Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
76
55 employees · 21 contractors · 32 on an average day Washington Odd Fellows Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Walla Walla, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Washington Odd Fellows Home
Nursing Home, Assisted Living & Skilled Nursing · Walla Walla, WA
ALM Inspection Grade
B
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
ALM's inspection grade is 85 / 100, a B — a combined grade: its CMS-certified nursing-home beds and its state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count · A proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade.A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. It is not a government rating.
CMS overall rating
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
4/5
CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) is the federal agency that rates nursing home quality. Its Overall Rating runs from 1 to 5 stars, combining health inspections, staffing, and quality measures, with inspections weighted most heavily.
Washington Odd Fellows Home accepts Medicaid, Medicare, and private pay.
Washington Odd Fellows Home provides assisted living and skilled nursing services in Walla Walla, Washington. The location offers studio and one-bedroom apartments, giving residents options between a compact space or separate living areas. Having multiple care levels allows individuals to stay within the same community if their medical needs change over time.
The 71-bed community provides an average of 4 hours of total nursing care per resident each day. A walk score of 67 indicates a somewhat walkable neighborhood, enabling residents who no longer drive to manage select local errands independently.
Prospective representatives can contact the Washington Odd Fellows Home team to schedule a tour or discuss payment choices, which include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay.
Quality ratings
The Overall CMS Rating combines results from health inspections, staffing levels and quality measures. Health inspections carry the most weight. Staffing and quality scores can increase or decrease the final rating based on performance compared to state and national standards.
Based on the results of the facility's three most recent standard inspections and any complaint investigations. CMS reviews the number, scope, and severity of deficiencies, with more recent findings weighted more heavily.
Measures average nursing staff hours per resident per day, including Registered Nurses (RNs) and total nursing staff. Ratings are adjusted based on the level of care residents require and are compared to state and national benchmarks.
Based on clinical and physical health indicators reported to CMS, such as hospital readmissions, falls, pressure ulcers, and improvements in mobility. These measures reflect how well residents' health needs are being managed.
Staffing
Data period: Q2 2026 (April 1 – June 30, 2026).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026).
Total nursing care per resident / day
This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 0m
This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 59 nursing homes we track in Washington for nurse hours. Total adjusted nursing hours per resident per day, combining RN, LPN, and aide time. CMS adjusts this for case-mix so facilities can be fairly compared.
4h 0mStandout metric: Physical therapist is +31% above Washington average
5 of 6 metrics below Washington average
Daily care time per resident, by role
Registered nurse (RN)
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 10 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
10 staff · 9.1-hour shifts
48m
↓ 10% · WA 53mThis facility: 48m per resident per day, 10% below the Washington average of 53m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
RNs hold the highest nursing license and can assess residents, interpret test results, and direct care plans. More RN hours per day often signals stronger clinical oversight and faster response to health changes. 10 total: 8 of the facility's own employees and 2 agency contractors.
10 staff · 9.1-hour shiftsUS average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
LPN / LVN
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.4-hour shifts
36m
↓ 26% · WA 49mThis facility: 36m per resident per day, 26% below the Washington average of 49m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) deliver routine hands-on care — medication administration, wound dressing, and monitoring vital signs. They work under RN supervision and make up a large share of daily bedside care. All 6 are the facility's own employees; no agency contractors work in this role.
6 staff · 9.4-hour shiftsUS average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
Certified nursing assistant
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 35 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
35 staff · 8.6-hour shifts
2h 37m
↓ 3% · WA 2h 41mThis facility: 2h 37m per resident per day, 3% below the Washington average of 2h 41m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) provide the most direct day-to-day assistance: bathing, dressing, feeding, and mobility. Nurse aide hours are typically the largest staffing category and directly affect residents' quality of life. 35 total: 26 of the facility's own employees and 9 agency contractors.
35 staff · 8.6-hour shiftsUS average: 2h 20m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 20m
Physical therapist
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
7m
↑ 31% · WA 5mThis facility: 7m per resident per day, 31% above the Washington average of 5m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Hours per resident per day provided by licensed Physical Therapists (PTs) or PT Assistants. PT services help residents recover mobility after injury or illness and are especially important for post-acute (short-stay) rehabilitation.
