Inspection Reports for
The Watermark at Napa Valley

The visit was related to an incident report (SOC341) involving Resident 1 and Resident 2. No substantiation status was stated.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

The visit was triggered by an incident report (SOC341) involving Resident 1 and Resident 2. No deficiencies were cited, and no substantiation status was provided.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incidents.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incidents.

The complaint investigation was unsubstantiated. Although allegations were made that Resident 1 did not receive timely medical care and staff did not ensure Resident 2 was adequately fed, there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violations occurred.

The investigation found that appropriate emergency responses were activated and CPR was performed as instructed, and the allegations regarding feeding were unsubstantiated based on interviews and records. No deficiencies were cited.

The complaint investigation was triggered by allegations received on 07/25/2025 regarding medication dispensing errors and staff yelling at residents. After interviews with staff and a resident, and review of medication records, the allegations were found to be unsubstantiated.

Based on interviews and records obtained, conflicting information was found regarding the allegations. The investigation concluded that the allegations were unsubstantiated, meaning there was insufficient evidence to prove the violations occurred. No deficiencies were cited.

The visit was related to a case management incident following receipt of an incident report and SOC341 concerning an incident involving Resident 1 and Resident 2. No substantiation status was stated.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

The visit was triggered by a complaint involving an incident between Resident 1 and Resident 2. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted an interview and document review. No deficiencies were found.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

The visit was triggered by an incident report received on 05/23/2025 concerning an incident on 05/20/2025 involving Resident 1 (R1).

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

No deficiencies were cited during the visit. The Licensing Program Analyst conducted interviews and obtained documents related to the incident.

The facility was found to be clean, with all required safety measures and postings in place, including emergency lighting, fire extinguishers, and secure medication storage. Staff and resident files were complete with required certifications and paperwork. No deficiencies were cited during the visit.

The applicant and administrator successfully completed COMP II, demonstrating understanding of Title 22 regulations including facility operation, admission policies, staffing requirements, restrictive health conditions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness.