Total health inspections
7
Washington average 7.8
Last Health inspection on May 2025
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
Nursing Home & Assisted Living · Bellevue, WA
CMS overall rating
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
Nursing Home & Assisted Living · Bellevue, WA
CMS overall rating
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Overall CMS Rating is scored from 1 to 5 stars and combines results from health inspections, staffing levels, and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
The Park at Belle Harbour undoubtedly provides the highest care for assisted living seniors in Bellevue. Management makes it a point that seniors are given the freedom and choice given to each resident and ensures that they attend to the unique needs of each individual with kindness and compassion. The premier assisted senior living community is enriched by world-class hospitality and service.
As a Koelsch senior living home, expect luxury and comfort at The Park as the driving forces of the community. Its premier all-inclusive features include ALDs, medication management, transfer assistance, housekeeping, and laundry services tailored to their unique needs.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing hours breakdown
Daily nursing hours per resident by staff type, reported to CMS. Higher is generally better — compare this facility to state and national averages to see where staffing stands.
Total nursing care / resident
This home is ranked 10th out of 89 homes in Washington. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
This home is ranked 10th out of 89 homes in Washington. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 43m per day
Rank #10 / 89Nurse hours — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 10th out of 89 homes in Washington. Shows adjusted nurse hours per resident per day benchmarked to the Washington average, with a ranking across 89 Washington SNFs. More hours mean more direct care. The national average is about 3.5 hrs; below 3.0 is a red flag.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
vs Washington avg
+8%
| Staff type | Hours / Day / Resident | vs state avg |
|---|---|---|
|
Total Nursing (Weekend)
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
| 3h 34m per day |
Types of Care at The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
Assisted Living
Capacity and availability
This home usually has availability
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Occupancy rate
78.7%
Rank #29 / 94Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 29th out of 94 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 94. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Avg. Length of Stay
38 days
Occupancy rate
78.7%
Rank #29 / 94Occupancy rate — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 29th out of 94 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 94. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Avg. Length of Stay
38 days
100-bed community Rank #29 / 95Bed count — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 29th out of 95 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington SNFs. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
A larger shared setting that may offer more common spaces and organized community services.
Walk Score: 38 / 100 Rank #65 / 95Walk Score — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 65th out of 95 homes in Washington. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average Walk Score across Washington SNFs. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
About this community
Facility TypeBoarding Home
StatusOperating
ExpirationJuly 31, 2026
CountyKing
License Number2703
Staffing
Key information about the people who lead and staff this community.
ContactCynthia Pollard
Inspection History
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
Since 2025 · 1 year of data
2 inspections
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2025 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 Better
Metrics better than Washington average:
• Total inspections (78% below)
• Total inspections (78% below)
Latest Inspection
May 23, 2025
Inspection
The facility failed to complete required tuberculosis testing for staff.
Inspections
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all routine and focused inspections. Excludes complaint investigations.
| 2 | 9 | This facility has 78% fewer total inspections than a typical Washington nursing home (2 vs. WA avg 9).↓ 78% better |
Read the full inspection reports for this facility, including detailed findings and corrective actions.
Show Inspection ReportsHealth Inspection History
Inspections
Total health citations
39
Rank #31 / 91Health citations — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 31st out of 91 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 91 WA SNFs. Lower citation counts earn a better rank.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Washington average 48.9
Citations per inspection
5.57
Rank #34 / 91Citations per inspection — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 34th out of 91 homes in Washington. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 91 SNFs with citation data. Lower is better.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Washington average 6.92
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
32 of 39 citations resulted from standard inspections; and 7 of 39 resulted from complaint investigations.
Breakdown of citation severity (last 4 years)
Critical Health citations
0
100% better than Washington averageWashington average: 0.3
Serious Health citations
1
Rank #1 / 63Serious citations (G–I) — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 1st out of 63 homes in Washington. Shows G–I scope serious health citations for this facility versus other Washington SNFs. Lower counts rank better.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
41% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.7
Citations history (last 4 years)
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
May 14, 2025
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Mar 14, 2025
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Mar 14, 2025
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Dec 18, 2024
Corrected
Staffing Data
Reporting period: October 1 – December 31, 2025 (Q4 2025). Source: CMS Payroll-Based Journal report.
Total staff
120
Employees
109
Contractors
11
Staff to resident ratio
1.60:1
14% worse than Washington average
Avg staff/day
52
Average shift
7.9 hours
0% compared with Washington average
Total staff hours (quarter)
37,565
Nursing staff breakdown
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Registered Nurse
Manages medical care and health needs.
Total count
27
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8.1 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Licensed Practical Nurse
Assists with medical care and medications.