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
Total nursing, weekends
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–Sun
3h 17m
↓ 13% · WA 3h 47mThis facility: 3h 17m per resident per day, 13% below the Washington average of 3h 47m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Combined nursing hours (RN + LPN + Nurse Aide) per resident per day on weekends. Staffing often drops on weekends — this figure reveals whether the facility maintains adequate coverage outside of weekday hours.
RN + LPN + aide · Sat–SunUS average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
RN, weekends
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–Sun
26m
↓ 32% · WA 38mThis facility: 26m per resident per day, 32% below the Washington average of 38m (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).
Registered nurse hours specifically on weekends. Facilities sometimes reduce RN presence on Saturdays and Sundays — a low weekend RN figure compared to weekday hours can indicate reduced clinical oversight when most administrative staff are absent.
Sat–SunUS average: 28m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 28m
Headcount
Every person who worked here at any point in the quarter, employees and contractors. It is not how many are on site at once: that is the "on an average day" figure.
76
55 employees · 21 contractors · 32 on an average day
76 total staff / 49 residents. Residents: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Sep 2026); staff: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (Q2 2026).Residents and staff come from two different CMS releases, so the two counts can be a few months apart.
1.55 : 1
↓ 11% · WA 1.75This facility: 1.55 staff per resident, 11% below the Washington average of 1.75 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
76 staff ÷ 49 residents
See full Washington ranking →
Average hours one staff member works on a day they are on shift, across every role.
8.3 h
↑ 4% · WA 8 hThis facility: 8.3 h, 4% above the Washington average of 8 h (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
24,211 staff hours this quarter
See full Washington ranking →86.2% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Washington average: 93.9% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (9), Registered Nurse (2), Physical Therapy Assistant (2), Respiratory Therapy Technician (2), Other Physician (2), Medical Director (1), Qualified Social Worker (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
By The Numbers
Community insights.
Bed count
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
124
Rank #19 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
A mid-sized community that may balance personal attention with shared amenities and social activities.
124
Rank #19 / 69Bed count — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 19th out of 69 nursing homes we track in Washington for bed count. Shows this facility's certified or reported bed count compared to other Washington facilities. Larger communities may offer more amenities, programs, and on-site services for residents and families. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.Medium-capacity home · Offers a balance of services and community atmosphere.
53 nursing-home beds (CMS) + 71 state-licensed beds.
Walk Score
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #21 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
Rank #21 / 80Walk Score — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 21st out of 80 nursing homes we track in Washington for walk score. Shows how walkable this facility's neighborhood is compared to the average walk score across Washington facilities. Higher scores benefit residents, families, and staff. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
67
/ 100
Occupancy rate
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #36 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Occupancy lower than 85% suggests more openings may be available.
Rank #36 / 56Occupancy rate — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 36th out of 56 nursing homes we track in Washington for occupancy. Shows this facility's occupancy rate versus the Washington average, with its Statewide rank out of 56. Higher occupancy signals strong local demand and financial stability. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
71.8%
This home usually has availability
Lower than the Washington average: 77.5%
Avg. Length of Stay
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
Average number of days residents stay at this facility, based on CMS cost report data. Shorter stays often reflect post-acute or rehab care; longer stays reflect long-term care.
143
days
About This Community
Facility TypeBoarding Home
CountyWalla Walla
License Number125
CMS Certification Number505421
Profit StatusNonprofit
Resident Council
ContactPotter, Alecksana (per state records, record updated Jul 2026)
Physical Therapy
Occupational Therapy
Speech Therapy
Medicaid Application Assistance
Pets not allowed
Bistro
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Washington Odd Fellows Home.
Dining & Nutrition
Sourced directly from the team at Washington Odd Fellows Home.- Bistro / café on site.
Building Type3-story
Room Types
Studio
1 Bed
This profile shows two inspection records, and their totals often differ. Inspection History and the Inspection Scorecard below are state data — the figures the state publishes and the state inspection reports we hold on file — covering the entire facility. CMS Health Inspection History covers only this home's Medicare and Medicaid-certified nursing beds, from federal certification surveys.
