Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center is a nursing home in Worland, WY, offering memory care, respite care, and skilled nursing. Skilled nursing provides licensed nursing care on site around the clock, while memory care provides a secured setting with supervision for someone at risk of wandering. Respite care is available for short stays, which can suit a family caregiver who needs time to travel or recover.
Several care levels are available here. As a resident’s needs grow, they may be able to move to another level of care without leaving the community. The center has 87 beds and may be a good fit for someone who needs skilled nursing, memory care, or a temporary respite stay.
Total nurse staffing is 3 hours and 50 minutes per resident per day, representing the daily hands-on nursing time allocated to each resident. Payment options include Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay. A Walk Score of 48 places the area in a car-dependent setting, so most errands require a car or a ride. A resident who no longer drives needs transportation for errands outside the community.
Staffing
Data period: Q4 2025 (October 1 – December 31, 2025).
Nursing care per resident per day and state rankings: CMS Provider Information.
Headcount, shifts and contractors: CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ).
Resident count: CMS Long-Term Care Facility Characteristics (data as of Jun 2026).
Standout metric: Certified nursing assistant is +12% above Wyoming average
3 of 6 metrics below Wyoming average
Daily care time per resident, by role
US average: 41m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 41m
US average: 52m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 52m
US average: 2h 21m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 2h 21m
US average: 4m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 4m
US average: 3h 26m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 3h 26m
US average: 29m.Green: 5% or more better than the state average. Yellow: within 5%. Red: 5% or more worse. US 29m
Headcount
93.4% of staff hours were worked by the facility's own employees
Wyoming average: 93.4% · Contractors this quarter: Certified Nursing Assistant (15), Licensed Practical Nurse (5), Nurse Aide in Training (1), Nurse Practitioner (1), Respiratory Therapy Technician (1), Occupational Therapy Aide (1), Occupational Therapy Assistant (1)
Why it matters: employees work here week after week and get to know each resident's routines and needs. Agency contractors often rotate between facilities, so a higher employee share usually means more consistent care.
Community insights.
Smaller home · May offer a more intimate, personalized care environment.
Based on residents per day and 87 beds.
Source: CMS Provider Information, average daily residents
About This Community
CMS Health Inspection History
ALM Inspection Grade
14 points below the Wyoming average for CMS-certified facilities (84/100)
Category breakdown
Citations
Typical
124 severity-weighted points (15 deficiencies) · 48% higher than the typical CMS-certified WY facility (median: 84)
Enforcement
Concern
2 enforcement actions · above the typical CMS-certified WY facility (median: 0) · $41,746 in fines
Persistence
Strong
20 days to fix issues · faster than the typical CMS-certified WY facility (median: 31)
Citation severity
Latest inspection: Apr 30, 2026 · 2 citations, all corrected
Most cited category: Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, 5 of 15 citations · 6 categories in total
Citations history
Most recent firstTop deficiency categories
Share of 15 citationsHow citations are counted
Health citations are formal notices following inspections when they fail to comply with safety and care standards.
6 of 15 citations resulted from standard inspections; 7 of 15 resulted from complaint investigations; and 2 of 15 came from combined inspections (standard and complaint).
Includes all CMS health inspection records for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Source
Data sourced from CMS Health Deficiencies reports. Citation severity codes range from A (least serious) to L (most serious). Immediate Jeopardy (J-L) citations indicate situations where the facility's noncompliance has placed residents at risk of death or serious harm.
Show Inspection Reports
Penalties and fines
Federal penalties imposed by CMS for regulatory violations, including civil money penalties (fines) and denials of payment for new Medicare/Medicaid admissions.
Source: CMS Penalties Database · Data as of Aug 2026
2 penalties in the past 3 years
Latest: Feb 26, 2026 · $34,958 civil money penalty
Penalty history · past 3 years
Fine amount comparison
Totals count every penalty on record; the history lists the past 3 years. Wyoming and US averages are among facilities with a penalty on record.
A civil money penalty is a fine for noncompliance, per day or per instance. A payment denial stops Medicare/Medicaid payments for new residents until issues are fixed.