Total count
21
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hoursThis role is partially covered by contractors.
Certified Nursing Assistant
Helps with daily care and mobility.
Total count
43
Average shift length
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hours
Average shift length. Calculated as total hours divided by days worked and average staff per day.
8 hoursNo contractors work on this role.
Contractor staffing
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
Total hours from contractors
0.4%
156 contractor hours this quarter
Registered Nurse: 7
Licensed Practical Nurse: 3
Medical Director: 1
Staff by category
Q4 2025 · Oct 1 – Dec 31
This data comes from the CMS Payroll-Based Journal report covering October 1 – December 31, 2025.
| Certified Nursing Assistant | 43 | 0 | 43 | 16,542 | 92 | 100% | 8 |
| Licensed Practical Nurse | 18 | 3 | 21 | 6,438 | 92 | 100% | 8 |
| Registered Nurse | 20 | 7 | 27 | 5,733 | 92 | 100% | 8.1 |
| Speech Language Pathologist | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,496 | 81 | 88% | 7.1 |
| Respiratory Therapy Technician | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1,095 | 71 | 77% | 7 |
| Physical Therapy Aide | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1,005 | 74 | 80% | 6.8 |
| Physical Therapy Assistant | 2 | 0 | 2 | 994 | 76 | 83% | 7.4 |
| Qualified Social Worker | 2 | 0 | 2 | 671 | 68 | 74% | 8.7 |
| Dental Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 528 | 59 | 64% | 9 |
| Administrator | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Nurse Practitioner | 1 | 0 | 1 | 512 | 64 | 70% | 8 |
| Dietitian | 1 | 0 | 1 | 500 | 64 | 70% | 7.8 |
| Therapeutic Recreation Specialist | 1 | 0 | 1 | 482 | 64 | 70% | 7.5 |
| Mental Health Service Worker | 1 | 0 | 1 | 469 | 61 | 66% | 7.7 |
| Other Dietary Services Staff | 1 | 0 | 1 | 393 | 49 | 53% | 8 |
| Occupational Therapy Aide | 1 | 0 | 1 | 147 | 23 | 25% | 6.4 |
| Medical Director | 0 | 1 | 1 | 48 | 12 | 13% | 4 |
43 Certified Nursing Assistant
% of Days
100%
21 Licensed Practical Nurse
% of Days
100%
27 Registered Nurse
% of Days
100%
6 Speech Language Pathologist
% of Days
88%
6 Respiratory Therapy Technician
% of Days
77%
4 Physical Therapy Aide
% of Days
80%
2 Physical Therapy Assistant
% of Days
83%
2 Qualified Social Worker
% of Days
74%
1 Dental Services Staff
% of Days
64%
1 Administrator
% of Days
70%
1 Nurse Practitioner
% of Days
70%
1 Dietitian
% of Days
70%
1 Therapeutic Recreation Specialist
% of Days
70%
1 Mental Health Service Worker
% of Days
66%
1 Other Dietary Services Staff
% of Days
53%
1 Occupational Therapy Aide
% of Days
25%
1 Medical Director
% of Days
13%
Penalties and fines
Includes penalties issued in 2024
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total fines amount
$16K Rank #39 / 91Federal fines — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 39th out of 91 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 91 skilled nursing facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
80% lower than Washington averageWashington average: $82K
Number of fines
1
46% fewer fines than Washington averageWashington average: 1.8
Payment Denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
100% fewer payment denials than Washington averageWashington average: 0.3
Fines amount comparison
Fines amount comparison
This facility
$16K
Washington average
$82K
Penalty History
Penalties are imposed by CMS for violations of federal nursing home regulations.
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Feb 8, 2024 · $16K
Civil Money Penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 8, 2024
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
Feb 8, 2024
$16K
Last updated: Jan 2026
Quality of care over time
These measures show how residents usually do over time at this home, based on health outcomes and preventive care.
High-risk clinical events score
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
17.5
A composite score based on pressure ulcers, falls with injury, weight loss, walking ability decline, and activities of daily living decline.
17.5
75% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 10.0
Functional decline score
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
29.2
A composite score based on activities of daily living decline, walking ability decline, and incontinence.
29.2
40% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 20.9
Long-stay resident measures
Need for Help with Daily Activities Increased
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
27.0%
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
27.0%
65% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 16.4%
Walking Ability Worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
44.1%
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
44.1%
102% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 21.8%
Low Risk Residents with Bowel/Bladder Incontinence
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.6%
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
16.6%
32% better than Washington averageWashington average: 24.3%
Falls with Major Injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.5%
33% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 2.6%
High Risk Residents with Pressure Ulcers
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.0%
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
12.0%
145% worse than Washington averageWashington average: 4.9%
Urinary Tract Infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
100% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.7%
Lost Too Much Weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9%
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.9%
84% better than Washington averageWashington average: 5.8%
Depressive Symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.4%
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
12.4%
24% better than Washington averageWashington average: 16.2%
Antipsychotic Use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.7%
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.7%
40% better than Washington averageWashington average: 14.5%
Pneumococcal Vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 96.2%
Influenza Vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
In line with Washington averageWashington average: 93.8%
Short-stay resident measures
Pneumococcal Vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
14% better than Washington averageWashington average: 88.1%
Antipsychotic medication increase
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
67% better than Washington averageWashington average: 1.4%
Influenza Vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9%
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.9%
12% better than Washington averageWashington average: 82.0%
Quality measures are calculated from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. For most measures, lower percentages indicate better care quality.
Breakdown by payment type
Medicare
55% of new residents, usually for short-term rehab.
Typical stay
28 days
Private pay
44% of new residents, often for short stays.
Typical stay
23 days
Medicaid
1% of new residents, often for long-term daily care.
Typical stay
3 years
Facility Characteristics
Source: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (Data as of Jan 2026)
Total residents
75
Medicare
21
28% of residents
Medicaid
25
33.3% of residents
Private pay or other
29
38.7% of residents
Programs & Services
Residents Group
Residents meet regularly to discuss policies, care quality, and activities
Active Resident Council
Organized group of residents that meets regularly to discuss facility policies, quality of life, and activities.
Data sourced from CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics quarterly report. Payer mix reflects the current resident census by primary payment source.
Financial Trends
Historical financial and operational data for The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community based on CMS SNF Cost Reports.
Occupancy Rate
78.7%
↑ 6.4pp vs 2022
Net Income
$366.1K
↑ ~$800.4K vs 2022
Total Payroll
$7.7M
↑ ~$872.4K vs 2022
Profit Margin
1.6%
↑ 4.0pp vs 2022
Finances and operations
Privately-owned community
Operated by a business corporation.
Home revenue
$23.4M
Profit
$366.1K
Privately-owned community
Operated by a business corporation.
Home revenue
$23.4M Rank #18 / 93Revenue — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 18th out of 93 homes in Washington. Shows this facility's annual revenue compared to the Washington SNF average. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Profit
$366.1K
Payroll costs
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #37 / 93Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 37th out of 93 homes in Washington. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Washington average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
$7.7M
The portion of the home's budget spent on staff, including nurses, caregivers, and other employees who support care and operations.
Rank #37 / 93Payroll — State benchmarkedThis home is ranked 37th out of 93 homes in Washington. Shows total annual staff payroll benchmarked to the Washington average. Higher payroll investment relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on cheaper contract labor.Click the rank badge to see the full State ranking.Click here to see the full State ranking.
Other operating costs
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
$15.3M
All remaining costs needed to run the home, such as food, utilities, building maintenance, supplies and administrative expenses.
Total costs
$23.0M
What does this home offer?
Pets Allowed
Housing Options: Studio / 1 Bed / 2 Bed
Building Type: Mid-rise
Dining Services
Transportation Services
Housekeeping Services
Social and Recreational Activities
Security Systems
Who this home usually serves
Show admissions and discharges
TYPE OF STAY
Places of interest near The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
2.1 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Bellevue's city center to The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 0.81 miles to nearest hospital (Kaiser Permanente Bellevue Medical Center)
Calculate Travel Distance to The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Nursing Home in Washington
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community is located in Bellevue, Washington.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington.
Frequently Asked Questions about The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
What neighborhood is The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community in?
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community is in the Wilburton neighborhood of Bellevue.
Is The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community in a walkable area?
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community has a walk score of 38. Somewhat walkable. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the license number of The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community?
According to WA state health department records, The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community's license number is 2703.
When does The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community's license expire?
According to WA state health department records, The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community's license expires on July 31, 2026.
How many beds does The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community have?
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community has 100 beds.
What is the phone number of The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community?
(206) 203-0462 will put you in contact with the team at The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community.
What county is The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community located in?
The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community is in King County.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance
Contact Us
Published on
Updated on
Feedback
Write a review for The Park at Belle Harbour Assisted Living Community
Rate your overall experience with this community
Explore Open Rooms
1
Contact details
2
What type of senior care service are you looking for?
3
What budget do you have in mind for senior care?
4
How soon do you need to find care?
5
Additional details
Thank you for your interest!
Our team will be in touch shortly to help with next steps.
Need Help?
Let us help you or a loved one find the perfect senior home.