Inspection History
In Washington, the Department of Social and Health Services, Residential Care Services conducts unannounced inspections and issues reports on the quality of care in all licensed settings.
Since 2023 · 3 years of data
These figures come from state-published data and the state inspection reports we hold on file. The period covered can vary depending on document availability.
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 22 deficiencies 7 inspections
Includes all inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes. 22 deficiencies 7 inspections
ALM Inspection Grade
85 / 100
Combined grade: CMS inspection data for this community's nursing-home beds and
Washington inspection data for its
state-licensed beds, weighted by bed count
How the two records combine
Nursing-home beds (CMS) · 43% of the grade
B+ · 88/100
6 points above the Washington average for CMS-certified facilities (82/100).
53 certified beds, 43% of the grade. Graded with CMS-certified facilities on the national scale.
Citations
Typical
113 severity-weighted points (53 deficiencies) · 8% lower than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 123)
Enforcement
Concern
$67,616 in fines · 1 enforcement action
Persistence
Strong
32 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WA facility (median: 37)
Washington state-licensed beds · 57% of the grade
B- · 82/100
1 point below the Washington average for state-licensed facilities (83/100).
71 licensed beds, 57% of the grade. Graded with Washington state-licensed facilities on the Washington scale.
Deficiencies
Typical
3.1 deficiencies per inspection (22 in 7 inspections) · 15% more than the typical state-licensed WA facility (median: 2.7)
0.31 deficiencies per resident bed (22 across 71 beds) · 7% more than the typical state-licensed WA facility (median: 0.29)
How the final grade is calculated
B · 85/100
88 × 43% + 82 × 57% = 85 / 100
The two grades are combined in proportion to the beds each record covers: 53 CMS-certified nursing-home beds (43%) and 71 Washington state-licensed beds (57%). The result, 85 out of 100, is a B on the same scale every ALM Inspection Grade uses.
Inspection Scorecard
This scorecard compares key inspection, deficiency, and complaint metrics at this facility against the Washington state average. Metrics rated ≥15% worse than average are highlighted in red; those ≥15% better are highlighted in green.
Since 2023 vs. Washington state average
Overall vs. WA average
0 Worse
No metrics in this bucket.
1 At Avg
Metrics at Washington average:
• Deficiencies per inspection (at WA avg) 1 Better Metrics better than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (21% below)
• Deficiencies per inspection (at WA avg) 1 Better Metrics better than Washington average:
• Total deficiencies (21% below)
Deficiencies
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total deficiencies
Formal regulatory issues recorded by inspectors across all inspection types.
| 22 | 28.0 | This facility has 21% fewer total deficiencies than a typical Washington nursing home (22 vs. WA avg 28).↓ 21% better |
|
Deficiencies per inspection
Average deficiencies per inspection.
| 3.1 | 3.1 | This facility has deficiencies per inspection in line with the Washington average (3.1 vs. WA avg 3.1).— At avg |
Inspections
| This Facility | WA Average | vs. WA Avg |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Total inspections
Combined count of all inspections conducted at this facility.
| 7 | 9.0 | This facility has had 22% fewer total inspections than the Washington average (7 vs. WA avg 9). More inspections can mean more regulatory scrutiny rather than worse care.↓ 22% fewer |
CMS Health Inspection History
Federal inspection data published by CMS, covering this home's Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing/nursing beds only.
