Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
87
67 employees · 20 contractors · 35 on an average day Sherwood Oaks
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cranberry Township, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sherwood Oaks
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Cranberry Township, PA
ALM Inspection Grade
B+
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 87 / 100, a B+ — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Sherwood Oaks accepts Medicare and private pay.
Overview of Sherwood Oaks
Sherwood Oaks provides independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing care in Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living provides help with dressing, bathing, medication, and similar tasks while the resident keeps an apartment. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision. Skilled nursing care is available from licensed nurses on site at all hours.
Several care levels are available in one community. That can suit a resident whose needs grow over time without requiring a move elsewhere. Sherwood Oaks has 77 beds, with 6 hours and 45 minutes of total nurse staffing per resident each day, representing the daily hands on nursing time allocated per resident.
Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. Medicare can apply to short term skilled care after a hospital stay, Medicaid may help when savings do not cover a long stay, and private pay means paying directly. Families will need to consider which option matches the resident’s care needs and financial situation.
A pool and fitness center support exercise, while the art studio and woodworking shop provide dedicated spaces for creative activities. Gardens and lakes add outdoor places to spend time. Free bus or car transportation is available around campus and to area shopping, medical services, and religious services.
Rehabilitation services are available for residents who need therapy as part of their care. Pittsburgh Lifetime Care Community operates Sherwood Oaks, and UPMC Senior Communities is the owner. The community also offers a Continuing Care program.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 45m
This nursing home is ranked 6th out of 180 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 45mStandout metric: Registered nurse (RN) is +226% above Pennsylvania average
2 of 6 metrics below Pennsylvania average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 21 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
21 staff · 8-hour shifts
2h 33m
↑ 226% · PA 47mThis facility: 2h 33m per resident per day, 226% above the Pennsylvania average of 47m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 21 total: 19 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
21 staff · 8-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 7.5-hour shifts
47m
↓ 14% · PA 55mThis facility: 47m per resident per day, 14% below the Pennsylvania average of 55m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 7.5-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 33 total: 31 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shifts
3h 25m
↑ 55% · PA 2h 12mThis facility: 3h 25m per resident per day, 55% above the Pennsylvania average of 2h 12m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 33 total: 31 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
33 staff · 7.7-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
5m
↓ 16% · PA 6mThis facility: 5m per resident per day, 16% below the Pennsylvania average of 6m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 45m
↑ 64% · PA 3h 31mThis facility: 5h 45m per resident per day, 64% above the Pennsylvania average of 3h 31m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
1h 41m
↑ 206% · PA 33mThis facility: 1h 41m per resident per day, 206% above the Pennsylvania average of 33m (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
87
67 employees · 20 contractors · 35 on an average day
87 total staff / 37 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
2.35 : 1
↑ 30% · PA 1.81This facility: 2.35 staff per resident, 30% above the Pennsylvania average of 1.81 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
87 staff ÷ 37 residents
See full Pennsylvania ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.4 h
↓ 5% · PA 7.8 hThis facility: 7.4 h, 5% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.8 h (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
23,685 staff hours this quarter
See full Pennsylvania ranking →88.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Pennsylvania average: 87.6% · Contractors this quarter: Speech Language Pathologist (3), Occupational Therapy Assistant (3), Certified Nursing Assistant (2), Registered Nurse (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Qualified Social Worker (2), Physical Therapy Aide (2), Medical Director (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #122 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
120
Rank #122 / 200Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 122nd out of 200 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Pennsylvania facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
43 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 77 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #202 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 202nd out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #202 / 207Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 202nd out of 207 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Pennsylvania facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
4
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #68 / 164Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 68th out of 164 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Pennsylvania average, with its Statewide rank out of 164. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
81.8%
This home usually has availability
Higher than the Pennsylvania average: 75.7%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
105
days
About This Community
Facility TypePersonal Care Homes
IssuanceDecember 8, 2025
ExpirationDecember 8, 2026 Expires in 25 days
CountyButler
License LevelFULL
License Number457760
CMS Certification Number395549
Sherwood Oaks is legally operated by Pittsburgh Lifetime Care Community.
