Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
139
117 employees · 22 contractors · 40 on an average day Trillium Woods
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Plymouth, MN
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Trillium Woods
Nursing Home, Assisted Living, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Independent Living, Memory Care & Skilled Nursing · Plymouth, MN
CMS overall rating
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
5/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Trillium Woods accepts Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Overview of Trillium Woods
Trillium Woods in Plymouth, Minnesota’s Glacier Vista area delivers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and 24-hour skilled nursing. A 44-bed capacity fosters closer connections between staff and residents. The continuum of care allows individuals to transition smoothly across service levels on the same campus as their daily health needs evolve.
Care spans private autonomous living, assisted personal routines, secured memory care, and round-the-clock clinical oversight. The property averages 6 hours and 31 minutes of total nurse staffing time per resident daily. Rehabilitation therapies are available to assist with recovery and functional maintenance.
Accepted payment avenues include Medicare for short-term skilled rehab, Medicaid for extended stays, and private pay.
Families looking for continuing care can benefit from a close-knit campus configured to accommodate evolving medical needs under one roof.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 31m
This nursing home is ranked 4th out of 63 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
6h 31mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +54% above Minnesota average
0 of 6 metrics below Minnesota average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 22 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
22 staff · 7.2-hour shifts
1h 41m
↑ 35% · MN 1h 15mThis facility: 1h 41m per resident per day, 35% above the Minnesota average of 1h 15m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. All 22 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
22 staff · 7.2-hour shiftsUS average: 42m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 42m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 21 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
21 staff · 7.8-hour shifts
1h 1m
↑ 44% · MN 42mThis facility: 1h 1m per resident per day, 44% above the Minnesota average of 42m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. 21 total: 20 of the facility's own employees and 1 agency contractor.
21 staff · 7.8-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 8.1-hour shifts
3h 50m
↑ 27% · MN 3h 0mThis facility: 3h 50m per resident per day, 27% above the Minnesota average of 3h 0m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. All 48 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
48 staff · 8.1-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 26m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 54% · MN 5mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 54% above the Minnesota average of 5m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
5h 55m
↑ 37% · MN 4h 19mThis facility: 5h 55m per resident per day, 37% above the Minnesota average of 4h 19m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 32m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 32m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
48m
↑ 13% · MN 43mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 13% above the Minnesota average of 43m (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
139
117 employees · 22 contractors · 40 on an average day
139 total staff / 40 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
3.48 : 1
↑ 60% · MN 2.17This facility: 3.48 staff per resident, 60% above the Minnesota average of 2.17 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
139 staff ÷ 40 residents
See full Minnesota ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
7.3 h
↓ 3% · MN 7.5 hThis facility: 7.3 h, 3% below the Minnesota average of 7.5 h (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
26,593 staff hours this quarter
See full Minnesota ranking →88% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Minnesota average: 90.4% · Contractors this quarter: Physical Therapy Aide (4), Qualified Social Worker (4), Physical Therapy Assistant (3), Respiratory Therapy Technician (3), Occupational Therapy Assistant (3), Speech Language Pathologist (2), Licensed Practical Nurse (1), Medical Director (1), Therapeutic Recreation Specialist (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
44
Rank #76 / 95Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A smaller, more intimate setting that may offer a quieter environment and closer staff-resident interactions.
44
Rank #76 / 95Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 76th out of 95 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Minnesota facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Years of operating
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #10 / 14Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 14 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Minnesota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A community with a solid operating history and experience delivering ongoing care. This is the number of years in operation under current management.
Rank #10 / 14Years in operation — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 10th out of 14 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for years in operation. Shows how long this facility has been in operation compared to other Minnesota facilities. Longer operating histories may benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
11
years
Walk Score
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #103 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
Rank #103 / 104Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 103rd out of 104 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Minnesota facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
4
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #21 / 58Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 58 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 58. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy between 85% and 95% suggests balanced demand.
Rank #21 / 58Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 58 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Minnesota average, with its Statewide rank out of 58. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
88.6%
This home usually has limited availability
Based on residents per day and 44 beds.
Higher than the Minnesota average: 80%
Residents per day (avg)
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
The average number of residents living at this facility on a given day. CMS calculates this figure from the facility's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and uses this value for other measures like Hours Per Resident Per Day (HPRD) and 5-Star Staffing rating.
