The Barrington of Carmel
The Barrington of Carmel is a continuing care retirement community in Carmel, IN, with independent living, assisted living, memory care, nursing home care, and skilled nursing care. Independent living offers private living with community services and no daily care, while assisted living adds help with bathing, dressing, and medication. Memory care is provided in a secured setting with supervision, and nursing home and skilled nursing care include licensed nursing care on site around the clock.
Multiple care levels may suit a resident whose needs could grow over time and who may want to remain in the same community as care needs change. The home has 154 beds, which gives families a clear measure of its capacity but does not indicate how a particular resident’s care will be arranged. Total nurse staffing is 7 hours and 46 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated per resident. Medicare and private pay are accepted, giving families two payment pathways for eligible services and residence costs.
The area has a Walk Score of 39 out of 100 and is car-dependent, so most errands require a car or a ride. Pets are allowed. Jasmine Kemp serves as the administrator, and Prairie Landing Community operates the community.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Standout metric: LPN / LVN is +278% above Indiana average
0 of 5 metrics below Indiana average
Daily care time per resident, by role
US average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
US average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
US average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
75.3% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Indiana average: 92.2% · Contractors this quarter: Respiratory Therapy Technician (7), Speech Language Pathologist (7), Qualified Social Worker (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Medical Director (1), Physical Therapy Aide (1), Feeding Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Community insights.
Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
Based on 110 residents and 154 beds. Source: state inspection report (Apr 2025)
About This Community
The Barrington of Carmel is legally operated by Prairie Landing Community, Inc, and administered by Jasmine Kemp.
- In-room dining available.
- Private dining room for family events.
- Multiple dining venues.
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Indiana, the Department of Health, Division of Long Term Care is the primary regulatory body that performs onsite inspections and quality of care reviews for all licensed facilities.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Indiana state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Total deficiencies (76% below)
• Substantiated complaints (50% below)
• Inspection deficiency rate (29% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
| 8 | 33.0 | This facility has 76% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Indiana nursing home (8 vs. IN avg 33).↓ 76% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
| 0.6 | 1.8 | This facility has had 67% fewer deficiencies per inspection than the Indiana average (0.6 vs. IN avg 1.8). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 67% fewer |
|
Substantiated complaints
| 2 | 4.0 | This facility has 50% fewer substantiated complaints than a typical Indiana nursing home (2 vs. IN avg 4).↓ 50% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | IN Average | vs. IN Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 14 | 19.0 | This facility has had 26% fewer total inspections than the Indiana average (14 vs. IN avg 19). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 26% fewer |
|
Routine inspections
| 8 | 6.0 | This facility has had 33% more routine inspections than the Indiana average (8 vs. IN avg 6). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↑ 33% more |
|
Complaint visits
| 6 | 13.0 | This facility has had 54% fewer complaint visits than the Indiana average (6 vs. IN avg 13). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 54% fewer |
|
Inspections with deficiencies
| 4 | 7.0 | This facility has had 43% fewer inspections with deficiencies than the Indiana average (4 vs. IN avg 7). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 43% fewer |
|
Inspection deficiency rate
| 29% | 41% | This facility has 12 percentage points lower inspection deficiency rate than a typical Indiana nursing home (29% vs. IN avg 41%).↓ 12% better |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Citation severity
Latest inspection: Jun 09, 2023 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Resident Rights, 1 of 4 citations · 4 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent firstTop deficiency categories
Share of 4 citationsHow citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 4 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Indiana average.
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Hospital & emergency visits
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
The Barrington of Carmel’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 274 Indiana nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−11.4% operating margin
+11.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($0.9M) trims the net loss to −$1.4M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Indiana homes
33.4% payroll share of revenue
IN average 50.9%Rank #264 / 274Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 264th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.2M while revenue rose $3.1M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Indiana homes.