Total health inspections
8
↓ 9% · WA 8.8This facility: 8, 9% below the Washington average of 8.8 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Total health citations
54
Rank #35 / 61Health citations — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 35th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for health citations. Shows this facility's total health deficiency citations benchmarked to the Washington State average, with a ranking across all 61 WA facilities. Lower citation counts earn a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 8% · WA 49.9This facility: 54, 8% above the Washington average of 49.9 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citations per inspection
6.75
Rank #45 / 61Citations per inspection — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 45th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for citations per inspection. Shows average deficiency citations per CMS inspection for this facility versus the Washington mean across 61 facilities with citation data. Lower is better. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.↑ 9% · WA 6.18This facility: 6.75, 9% above the Washington average of 6.18 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Citation severity
100% corrected
54 of 54 citations corrected
Critical
J–L
0
↓ 100% · WA 0.3This facility: 0, 100% below the Washington average of 0.3 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Immediate jeopardy
Serious
G–I
3
↑ 76% · WA 1.7This facility: 3, 76% above the Washington average of 1.7 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Actual harm
Moderate
D–F
48
↑ 1% · WA 47.4This facility: 48, 1% above the Washington average of 47.4 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, more than minimal risk
Minor
A–C
3
↑ 500% · WA 0.5This facility: 3, 500% above the Washington average of 0.5 (among Washington facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
No harm, minimal riskLatest inspection: Jul 06, 2026 · 1 citation (Abuse/Neglect, moderate), corrected
Most cited category: Quality of Life & Care, 13 of 54 citations · 10 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent first
Jul 06, 2026
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Feb 11, 2026
1 citation
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 08, 2025
14 citations
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Environmental moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights minor citation
Corrected
Corrected
Aug 21, 2024
1 citation
Infection Control moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Jul 23, 2024
18 citations
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care serious citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nutrition moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Nursing Services moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Pharmacy moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Apr 19, 2024
4 citations
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Mar 05, 2024
1 citation
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Sep 14, 2023
10 citations
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Resident Rights moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Abuse/Neglect moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Care Planning moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Quality of Care moderate citation
Corrected
Corrected
Showing the 50 most recent of 54 citations.
Top deficiency categories
Share of 54 citations
Quality of Life & Care
13 deficiencies (24%)
Resident Rights
11 deficiencies (20%)
Resident Assessment & Care Planning
10 deficiencies (19%)
Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation
8 deficiencies (15%)
Pharmacy Services
4 deficiencies (7%)
Infection Control
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nutrition & Dietary
2 deficiencies (4%)
Nursing & Physician Services
2 deficiencies (4%)
Administration
1 deficiency (2%)
Environmental
1 deficiency (2%)
How citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
43 of 54 citations resulted from standard inspections; 8 of 54 resulted from complaint investigations; and 3 of 54 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports, which cover the Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified skilled-nursing and nursing beds and no other part of the community. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Enforcement
Penalties and fines
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Oct 2026
1 penalty in the past 3 years
Latest: Jul 23, 2024 · $67,616 civil money penalty
Jul 23, 2024 · $67,616 civil money penalty
Total fines
$67,616
↓ 16% · WA $80KThis facility: $67,616, 16% below the Washington average of $80,436. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg $66KUS average: $66,281, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.Rank #48 / 61Federal fines — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 61 nursing homes we track in Washington for federal fines. Shows this facility's cumulative CMS federal fine dollars versus the Washington average among facilities with fines, and where it ranks among 61 facilities in the pool. Lower total dollars mean a better rank. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Number of fines
1
↓ 47% · WA 1.89This facility: 1, 47% below the Washington average of 1.89. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.US avg 1.88US average: 1.88, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Payment denials
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Serious action where Medicare and/or Medicaid temporarily stops payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
0
WA avg 0.25Washington average: 0.25. Average among the 116 Washington facilities with a penalty on record.US avg 0.35US average: 0.35, among the 6,725 US facilities with a penalty on record.
Penalty history · past 3 years
Jul 23, 2024
Civil money penalty
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$67,616
Fines imposed for noncompliance, which can be assessed per day or per instance of violation.
$67,616Fine amount comparison
This facility
$67,616
Washington average
$80,436
US average
$66,281
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Washington and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Health Outcomes
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Washington average.
CMS star rating for the care of long-stay residents, who live at the home for 100 days or more. It is built from the long-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 40% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 40% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
CMS star rating for the care of short-stay residents, mostly people recovering after a hospital stay for under 100 days. It is built from the short-stay quality measures below. 5 stars is the best.
