allowed at Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center?
No, Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center has a no-pet policy.
04 Does Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center is registered as a for-profit.
05 What is the overall rating for Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center?
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center received a 2-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
06 How many beds does Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center have?
Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center has 41 beds.
07 Are there photos of Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center?
Yes — there are 4 photos of Quinn Meadows Rehabilitation & Care Center in the photo gallery on this page.
Updated on