Quality of care over time
How residents at this home fare on health outcomes and preventive care, compared with the Wyoming average.
13 long-stay measures: 3 better, 7 worse, 3 near WY average
8 short-stay measures: 4 better, 1 worse, 3 compared with US only
Long-stay residents
People who live at the home · 13 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Hospital & emergency visits
Short-stay residents
Rehab and recovery after a hospital stay · 8 measures
Daily care & independence
Safety & clinical stability
Physical & mental health
Preventive care
Hospital & emergency visits
Arrows show whether a figure is above or below the average. Green is better for residents, red is worse, and yellow means within 5% of the average. Grey compares with the US average only, because CMS publishes no state figure. The line on each bar marks the average.
Quality measures are calculated by CMS from Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessments and Medicare claims.
Money and staffing.
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center’s finances from its CMS cost report for the fiscal year ending December 2024, compared with 11 Wyoming nursing homes that filed a recent report. Includes all financial data for this property, which could include management/ownership changes.
Is it financially stable?
Breaking even on care
3.3% operating margin
+1.6 pts vs prior year
Positive margin in 6 of the last 8 reported years. Net income $0.3M after other income.
Does it invest in staff?
Spends less on payroll than most Wyoming homes
56.6% payroll share of revenue
WY average 59.8%Rank #5 / 11Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Wyoming for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wyoming average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wyoming that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric.
Payroll rose $0.4M while revenue rose $1.0M. A low share can mean leaner staffing; check hours per resident in the staffing section.
FY 2024 scorecard
Each row shows the FY 2024 figure, the change since the prior report, the trend, and how it compares with Wyoming homes.
Revenue & profit
Profitable on care
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WY median | Compared with WY homesRank in WY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue What the home earns from resident care, after discounts and bad debt. | $8.5M | +$1.0M | Trend 20172024 | WY median $11.4M | Rank in WY Rank #7 / 11Net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 7th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Wyoming for net patient revenue. Shows this facility's net patient revenue compared to the Wyoming average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher revenue generally means more resources for staffing and capital — read alongside Payroll %. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wyoming that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 40% of homes | Below WY median Higher net patient revenue than 40% of WY homes that filed a recent report. Revenue mostly follows how big a home is. |
| Operating expenses Everything it costs to run the home: staff, supplies, rent, admin. | $8.3M | +$0.8M | Trend 20172024 | WY median — | Rank in WY Not ranked | Within revenue Operating expenses are lower than net patient revenue, so resident care covers its costs. |
| Net patient income Revenue minus operating expenses. Negative means care loses money. | $0.3M | +$0.2M | Trend 20172024 | WY median — | Rank in WY Not ranked | Profit, growing Resident care made money this year, more than in the prior report. |
| Operating margin Net patient income as a share of revenue. The clearest health signal. | 3.3% | +1.6 pts | Trend 20172024 | WY median — | Rank in WY Not ranked | Thin margin A margin from 0% to 5% of revenue leaves little room for unexpected costs. |
| Other income Money not from resident care: investments, grants, services. | $0.0M | — | Trend — | WY median — | Rank in WY Not ranked | Adds to profit Income from outside resident care, on top of the profit from care. |
| Net income The bottom line after other income. | $0.3M | +$0.2M | Trend — | WY median — | Rank in WY Not ranked | Profit The bottom line is above zero after other income. |
Staffing spend
Spends less of revenue on staff than most Wyoming homes