39
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents (data as of Oct 2026)
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
187
days
BBB Rating
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
An independent rating from the Better Business Bureau based on factors such as complaint history, transparency, and business practices.
A+
Not Accredited
How BBB ratings workAbout This Community
CMS Certification Number245627
Silver LEED certification — U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC)A specialty credential or certification held by the community or its staff, indicating training or standards beyond basic state licensure.
NIFS (National Institute for Fitness and Sport) fitness instruction — National Institute for Fitness and SportA branded program developed by this community's operator or its partners - a named approach to programming or care, rather than an independent external certification.
Resident Council
Family Council
Health Care Navigator
Concierge
Housekeeping
MaintenanceListed as: Interior and exterior maintenance
TransportationListed as: Transportation to and from doctors' appointments
Pets not allowed
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Swimming Pool
Fitness Center
Auditorium
Beauty Salon
Spa
Library
Sun Room
Business Center
Picnic Area
Balcony
46-Acre Campus with Trails
Fire Pit
Garage (Garden Homes)
Biking, Hiking and Walking Paths
Private Dining Room
Activities
Music and Cultural Events
Book Clubs and Reviews
Strength and Cardio Training
Posture, Core and Balance Classes
Continued Learning Programs
Educational Seminars
Off-Site Shopping and Cocktails Outings
Guest Lecture Series
Strength Training
Dance Classes
Arts and Crafts
Cards and Games
Swimming and Aquacise
Tai Chi and Yoga
Happy Hour
Wine Pairing Dinners
Tasting Events
Pickleball
- Trips, lectures, theaters, concerts, operas, movies
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Trillium Woods.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Trillium Woods.Anytime / all-day dining.
- Bistro / café on site.
- Multiple dining venues.
- Outdoor dining option.
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
Cottage / Villa Floor plans as listed by the community: Wood Hill · Spring Hill
Floor plans: Wood Hill, Spring Hill
Apartment Floor plans as listed by the community: Shenandoah · Shenandoah II · Imperial · Imperial II · Linden · Oakwood · Oakwood II · Heritage · Heritage II · Heather · +10 more
Floor plans: Shenandoah, Shenandoah II, Imperial, Imperial II, Linden +15 more
In-Room Features
Full Kitchen In-Unit
Walk-In Closets
In-Unit Washer And Dryer
CMS Health Inspection History
Total health inspections
2
↓ 66% · MN 5.8This facility: 2, 66% below the Minnesota average of 5.8 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
6
Rank #5 / 66Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Minnesota State average, with a ranking across all 66 MN facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 74% · MN 23.5This facility: 6, 74% below the Minnesota average of 23.5 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
3
Rank #14 / 66Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 14th out of 66 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Minnesota mean across 66 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↓ 24% · MN 3.96This facility: 3, 24% below the Minnesota average of 3.96 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
6 of 6 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
6
↓ 72% · MN 21.4This facility: 6, 72% below the Minnesota average of 21.4 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
0
↓ 100% · MN 0.7This facility: 0, 100% below the Minnesota average of 0.7 (among Minnesota facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: May 27, 2026 · 4 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Pharmacy Services, 3 of 6 citations · 3 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
May 27, 2026
4 citations
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 12, 2024
2 citations
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Top deficiency categories
Share of 6 citations
Pharmacy Services
3 deficiencies (50%)
Resident Rights
2 deficiencies (33%)
Quality of Life & Care
1 deficiency (17%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
All 6 citations resulted from standard inspections.
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
No penalties in the past 3 years
No civil money penalties or payment denials on record since Oct 2023.