Owner NamePittsburgh Lifetime Care Community
Profit StatusNonprofit
Alzheimer's Units
30 units
Total beds
77 units
Resident Council
CNA Training Program
Transportation
85
Total Daily Staff
64
Waking Staff
0
Resident Support Staff
59
Residents Served
5
Hospice Residents
30
Capacity
26
Residents Served
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Fitness Center
Workshop
Library
Wi-Fi
Activities
Arts & Crafts
Touring HoursMonday – Friday: 8:30 a.m. – 4 p.m.
Two inspection records, one community. Pennsylvania inspects its 77 state-licensed beds; CMS inspects its 43 nursing-home beds.
Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are the state record. CMS Health Inspection History, further down, is the federal record. Each covers only its own beds, visits and dates, so the totals are not meant to match, and nothing is counted twice.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
ALM Inspection Grade
87 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Pennsylvania inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 36% of the grade
C- · 70/100
10 points below the Pennsylvania average for CMS-certified facilities (80/100).
43 certified beds, 36% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
35 severity-weighted points (16 citations) · 14% lower than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 40)
Enforcement
Typical
1 enforcement action · above the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 0) · $8,281 in fines
Persistence
Strong
29 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified PA facility (median: 38)
Pennsylvania state-licensed beds · 64% of the grade
A+ · 97/100
14 points above the Pennsylvania average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
77 licensed beds, 64% of the grade. Graded with Pennsylvania state-licensed facilities on the Pennsylvania scale.
Citations
Strong
2 citations per inspection (39 in 20 inspections) · 41% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 3.3)
Finding Frequency
Strong
45% of inspections found a citation · 24% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 59%)
Complaints
Typical
3 complaints · 40% fewer than the typical state-licensed PA facility (median: 5)
How the final grade is calculated
B+ · 87/100
70 × 36% + 97 × 64% = 87 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 43 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (36%) and 77 Pennsylvania state-licensed beds (64%). The result, 87 out of 100, is a B+ on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
1vs 1.3 avg↓ 23% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Overall vs. PA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
5 Better
Metrics better than Pennsylvania average:
• Total citations (56% below)
• Citations per inspection (53% below)
• Inspections with citations (25% below)
• Inspection citation rate (24% below)
• Total complaints (40% below)
• Total citations (56% below)
• Citations per inspection (53% below)
• Inspections with citations (25% below)
• Inspection citation rate (24% below)
• Total complaints (40% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 39 | 89.0 | This facility has 56% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (39 vs. PA avg 89).↓ 56% better |
|
Citations per inspection
Average citations per inspection.
| 2.0 | 4.3 | This facility has 53% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (2 vs. PA avg 4.3).↓ 53% better Rank #66 / 179 Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows this facility's citations per inspection compared to the Pennsylvania average among the 179 nursing homes in the ranking pool. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 20 | 21.0 | This facility has had 5% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (20 vs. PA avg 21). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 5% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
Inspections that resulted in at least one regulatory citation.
| 9 | 12.0 | This facility has 25% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (9 vs. PA avg 12).↓ 25% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
Percentage of inspections that resulted in at least one citation.
| 45% | 59% | This facility has 14 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (45% vs. PA avg 59%).↓ 14% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
Formal expressions of concern made by residents, families, or staff.