| Metric | FY 2024 | vs prior year | Trend 2017 → 2024Trend | WY median | Compared with WY homesRank in WY | In short |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payroll costs Salaries and wage-related benefits, not counting contract labor. | $4.8M | +$0.4M | Trend 20172024 | WY median $5.6M | Rank in WY Rank #8 / 11Payroll costs — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 8th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Wyoming for payroll costs. Shows total staff payroll — salaries plus wage-related benefits — benchmarked to the Wyoming average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Higher payroll relative to peers often signals better staffing and less reliance on contract labor. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wyoming that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 30% of homes | Below WY median Higher payroll than 30% of WY homes. Payroll in dollars mostly follows how big a home is, so this compares size, not staffing levels. |
| Payroll share of revenue Payroll divided by revenue. Higher usually means more staff per resident. | 56.6% | −1.9 pts | Trend 20172024 | WY median 56.1% | Rank in WY Rank #5 / 11Payroll % of net patient revenue — State benchmarked This nursing home is ranked 5th out of 11 nursing homes we track in Wyoming for payroll % of net patient revenue. Shows payroll as a percentage of net patient revenue versus the Wyoming average, among facilities reporting a recent fiscal year. Below 25% may signal understaffing or heavy agency use — read with Staffing ratings. Communities with the same value for a metric share the same rank. Rankings compare like with like: every nursing home we track in Wyoming that reports data for that category. Nursing homes without available data are excluded, so the pool size varies from metric to metric. Higher than 60% of homes | 3.2 pts under WY average The WY average is 59.8% of revenue. Within 3 points of it reads as near the average. |
Charts, 2017–2024 2 charts · WY benchmark drawn as a dashed line
Revenue, expenses and income
What the home earned from resident care (net patient revenue), what it cost to run (operating expenses) and the difference between the two (net patient income), for each fiscal year it filed a CMS cost report.
USD, millions
Net patient revenue Operating expenses Net patient income
Where revenue goes
Both lines are a share of net patient revenue. Payroll share is what goes to salaries and wage-related benefits; operating margin is what is left after every operating cost (below 0%, resident care lost money). The dashed line is the Wyoming payroll average.
% of net patient revenue
Payroll share Operating margin WY payroll average
Year-by-year data, 2017–2024 every reported year · latest first, scroll sideways
| Metric | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net patient revenue | $5.7M | $5.9M | $5.9M | $6.6M | $5.1M | $6.5M | $7.5M | $8.5M |
| Operating expenses | $5.4M | $5.5M | $6.1M | $6.0M | $5.9M | $6.4M | $7.4M | $8.3M |
| Net patient income | $0.3M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | $0.5M | −$0.7M | $0.1M | $0.1M | $0.3M |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | 6.5% | −3.2% | 8.2% | −14.5% | 1.4% | 1.7% | 3.3% |
| Net income | $0.3M | $0.4M | −$0.2M | $0.8M | −$0.7M | −$0.0M | $0.1M | $0.3M |
| Payroll costs | $2.7M | $2.9M | $3.2M | $3.7M | $3.5M | $3.6M | $4.4M | $4.8M |
| Payroll share of revenue | 46.8% | 48.9% | 55.3% | 55.7% | 68.1% | 55.6% | 58.5% | 56.6% |
| Beds | 93 | 93 | 93 | 93 | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 |
| Gross revenue | $5.7M | $5.9M | $6.2M | $6.3M | $5.4M | $8.6M | $8.3M | $8.0M |
| Salaries | $2.4M | $2.4M | $2.6M | $2.7M | $2.7M | $2.9M | $3.6M | $3.9M |
| Wage-related costs | $0.3M | $0.5M | $0.7M | $1.0M | $0.8M | $0.7M | $0.9M | $0.9M |
| Contract labor | — | $0.0M | — | — | $0.3M | $0.7M | $0.5M | $0.3M |
| Other operating costs | $2.7M | $2.6M | $2.8M | $2.4M | $2.4M | $2.8M | $3.0M | $3.4M |
| Net patient revenue per day | $231 | $236 | $231 | $264 | $268 | $270 | $284 | $300 |
| Cost per day | $219 | $221 | $239 | $242 | $307 | $266 | $279 | $290 |
| Average length of stay | 198.9 days | 240.9 days | 329.9 days | 231.6 days | 233.6 days | 481.1 days | 207.8 days | 351.4 days |
Showing 2024–2022 · scroll sideways for 5 earlier years
Earlier and partial years are in the download. Download CSV
Who this home usually serves
Residents split by who pays for their care: Medicare, Medicaid, or private pay and other sources.Mostly short-term rehab stays
Most residents typically stay for a few weeks or months before returning home or moving on.
