Inspection Reports for
Sweet Home Senior Living

The facility was found to be in compliance with all applicable regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The physical plant, medication storage, resident records, infection control, and emergency disaster plans were all reviewed and found satisfactory.

The facility was found to be in compliance with all regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The physical plant, kitchen, bedrooms, restrooms, common areas, and medication storage were all inspected and found satisfactory. Staff and resident interviews revealed no concerns.

The complaint alleged that the Licensee admitted Resident #1 with an unstageable wound/ulcer. The resident had been discharged from a Skilled Nursing Facility against medical advice and admitted to the facility with plans for home health care. Interviews and record reviews revealed conflicting documentation about the wound's stage, and no sufficient evidence was found to prove the allegation. The complaint was deemed unsubstantiated.

The investigation found insufficient documentation to substantiate the allegation that the facility retained a resident with an unstageable wound. The Licensee was educated on the importance of obtaining proper documentation and ensuring residents with certain wounds have appropriate care plans. The allegation was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The Licensing Program Analyst reviewed resident records, personnel files, medication documentation, and conducted a physical plant tour. No deficiencies were cited and all files and practices were found to be in compliance.

The facility was found to be in compliance with no deficiencies observed. The kitchen, bedrooms, restrooms, common areas, and outdoor spaces were all inspected and found to be safe, clean, and properly maintained.

The complaint alleged that Resident #1 developed skin damage and right ankle rashes and sustained an unexplained injury while in care. The resident was on home health services for wound care and later hospice services. The investigation included interviews, record reviews, and physical plant tours but did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations.

The investigation found insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations regarding the resident's injury and rash. The complaint was deemed unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The complaint alleged that the facility caused the death of Resident #1 by overdosing with morphine and that the resident was not accorded dignity in relationship with staff. The investigation included interviews with the resident's Power of Attorney, review of medical and pathology records, and interviews with facility staff. The allegations were found unsubstantiated due to lack of preponderance of evidence.

The investigation found no sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegations of questionable death by morphine overdose or that the resident was not accorded dignity by staff. Both allegations were deemed unsubstantiated based on record reviews and interviews with the resident's Power of Attorney and facility staff.

The facility was found to be in compliance with Title 22 Regulations, with no deficiencies observed. Infection control practices, physical plant safety, and sanitation were all adequate and properly maintained.

The facility was found to be in compliance with Title 22 Regulations, with no deficiencies cited. The physical plant, kitchen, bedrooms, restrooms, and common areas were observed to be clean, safe, and properly maintained. Infection control practices and policies were adequate, with sufficient PPE and cleaning protocols in place.