| 3 | 5.0 | This facility has 40% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (3 vs. PA avg 5).↓ 40% better |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
6
↓ 18% · PA 7.3This facility: 6, 18% below the Pennsylvania average of 7.3 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
16
Rank #87 / 179Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 87th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Pennsylvania State average, with a ranking across all 179 PA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 50% · PA 31.8This facility: 16, 50% below the Pennsylvania average of 31.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
2.67
Rank #66 / 179Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 179 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Pennsylvania mean across 179 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 35% · PA 4.11This facility: 2.67, 35% below the Pennsylvania average of 4.11 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
16 of 16 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
1
↑ 150% · PA 0.4This facility: 1, 150% above the Pennsylvania average of 0.4 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.8This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.8 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
15
↓ 49% · PA 29.7This facility: 15, 49% below the Pennsylvania average of 29.7 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · PA 0.9This facility: 0, 100% below the Pennsylvania average of 0.9 (among Pennsylvania facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Feb 19, 2026 · 1 citation (Infection Control, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 5 of 16 citations · 8 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Feb 19, 2026
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 13, 2025
2 citations
Quality of Care critical citation
Corrected
Corrected
Administration moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 05, 2025
4 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Dec 05, 2024
1 citation
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 25, 2024
2 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 25, 2024
6 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 16 citations
Quality of Life & Care
5 deficiencies (31%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (13%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
2 deficiencies (13%)
Pharmacy Services
2 deficiencies (13%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
1 deficiency (6%)
Administration
1 deficiency (6%)
Nursing & Physician Services
1 deficiency (6%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
11 of 16 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 5 of 16 resulted from complaint investigations.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Aug 13, 2025 · $8,281 civil money penalty
Aug 13, 2025 · $8,281 civil money penalty
Total fines
$8,281
↓ 86% · PA $58KThis facility: $8,281, 86% below the Pennsylvania average of $58,340. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #123 / 183Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 123rd out of 183 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Pennsylvania average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 183 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 45% · PA 1.82This facility: 1, 45% below the Pennsylvania average of 1.82. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
PA avg 0.15Pennsylvania average: 0.15. Average among the 301 Pennsylvania facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Aug 13, 2025
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,281
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$8,281Fine amount comparison
This facility
$8,281
Pennsylvania average
$58,340
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Pennsylvania and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Pennsylvania average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↓ 20% · PA 3.7This facility: 3.0, 20% below the PA average of 3.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.5
Score · lower is better
↑ 16% · PA 9.1This facility: 10.5, 16% above the PA average of 9.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
23.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 24% · PA 19.0This facility: 23.6, 24% above the PA average of 19.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 6 better, 5 worse
8 short-stay measures: 5 better, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.5%
↑ 43% · PA 16.4This facility: 23.5, 43% above the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.5%
↑ 43% · PA 16.4This facility: 23.5, 43% above the PA average of 16.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.8%
↓ 10% · PA 15.4This facility: 13.8, 10% below the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.8%
↓ 10% · PA 15.4This facility: 13.8, 10% below the PA average of 15.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.5%
↑ 34% · PA 25.0This facility: 33.5, 34% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.5%
↑ 34% · PA 25.0This facility: 33.5, 34% above the PA average of 25.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1%
↑ 190% · PA 1.4This facility: 4.1, 190% above the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.1%
↑ 190% · PA 1.4This facility: 4.1, 190% above the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7%
↑ 82% · PA 3.1This facility: 5.7, 82% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.7%
↑ 82% · PA 3.1This facility: 5.7, 82% above the PA average of 3.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 27% · PA 4.7This facility: 5.9, 27% above the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