Places of interest near Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
1.0 miles from city center
Estimated distance in miles from Worland's city center to Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center's address, calculated via Google Maps.
Calculate Travel Distance to Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
Add your location
Compare Nursing Homes around the area
Info below is compiled from CMS reports & the WY Dept. of Health (WDH), senior community websites & trusted data sources such as Walk Score & BBB.
Communities are listed from highest-ranked to lowest-ranked based on our methodology.
The facility name. Click to view the full profile page on Assisted Living Magazine, including photos, services, and contact info.
|
CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the federal agency that regulates nursing homes) Overall 5-star rating — a composite of Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures scores. 5 stars = top 10% nationally. 1 star = bottom 10%. The single most important number to start with when comparing facilities.
|
Care Types in This Table
NH (Nursing Home):
24/7 skilled nursing care for residents with complex, ongoing medical needs.
SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility):
Round-the-clock nursing care, often for recovery after surgery, injury, or illness.
MC (Memory Care):
Secured, specialized care for people living with Alzheimer's or dementia.
RC (Respite Care):
Short-term temporary care that gives family caregivers a break.
HOS (Hospice Care):
Comfort-focused care for those with a terminal illness, prioritizing quality of life over treatment.
|
Neighborhood or city area where the facility is located. Proximity to family, hospitals, and green space matters for both quality of life and ease of visitation. Consider drive time and transit access when evaluating location.
|
Licensed bed capacity. Larger facilities (300+ beds) often have more specialized programs but can feel institutional. Smaller homes (under 150 beds) tend to deliver more personalized care. Compare with Avg Res/Day to understand how full the facility typically runs.
|
A 0–100 score of a facility's regulatory inspection record, shown as a letter and compared with other facilities of the same kind in the same state. This is a proprietary Assisted Living Magazine grade. It is not a government rating. A dash means we have no inspection data for that facility.
|
Percentage of licensed beds filled on an average day. Color indicates financial health: green (90%+) = operationally strong, typically profitable. Amber (80–89%) = stable but leaving revenue on the table. Orange (70–79%) = financial strain likely, may struggle with fixed costs. Red (<70%) = significant distress, closure or ownership change risk increases sharply.
|
This facility's occupancy rate compared to the statewide average for similar facilities. A positive number means above-average demand. Facilities running 5%+ above the state average are typically the most sought-after in their market — a strong proxy for reputation.
|
CMS-adjusted total nurse hours per resident per day (RN + LPN + CNA combined). The national average is approximately 3.5 hrs. Higher is better — more direct care time per resident. Below 3.0 is a red flag. CMS weights RN hours more heavily because RNs handle complex clinical decisions that CNAs cannot.
|
CMS Health Inspection star rating (1–5 stars), based on the 3 most recent annual state surveys plus any complaint investigations. This is the hardest rating to manipulate — it reflects real surveyor findings on-site. 5 stars = fewest deficiencies found. 1 star = most. It carries the heaviest weight in the Overall CMS rating.
|
CMS Staffing star rating (1–5 stars), based on daily nurse staffing hours submitted to CMS via verified payroll data. Compares RN, LPN, and CNA coverage relative to resident acuity level. 5 stars = well above expected staffing. Weekend staffing is evaluated separately, as that's where many facilities quietly reduce coverage.
|
CMS Quality Measures star rating (1–5 stars), based on 15 clinical outcome metrics including fall rates, pressure ulcers, antipsychotic drug use, and hospital readmissions. Captures actual resident health outcomes, not just compliance. High QM combined with low Health Inspection scores can indicate a facility with strong care but weak documentation practices.
|
Registered Nurse hours per resident/day compared to the statewide average. RNs are the highest-skilled nursing staff — they assess residents, manage medications, and respond to emergencies. A value of +50% means RN coverage is 50% above the state norm. Negative values are a concern for residents with complex or acute medical needs.