Revenue & profit
Big revenue, persistent losses
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | IN median | Compared with IN homesRank in IN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $20.1M | +$3.1M | Trend 20162024 | IN median $10.2M | Rank in IN Rank #17 / 274Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 17th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 94% of homes | Top 6% in IN Higher net patient revenue than 94% of IN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $22.4M | +$1.5M | Trend 20162024 | IN median $9.8M | Rank in IN Rank #12 / 274Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 12th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$2.3M | +$1.5M | Trend 20162024 | IN median $0.3M | Rank in IN Rank #258 / 274Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 258th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 6% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −11.4% | +11.0 pts | Trend 20162024 | IN median 3.0% | Rank in IN Rank #240 / 274Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 240th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 12% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.9M | — | Trend — | IN median $0.0M | Rank in IN Rank #27 / 271Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 27th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Indiana for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 90% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$1.4M | +$2.3M | Trend — | IN median $0.5M | Rank in IN Rank #257 / 271Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 257th out of 271 nursing homes we track in Indiana for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Indiana homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 5% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Indiana homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2016 → 2024Trend | IN median | Compared with IN homesRank in IN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $6.7M | −$0.2M | Trend 20162024 | IN median $5.1M | Rank in IN Rank #66 / 274Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 66th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 76% of homes | Above IN median Higher payroll than 76% of IN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 33.4% | −7.2 pts | Trend 20162024 | IN median 49.2% | Rank in IN Rank #264 / 274Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 264th out of 274 nursing homes we track in Indiana for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Indiana average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Indiana that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 4% of homes | 17.5 pts under IN average The IN average is 50.9% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2016–2024 2 charts · IN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income No report
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Indiana payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin IN payroll average No report
Year-by-year data, 2016–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019no report | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $13.8M | $15.5M | $16.4M | $13.3M | $12.2M | $14.1M | $17.0M | $20.1M | |
| Operating expenses | $23.9M | $25.9M | $27.4M | $17.9M | $17.5M | $19.2M | $20.8M | $22.4M | |
| Net patient income | −$10.2M | −$10.4M | −$11.0M | −$4.7M | −$5.2M | −$5.1M | −$3.8M | −$2.3M | |
| Operating margin | −73.6% | −67.2% | −67.1% | −35.3% | −42.6% | −35.8% | −22.4% | −11.4% | |
| Net income | −$9.0M | −$8.8M | −$9.0M | −$5.2M | −$2.2M | −$0.1M | −$3.7M | −$1.4M | |
| Payroll costs | $6.5M | $6.8M | $6.7M | $6.9M | $6.4M | $5.7M | $6.9M | $6.7M | |
| Payroll share of revenue | 47.0% | 43.8% | 40.6% | 52.2% | 52.5% | 40.0% | 40.6% | 33.4% | |
| Beds | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | 271 | |
| Gross revenue | $15.3M | $16.6M | $17.6M | $13.6M | $12.5M | $14.2M | $17.1M | $20.3M | |
| Salaries | $5.8M | $6.0M | $6.0M | $5.7M | $5.2M | $4.9M | $5.9M | $6.2M | |
| Wage-related costs | $0.6M | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.3M | $1.2M | $0.8M | $1.0M | $0.5M | |
| Contract labor | $0.7M | $0.7M | $1.4M | $0.6M | $0.5M | $0.4M | $0.6M | $0.6M | |
| Other operating costs | $17.5M | $19.1M | $20.8M | $11.0M | $11.0M | $13.5M | $13.9M | $15.7M | |
| Net patient revenue per day | $133 | $152 | $249 | $177 | $206 | $177 | $187 | $221 | |
| Cost per day | $231 | $255 | $416 | $240 | $294 | $241 | $229 | $246 | |
| Average length of stay | 72.8 days | 55.4 days | 96.6 days | 95.6 days | 118.1 days | 190.4 days | 152.5 days | 381.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 6 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near The Barrington of Carmel
2.5 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Carmel's city center to The Barrington of Carmel's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 4.72 miles to nearest hospital (Ascension St. Vincent Hospital - Indianapolis)
Calculate Travel Distance to The Barrington of Carmel
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around Carmel
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the IN Dept. of Health (IDOH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
PC (Palliative Care):
Comfort-focused care for serious illness at any stage, including alongside curative treatment.