5
/ 5
Significantly above average
↑ 38% · WA 3.6This facility: 5.0, 38% above the WA average of 3.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of five long-stay measures: pressure ulcers, falls with major injury, unplanned weight loss, worsening ability to walk, and needing more help with daily activities. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
7.1
Score · lower is better
↓ 14% · WA 8.2This facility: 7.1, 14% below the WA average of 8.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Average of three long-stay measures: needing more help with daily activities, worsening ability to walk, and loss of bowel or bladder control. Each is the % of residents affected, so lower is better.
17.9
Score · lower is better
↑ 5% · WA 17.0This facility: 17.9, 5% above the WA average of 17.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.13 long-stay measures: 6 better, 6 worse, 1 near WA average
8 short-stay measures: 3 better, 2 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Needed more help with daily activities
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
↑ 16% · WA 13.8This facility: 16.0, 16% above the WA average of 13.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
↑ 16% · WA 13.8This facility: 16.0, 16% above the WA average of 13.8 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Walking ability worsened
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.0%
↓ 36% · WA 15.6This facility: 10.0, 36% below the WA average of 15.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.0%
↓ 36% · WA 15.6This facility: 10.0, 36% below the WA average of 15.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Bowel or bladder incontinence (low-risk residents)
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
↑ 28% · WA 21.6This facility: 27.7, 28% above the WA average of 21.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
27.7%
↑ 28% · WA 21.6This facility: 27.7, 28% above the WA average of 21.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Safety & clinical stability
Urinary tract infection
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 1.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 1.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 1.7This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 1.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Falls with major injury
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 2.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
↓ 100% · WA 2.6This facility: 0.0, 100% below the WA average of 2.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Pressure ulcers (high-risk residents)
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
↓ 24% · WA 4.4This facility: 3.3, 24% below the WA average of 4.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay high risk residents with pressure ulcers
3.3%
↓ 24% · WA 4.4This facility: 3.3, 24% below the WA average of 4.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Physical & mental health
Lost too much weight
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2%
↑ 11% · WA 5.6This facility: 6.2, 11% above the WA average of 5.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.2%
↑ 11% · WA 5.6This facility: 6.2, 11% above the WA average of 5.6 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Depressive symptoms
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
81.7%
↑ 357% · WA 17.9This facility: 81.7, 357% above the WA average of 17.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
81.7%
↑ 357% · WA 17.9This facility: 81.7, 357% above the WA average of 17.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Antipsychotic use
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3%
↓ 45% · WA 15.0This facility: 8.3, 45% below the WA average of 15.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3%
↓ 45% · WA 15.0This facility: 8.3, 45% below the WA average of 15.0 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.2This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
100.0%
↑ 4% · WA 96.2This facility: 100.0, 4% above the WA average of 96.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · WA 94.3This facility: 100.0, 6% above the WA average of 94.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
↑ 6% · WA 94.3This facility: 100.0, 6% above the WA average of 94.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Hospitalizations per 1,000 days
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↑ 64% · WA 1.38This facility: 2.26, 64% above the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of hospitalizations per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.26
↑ 64% · WA 1.38This facility: 2.26, 64% above the WA average of 1.38 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits per 1,000 days
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.52
↑ 67% · WA 1.51This facility: 2.52, 67% above the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Number of outpatient emergency department visits per 1,000 long-stay resident days.
2.52
↑ 67% · WA 1.51This facility: 2.52, 67% above the WA average of 1.51 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Able to care for self at discharge
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
48.8%
↓ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 48.8, 9% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of residents at or above expected ability to care for themselves at discharge.
48.8%
↓ 9% · US 53.7This facility: 48.8, 9% below the US average of 53.7 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Returned home or to the community
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.0%
↑ 13% · US 50.6This facility: 57.0, 13% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Rate of successful return to home or community from a skilled nursing facility.
57.0%
↑ 13% · US 50.6This facility: 57.0, 13% above the US average of 50.6 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Safety & clinical stability
Falls with major injury
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.9%
↑ 18% · US 0.8This facility: 0.9, 18% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).
Percentage of SNF residents who experience falls with major injury during their stay.