|
Total nursing staff hours (RN + LPN + CNA combined) per resident/day vs. the statewide average. A broader measure than RN vs State — it captures the entire care team. A facility can have high total staffing but low RN hours, meaning more aides and fewer nurses. Read both columns together for the full picture.
|
Total dollar amount of federal monetary fines (civil money penalties) issued by CMS in the past 3 years. Fines are only levied for serious violations — typically actual harm to residents, repeated uncorrected deficiencies, or systemic non-compliance. Even a single fine is noteworthy. Multiple fines strongly suggest a pattern, not isolated incidents.
|
Total health deficiency citations from the most recent standard inspection cycle. Minor citations (scope A–C) are common and often administrative in nature. Higher counts aren't always disqualifying, but should be read alongside Severe Citations to understand actual harm levels. Under 10 is strong for a large facility; 30+ warrants a closer look.
|
Average deficiency citations per CMS inspection (survey) in the reporting window — total citations divided by the number of inspections. Lower is better; compare alongside total Citations and Severe Citations for context.
|
Citations at CMS scope/severity level G or higher — G–I means actual harm occurred; J–L means residents were placed in immediate jeopardy. (D–F is potential for harm only). Examples include unaddressed falls, medication errors causing injury, neglect, or abuse.
|
Average number of residents in the building on any given day, derived from annual census data. Reflects true operating scale — a 400-bed facility running 200 residents/day operates very differently from one at 390. Higher resident counts generally mean more funded staffing hours.
|
Better Business Bureau rating (A+ to F). Reflects complaint history, business transparency, and how family disputes were resolved. A+ means no significant unresolved complaints. A blank (—) means the facility isn't BBB-accredited, which is common for healthcare providers and not necessarily a negative signal.
|
Walk Score® (0–100). Measures walkability of the surrounding area. 90–100 = Walker's Paradise. 70–89 = Very Walkable. 50–69 = Somewhat Walkable. Below 50 = Car-Dependent. Higher scores benefit family visitors, resident outings, and staff commuting.
|
The licensed owner or operator of record filed with CMS — the individual or organization legally accountable for the facility. Searching the operator name across other facilities can reveal chain or multi-site ownership, which matters: chain-operated homes tend to have more variable quality outcomes than independently run facilities.
|
What the home actually collects for resident care, after contractual allowances, bad debt and discounts — not gross billings. Taken from the latest complete annual cost report, so it is comparable across homes reporting the same period. Revenue alone doesn't indicate care quality, but it funds staffing and capital reinvestment. Pair with Payroll %. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Staff salaries plus wage-related benefits from the latest complete annual cost report. Contract and agency labour is counted separately, under other operating costs, so a home leaning on agency staff can show a low figure here. Payroll is the cost most directly tied to care quality — compare with Payroll % for full context. Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
Payroll as a share of NET PATIENT REVENUE (not gross revenue). Both figures come from the same cost-report year. A higher figure means more of each revenue dollar goes to staff pay. Read with the Staffing star rating to judge whether spend translates into coverage — and note that homes whose patient revenue covers only part of their operation can read implausibly high. The Wyoming average is: 59.8% Figures are from each facility's most recent complete fiscal year — hover a value for the exact year; a * marks homes that report an older period than most facilities.
