Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
The Preserve at Cedarwood
The Preserve at Cedarwood is a personal care home in Tyrone, Pennsylvania, that provides rehabilitation services, skilled nursing support, and long-term residential care. Operated by Epworth Rehabilitation and Healthcare LLC in Blair County, this community has a care model that focuses on individualized service planning and 24-hour staffing coverage. A dedicated 12-bed secured memory care unit is also available to support residents living with dementia and related cognitive conditions.
This 54-bed community is dedicated to those 60 and older, with one-third of its population having mobility needs. Current occupancy remains around 69%, suggesting availability for interested families seeking placement.
State inspections over the past four years reflect a strong compliance history. Earlier citations primarily involved documentation practices, staff credentialing, and maintenance concerns, all of which were addressed through approved correction plans. However, no fines, sanctions, or enforcement actions have been issued, and the absence of staffing waivers indicates the community consistently meets credentialing requirements without exceptions.
Residents have access to a range of practical amenities and shared living spaces, including semi-private suites, dining areas, outdoor gathering spaces, WiFi access, onsite nutritional support, laundry services, and community lounges. The location is also considered highly walkable, offering convenient access to nearby services and neighborhood resources.
Featuring specialized dementia programming, improved inspection outcomes, and a stable operational history, The Preserve at Cedarwood is best suited for older adults who need rehabilitation services, skilled nursing support, or long-term residential care in a smaller community environment, especially families looking for structured support for individuals with memory loss or mobility-related care needs.
Community insights.
About this community
The Preserve at Cedarwood is legally operated by Epworth Rehabilitation And Healthcare LLC.
Inspection History
In Pennsylvania, the Department of Human Services (for assisted living facilities) and the Department of Health (for nursing homes) conduct unannounced inspections to verify adherence to state regulations.
Waivers
A higher number of waivers may indicate the facility relies on staff who don't fully meet standard credential requirements. A lower number may suggest the facility meets staffing qualification standards without exemptions.
This Facility
PA Average
vs. PA Avg-
0vs 0.9 avg↓ 100% fewer than PA avg
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, citation, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Pennsylvania state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
• Total citations (62% below)
• Citations per inspection (52% below)
• Inspections with citations (50% below)
• Inspection citation rate (40% below)
• Total complaints (75% below)
• Complaints per year (75% below)
Citations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total citations
| 24 | 63 | This facility has 62% fewer total citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (24 vs. PA avg 63).↓ 62% better |
|
Citations per inspection
| 2.4 | 5.05 | This facility has 52% fewer citations per inspection than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (2.4 vs. PA avg 5.05).↓ 52% better |
Inspections
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
| 10 | 11 | This facility has had 9% fewer total inspections than the Pennsylvania average (10 vs. PA avg 11). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 9% fewer |
|
Inspections with citations
| 4 | 8 | This facility has 50% fewer inspections with citations than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (4 vs. PA avg 8).↓ 50% better |
|
Inspection citation rate
| 40% | 67% | This facility has 27 percentage points lower inspection citation rate than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (40% vs. PA avg 67%).↓ 27% better |
Complaints & Investigations
| This Facility | PA Average | vs. PA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total complaints
| 1 | 4 | This facility has 75% fewer total complaints than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (1 vs. PA avg 4).↓ 75% better |
|
Complaints per year
| 0.2 | 0.8 | This facility has 75% fewer complaints per year than a typical Pennsylvania nursing home (0.2 vs. PA avg 0.8).↓ 75% better |
Places of interest near The Preserve at Cedarwood
0.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Tyrone's city center to The Preserve at Cedarwood's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to The Preserve at Cedarwood
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the PA Depts. of Human Services & Health, senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest to lowest based on our ranking methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
AL (Assisted Living):
Housing with help for daily activities like bathing, dressing, and medication, without 24-hour skilled nursing.
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
RESC (Residential Care):
Personal care and daily-living support in a smaller, more intimate residential setting.
IL (Independent Living):
Community living with dining, activities, and transportation for active seniors who need little personal care.