CCRC (Continuing Care Retirement Community):
A campus with multiple care levels so residents can age in place without moving.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Indiana average is: 50.9% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewater Healthcare Center | NH HOS PC RC SNF | Carmel | 120
Facility
120
IN AVG
119
Rank
#104 / 276 |
91.4%
Facility
91.4%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#17 / 270 | +35% | 3.64
Facility
3.64
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#96 / 275 | -24% | +4% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 18
Facility
18
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#123 / 277 | 3.6
Facility
3.6
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#146 / 277 | - | 110 | F |
49
Facility
49
IN AVG
44
Rank
#130 / 264 | Hancock Regional Hospital | $17.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$17.1MFiscal year ending 06/2025
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#32 / 274 | $6.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
$6.5MFiscal year ending 06/2025
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#79 / 274 | 37.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
Facility
37.7%Fiscal year ending 06/2025
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#245 / 274 | 155790 | ||||
| The Barrington of Carmel | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Carmel | 154
Facility
154
IN AVG
119
Rank
#57 / 276 |
71.4%
Facility
71.4%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#133 / 270 | +5% | 7.76
Facility
7.76
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#3 / 275 | -28% | +123% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 4
Facility
4
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#5 / 277 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#164 / 277 | - | 110 | A+ |
39
Facility
39
IN AVG
44
Rank
#152 / 264 | Prairie Landing Community, Inc | $20.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#17 / 274 | $6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$6.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#66 / 274 | 33.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
33.4%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#264 / 274 | 155817 | ||||
| The Restoracy of Carmel | NH MC SNF | Carmel | 72
Facility
72
IN AVG
119
Rank
#227 / 276 |
95.3%
Facility
95.3%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#7 / 270 | +40% | 4.43
Facility
4.43
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#31 / 275 | -50% | +27% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 22
Facility
22
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#161 / 277 | 5.5
Facility
5.5
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#194 / 277 | - | 69 | A+ |
77
Facility
77
IN AVG
44
Rank
#20 / 264 | Major Hospital | $11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$11.3MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#116 / 274 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#137 / 274 | 44.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
44.8%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#194 / 274 | 155846 | ||||
| The Stratford | NH AL CCRC IL MC SNF | Carmel (The Village Of West Clay) | 18
Facility
18
IN AVG
119
Rank
#276 / 276 |
63.3%
Facility
63.3%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#171 / 270 | -7% | 6.28
Facility
6.28
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#6 / 275 | +21% | +80% | $0
Facility
$0
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#1 / 277 | 12
Facility
12
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#61 / 277 | 3.0
Facility
3.0
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#96 / 277 | - | 11 | A+ |
54
Facility
54
IN AVG
44
Rank
#117 / 264 | Chris Wente | $2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$2.9MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#273 / 274 | $5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.0MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#142 / 274 | 169.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
169.1%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#1 / 274 | 155794 | ||||
| Carmel Health & Living Community | NH HOS MC RC SNF | Carmel (Newark Village) | 188
Facility
188
IN AVG
119
Rank
#29 / 276 |
72.8%
Facility
72.8%
IN AVG
68%
Rank
#125 / 270 | +7% | 3.58
Facility
3.58
IN AVG
3.48
Rank
#96 / 275 | +8% | +3% | $9.1k
Facility
$9.1k
IN AVG
$45.5k
Rank
#236 / 277 | 30
Facility
30
IN AVG
23.3
Rank
#196 / 277 | 5.0
Facility
5.0
IN AVG
3.9
Rank
#205 / 277 | 2 | 137 | A+ |
78
Facility
78
IN AVG
44
Rank
#17 / 264 | Riverview Hospital | $20.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$20.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$11.1M
Rank
#13 / 274 | $9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$9.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
$5.5M
Rank
#16 / 274 | 47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
47.2%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
IN AVG
50.9%
Rank
#168 / 274 | 155181 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other IN nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 5 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Indiana
The Barrington of Carmel is located in Carmel, Indiana.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Indiana.