|
CMS Certification Number: the unique federal identifier for this skilled nursing provider.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morning Star Care Center | NH HOS RC SNF | Fort Washakie | 45
Facility
45
WY AVG
97
Rank
#12 / 14 | A |
60.0%
Facility
60.0%
WY AVG
61.6%
Rank
#9 / 14 | -3% | 6.86
Facility
6.86
WY AVG
4.64
Rank
#1 / 13 | +28% | +48% | $5.2k
Facility
$5.2k
WY AVG
$39.6k
Rank
#6 / 13 | 16
Facility
16
WY AVG
20.2
Rank
#5 / 13 | 4.0
Facility
4.0
WY AVG
3.5
Rank
#10 / 13 | - | 27 | - |
13
Facility
13
WY AVG
49
Rank
#14 / 16 | Morning Star Care Center | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$11.2M
Rank
#11 / 11 | $5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$5.1MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#7 / 11 | 101.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
101.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
59.8%
Rank
#1 / 11 | 535050 | ||||
| Westward Heights Care Center | NH RC SNF | Lander | 66
Facility
66
WY AVG
97
Rank
#11 / 14 | A+ |
83.3%
Facility
83.3%
WY AVG
61.6%
Rank
#2 / 14 | +35% | 4.51
Facility
4.51
WY AVG
4.64
Rank
#3 / 13 | +42% | -3% | $0
Facility
$0
WY AVG
$39.6k
Rank
#1 / 13 | 9
Facility
9
WY AVG
20.2
Rank
#1 / 13 | 1.8
Facility
1.8
WY AVG
3.5
Rank
#1 / 13 | - | 55 | - |
70
Facility
70
WY AVG
49
Rank
#4 / 16 | Westward Heights Corp | $7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$7.7MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$11.2M
Rank
#8 / 11 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#9 / 11 | 61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
61.7%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
59.8%
Rank
#4 / 11 | 535034 | ||||
| South Lincoln Nursing Center | NH SNF | Kemmerer | 24
Facility
24
WY AVG
97
Rank
#14 / 14 | ? |
66.7%
Facility
66.7%
WY AVG
61.6%
Rank
#7 / 14 | +8% | 6.28
Facility
6.28
WY AVG
4.64
Rank
#2 / 13 | - | +35% | $0
Facility
$0
WY AVG
$39.6k
Rank
#1 / 13 | 24
Facility
24
WY AVG
20.2
Rank
#8 / 13 | 6.0
Facility
6.0
WY AVG
3.5
Rank
#13 / 13 | - | 16 | - |
43
Facility
43
WY AVG
49
Rank
#11 / 16 | - | - | - | - | 53A051 | ||||
| Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | NH MC RC SNF | Worland | 87
Facility
87
WY AVG
97
Rank
#9 / 14 | C- |
74.4%
Facility
74.4%
WY AVG
61.6%
Rank
#3 / 14 | +21% | 3.83
Facility
3.83
WY AVG
4.64
Rank
#7 / 13 | -46% | -18% | $41.7k
Facility
$41.7k
WY AVG
$39.6k
Rank
#10 / 13 | 15
Facility
15
WY AVG
20.2
Rank
#4 / 13 | 2.1
Facility
2.1
WY AVG
3.5
Rank
#3 / 13 | 3 | 65 | - |
48
Facility
48
WY AVG
49
Rank
#8 / 16 | Stellar Worland Management LLC | $8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$8.5MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$11.2M
Rank
#7 / 11 | $4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
$4.8MFiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
$6.4M
Rank
#8 / 11 | 56.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
Facility
56.6%Fiscal year ending 12/2024
WY AVG
59.8%
Rank
#5 / 11 | 535048 |
Rank badges are statewide and care-type specific: each nursing home is ranked against every other WY nursing home we track that reports that metric, not just the 4 on this page. See how we rank facilities
Frequently Asked Questions about Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
Is Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center in a walkable area?
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center has a walk score of 48. Car-dependent. A few nearby services may be reachable on foot, but most trips require transportation.
What is the occupancy rate at Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center's occupancy is 74.4%.
Are pets allowed at Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
No, Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center has a no-pet policy.
What is the best email address for Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
The team at Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center can be reached at info@evergreenhcg.com.
Does Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center operate as a for-profit or non-profit?
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center is registered as a for-profit.
What is the overall rating for Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center?
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center received a 1-star overall rating from the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). This score combines results from staffing levels, quality measures, and health inspections.
How many beds does Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center have?
Worland Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center has 87 beds.
Guides for Better Senior Living
Care Cost Calculator: See Prices in Your Area
Nursing Home Data Explorer
Don’t Wait Too Long: 7 Red Flag Signs Your Parent Needs Assisted Living Now
The True Cost of Assisted Living in 2025 – And How Families Are Paying For It
Understanding Senior Living Costs: Pricing Models, Discounts & Financial Assistance