Total fines
$0
MN avg $54KMinnesota average: $53,746. Average among the 154 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Number of fines
0
MN avg 1.62Minnesota average: 1.62. Average among the 154 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
MN avg 0.41Minnesota average: 0.41. Average among the 154 Minnesota facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Minnesota average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
3
/ 5
Average
↑ 14% · MN 2.6This facility: 3.0, 14% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
4
/ 5
Above average
↑ 31% · MN 3.1This facility: 4.0, 31% above the MN average of 3.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
10.7
Score · lower is better
↑ 8% · MN 10.0This facility: 10.7, 8% above the MN average of 10.0 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
27.6
Score · lower is better
↑ 36% · MN 20.3This facility: 27.6, 36% above the MN average of 20.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.11 long-stay measures: 3 better, 6 worse, 2 near MN average
3 short-stay measures: 3 better
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 11 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
27.8%
↑ 53% · MN 18.2This facility: 27.8, 53% above the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
27.8%
↑ 53% · MN 18.2This facility: 27.8, 53% above the MN average of 18.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.2%
↓ 9% · MN 18.8This facility: 17.2, 9% below the MN average of 18.8 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.2%
↓ 9% · MN 18.8This facility: 17.2, 9% below the MN average of 18.8 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.7%
↑ 59% · MN 23.7This facility: 37.7, 59% above the MN average of 23.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.7%
↑ 59% · MN 23.7This facility: 37.7, 59% above the MN average of 23.7 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
↑ 30% · MN 2.6This facility: 3.3, 30% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
↑ 30% · MN 2.6This facility: 3.3, 30% above the MN average of 2.6 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
↓ 19% · MN 4.1This facility: 3.3, 19% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
↓ 19% · MN 4.1This facility: 3.3, 19% below the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 5.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 5.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
↓ 100% · MN 5.1This facility: 0.0, 100% below the MN average of 5.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
↑ 37% · MN 3.9This facility: 5.4, 37% above the MN average of 3.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
↑ 37% · MN 3.9This facility: 5.4, 37% above the MN average of 3.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↑ 18% · MN 4.1This facility: 4.8, 18% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.8%
↑ 18% · MN 4.1This facility: 4.8, 18% above the MN average of 4.1 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.2%
↑ 23% · MN 17.2This facility: 21.2, 23% above the MN average of 17.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.2%
↑ 23% · MN 17.2This facility: 21.2, 23% above the MN average of 17.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MN 97.3This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MN average of 97.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 3% · MN 97.3This facility: 100.0, 3% above the MN average of 97.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MN 96.4This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MN average of 96.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · MN 96.4This facility: 100.0, 4% above the MN average of 96.4 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 3 measures
Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
↓ 14% · MN 1.9This facility: 1.6, 14% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
↓ 14% · MN 1.9This facility: 1.6, 14% below the MN average of 1.9 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 12% · MN 88.2This facility: 98.6, 12% above the MN average of 88.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
98.6%
↑ 12% · MN 88.2This facility: 98.6, 12% above the MN average of 88.2 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
↑ 17% · MN 83.3This facility: 97.3, 17% above the MN average of 83.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.3%
↑ 17% · MN 83.3This facility: 97.3, 17% above the MN average of 83.3 (among MN facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Trillium Woods’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 62 Minnesota nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, and more than last year
−811.0% operating margin
−155.0 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 8 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($19.4M) trims the net loss to −$7.8M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends more on payroll than most Minnesota homes
280.8% payroll share of revenue
MN average 72.0%Rank #1 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.6M while revenue fell $0.6M. Check hours per resident in the staffing section to confirm it reaches the floor.