5.9%
↑ 27% · PA 4.7This facility: 5.9, 27% above the PA average of 4.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 42% · PA 6.0This facility: 3.5, 42% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.5%
↓ 42% · PA 6.0This facility: 3.5, 42% below the PA average of 6.0 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 13.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
↓ 100% · PA 13.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the PA average of 13.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
↓ 65% · PA 17.6This facility: 6.2, 65% below the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.2%
↓ 65% · PA 17.6This facility: 6.2, 65% below the PA average of 17.6 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · PA 87.8This facility: 100.0, 14% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 14% · PA 87.8This facility: 100.0, 14% above the PA average of 87.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · PA 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 7% · PA 93.7This facility: 100.0, 7% above the PA average of 93.7 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.7%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.7, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
56.7%
↑ 6% · US 53.7This facility: 56.7, 6% above the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
42.6%
↓ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 42.6, 16% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
42.6%
↓ 16% · US 50.6This facility: 42.6, 16% below the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.0%
↓ 100% · US 0.8This facility: 0.0, 100% below the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 11% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 11% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
↓ 11% · PA 1.4This facility: 1.2, 11% below the PA average of 1.4 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.6%
↑ 31% · PA 70.8This facility: 92.6, 31% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.6%
↑ 31% · PA 70.8This facility: 92.6, 31% above the PA average of 70.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.1%
↑ 23% · PA 70.9This facility: 87.1, 23% above the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
87.1%
↑ 23% · PA 70.9This facility: 87.1, 23% above the PA average of 70.9 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.8%
↓ 49% · PA 23.1This facility: 11.8, 49% below the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
11.8%
↓ 49% · PA 23.1This facility: 11.8, 49% below the PA average of 23.1 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.9%
↓ 50% · PA 9.8This facility: 4.9, 50% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
4.9%
↓ 50% · PA 9.8This facility: 4.9, 50% below the PA average of 9.8 (among PA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Sherwood Oaks’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending June 2025, compared with 177 Pennsylvania nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Jun 2025
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−19.5% operating margin
+9.9 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 7 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($3.5M) trims the net loss to −$0.7M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Pennsylvania homes
54.7% payroll share of revenue
PA average 70.1%Rank #88 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.8M while revenue rose $1.8M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2025 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2025 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Pennsylvania homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $21.3M | +$1.8M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $17.3M | Rank in PA Rank #58 / 177Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 68% of homes | Above PA median Higher net patient revenue than 68% of PA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $25.4M | +$0.2M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $20.8M | Rank in PA Rank #62 / 177Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 62nd out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 65% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$4.1M | +$1.6M | Trend 20182025 | PA median −$1.3M | Rank in PA Rank #124 / 177Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 124th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 30% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −19.5% | +9.9 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median −7.6% | Rank in PA Rank #119 / 177Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 119th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 33% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $3.5M | — | Trend — | PA median $1.1M | Rank in PA Rank #58 / 172Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 58th out of 172 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 67% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$0.7M | +$1.6M | Trend — | PA median $0.4M | Rank in PA Rank #134 / 177Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 134th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Pennsylvania homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 24% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Pennsylvania homes
| Metric | FY 2025 | vs prior year | Trend 2018 → 2025Trend | PA median | Compared with PA homesRank in PA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $11.6M | −$0.8M | Trend 20182025 | PA median $9.9M | Rank in PA Rank #70 / 177Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 70th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 61% of homes | Above PA median Higher payroll than 61% of PA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 54.7% | −9.0 pts | Trend 20182025 | PA median 54.4% | Rank in PA Rank #88 / 177Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 88th out of 177 nursing homes we track in Pennsylvania for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Pennsylvania average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Pennsylvania that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 51% of homes | 15.4 pts under PA average The PA average is 70.1% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2018–2025 2 charts · PA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Pennsylvania payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin PA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2018–2025 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $19.9M | $20.0M | $19.4M | $19.9M | $19.3M | $18.8M | $19.5M | $21.3M |
| Operating expenses | $19.9M | $21.0M | $22.2M | $22.0M | $24.4M | $24.8M | $25.2M | $25.4M |
| Net patient income | $0.0M | −$1.1M | −$2.8M | −$2.1M | −$5.0M | −$6.1M | −$5.7M | −$4.1M |
| Operating margin | 0.2% | −5.3% | −14.3% | −10.5% | −25.9% | −32.3% | −29.3% | −19.5% |
| Net income | $0.8M | $0.3M | −$1.4M | $4.2M | −$4.6M | −$3.5M | −$2.3M | −$0.7M |
| Payroll costs | $9.8M | $10.1M | $11.1M | $10.3M | $11.0M | $11.7M | $12.4M | $11.6M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 49.0% | 50.9% | 57.2% | 52.0% | 57.0% | 62.1% | 63.7% | 54.7% |
| Beds | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 43 |
| Gross revenue | $23.3M | $22.8M | $22.8M | $23.1M | $22.7M | $21.4M | $22.1M | $23.0M |
| Salaries | $7.9M | $8.3M | $8.5M | $8.6M | $9.1M | $9.2M | $9.9M | $9.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.9M | $1.9M | $2.6M | $1.7M | $1.9M | $2.5M | $2.5M | $1.8M |
| Contract labor | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.3M | $1.2M | $0.6M | $1.3M |
| Other operating costs | $10.1M | $10.9M | $11.1M | $11.6M | $13.3M | $13.2M | $12.8M | $13.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $535 | $525 | $520 | $542 | $512 | $525 | $589 | $1,725 |
| Cost per day | $534 | $552 | $594 | $599 | $645 | $695 | $761 | $2,060 |
| Average length of stay | 128.4 days | 136.3 days | 163.5 days | 228.2 days | 197.8 days | 104.1 days | 42.6 days | 104.6 days |
Showing 2025–2023 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2025
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
122 admissions · FY2025
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
24 · 20%
Medicaid
0 · 0%
Private pay & other
98 · 80%
Resident snapshot
37 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
4 · 11%
Medicaid
2 · 5%
Private pay & other
31 · 84%
Leaving
118 discharges · FY2025
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
17 · 14%
Medicaid
2 · 2%
Private pay & other
99 · 84%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Places of interest near Sherwood Oaks
1.4 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Cranberry Township's city center to Sherwood Oaks's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Sherwood Oaks
Add your location
Financial assistance
Get financial aid guidance Programs that may help with care and living costs in Pennsylvania
Sherwood Oaks is in CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP, Pennsylvania. These programs may support different care settings or living expenses. A listing does not confirm this community participates; our concierge team can help confirm.
Community HealthChoices (CHC)
Community HealthChoices (CHC)
Eligibility
- General
- Age 21+ and enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid, or receiving qualifying Medicaid long-term services and supports, subject to listed exclusions. Nursing-facility level of care is not a requirement for every dual-eligible CHC enrollee.
- PA specifics
- CHC is a managed-care coordination program; separate service and financial criteria govern long-term supports. Certain developmental-disability program participants and state-facility residents are excluded.
What it provides
- Coordination of health coverage and authorized long-term services and supports when eligible.
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
VA Aid and Attendance (A&A) and Housebound Benefits
- Who it is for
- Veterans or survivors with VA pension eligibility and an Aid and Attendance or Housebound medical need
- Income limit
- 2026 · Countable income is compared with the applicable maximum annual pension rate (MAPR), which varies by dependents and benefit category. For a veteran with one dependent and Aid and Attendance, MAPR is $34,488/year.
- Asset limit
- VA pension net-worth ceiling is $163,699 from December 1, 2025 through November 30, 2026. Net worth includes countable assets plus income for VA purposes; exclusions and transfer rules apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Aid and Attendance or Housebound is an increased VA pension rate for eligible veterans or surviving spouses who meet pension and additional care/disability requirements; it is not a stand-alone state benefit.
- PA specifics
- Federal VA pension rules apply nationwide.
What it provides
- Monthly pension is based on the applicable MAPR less countable annual income; divided by 12. Maximum annual veteran Aid and Attendance rates are $29,093 without dependents and $34,488 with one dependent; actual payments may be lower.
Pennsylvania OPTIONS Program
Pennsylvania OPTIONS Program
- Income limit
- No income requirement to participate; income-based sliding copayments may apply.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania resident age 60+ needing help to remain at home, subject to assessment and program availability.
What it provides
- Assessed support to help remain at home; service mix and copayment depend on individual assessment.
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
Family Caregiver Support Program (FCSP)
- Who it is for
- Family or informal caregivers of an adult 60+ or of someone of any age with dementia
- Income limit
- Financial reimbursement is income-based: care-receiver household income up to 200% of federal poverty guidelines receives the full applicable percentage; 200%–380% receives reduced reimbursement; above 380% no reimbursement, although nonreimbursable services may remain available.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania caregivers and care recipients in qualifying categories: adult caregivers of functionally dependent adults age 60+ or people with dementia; and eligible relative caregivers age 55+ caring for children or disabled adults. Enrollment in Medicaid long-term-care programs excludes participation.
What it provides
- Reimbursement of approved caregiving services and supplies up to $600/month; multiplied by the applicable income-based reimbursement percentage; care management; education and support. No fixed respite-hours package is guaranteed.
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
Medicare Savings Program (MSP)
- Who it is for
- Medicare beneficiaries with limited income who need help with premiums or cost sharing
Eligibility
- General
- Medicare beneficiary; the state determines the applicable Medicare Savings Program. QMB helps with premiums and Medicare cost sharing; SLMB and QI generally help with Part B premiums.
- PA specifics
- QI requires annual application and is funded first-come, first-served with priority for prior recipients. QMB, SLMB and QI confer Part D Extra Help.
What it provides
- QMB pays eligible Part A/Part B premiums and Medicare deductibles and cost sharing; SLMB and QI pay Part B premiums. The exact benefit depends on the approved program.
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)
- Who it is for
- Income-eligible households responsible for home heating or energy costs
Eligibility
- General
- Income-eligible households with qualifying home-energy costs; the administering agency applies household-size and program eligibility rules.
What it provides
- Grants to help eligible households pay heating bills.
Property Tax/Rent Rebate Program (PTRR)
Property Tax/Rent Rebate Program (PTRR)
- Income limit
- 2025 claims filed in 2026 · Eligible annual household income no more than $48,110, applying program exclusions including one-half of Social Security income.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania homeowners or renters age 65+; widows or widowers age 50+; or adults age 18+ with disabilities, subject to household-income and tax or rent-payment requirements.
- PA specifics
- The deadline to apply for a rebate of 2025 property taxes or rent is December 31, 2026. A future tax-year ceiling is not interchangeable with this application year.
What it provides
- Standard rebate up to $1,000; based on eligible income and property tax or rent paid; special supplemental rules may apply.
PACE and PACENET Prescription Assistance
PACE and PACENET Prescription Assistance
- Income limit
- PACE: up to $14,500 single or $17,700 married. PACENET: $14,501–$33,500 single or $17,701–$41,500 married; based on the prior calendar year.
Eligibility
- General
- Pennsylvania residents 65+ who lived in the state at least 90 days before applying and are not enrolled in the state Medicaid prescription benefit. Prior-calendar-year income determines eligibility.
What it provides
- Prescription-cost assistance coordinated with Medicare Part D and other drug coverage; PACE and PACENET use different income tiers.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Sherwood Oaks
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Who is the owner of Sherwood Oaks?
Sherwood Oaks is legally operated by Pittsburgh Lifetime Care Community.
02 Is Sherwood Oaks in a walkable area?
Sherwood Oaks has a walk score of 4. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the license number of Sherwood Oaks?
According to PA state health department records, Sherwood Oaks's license number is 457760.
04 When does Sherwood Oaks's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, Sherwood Oaks's license expires on December 8, 2026.
05 What is the occupancy rate at Sherwood Oaks?
Sherwood Oaks's occupancy is 81.8%.
06 Are pets allowed at Sherwood Oaks?
No, Sherwood Oaks has a no-pet policy.
07 What is the best email address for Sherwood Oaks?
The team at Sherwood Oaks can be reached at bjhaden@srcare.org.
Updated on