0.9%
↑ 18% · US 0.8This facility: 0.9, 18% above the US average of 0.8 (among US facilities reporting a recent figure).Physical & mental health
New antipsychotic medication
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 31% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.9, 31% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
↓ 31% · WA 1.3This facility: 0.9, 31% below the WA average of 1.3 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Preventive care
Pneumococcal vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 12% · WA 88.7This facility: 99.4, 12% above the WA average of 88.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.4%
↑ 12% · WA 88.7This facility: 99.4, 12% above the WA average of 88.7 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Flu vaccine
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7%
↓ 21% · WA 84.4This facility: 66.7, 21% below the WA average of 84.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percent of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
66.7%
↓ 21% · WA 84.4This facility: 66.7, 21% below the WA average of 84.4 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Hospital & emergency visits
Re-hospitalized after admission
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.6%
↓ 12% · WA 19.9This facility: 17.6, 12% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were re-hospitalized after their nursing home admission.
17.6%
↓ 12% · WA 19.9This facility: 17.6, 12% below the WA average of 19.9 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
ER visits
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.6%
↑ 41% · WA 13.2This facility: 18.6, 41% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.
Percentage of short-stay residents who had an outpatient emergency department visit.
18.6%
↑ 41% · WA 13.2This facility: 18.6, 41% above the WA average of 13.2 (among WA facilities reporting a recent figure).Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse.Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Washington Odd Fellows Home’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 60 Washington nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
FY Dec 2024
Is it financially stable?
Losing money on care, but less than last year
−12.5% operating margin
+7.4 pts vs prior year
An operating loss in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Other income ($14.8M) turns it into a net profit to $13.2M. Watch for cost-cutting that reaches staffing.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Washington homes
58.1% payroll share of revenue
WA average 64.4%Rank #33 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll fell $0.6M while revenue fell $0.3M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Washington homes.
Revenue & profit
Losing money on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $12.5M | −$0.3M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $13.7M | Rank in WA Rank #37 / 60Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 37th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 39% of homes | Below WA median Higher net patient revenue than 39% of WA homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $14.1M | −$1.3M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $14.1M | Rank in WA Rank #32 / 60Operating expenses — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 32nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for operating expenses. Shows everything it cost to run the home — staff, supplies, rent, admin — compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Expenses in dollars mostly follow how big a home is, so this compares size, not efficiency; read it next to operating margin. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 47% of homes | Exceeds revenue Operating expenses are higher than net patient revenue, so resident care runs at a loss. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | −$1.6M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | WA median −$0.2M | Rank in WA Rank #48 / 60Net patient income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 48th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net patient income. Shows net patient revenue minus operating expenses, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes that lost money on care are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 20% of homes | Loss, narrowing Resident care lost money this year, less than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | −12.5% | +7.4 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median −1.7% | Rank in WA Rank #49 / 60Operating margin — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 49th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for operating margin. Shows net patient income as a share of net patient revenue, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Unlike the dollar figures it does not follow size, so it is the fairest comparison of financial health between a small home and a large one. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 19% of homes | Loss A negative margin means resident care costs more than it earns. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $14.8M | — | Trend — | WA median $0.0M | Rank in WA Rank #3 / 58Other income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 3rd out of 58 nursing homes we track in Washington for other income. Shows income from outside resident care — investments, grants, rentals, services — compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. It is not part of net patient revenue; a high rank here can offset a loss on care. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 96% of homes | Offsets part of the loss Income from outside resident care covers part of the loss on care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $13.2M | +$12.2M | Trend — | WA median −$0.0M | Rank in WA Rank #2 / 60Net income — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 2nd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for net income. Shows the bottom line after other income, compared with other Washington homes reporting a recent fiscal year. Homes with a net loss are in the pool too, so a rank in the bottom half usually means a loss. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 98% of homes | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Washington homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WA median | Compared with WA homesRank in WA | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $7.3M | −$0.6M | Trend 20172024 | WA median $8.4M | Rank in WA Rank #40 / 60Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 40th out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 34% of homes | Below WA median Higher payroll than 34% of WA homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 58.1% | −3.2 pts | Trend 20172024 | WA median 58.9% | Rank in WA Rank #33 / 60Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 33rd out of 60 nursing homes we track in Washington for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Washington average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Washington that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 46% of homes | 6.3 pts under WA average The WA average is 64.4% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WA benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Washington payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WA payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $9.2M | $13.6M | $14.7M | $14.7M | $13.9M | $12.7M | $12.8M | $12.5M |
| Operating expenses | $9.0M | $14.1M | $14.4M | $15.0M | $16.1M | $16.5M | $15.4M | $14.1M |
| Net patient income | $0.2M | −$0.4M | $0.3M | −$0.3M | −$2.2M | −$3.8M | −$2.5M | −$1.6M |
| Operating margin | 2.5% | −3.2% | 1.9% | −2.4% | −15.7% | −30.4% | −19.9% | −12.5% |
| Net income | $0.5M | −$0.1M | $1.1M | $0.3M | $4.1M | −$2.9M | $1.0M | $13.2M |
| Payroll costs | $5.5M | $7.9M | $8.4M | $8.8M | $9.2M | $8.2M | $7.8M | $7.3M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 59.9% | 57.6% | 57.3% | 60.2% | 65.9% | 64.8% | 61.3% | 58.1% |
| Beds | 117 | 226 | 226 | 226 | 226 | 226 | 226 | 198 |
| Gross revenue | $11.7M | $15.8M | $16.5M | $15.3M | $14.1M | $12.7M | $12.1M | $11.8M |
| Salaries | $4.5M | $6.7M | $7.1M | $7.6M | $7.8M | $7.0M | $6.8M | $6.3M |
| Wage-related costs | $1.1M | $1.1M | $1.3M | $1.3M | $1.4M | $1.2M | $1.0M | $1.0M |
| Contract labor | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Other operating costs | $3.5M | $6.2M | $6.0M | $6.2M | $6.9M | $8.3M | $7.5M | $6.8M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $261 | $202 | $113 | $222 | $234 | $247 | $257 | $290 |
| Cost per day | $255 | $209 | $111 | $227 | $271 | $322 | $309 | $326 |
| Average length of stay | 139.8 days | 151.9 days | 451.5 days | 203.4 days | 206.5 days | 187.6 days | 174.7 days | 142.7 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.
Over a year: CMS SNF Cost Report, FY2024
Snapshot: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (quarterly), Sep 2026
Arriving
145 admissions · FY2024
Residents admitted during the year.
Medicare
85 · 59%
Medicaid
16 · 11%
Private pay & other
44 · 30%
Resident snapshot
49 residents · Sep 2026
Residents counted on the date of the latest CMS report, which updates quarterly.
Medicare
3 · 6%
Medicaid
37 · 76%
Private pay & other
9 · 18%
Leaving
154 discharges · FY2024
Residents discharged during the year.
Medicare
83 · 54%
Medicaid
33 · 21%
Private pay & other
38 · 25%
Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Washington Odd Fellows Home
1.3 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Walla Walla's city center to Washington Odd Fellows Home's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Washington Odd Fellows Home
Add your location
Financial Assistance for
Assisted Living in Washington
Washington Odd Fellows Home is located in Walla Walla, Washington State.
Here are the financial assistance programs available to residents in Washington State.
Know before you visit
Frequently Asked Questions about Washington Odd Fellows Home
Quick answers from public records and the community's own listing.01 Is Washington Odd Fellows Home in a walkable area?
Washington Odd Fellows Home has a walk score of 67. Somewhat walkable. Some errands can be accomplished on foot, with a mix of nearby amenities.
02 What is the license number of Washington Odd Fellows Home?
According to WA state health department records, Washington Odd Fellows Home's license number is 125.
03 What is the occupancy rate at Washington Odd Fellows Home?
Washington Odd Fellows Home's occupancy is 71.8%.
04 Are pets allowed at Washington Odd Fellows Home?
No, Washington Odd Fellows Home has a no-pet policy.
05 What is the best email address for Washington Odd Fellows Home?
The team at Washington Odd Fellows Home can be reached at evpmarketing@oddfellows.com.
06 Does Washington Odd Fellows Home operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Washington Odd Fellows Home is registered as a non-profit in WA.
07 What is the overall rating for Washington Odd Fellows Home?
Washington Odd Fellows Home received a 4-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
Updated on