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Minnesota homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $3.4M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $11.1M | Rank in MN Rank #61 / 62Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Below MN median Higher net patient revenue than 2% of MN homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $30.5M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $12.9M | Rank in MN Rank #5 / 62Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Minnesota homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 93% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$27.2M | −$1.4M | Trend 20172024 | MN median −$1.0M | Rank in MN Rank #61 / 62Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Minnesota homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Loss, widening Resident care lost money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −811.0% | −155.0 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median −8.5% | Rank in MN Rank #61 / 62Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Minnesota homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $19.4M | — | Trend — | MN median $0.8M | Rank in MN Rank #1 / 62Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Minnesota homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | −$7.8M | +$0.1M | Trend — | MN median $0.0M | Rank in MN Rank #61 / 62Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 61st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Minnesota homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 2% of homes | Loss The bottom line is below zero even after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends more of revenue on staff than most Minnesota homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | MN median | Compared with MN homesRank in MN | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $9.4M | +$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | MN median $7.5M | Rank in MN Rank #20 / 62Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 20th out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 69% of homes | Above MN median Higher payroll than 69% of MN homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 280.8% | +57.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | MN median 58.1% | Rank in MN Rank #1 / 62Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 1st out of 62 nursing homes we track in Minnesota for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Minnesota average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Minnesota that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 100% of homes | 208.8 pts over MN average The MN average is 72.0% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · MN benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Minnesota payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin MN payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.3M | $5.2M | $4.9M | $3.8M | $16.5M | $17.8M | $3.9M | $3.4M |
| Operating expenses | $25.9M | $23.7M | $21.9M | $21.5M | $22.4M | $26.0M | $29.7M | $30.5M |
| Net patient income | −$20.5M | −$18.5M | −$17.1M | −$17.6M | −$5.9M | −$8.1M | −$25.8M | −$27.2M |
| Operating margin | −385.5% | −358.6% | −351.7% | −459.7% | −36.1% | −45.7% | −656.0% | −811.0% |
| Net income | −$11.1M | −$6.6M | −$3.0M | −$1.4M | −$2.5M | −$6.6M | −$7.9M | −$7.8M |
| Payroll costs | $5.8M | $7.0M | $7.5M | $7.3M | $7.6M | $7.8M | $8.8M | $9.4M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 107.9% | 135.8% | 155.2% | 191.6% | 46.0% | 43.5% | 223.4% | 280.8% |
| Beds | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 44 |
| Gross revenue | $6.9M | $7.3M | $7.1M | $5.8M | $20.2M | $21.2M | $6.8M | $7.8M |
| Salaries | $4.8M | $5.7M | $6.1M | $6.1M | $6.2M | $6.3M | $7.3M | $7.7M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.9M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.4M | $1.4M | $1.5M | $1.7M |
| Contract labor | $0.8M | $0.9M | $0.8M | $0.5M | $0.2M | $0.3M | $0.1M | $0.1M |
| Other operating costs | $20.1M | $16.7M | $14.4M | $14.1M | $14.8M | $18.2M | $20.9M | $21.1M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $390 | $378 | $54 | $316 | $1,247 | $1,429 | $281 | $222 |
| Cost per day | $1,892 | $1,733 | $243 | $1,766 | $1,697 | $2,082 | $2,122 | $2,020 |
| Average length of stay | 44.2 days | 40.5 days | 43.8 days | 56.2 days | 76.8 days | 77.0 days | 79.5 days | 186.5 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
177 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
39 · 22%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
137 · 77%
Resident snapshot
40 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
18 · 45%
Medicaid
1 · 3%
Private pay & other
21 · 53%
Leaving
81 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
23 · 28%
Medicaid
1 · 1%
Private pay & other
57 · 70%
Primarily short stays
Residents typically stay for brief periods, with frequent admissions and discharges throughout the year.
Over 20 years of experience
Joseph “Joe” Amend-Marshall is the Executive Director at Trillium Woods, bringing over 20 years of senior living experience. He is a licensed nursing home administrator and assisted living director with a Master of Arts in Health & Human Service Administration. Joe is passionate about aging well and enhancing life in a continuing care retirement community, focusing on exceptional resident service and building a cohesive team.
Places of interest near Trillium Woods
3.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Plymouth's city center to Trillium Woods's address, calculated via Google Maps.
— 7.55 miles to nearest hospital (North Memorial Health - Robbinsdale Hospital)
Calculate Travel Distance to Trillium Woods
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Assisted Living in Minnesota
Trillium Woods is located in Plymouth, Minnesota.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Minnesota.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Trillium Woods
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 What neighborhood is Trillium Woods in?
Trillium Woods is in the Glacier Vista neighborhood of Plymouth.
02 Is Trillium Woods in a walkable area?
Trillium Woods has a walk score of 4. Car-dependent. Most errands require a car, with limited nearby walkable options.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Trillium Woods?
Trillium Woods's occupancy is 88.6%.
04 How long has Trillium Woods been in business?
Trillium Woods has been operating for approximately 11 years, based on available licensing and registration records.
05 Are pets allowed at Trillium Woods?
No, Trillium Woods has a no-pet policy.
06 What is the best email address for Trillium Woods?
The team at Trillium Woods can be reached at info@trilliumwoodslcs.com.
07 Does Trillium Woods operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Trillium Woods is registered as a for-profit in MN.
Updated on
