Inspection Reports for
Sisters Assisted Living

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required furniture and sufficient lighting. Water temperature was compliant, fire safety equipment was current, and medications were securely stored. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required furniture and sufficient lighting. Water temperature, fire safety equipment, food supplies, medication storage, and first aid kit were all in compliance. No deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

The facility was found to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair with all required furniture and safety equipment in place. Water temperature and food supplies met regulatory standards, and no deficiencies were cited during the inspection.

Proper proof of correction documentation was received and no deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The Licensing Program Analyst received proper proof of correction documentation and no deficiencies were observed or cited during this visit.

The complaint involved three allegations: 1) Facility staff did not allow a resident a choice of hospice services; 2) Facility staff signed a hospice transfer request form without the resident's family authorization; 3) Facility staff caused delays in residents receiving timely hospice services. All allegations were deemed unsubstantiated based on evidence reviewed.

The investigation found the allegations unsubstantiated after reviewing records and interviewing the administrator, reporting party, and witnesses. It was unclear if facility staff denied hospice service choices, signed transfer requests without family authorization, or caused delays in hospice services.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included denial of resident choice in hospice services, unauthorized signing of hospice transfer forms, and delays in hospice service delivery. The conservator had authorized hospice service changes and transfer requests. The Department found no preponderance of evidence to substantiate the allegations.

Based on records review and interviews with the administrator, reporting party, and witnesses, all allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

Licensing Program Analyst Jason Lund received documentation proving correction of the two deficiencies from the previous inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the administrator and the report was left at the facility.

The Licensing Program Analyst received documentation proving correction of the two deficiencies from the previous inspection. An exit interview was conducted with the Administrator and the report was left at the facility.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included failure to have the resident's authorized representative sign an admission agreement, refusal to provide information to the authorized representative, and overcharging the resident. The resident's husband had a Durable Power of Attorney for finances but not for medical decisions. The hospital paid the admission fee initially. The case worker admitted the resident to the facility. No evidence supported the allegations.

Based on records review and interviews with the administrator, reporting party, and witness, all allegations were deemed unsubstantiated due to insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violations occurred.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Allegations included staff not having the resident's authorized representative sign an admission agreement, refusal to provide care information to the authorized representative, and overcharging the resident. The resident's husband had a Durable Power of Attorney for finances but no medical decision authority. The hospital paid the admission fee initially, and the admission agreement was signed by the hospital, not the resident's husband.

The investigation found the allegations to be unsubstantiated based on records review and interviews with the Administrator, Reporting Party, and witness. It was unclear if staff failed to have the resident's authorized representative sign the admission agreement, refused to provide care information, or overcharged the resident.

The facility was inspected and found to be in compliance with no violations observed. The environment was safe, clean, and properly equipped with necessary safety devices and supplies.

The facility was inspected and found to be in compliance with no violations observed. The environment was safe, clean, and properly equipped with necessary safety devices and supplies.

The facility was toured and inspected, including resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, and safety equipment. No violations were observed during this visit, and the facility was found to be in compliance with regulations.

The facility was toured and inspected, including resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, and safety equipment. No violations were observed during the visit, and the facility was found to be in compliance with applicable regulations.

The facility was toured and inspected, including resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, and safety equipment. No violations were observed during the visit, and the facility was found to be in compliance with regulations.

The facility was toured and inspected, including resident rooms, common areas, kitchen, and safety equipment. No violations were observed and the facility was found to be in compliance with regulations.

No violations were observed during the visit. The facility was found to be in compliance with regulations including proper lighting, cleanliness, safety equipment, locked toxins and sharp objects, and adequate food supply.