ADC (Adult Day Care):
Daytime supervision, health monitoring, and social activities for seniors who live at home.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Pennsylvania average is: 69.2% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dunwoody Village | NH MC RC SNF | Newtown Square | 81
Facility
81
PA AVG
94
Rank
#288 / 552 |
92.6%
Facility
92.6%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#46 / 494 | +33% | 6.24
Facility
6.24
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#9 / 181 | +13% | +51% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 5
Facility
5
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#28 / 178 | 2.5
Facility
2.5
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#48 / 178 | - | 75 | - |
64
Facility
64
PA AVG
47
Rank
#183 / 657 | Maureen Casey | $40.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$40.1MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#8 / 167 | $21.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$21.7MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#9 / 167 | 54%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
54%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#86 / 167 | 395329 | ||||
| Messiah Lifeways at Messiah Village | NH ADC AL IL MC RESC RC SNF | Mechanicsburg | 190
Facility
190
PA AVG
94
Rank
#21 / 552 |
78.4%
Facility
78.4%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#171 / 494 | +12% | 5.61
Facility
5.61
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#17 / 181 | +9% | +35% | $8.0k
Facility
$8.0k
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#122 / 183 | 5
Facility
5
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#28 / 178 | 1.7
Facility
1.7
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#23 / 178 | - | 149 | A+ |
22
Facility
22
PA AVG
47
Rank
#520 / 657 | Messiah Lifeways | $46.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$46.8MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#4 / 167 | $19.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
$19.5MFiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#16 / 167 | 41.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
Facility
41.6%Fiscal year ending 06/2024
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#145 / 167 | 395445 | ||||
| The Heritage at St. Paul Homes | NH IL MC RC SNF | Greenville | 125
Facility
125
PA AVG
94
Rank
#102 / 552 |
64.8%
Facility
64.8%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#307 / 494 | -7% | 4.49
Facility
4.49
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#63 / 181 | -15% | +8% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 3
Facility
3
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#11 / 178 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#1 / 178 | - | 81 | - |
66
Facility
66
PA AVG
47
Rank
#166 / 657 | Brian Mailliard | $23.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$23.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#39 / 167 | $16.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$16.6MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#26 / 167 | 70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
70.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#31 / 167 | 395244 | ||||
| The Glen at Willow Valley | NH MC SNF | Lancaster | 76
Facility
76
PA AVG
94
Rank
#317 / 552 |
77.6%
Facility
77.6%
PA AVG
69.7%
Rank
#182 / 494 | +11% | 5.66
Facility
5.66
PA AVG
4.15
Rank
#16 / 181 | -15% | +37% | $0
Facility
$0
PA AVG
$61.2k
Rank
#1 / 183 | 2
Facility
2
PA AVG
31.3
Rank
#7 / 178 | 1.0
Facility
1.0
PA AVG
4.4
Rank
#1 / 178 | 1 | 59 | - |
6
Facility
6
PA AVG
47
Rank
#628 / 657 | Margaret Donegan | $62.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$62.0MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$18.8M
Rank
#2 / 167 | $61.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
$61.3MFiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
$11.4M
Rank
#1 / 167 | 99%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
Facility
99%Fiscal year ending 12/2023
PA AVG
69.2%
Rank
#16 / 167 | 395956 |
Frequently Asked Questions about The Preserve at Cedarwood
Who is the owner of The Preserve at Cedarwood?
The Preserve at Cedarwood is legally operated by Epworth Rehabilitation And Healthcare LLC.
Is The Preserve at Cedarwood in a walkable area?
The Preserve at Cedarwood has a walk score of 74. Very walkable. Most errands can be accomplished on foot, and many essentials are within a short walk.
What is the license number of The Preserve at Cedarwood?
According to PA state health department records, The Preserve at Cedarwood's license number is 339720.
When does The Preserve at Cedarwood's license expire?
According to PA state health department records, The Preserve at Cedarwood's license expires on September 18, 2026.
What is the occupancy rate at The Preserve at Cedarwood?
The Preserve at Cedarwood's occupancy is 69%.
Are pets allowed at The Preserve at Cedarwood?
No, The Preserve at Cedarwood has a no-pet policy.
Does The Preserve at Cedarwood operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
The Preserve at Cedarwood is registered as a for-profit in PA.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance





